5th gen Off Topic Thread (Official Ghustle thread v1)
07-10-2012 | 06:34 PM
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 10,349
From: Jacksonville, FL
07-10-2012 | 07:09 PM
exactly yet javon is calling BS on its power that it dynoed... with the way that thing just climbed if they say that car made 600+whp id believe it True. And good on you for realizing that certain breeds of dog, while they may be able to be raised in an apartment, SHOULDN'T be raised in an apt. Gotta let the big guy run around and stay active...just not all that possible in an apt. Apartments are good for beagle-size dogs and smaller.
Can you see yourself with a teacup chihuahua?
Can you see yourself with a teacup chihuahua?
no... it has to be a big dog lol... ive had a dog before while in jamaica (not sure the breed i was young), never one day that goes by that i didnt show that dog more attn than myself, it def ate better than i fed myself lol... my 1st choice was a Siberian Husky, then Akita, then St. Bernard ( yup one of them), then a cane corso, now its a German shepard... and im stuck here, its the perfect mix between a "wolf" looking dog and trainable... says they are the easiest to train and manage, so thats what i want...
07-10-2012 | 07:25 PM
well i dont know how we switched to the C class now, i thought we were talking about the 2012 twin turbo CLS63... plus that C class may dyno 50whp less than you but its dyning 60wtq more than you also lol... and lighter than the CLS... again, no need to get into another dcik fest... im just saying... those cars are not now slow and "waste of power" because you are now boosted lol.. they still hold they own, and they are in stock form lol... no need to compare your max to a AMG... but i do respect you have a fast maxima, but if you must compare, i have that CLS mopping up anybody in this thread... in its stock form... on a hwy roll i even have it beating every car in this forum lol... dont down play its power now just because ur boosted is all im saying
nah I think we talking about 2 different cars......I was talking about this car:
2012 CLS63 AMG is powered by a 5.5-liter version of the new V8 that's rated at 518 hp and 516 lb-ft of torque.
you were talking about this car (I think):
Mercedes-Benz CL65 AMG ($209,300) features a twin-turbo V12 rated at 621 hp and 738 lb-ft of torque
^^ YO IM NOT STUPID!!!! LOL!!!!
You said CLS......the CLS is the first car I was talking about.....maybe you meant the CL??
CL has 4 models:
1. Mercedes-Benz CL550 4MATIC ($113,150) has a 4.7-liter (4663-cc) twin-turbo V8 rated at 429 hp and 516 lb-ft of torque
2. Mercedes-Benz CL600 ($157,000) uses a 5.5-liter twin turbo V12 with 510 hp, 612 lb-ft of torque
3. Mercedes-Benz CL63 AMG ($150,250) uses a 5.5-liter twin-turbo V8 rated at 536 hp and 590 lb-ft of torque
4. Mercedes-Benz CL65 AMG ($209,300) features a twin-turbo V12 rated at 621 hp and 738 lb-ft of torque
The only one I feel I can give a good run in the CL class is the first model..all those others forget it........
I was talking about the CLS that you referred to has 2 models:
The 2012 CLS-Class includes models, both powered by new biturbo, direct-injection V8 engines: The 4.6-liter CLS550 engine produces 402 horsepower and 443 pound-feet of torque
and the high-performance CLS63 AMG is powered by a 5.5-liter version of the new V8 that's rated at 518 hp and 516 lb-ft of torque.
The CLS class is not as powerful as the CL class cars......those CLs are crazy...no way......but I can do something with the STOCK CLS class......
Not hating.....I know what the car can do and cant do......I cant do CL class...LOL. I can do CLS class.....Mercedes get props from me but ever since Chysler bought them they haven't been the same quality as they once were.
07-10-2012 | 07:38 PM
nah I think we talking about 2 different cars......I was talking about this car:
2012 CLS63 AMG is powered by a 5.5-liter version of the new V8 that's rated at 518 hp and 516 lb-ft of torque.
you were talking about this car (I think):
Mercedes-Benz CL65 AMG ($209,300) features a twin-turbo V12 rated at 621 hp and 738 lb-ft of torque
^^ YO IM NOT STUPID!!!! LOL!!!!
You said CLS......the CLS is the first car I was talking about.....maybe you meant the CL??
CL has 4 models:
1. Mercedes-Benz CL550 4MATIC ($113,150) has a 4.7-liter (4663-cc) twin-turbo V8 rated at 429 hp and 516 lb-ft of torque
2. Mercedes-Benz CL600 ($157,000) uses a 5.5-liter twin turbo V12 with 510 hp, 612 lb-ft of torque
3. Mercedes-Benz CL63 AMG ($150,250) uses a 5.5-liter twin-turbo V8 rated at 536 hp and 590 lb-ft of torque
4. Mercedes-Benz CL65 AMG ($209,300) features a twin-turbo V12 rated at 621 hp and 738 lb-ft of torque
The only one I feel I can give a good run in the CL class is the first model..all those others forget it........
I was talking about the CLS that you referred to has 2 models:
The 2012 CLS-Class includes models, both powered by new biturbo, direct-injection V8 engines: The 4.6-liter CLS550 engine produces 402 horsepower and 443 pound-feet of torque
and the high-performance CLS63 AMG is powered by a 5.5-liter version of the new V8 that's rated at 518 hp and 516 lb-ft of torque.
The CLS class is not as powerful as the CL class cars......those CLs are crazy...no way......but I can do something with the STOCK CLS class......
Not hating.....I know what the car can do and cant do......I cant do CL class...LOL. I can do CLS class.....Mercedes get props from me but ever since Chysler bought them they haven't been the same quality as they once were.
2012 CLS63 AMG is powered by a 5.5-liter version of the new V8 that's rated at 518 hp and 516 lb-ft of torque.
you were talking about this car (I think):
Mercedes-Benz CL65 AMG ($209,300) features a twin-turbo V12 rated at 621 hp and 738 lb-ft of torque
^^ YO IM NOT STUPID!!!! LOL!!!!
You said CLS......the CLS is the first car I was talking about.....maybe you meant the CL??
CL has 4 models:
1. Mercedes-Benz CL550 4MATIC ($113,150) has a 4.7-liter (4663-cc) twin-turbo V8 rated at 429 hp and 516 lb-ft of torque
2. Mercedes-Benz CL600 ($157,000) uses a 5.5-liter twin turbo V12 with 510 hp, 612 lb-ft of torque
3. Mercedes-Benz CL63 AMG ($150,250) uses a 5.5-liter twin-turbo V8 rated at 536 hp and 590 lb-ft of torque
4. Mercedes-Benz CL65 AMG ($209,300) features a twin-turbo V12 rated at 621 hp and 738 lb-ft of torque
The only one I feel I can give a good run in the CL class is the first model..all those others forget it........
I was talking about the CLS that you referred to has 2 models:
The 2012 CLS-Class includes models, both powered by new biturbo, direct-injection V8 engines: The 4.6-liter CLS550 engine produces 402 horsepower and 443 pound-feet of torque
and the high-performance CLS63 AMG is powered by a 5.5-liter version of the new V8 that's rated at 518 hp and 516 lb-ft of torque.
The CLS class is not as powerful as the CL class cars......those CLs are crazy...no way......but I can do something with the STOCK CLS class......
Not hating.....I know what the car can do and cant do......I cant do CL class...LOL. I can do CLS class.....Mercedes get props from me but ever since Chysler bought them they haven't been the same quality as they once were.
07-10-2012 | 07:54 PM
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 10,349
From: Jacksonville, FL
07-10-2012 | 08:00 PM
speaking of FAST......
07-10-2012 | 08:10 PM
with the attire of the dudes in the van it would seem like a safe assumption....... imaging how fast that wagon is
07-10-2012 | 08:17 PM
07-10-2012 | 09:20 PM
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 10,349
From: Jacksonville, FL
at my mother in law lol.... def a temptation i wouldnt resist
07-10-2012 | 09:44 PM
Omg I just RTV'd my upper oil pan... I haven't been so shaky and sweaty since I saw my first coochie that fateful homecoming a looong time ago..... My hands are killin me now from gripping the RTV tube so hard
I didn't even get to do the lower, I'll do that some other day......
Can't believe after this the motor will be done.... Just need to do the wiring next
I didn't even get to do the lower, I'll do that some other day......
Can't believe after this the motor will be done.... Just need to do the wiring next
07-10-2012 | 10:46 PM
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 410
Thanks everyone 
good news, the Vet says theres a 99.9% chance it's not cancerous, it doesen't fit the profile of a tumour. He's currently still passed out on the couch 
seems to be recovering well.
good news, the Vet says theres a 99.9% chance it's not cancerous, it doesen't fit the profile of a tumour. He's currently still passed out on the couch seems to be recovering well.
07-11-2012 | 02:38 AM
07-11-2012 | 04:10 AM
i just got bacon w/ less sodium, *** that turkey shiet...i *** up enough when i get ground turkey...anyone ever had chicken sausage though...JEEEEEEEEEEEEEZUSS that **** good AF
i forgot exactly what flavor, but it's lower and calories and the taste >>>>>>>
07-11-2012 | 05:25 AM
07-11-2012 | 05:34 AM
07-11-2012 | 05:36 AM
07-11-2012 | 05:41 AM
.... "after that last sentence i felt ive sinned lolwhere would i get that pic???
07-11-2012 | 05:44 AM
you have a droid, make the pic happen
07-11-2012 | 05:44 AM
