5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.
View Poll Results: Who did the IAVC Bypass??
I did it.
15
51.72%
I did not do it.
12
41.38%
My IVAC shorted out my ECU before I could do it.
2
6.90%
Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll

Who did the IAVC Bypass???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 13, 2012 | 11:57 AM
  #1  
sascuderi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,329
From: South Jersey
Who did the IAVC Bypass???

Just wondering if this is something everyone has done or just few? For those that did it, did you replace the two hoses with one longer hose to bypass the IAVC or just connect the two hoses? Any problems after doing the bypass? If you don't do it, when do these leaks start--after 100K miles??

Thanks--with only 83K on the I30 not sure its worth doing it.

Last edited by sascuderi; Mar 13, 2012 at 12:02 PM.
Old Mar 13, 2012 | 02:38 PM
  #2  
sascuderi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,329
From: South Jersey
Bump--lets get some votes in!
Old Mar 13, 2012 | 02:42 PM
  #3  
MrEous's Avatar
^ Jeff™
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,776
From: Garland (DFW), TX
Bump--Explain the process


...oh and I thought it was IACV?
Old Mar 13, 2012 | 03:18 PM
  #4  
sascuderi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,329
From: South Jersey
yes ..could be IACV...it is where the hoses that supply antifreeze are disconnect from the IACV to prevent the fliud from leaking into the electronics and shorting out not only the IACV but the ECU.
Old Mar 13, 2012 | 04:55 PM
  #5  
Amave's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 622
From: Florida
have not done it yet
Old Mar 13, 2012 | 05:35 PM
  #6  
Darkrock's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 42
I did it with a common brass hose splitter and joined both ends maybe 4 months ago. No issues.
Old Mar 15, 2012 | 03:07 PM
  #7  
dna59's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 229
I removed both hoses and ran a new hose from where the inlet came from and where the outlet went to. When I started the car when it was warm sometimes it would shut right back down or stutter for a second and after that idle perfectly. After I did this I no longer had a problem with that.
Old Mar 15, 2012 | 03:54 PM
  #8  
sascuderi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,329
From: South Jersey
Originally Posted by dna59
I removed both hoses and ran a new hose from where the inlet came from and where the outlet went to. When I started the car when it was warm sometimes it would shut right back down or stutter for a second and after that idle perfectly. After I did this I no longer had a problem with that.
Interesting..I notice the same thing sometime on hot re-starts.

Any others interested in voting??? I know we have more than 7 members on the org!
Old Mar 15, 2012 | 06:54 PM
  #9  
MrEous's Avatar
^ Jeff™
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,776
From: Garland (DFW), TX
That mod is called 'coolant bypass' and has nothing to do with the IAC Valve itself.

I've done the coolant bypass for free. Just re-route the hose from the tb back to the male end of the pipe below it. simple
Old Mar 15, 2012 | 07:30 PM
  #10  
dannyperrault's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 16
hey i got a question about the iacv wondering if u could help me out
Old Mar 16, 2012 | 06:17 AM
  #11  
MrEous's Avatar
^ Jeff™
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,776
From: Garland (DFW), TX
Who? What is your question?
Old Mar 16, 2012 | 06:25 AM
  #12  
TDMIIG's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 108
Part of the intake manifold spacer kit.
Old Mar 16, 2012 | 06:30 AM
  #13  
MrEous's Avatar
^ Jeff™
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,776
From: Garland (DFW), TX
Spacer kit not needed for the mod...
Originally Posted by Rochester
My understanding of why coolant is cycled around the Throttle Body is to use the heated fluid to warm the TB in sub-zero temperatures so it doesn't stick. Right? Wrong? IDK for sure, really. There's some funny in the idea of using something called "coolant" in order to heat things up... but there it is.

NWP gives you this adapter so you can easily disconnect the inlet and outlet hoses that go to the TB, which is nice and all, but not required for phenolic spacer installation. It also leaves a lot of rubber hose lying around.

An alternative is to simply loop one of the hoses back around. Same net effect... less rubber. Here's a picture:



I live in Upstate NY, which only sees 1 or 2 sub-zero days a year, so I'm not really worried about that.

As to performance increases because of cooler air... who knows? I've got spacers, you see.
Old Mar 16, 2012 | 08:39 PM
  #14  
sascuderi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,329
From: South Jersey
Originally Posted by MrEous
That mod is called 'coolant bypass' and has nothing to do with the IAC Valve itself.

I've done the coolant bypass for free. Just re-route the hose from the tb back to the male end of the pipe below it. simple
I always thought that the coolant circulates in the IAVC to help set the idle speed. As the coolant temp goes up, the IAVC lowers the idle speed. No? Or is it just used to heat up the throttle body?
Old Mar 16, 2012 | 09:45 PM
  #15  
defiance's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 649
From: USA - New Joisey
Originally Posted by sascuderi
I always thought that the coolant circulates in the IAVC to help set the idle speed. As the coolant temp goes up, the IAVC lowers the idle speed. No? Or is it just used to heat up the throttle body?
Hmm good question, does someone know the answer to this ?
I almost did the coolant bypass myself by just connecting the hoses
together with a splitter. But didn't know what the consequences would be
so i left it alone.
Old Mar 20, 2012 | 12:30 PM
  #16  
dna59's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 229
I haven't had any idle troubles either with the engine being cold or warm since I have done it. However take in note that I live in tropical climates.
Old Feb 22, 2013 | 12:17 AM
  #17  
defiance's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 649
From: USA - New Joisey
For those who have done the coolant bypass, is it required to cap the ends off so there's no vaccum leaks ?
Old Feb 22, 2013 | 11:24 PM
  #18  
olypopper's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 14
From: Alaska
When you do the coolant bypass, you should, in my opinion, cap the nipples on the IACV in the event your internal seal leaks you won't have an intake leak causing erratic idle.

I bypassed my IACV with a single hose.
Old Feb 23, 2013 | 04:27 AM
  #19  
Rochester's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by defiance
For those who have done the coolant bypass, is it required to cap the ends off so there's no vaccum leaks ?
No, not at all. But It looks more clean than otherwise, and I had a box of rubber caps lying around, which is why I did it. I suppose you could look at it as a precaution against an internal crack in the TB causing a vacuum leak, But really, if you consider that's supposed to be coolant fluid in that channel, and it were compromised by a crack, they you've got bigger issues. Not sure how the TB housing could crack anyway. It's not like it's under any stress.

Surprised me and made me laugh to see that old picture re-posted here by MrEous. Sometimes I miss how active I used to be in this forum.

Last edited by Rochester; Feb 23, 2013 at 04:38 AM.
Old Jan 27, 2014 | 01:39 PM
  #20  
maxiiiboy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,446
From: California
Originally Posted by MrEous
That mod is called 'coolant bypass' and has nothing to do with the IAC Valve itself.

I've done the coolant bypass for free. Just re-route the hose from the tb back to the male end of the pipe below it. simple
I want to do this - to protect my ECU.
Do I have to take the Throttle Body off? (it seems like I have to ... )
Any other suggestions?

Thanks!
Old Jan 28, 2014 | 05:16 PM
  #21  
Donkeypunch's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,215
So it's the coolant that's 100% responsible for fried ecu?
How did you guys find out?
Old Jan 30, 2014 | 07:18 PM
  #22  
maxiiiboy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,446
From: California
Well, indirectly, yes.

The direct cause is a failed (= shorted) motor wiring in the IACV, causing too much current to be drawn from the ECU, which leads to the Mosfet in the ECU to fail/fry. Unfortunately, Nissan designer never thought of using a fuse to protect the ECU.

Most of us think that the coolant, or rather a coolant leak in the IACV, is a major reason (but not the only reason) for the IACV motor shorting.

There are several solutions to this problem .... search for "IACV" or "ECu".
Old Mar 12, 2014 | 11:15 AM
  #23  
maxiiiboy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,446
From: California
Need advice re. Coolant Bypass

Originally Posted by olypopper
When you do the coolant bypass, you should, in my opinion, cap the nipples on the IACV in the event your internal seal leaks you won't have an intake leak causing erratic idle.

I bypassed my IACV with a single hose.
I would appreciate advice from somebody who has done it.

I am trying to do coolant bypass for my 2000 SE. My understanding is that I have to remove the Airbox. Do I have to also remove the "cross-member" to which the the MAF housing is attached on one side, and the "hose" leading to the TB on the other side? If so, what's the best way to do it?

There is a lot of stuff connected to this cross-member, so removing it looks like a lot of pain .... that's why this post.

I appreciate your help and suggestions.
Old Mar 12, 2014 | 12:30 PM
  #24  
maxiiiboy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,446
From: California
One more thing: My mechanic refused to do the throttle bypass for me. He claims if he does that, the IACV will overheat and fail.

Is he right? Anybody has experience with IACV failure after doing a coolant bypass ??
Old Mar 26, 2014 | 10:08 AM
  #25  
Brak's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 10
From: Tn
Haven't heard anyone mention the by-pass could fry the IACV yet???
I'm considering doing this by-pass when I get my car back.
Old Mar 26, 2014 | 12:42 PM
  #26  
Montego Murph's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 466
From: Central IL
If we add #4 "Going to do it next time I'm under the hood" I'll place my vote.
Old Mar 26, 2014 | 02:06 PM
  #27  
DennisMik's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,644
From: Plano, TX
Originally Posted by maxiiiboy
One more thing: My mechanic refused to do the throttle bypass for me. He claims if he does that, the IACV will overheat and fail.

Is he right? Anybody has experience with IACV failure after doing a coolant bypass ??
No, he evidently doesn't know why coolant is flowing to the IACV. It is to warm the IACV so that the air doing through the throttle body will vaporize the fuel better (translation: burn better in the cylinder). It is not to cool the IACV.

There are way too many people that have done this to prove him wrong.
Old Aug 4, 2014 | 01:17 PM
  #28  
2003MaximaMan's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 140
From: Birmingham, AL
Has anyone ever tried using the coolant lines on the TB to actually cool the air? For example, run the incoming coolant line through a separate fluid cooler before going to the TB? or maybe even a closed system using an auxiliary 12v pump? Of course this is after the MAF, so such a mod would require engine management.


also, there is something called non-conductive coolant that is used in computers.

Last edited by 2003MaximaMan; Aug 4, 2014 at 01:20 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tsi6001
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
12
Oct 3, 2022 10:23 PM
05' MaximaMan
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
2
Oct 8, 2017 06:36 PM
jwright36
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
0
Sep 8, 2015 11:45 AM
Slamrod
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
6
Sep 3, 2015 07:38 PM
lux97Max
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
19
Aug 27, 2015 07:48 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:22 AM.