5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

Bel 985

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-24-2002, 01:11 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Neal728's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 544
Bel 985

Has anyone used this one yet? I want to know if it's worth the 220 bucks. Right now I have a Bel 870, bottom of the line but I got it off a friend for 20 bucks. Works OK I guess, I haven't gotten a ticket. However, this one looks real nice. Anyone? Or on a side note, how are people's experiences with the Bel 980? I know about the www.radartest.com review, I want to know from you guys. Thanks in advance!

Neal

Cop says, "Do you know how fast you were going?"

:King: I say, "Why don't we go back out on the road so I can check?"
Neal728 is offline  
Old 06-24-2002, 02:04 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Virus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,602
If you want the best go with Valentine One. After owning it you'll wonder why you bought cheaper detectors all these years.
Virus is offline  
Old 06-24-2002, 04:16 AM
  #3  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Max_Gator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,038
Plenty of comparison threads re: the V1 and others on this board - do a search for that.

As for the 985 - I did quite a bit of research into the bels. The 985 has a couple whistles that to me weren't worth the money. If I recall it had an option to turn off certain bands and a couple of other things.

The cheaper model - now the 960 (was the 950) - has the exact same detection and warning capability for less.

The V1 is better but the bel 950/960 has worked well for me.
Max_Gator is offline  
Old 06-24-2002, 07:08 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Virus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,602
The Bels are good detectors. I've had quite a few, but the V1 definately has better rear detection, awesome laser detection and without a doubt fewer false alarms without sacrificing signal strength.
Virus is offline  
Old 06-24-2002, 12:28 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Neal728's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 544
The V1 is too expensive and too large for me. Plus, if it's so great why did it not come in first on radartest.com? I have an 870 right now, the 980/85 looks really nice, but I dunno if it's worth the 200 bucks for slightly better sensitivity.
Neal728 is offline  
Old 06-24-2002, 01:00 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Virus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,602
For whatever reason, Mike Valentine hasn't been much for making friends over the years. I don't know about their tests, overall I think the V1 wins a majority of the time and from my own personal experience it's been alot more reliable when threats arise than any of my bells have been. Don't get me wrong, the bells were leaps and bounds above Uniden, Whistler, etc, but the V1 has proved to me to be the best. Have you seen one in person? It's really not that much larger than the others. I had a cop friend test the VG2 on my bell and the V1. Although the Bell was only detectable within 10 feet, the V1 was 100% undetectable even with it next to the VG2 unit. I'm in VA and that's important to me.
Virus is offline  
Old 06-24-2002, 02:25 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Neal728's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 544
Oh, well I'm in CA so that's not important to me @ all, no offense. I used to live near DC so it used to matter. I'm just trying to guage on that Bel. Thanks for the info on the V1 though, my friend as one, maybe I'll trade with him for a weekend and try it out!
Neal728 is offline  
Old 06-24-2002, 02:30 PM
  #8  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Max_Gator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,038
Originally posted by Neal728
The V1 is too expensive and too large for me. Plus, if it's so great why did it not come in first on radartest.com? I have an 870 right now, the 980/85 looks really nice, but I dunno if it's worth the 200 bucks for slightly better sensitivity.
I think radartest may have tested in ways that are unfavorable to the V1. And I believe someone on here said that they used an older version of the V1.

If you really want info on the comparison - do a search. There are TONS of threads.
Max_Gator is offline  
Old 06-24-2002, 03:17 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
SHPatel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 195
I'm not sure of the V1 since I've never tried one but I did have a Bel for a while and it is definitely a great detector. My only problem with it is the fact that it sounds off way too many false detections. This is its only drawback.
SHPatel is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
supernet33
Audio and Electronics
18
10-22-2005 09:11 PM
Kruppa
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
33
07-23-2005 08:26 AM
CCx
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
28
10-26-2003 01:49 PM
Blu
Audio and Electronics
3
12-10-2002 11:36 AM



Quick Reply: Bel 985



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:47 PM.