5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

Olds Aurora vs. 2k2 6spd

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 6, 2002 | 10:37 PM
  #1  
MaxSE2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 508
Olds Aurora vs. 2k2 6spd

Ok - I laughed at this initially, but need your opinions... my friends father swears that his 2001 Aurora (4.0) can take my Max. Given that I get a good launch, can I take him?

Aurora: 250Hp, 260lb/ft Tq, 3800lbs
Max: 255Hp, 246lb/ft Tq, 3200lbs + PR CAI

Thoughts? I'd hate to eat my words...
Old Jul 6, 2002 | 10:40 PM
  #2  
AznWontonboy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,628
Re: Olds Aurora vs. 2k2 6spd

Originally posted by MaxSE2k
Ok - I laughed at this initially, but need your opinions... my friends father swears that his 2001 Aurora (4.0) can take my Max. Given that I get a good launch, can I take him?

Aurora: 250Hp, 260lb/ft Tq, 3800lbs
Max: 255Hp, 246lb/ft Tq, 3200lbs + PR CAI

Thoughts? I'd hate to eat my words...
YOU HAVE A 6SPEED with 600 LESSlbs... "smoke him"
Old Jul 6, 2002 | 10:42 PM
  #3  
MaxSE2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 508
Did I mention that I weight 185, and this guy is well over 300???
Old Jul 6, 2002 | 10:48 PM
  #4  
KLOOGY's Avatar
L33t BMW Drivah
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,421
From: Murrieta, Ca
Originally posted by MaxSE2k
Did I mention that I weight 185, and this guy is well over 300???
You could weigh 500lbs and you would still that thing !
Old Jul 6, 2002 | 11:26 PM
  #5  
SteVTEC's Avatar
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,064
Just don't miss a gear and you will MURDER him!
Old Jul 7, 2002 | 01:09 AM
  #6  
2001SE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,145
you can start in 3rd and still beat him
Old Jul 7, 2002 | 07:52 AM
  #7  
PrinzII's Avatar
OG and counting...
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 12,839
Can we say annihilation? You've got the weight and HP advantage.
Old Jul 7, 2002 | 07:55 AM
  #8  
Eric's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 350
Get some cloves and smoke that ham.
Old Jul 7, 2002 | 10:59 AM
  #9  
soundmike's Avatar
Very sound, Mike
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,011
From: H-Town
And a little known *fact*

You have more torque at the crank than what Nissan has you believe
Old Jul 7, 2002 | 11:01 AM
  #10  
bigbadboss101's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 491
When I first got my 2002 6 speed I was following an Aurora. I wasn't pushing it, and he was getting away from me. Therefore I would say if you drive under 4000-4500 rpm, the Olds will beat you. To be competitive one would need to be around 5000 rpm.
Old Jul 7, 2002 | 11:10 AM
  #11  
SmokinOdum's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 285
Originally posted by soundmike
And a little known *fact*

You have more torque at the crank than what Nissan has you believe
Thats something the eerks me. people say my car only had 240ish torque, but going off of what people dyno, our cars have ~15more torque than horsepower. So 255hp and 270trq right?
Old Jul 7, 2002 | 11:13 AM
  #12  
soundmike's Avatar
Very sound, Mike
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,011
From: H-Town
I'd say probably in between at 265. (That's just my calculations from the % loss i get from the auto tranny)

Originally posted by SmokinOdum
torque than horsepower. So 255hp and 270trq right?
Old Jul 7, 2002 | 01:14 PM
  #13  
suds1's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 429
My parents had a 2000 Aurora. That was the weakest feeling V8 I ever driven. Dang thing kept trying to overheat when I got into the higher rpm's too. Loved the interior though!

I think you can smoke him!
Old Jul 7, 2002 | 05:44 PM
  #14  
2K2THEMAX's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 173
Originally posted by soundmike
I'd say probably in between at 265. (That's just my calculations from the % loss i get from the auto tranny)

Torque does not follow the same 15% drivetrain loss as horsepower does. In fact, it is totally unrelated to the horsepower drivetrain loss. We could very easily dyno at 230 pound-feet of torque and only have 246 pound-feet at the crank.

Daniel
Old Jul 7, 2002 | 07:14 PM
  #15  
soundmike's Avatar
Very sound, Mike
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,011
From: H-Town
So i've heard.

What do you think could be the reason we have so much torque at the wheels? Not that it's a good comparison but it's the closest i can find - a CL-S has slightly lower tq #'s than us at the crank but it seems to follow the same % loss that we use for calculating HP@the wheels.

And looking at our own dyno's (maxima's) the TQ #'s are definitely higher than HP #'s. So would i be proper to presume that drivetrain loss for power overall is more biased towards HP?

To add, judging from 2k/2k1 dyno graphs - their torque is definitely lower than HP and seems to correlate well to what Nissan advertises it to be.
Old Jul 7, 2002 | 09:27 PM
  #16  
ajahearn's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 844
From: Bay Area, CA
drivetrain loss

Originally posted by 2K2THEMAX


Torque does not follow the same 15% drivetrain loss as horsepower does. In fact, it is totally unrelated to the horsepower drivetrain loss. We could very easily dyno at 230 pound-feet of torque and only have 246 pound-feet at the crank.

Daniel
Just to back up this statement, my dyno (2k2, 6spd, stock) had a MAX HP of 208.4 for a 18% (255) loss, whereas the MAX TQ was 225.8 for a 8% (246) loss.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TallTom
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
57
Oct 14, 2025 05:16 PM
gavin68
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
8
Sep 18, 2021 12:36 PM
TKHanson
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
6
Nov 24, 2018 01:39 AM
VQ'ed
Forced Induction
8
Feb 29, 2016 08:05 AM
Redfox
New Member Introductions
1
Sep 28, 2015 10:41 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:04 PM.