2K1 SE 0-60 Times
01-10-2002, 06:28 PM
#41
All YOUR grammer belong to me
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Originally posted by ScreamingVQ
I know, My 2k is slower than the 95 Max :bawlig:
I know, My 2k is slower than the 95 Max :bawlig:
And besides whenever I see any modded max I give respect to them, except 3rd gen's cause they look like boxes 
01-10-2002, 07:16 PM
#42
Originally posted by nc00max
Blow me and my auto. Automatics are Maximas too, and people buy their cars with the options they have for different reasons. Mine was $4k less for a new 2K auto than a new 2k1 5spd. My car is slower than every 5spd out there, but I don't think that makes it inferior in any way. Hop off your high horse and have some respect for your fellow Maxima owners.
Blow me and my auto. Automatics are Maximas too, and people buy their cars with the options they have for different reasons. Mine was $4k less for a new 2K auto than a new 2k1 5spd. My car is slower than every 5spd out there, but I don't think that makes it inferior in any way. Hop off your high horse and have some respect for your fellow Maxima owners.
01-10-2002, 07:41 PM
#43
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Y2KMaxGXE-R
so if I can ask automagic drivers to get your sorry behinds and start your own thread
so if I can ask automagic drivers to get your sorry behinds and start your own thread
01-10-2002, 08:00 PM
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,575
What's with the ignorance?
not to continue (or start) flames but would a 2k2auto (stock) be comparable to a 2k1 5sp.?--traffic and food make up a large portion of my life, that's why I have an auto 
Y2KMAXGXE-R:
i think the temper rises when you personally dis someone who just spent $25k on a car simply b/c you don't like the type of transmission they have
"too much stuff no one needs on the performance of 5th gen autos"
performance depends on the owner's needs, i NEED my max to shift for me (not b/c i don't know how but) b/c i spend 99% of my time in my max in traffic or eating or both--speaking of 'too much stuff no one needs on the performance...' i don't NEED a tranny that i have to shift, so in a sense, your 5th gen 5sp. has something I (performance-wise) "don't need"
BTW i wasn't offended by anything you wrote i just wanted to clear that up in an attempt to avoid future flames--there's no need to kick someone out of a forum/discussion b/c of the type of tranny they prefer, oh and nc00max:"blow me and my auto", come on, i'm sure you can think of something more intellegent to say
this automagic's "sorry behind"(another intellegent remark) is outta here i hope someone was enlightened
Y2KMAXGXE-R:
i think the temper rises when you personally dis someone who just spent $25k on a car simply b/c you don't like the type of transmission they have
"too much stuff no one needs on the performance of 5th gen autos"
performance depends on the owner's needs, i NEED my max to shift for me (not b/c i don't know how but) b/c i spend 99% of my time in my max in traffic or eating or both--speaking of 'too much stuff no one needs on the performance...' i don't NEED a tranny that i have to shift, so in a sense, your 5th gen 5sp. has something I (performance-wise) "don't need"
BTW i wasn't offended by anything you wrote i just wanted to clear that up in an attempt to avoid future flames--there's no need to kick someone out of a forum/discussion b/c of the type of tranny they prefer, oh and nc00max:"blow me and my auto", come on, i'm sure you can think of something more intellegent to say
this automagic's "sorry behind"(another intellegent remark) is outta here i hope someone was enlightened
01-10-2002, 08:10 PM
#46
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: What's with the ignorance?
Originally posted by mattattax
and nc00max:"blow me and my auto", come on, i'm sure you can think of something more intellegent to say
and nc00max:"blow me and my auto", come on, i'm sure you can think of something more intellegent to say
Oh wait, I am a sailor. 
01-10-2002, 09:12 PM
#47
I have an auto and quite happy about it but still not as fast as the manual, but hey, who care, I know how to drive a car in many situation. I am wondering if an auto with S/C can do better than 6.1 sec ??? I believe I did like 7.8 but with my b*tt dyno, does this count ?
I though of sharing this info with you guys....
I saw an article in a sport car magazine they claim that a Tiburon with an automagic did a 10.6 on the 1/4, euh... faster than Ferrari Modano 360...and everything that I know. I also read that a Viper with over 850 HP did a 0-100 in 2 sec, that's a bit faster than our car.
Cheers
AA
I though of sharing this info with you guys....
I saw an article in a sport car magazine they claim that a Tiburon with an automagic did a 10.6 on the 1/4, euh... faster than Ferrari Modano 360...and everything that I know. I also read that a Viper with over 850 HP did a 0-100 in 2 sec, that's a bit faster than our car.
Cheers
AA
01-11-2002, 10:12 AM
#48
Originally posted by ScreamingVQ
Read the first post, they guy just asked for stock times. No mentioning of auto's or manual's.
Read the first post, they guy just asked for stock times. No mentioning of auto's or manual's.
01-11-2002, 01:20 PM
#49
All YOUR grammer belong to me
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Everyone quit b!tchin' about your focking transmission. 95% of people bought auto maxima's becuase they wanted a QUICK sedan that was unique rather than just another accord. They don't plan to race, and they use the Maxi's for everyday driving and don't wanna **** with stick.
If I wanted a car PURELY for speed I would have gotten a Cobra, Lightning, supra or 300zx TT, or somethin along those lines.
Sheesh.
If I wanted a car PURELY for speed I would have gotten a Cobra, Lightning, supra or 300zx TT, or somethin along those lines.
Sheesh.
01-11-2002, 03:44 PM
#50
you just dont let it go won't you? Whining like a bunch of old ladies. Yes I got this one confused with the love for 5 spd thread!!!To those whose feelings were hurt, my sincere apologies. But you still know that manual tranny owns y'all?
01-12-2002, 07:37 PM
#59
Originally posted by Craig Mack
'95 Auto maxima's do 0-60 stock in 7.3-7.6
And we have no rev limiter and are light on our feet
'95 Auto maxima's do 0-60 stock in 7.3-7.6
And we have no rev limiter and are light on our feet
I know you guy's are talking about 2000-2001 but a 5spd 95 max is pretty comparible time wise. With a Stillen:Intake, CatBack, Aluminum flywheel, RT cat, PPC headers/ Y-Pipe, UR UDP and no spare and about 3 gallons of gas I did 0-60 = 5.98 Seconds. I use to average about 6.1 for 0-60{with gas and spare}.
01-12-2002, 08:01 PM
#60
All YOUR grammer belong to me
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,400
Originally posted by emax95
I know you guy's are talking about 2000-2001 but a 5spd 95 max is pretty comparible time wise. With a Stillen:Intake, CatBack, Aluminum flywheel, RT cat, PPC headers/ Y-Pipe, UR UDP and no spare and about 3 gallons of gas I did 0-60 = 5.98 Seconds. I use to average about 6.1 for 0-60{with gas and spare}.
I know you guy's are talking about 2000-2001 but a 5spd 95 max is pretty comparible time wise. With a Stillen:Intake, CatBack, Aluminum flywheel, RT cat, PPC headers/ Y-Pipe, UR UDP and no spare and about 3 gallons of gas I did 0-60 = 5.98 Seconds. I use to average about 6.1 for 0-60{with gas and spare}.
Anywhoo here is the basic brake down IMHO:
Auto: 95-99 own 2000-2001
Manual: 95-96' own all ('cept 2k2 and Russ of course)
Manual: 97-99 & 2000-2001 are very close
Emax, you still own your '95 ? I can't believe it is as fast as your 2k2, that is awesome. Too bad it won't be after you bolt sommore 'ish on.
Anyways, are you plannin' on selling it? What about your headers?
01-12-2002, 09:10 PM
#61
Originally posted by Craig Mack
That is on G-Tech right ? I hear tracks don't measure 0-60. That blows.
Anywhoo here is the basic brake down IMHO:
Auto: 95-99 own 2000-2001
Manual: 95-96' own all ('cept 2k2 and Russ of course)
Manual: 97-99 & 2000-2001 are very close
Emax, you still own your '95 ? I can't believe it is as fast as your 2k2, that is awesome. Too bad it won't be after you bolt sommore 'ish on.
Anyways, are you plannin' on selling it? What about your headers?
That is on G-Tech right ? I hear tracks don't measure 0-60. That blows.
Anywhoo here is the basic brake down IMHO:
Auto: 95-99 own 2000-2001
Manual: 95-96' own all ('cept 2k2 and Russ of course)
Manual: 97-99 & 2000-2001 are very close
Emax, you still own your '95 ? I can't believe it is as fast as your 2k2, that is awesome. Too bad it won't be after you bolt sommore 'ish on.
Anyways, are you plannin' on selling it? What about your headers?
Sooner or later I am going to sell my 95, I am just really lazy and it's a pain in the **** trying to sell a car + the resale on it is so $hitty it is depresing having to sell it for so damn cheap. I have a cracked winshield and I need to get a new tail light{clears went bad} and then I will put it up for sale I guess.
01-12-2002, 09:47 PM
#62
Originally posted by emax95
I know you guy's are talking about 2000-2001 but a 5spd 95 max is pretty comparible time wise. With a Stillen:Intake, CatBack, Aluminum flywheel, RT cat, PPC headers/ Y-Pipe, UR UDP and no spare and about 3 gallons of gas I did 0-60 = 5.98 Seconds. I use to average about 6.1 for 0-60{with gas and spare}.
I know you guy's are talking about 2000-2001 but a 5spd 95 max is pretty comparible time wise. With a Stillen:Intake, CatBack, Aluminum flywheel, RT cat, PPC headers/ Y-Pipe, UR UDP and no spare and about 3 gallons of gas I did 0-60 = 5.98 Seconds. I use to average about 6.1 for 0-60{with gas and spare}.
01-12-2002, 09:55 PM
#63
Originally posted by Y2KMaxGXE-R
I thought we were talking "stock" only. Of course, you can beat any stock 5th gen with your $2500 worth of mods. What would happen if you spend the same amt. on 5th gen..Ask 2KevSe (he may be auto-not sure)
I thought we were talking "stock" only. Of course, you can beat any stock 5th gen with your $2500 worth of mods. What would happen if you spend the same amt. on 5th gen..Ask 2KevSe (he may be auto-not sure)
My 95 can't beat any "stock" 5th gen, my 2002 was quicker stock
I will let you know what happens when I spend $2,500 on my 02, I am willing to bet my 02 will still be faster then my 95..
01-13-2002, 05:55 AM
#64
Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 55
Automatics can actually shift faster than most humans can push in the clutch and select a gear.
The trannys are heavier, and less efficient becuase of the needed torque converter.
Some other huge reasons in the case with a max is the shifts aren't that aggresive, or postive, the gearing is also very tall. If you could shorten first and second gear by a at least .75 to 1.00 each the car might or even be able to rip off mid 6's to 60mph.
The trannys are heavier, and less efficient becuase of the needed torque converter.
Some other huge reasons in the case with a max is the shifts aren't that aggresive, or postive, the gearing is also very tall. If you could shorten first and second gear by a at least .75 to 1.00 each the car might or even be able to rip off mid 6's to 60mph.
Originally posted by carguyrob
I would say the 0-60 times on a 5 speed would be right about 6.7 seconds. I have raced a number of TL-S' and always won, but just by 1/2 a car length or so. They are rated at right about 6.7 seconds. My car is totally stock.
BTW, the difference between a stick and auto trans is always more than .2 or .3 unless you are driving a 540i auto or a Porsche. Those German autos are very aggressive and can hold their own with a manual. Most autos are rated at about a second slower than a manual. Remember, the auto is less efficient and weights more.
Just my .02.
I would say the 0-60 times on a 5 speed would be right about 6.7 seconds. I have raced a number of TL-S' and always won, but just by 1/2 a car length or so. They are rated at right about 6.7 seconds. My car is totally stock.
BTW, the difference between a stick and auto trans is always more than .2 or .3 unless you are driving a 540i auto or a Porsche. Those German autos are very aggressive and can hold their own with a manual. Most autos are rated at about a second slower than a manual. Remember, the auto is less efficient and weights more.
Just my .02.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sctludwig
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
8
09-01-2022 01:32 PM
kjlouis
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
12
10-03-2015 05:29 AM
trungg86
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
7
09-04-2015 04:58 AM