All Motor All Motor Advanced Performance. Talk about Engine Swaps, Internal Engine work. Not your basic Y pipe and Intake Information.

3rd gen VQ35DE Full ECU Swap Progress Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-2009 | 12:40 PM
  #321  
GRNMAXDMON's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,614
From: Miami, FL. / Indianapolis, IN.
Originally Posted by Aaron92SE
Update:

Just this past Wednesday, I had Surra_TT come over so we could test a new NWP product for the 5.5 gen. After we were done, I pulled out my complete wiring harness for this VQ35 swap project. I start going over it and labeling different connectors as I compared it to his 2K2 Maxima harness. Then, we quickly find out that something isn't right. There are just too many major differences between the connectors. So I said, "oh well, I'll figured it out" and we gave up since it was getting late. The harness did not seem like the right one though.

Then, Surra had an epiphany and sends me a text that says "Your harness is a 4cyl Altima!!!!!!". I open up the QR25DE 2K3 Altima FSM and start comparing wire colors and sure enough, he is correct! The stupid salvage yard said the harness came from a 2K3 Maxima 3.5, but it actually came from a 2K3 Altima 2.5L. I guess they couldn't tell the difference between an Altima and Maxima and a 2.5L and 3.5L.

But, I have a lead on an intact harness from another 5.5 gen auto. So I will post pics just as soon as I get this one.
damn, that sucked a$$ but good thing you guys caught it in time before you started pulling your hair.
Old 02-16-2009 | 11:06 AM
  #322  
Aaron92SE's Avatar
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,066
From: Walstonburg, NC
I have been busy lately knocking out some of this headwork! Here are some pics of the LIM and RH head intake ports all scribed and ready to go. The intake ports are matched up perfectly with the 1/16" thick NWP Engineering Thermal Intake Spacer, but port matched to the port size of the OEM gasket. Port matching to a 1/16" spacer instead of the stock thin gasket is a little tricky since it slightly raises the level of the LIM on an angled V6 head. But it's perfect.









The LIM is now 100% completed as well as the LH head. I have started on the RH head and finished all the intake ports. Now I just have about 8 more labor hours left on the intake valves, exhaust ports and valves, and then combustion chamber polishing. Once the headwork is complete, I will start making actual progress.
Old 02-16-2009 | 10:21 PM
  #323  
CapedCadaver's Avatar
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 43,324
From: Central NC
sweet! so what's the blue stuff for? and where it looks like you sort of etched a shape into the blue stuff, is that what you're shaping the ports to (the "scribing" i assume you were talking about)
Old 02-17-2009 | 06:47 AM
  #324  
Aaron92SE's Avatar
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,066
From: Walstonburg, NC
Originally Posted by CapedCadaver
sweet! so what's the blue stuff for? and where it looks like you sort of etched a shape into the blue stuff, is that what you're shaping the ports to (the "scribing" i assume you were talking about)
That's Dykem layout fluid. It makes the scribe marks easier to see. I scribed around the stock OEM intake gaskets and I matched both intake ports to that (heads and LIM).
Old 02-17-2009 | 03:24 PM
  #325  
CapedCadaver's Avatar
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 43,324
From: Central NC
Originally Posted by Aaron92SE
That's Dykem layout fluid. It makes the scribe marks easier to see. I scribed around the stock OEM intake gaskets and I matched both intake ports to that (heads and LIM).
i see.. so why did you use the OEM gasket as a template rather than one of your spacers? or did i read something wrong?
Old 02-17-2009 | 03:48 PM
  #326  
Aaron92SE's Avatar
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,066
From: Walstonburg, NC
Originally Posted by CapedCadaver
i see.. so why did you use the OEM gasket as a template rather than one of your spacers? or did i read something wrong?
The LIM Spacers in the VQ35DE Spacer Kit are matched perfectly to the LIM ports.

The ports on the heads are larger than the ports on the LIM. And the OEM LIM gasket is oversized and is not matched to either the LIM ports or the ports on the heads. So this is a good template to use since it's larger than both LIM and the ports on the heads.

As for the port work I will do on the UIM, I will use the spacers to scribe all my lines since it's already matched perfectly to the large of the two ports (the LIM). All I'll have to do then is port matched the UIM runners. When I ported the upper part of the LIM, I didn't increase the size of the port. I just decreased the initial angle at the top part of the runners and polish everything up. If you've ever seen a VQ35 LIM, you'll know what I mean by decreasing the angle.
Old 02-27-2009 | 06:46 PM
  #327  
Aaron92SE's Avatar
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,066
From: Walstonburg, NC
It's been a little while since my last update. I've been slacking off a little bit with the pictures.

Several posts above, you may have read that I got the wrong engine harness. Well I fixed that problem rather quickly! The harness came off an 03 Maxima AT. I also snagged the alternator and MAF from the same car.



And look what just arrived today!

Old 02-27-2009 | 06:51 PM
  #328  
Aaron92SE's Avatar
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,066
From: Walstonburg, NC
Also, just this evening, I FINALLY finished all the headwork that I have to do!!!

27 labor hours of back breaking tedious work broken up over the period of several months. I kept a strict timesheet so I knew how much time I was spending on each task. The 2nd head went a lot faster of course since I already mastered my techniques on the first head.

I will get my heads resurfaced next week and immediately start assembling the heads and installing all my goodies from DaveB!

After that, I have to do a little grinding on the coolant entry port on the block in order to install the HR head gaskets.

I am so relieved that all this headwork is finally over with! Onto the fun stuff!
Old 02-27-2009 | 06:53 PM
  #329  
CapedCadaver's Avatar
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 43,324
From: Central NC
oh good, the harness. So are you just gonna cut your VE harness open and take the TCU wiring out of it, or are you gonna hand-wire all that?

also...

in for before/after pics of the headwork
Old 02-27-2009 | 07:01 PM
  #330  
Aaron92SE's Avatar
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,066
From: Walstonburg, NC
Originally Posted by CapedCadaver
oh good, the harness. So are you just gonna cut your VE harness open and take the TCU wiring out of it, or are you gonna hand-wire all that?

also...

in for before/after pics of the headwork
You've already seen my port work pics.

The VE engine control harness is coming out. I haven't completely decided what I am going to do with the VE TCU wiring. I could just get a Suprastick and call it a day. But for right now, I am going to prune as much wiring out of the car as I possibly can to save weight. I planned on keeping the VE TCU and needed wiring. There's no need for me to run any custom wires and make connectors. The harnesses are all I need pretty much.
Old 02-27-2009 | 07:34 PM
  #331  
CapedCadaver's Avatar
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 43,324
From: Central NC
Originally Posted by Aaron92SE
You've already seen my port work pics.

The VE engine control harness is coming out. I haven't completely decided what I am going to do with the VE TCU wiring. I could just get a Suprastick and call it a day. But for right now, I am going to prune as much wiring out of the car as I possibly can to save weight. I planned on keeping the VE TCU and needed wiring. There's no need for me to run any custom wires and make connectors. The harnesses are all I need pretty much.
o whoops... i was thinking the blue stuff was something we hadn't seen before... i see it now.

with suprastick is it still usually fully-auto until you enter manual mode, like newer cars have? My main worry would be the interconnecting wiring between the ECU and TCU (on the stock VE stuff), and if it's the same pinout onto the 3.5 ECU.
Old 02-27-2009 | 09:37 PM
  #332  
eng92's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,204
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by CapedCadaver
My main worry would be the interconnecting wiring between the ECU and TCU (on the stock VE stuff), and if it's the same pinout onto the 3.5 ECU.
In an auto A33B, the TCM and ECM communicate using the two wire CAN system. You will not be able to interface the TCM from an A32 or earlier vintage max with it.
Old 02-27-2009 | 09:47 PM
  #333  
eng92's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,204
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by Aaron92SE
I also snagged the alternator and MAF from the same car.
Will your 3G alternator connector plug into that A33B alternator or did you score a section of the engine room harness when you grabbed the alternator?

I just re-used my A32 alternator when I did my swap.
Old 02-27-2009 | 10:16 PM
  #334  
JonBlz's Avatar
a.k.a. STuNtMAN
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,382
From: Br00kLyN N.Y.
looking good on everything keep up the good work
Old 03-01-2009 | 04:49 AM
  #335  
CapedCadaver's Avatar
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 43,324
From: Central NC
Originally Posted by eng92
In an auto A33B, the TCM and ECM communicate using the two wire CAN system. You will not be able to interface the TCM from an A32 or earlier vintage max with it.
yea, i was looking at that.. but if the sensors on both transmissions read the same way, then he can probably just get the a33b TCU and splice a his harness connectors (unless of course they plug in exactly the same way! that would be cool) onto that, cuz they have the same control mechanism (a/b solenoids, overrun clutch, tc lockup, line pressure solenoid) on both trannys.
Old 03-01-2009 | 07:02 AM
  #336  
eng92's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,204
From: Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by CapedCadaver
yea, i was looking at that.. but if the sensors on both transmissions read the same way, then he can probably just get the a33b TCU and splice a his harness connectors (unless of course they plug in exactly the same way! that would be cool) onto that, cuz they have the same control mechanism (a/b solenoids, overrun clutch, tc lockup, line pressure solenoid) on both trannys.
The outputs you listed are not the problem. It is the inputs that the tcm gets from the ecm (rpm, throttle position, etc.) that are the issue.
Old 03-01-2009 | 03:29 PM
  #337  
Aaron92SE's Avatar
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,066
From: Walstonburg, NC
Originally Posted by eng92
Will your 3G alternator connector plug into that A33B alternator or did you score a section of the engine room harness when you grabbed the alternator?

I just re-used my A32 alternator when I did my swap.
I believe the alternator plugs are different. So I will probably need to splice in the right connectors.

I got the 03 alternator just b/c my VE alternator won't bolt to the VQ block/timing cover.

Originally Posted by JonBlz
looking good on everything keep up the good work
Thanks.
Old 03-01-2009 | 07:56 PM
  #338  
CapedCadaver's Avatar
Call me Wookiee Goldberg
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 43,324
From: Central NC
Originally Posted by eng92
The outputs you listed are not the problem. It is the inputs that the tcm gets from the ecm (rpm, throttle position, etc.) that are the issue.
yea i meant that if he gets the a33b tcu and just wires the outputs to work on his 3rd gen tranny... he is doing the full 5.5 ECU swap, he's using the drive-by-wire throttle, so if he uses the TCU form the 5.5 as well, it's basically using EVERYTHING from the 5.5, except that the outputs are controlling a slightly different tranny. I looked, and the output plugs are not exactly the same.. but with about an hour or two spent comparing FSMs, it should be pretty easy to cut and splice (or do the pin-release-and-relocate method like i did for my 5spd swap re-wire) to get the right wires going to the right plugs on the tranny case.
Old 03-04-2009 | 09:07 PM
  #339  
Aaron92SE's Avatar
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,066
From: Walstonburg, NC
I got my heads resurfaced today.

Before:


After:
Old 03-05-2009 | 03:17 AM
  #340  
t6378tp's Avatar
Turbo 3.5
iTrader: (69)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,796
From: Philly
how much did they take off, do you have to go with a thicker head gasket to make up the differance

btw looks nice
Old 03-05-2009 | 04:02 AM
  #341  
hadman's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,179
From: Toronto, Canada
That head work is far too pretty. On to the fun stuff...
Old 03-05-2009 | 05:26 AM
  #342  
Kevlo911's Avatar
Kevlo for President
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 35,779
From: Lake Orion, MI
Make sure you use the Z or HR head gasket.
Old 03-05-2009 | 08:43 AM
  #343  
mmg23max's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 80
From: New York
Originally Posted by Kevlo911
Make sure you use the Z or HR head gasket.
He's using the HR head gasket because it has a better cooling.
Old 03-05-2009 | 09:44 AM
  #344  
Aaron92SE's Avatar
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,066
From: Walstonburg, NC
I have a little bit of a problem and I may be worrying over nothing. But the machinist said he took off 4 thousandths. I took several very accurate head height measurements at various points around the heads. It turns out that the machinist removed an average of .004" on the intake side of the heads. But on the exhaust side of the heads, he removed anywhere from .006 to .009". I did my homework before choosing this machinist. He's widely considered to be the best machinist in the area when it comes to building race engines over 1500 hp.

But, what issues could I possibly run into if he did remove .009"? The block hasn't been touch BTW. And the overall height of the head is .004" below what the FSM says is in spec. It was on the low side of things to begin with.

I am pretty sure piston to valve clearances aren't going to be an issue. I am going to use the HR head gasket, which is not really any thicker than stock. And I have the 10.9mm lift cams from ebay.

But what issues could I run into if .009" removed is too much?
Old 03-06-2009 | 03:50 PM
  #345  
Aaron92SE's Avatar
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,066
From: Walstonburg, NC
I did some more math on these heads. I figured up the amount they are crooked or sloped. I took several measurements on the intake side and the exhaust side of the heads. It turns out that the machinist took a lot more off the exhaust side of the heads. Below is the difference between each side of the heads. You will see the stock head decks are very close to parallel with the valve cover gasket surface on the top of the head.

STOCK LH Head variance: .00160"
STOCK RH Head variance: .00090"

Milled LH Head variance: .00075"
Milled RH Head variance: .00550"

So the stock heads are flat within a couple thousandths, which is pretty good. And the Milled LH head is good since it's below a thou. But take a look at the RH head, which is over 5 thousandths. That is roughly the width of a normal piece of copier paper, which shouldn't make a difference, but can anybody think of anything that could be affected b/c of this?

Also, my question above still stands. If anybody has any thoughts that may sound crazy and you don't want to post, please PM me and tell me what you think. Thanks.
Old 03-06-2009 | 04:31 PM
  #346  
hadman's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,179
From: Toronto, Canada
Did you bring in to question with the machinist the results of your measurements? What is his stance on this?
How does one find out what is generally accepted as being within a tolerable limit and what isn't?
Old 03-06-2009 | 05:56 PM
  #347  
Aaron92SE's Avatar
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,066
From: Walstonburg, NC
Originally Posted by hadman
Did you bring in to question with the machinist the results of your measurements? What is his stance on this?
How does one find out what is generally accepted as being within a tolerable limit and what isn't?
I do not want to contact my machinist until I finish my research and know if he will have to pay for my thicker headgaskets to fix his error.
Old 03-06-2009 | 06:05 PM
  #348  
Aaron92SE's Avatar
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,066
From: Walstonburg, NC
I spent a couple hours at the junkyard today snagging some parts for a prototype for a new 02/03 Maxima NWP product. I also picked up an ignition switch connector with wiring since I want to use the 02 Maxima key and ignition to start the car. I don't know what it is, but I really want to start my 3rd gen with a newer ignition switch.

I also snagged some relays I needed with sockets and wiring, an ECU mounting bracket, and a clock that I may use some day. Who knows.

Old 03-09-2009 | 08:47 AM
  #349  
Aaron92SE's Avatar
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,066
From: Walstonburg, NC
I messed around with my instrument clusters a little bit today. The cluster I want to use shows 49K miles on the odometer and came from the same car my engine came from. So it would be nice to see the actual miles of my engine since I didn't do a full rebuild.

But, that cluster has black face gauges and another cluster that I have has silver gauges which look much nicer. So in order to keep the right miles, I swapped face panels successfully. It was a bit scary at first not knowing if I will mess up my calibration which I've heard so much talk about it on the forums. But I discovered there is a calibration mode on the cluster for the 5th gen digital odometer. The steps are in the FSM. Once you are in this mode, the needles point to a certain spot (i.e. Speed=24mph, RPM=1300, etc). You note where the needles point to before you remove them. And removing the needles without breaking anything seems a bit tough as well. But I managed to do the swap successfully the first time. You just gotta be really careful while prying up on the needle for it to pop out without breaking anything.

Giving 12v to the right terminals and providing a ground:


Swapping panels:

Last edited by Aaron92SE; 03-09-2009 at 08:50 AM.
Old 03-09-2009 | 10:07 AM
  #350  
DanNY's Avatar
Ad·min·is·tra·tor
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 17,725
aren't you suppose to measure thickness/deflection on the head after it's torqued down to jig or something?
Old 03-09-2009 | 10:10 AM
  #351  
Aaron92SE's Avatar
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,066
From: Walstonburg, NC
Originally Posted by DanNY
aren't you suppose to measure thickness/deflection on the head after it's torqued down to jig or something?
You mean me? Or my machinist?

All I know is that my heads were flat before and now the RH head isn't. I'm just want to make sure a 5 thou slope isn't going to affect anything. I also want to be certain that removing as much as 9 thou from a head that was already very low on the in-spec nominal head height range won't give me any problems.

Any thoughts?
Old 03-10-2009 | 06:08 AM
  #352  
GRNMAXDMON's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,614
From: Miami, FL. / Indianapolis, IN.
looking good Aaron. when will you be able to fit the motor in the car?
Old 03-10-2009 | 06:51 AM
  #353  
maxine'sMan's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 363
From: Toronto, ON
...can't see your latest pics for some reason.
Old 03-10-2009 | 08:33 AM
  #354  
Aaron92SE's Avatar
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,066
From: Walstonburg, NC
Originally Posted by GRNMAXDMON
looking good Aaron. when will you be able to fit the motor in the car?
I haven't started assembling the heads just yet. I've been spending all my time tracing wires and studying schematics so I can get ready to wire everything into my car.

I hope to have the engine in the car by early April. It depends on how fast I can get this engine back together now that the headwork is done.

Originally Posted by maxine'sMan
...can't see your latest pics for some reason.
The NWP Engineering web server seems to be working just fine. Are you still having problems seeing the pics? Is anybody else having problems?
Old 03-10-2009 | 08:54 AM
  #355  
Aaron92SE's Avatar
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,066
From: Walstonburg, NC
Jime, I never got that email from you.
Old 03-10-2009 | 10:12 AM
  #356  
Jime's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,924
From: https://t.me/pump_upp
Originally Posted by Aaron92SE
Jime, I never got that email from you.
I have sent it 3 times now o will try once more. Just sent it again to the adogg18.
Old 03-10-2009 | 10:31 AM
  #357  
Aaron92SE's Avatar
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,066
From: Walstonburg, NC
Originally Posted by Jime
I have sent it 3 times now o will try once more. Just sent it again to the adogg18.
I don't know what's wrong. It's not going to my spam folder either.

Thanks again for your help.

Last edited by Aaron92SE; 03-19-2009 at 07:57 AM.
Old 03-10-2009 | 01:16 PM
  #358  
Gunther's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 539
Did you resolve the headwork issue?
Old 03-10-2009 | 02:38 PM
  #359  
Aaron92SE's Avatar
Thread Starter
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,066
From: Walstonburg, NC
Originally Posted by Gunther
Did you resolve the headwork issue?
No. I haven't been able to find an answer to my questions above. So I don't want to assemble my heads until I have some idea on the problems I may face with the head resurfacing issue.

The headwork itself isn't an issue though. That's perfect, cause I did it. But the head resurfacing is the issue.
Old 03-10-2009 | 04:42 PM
  #360  
Gunther's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 539
Originally Posted by Aaron92SE
No. I haven't been able to find an answer to my questions above. So I don't want to assemble my heads until I have some idea on the problems I may face with the head resurfacing issue.

The headwork itself isn't an issue though. That's perfect, cause I did it. But the head resurfacing is the issue.
haha, my mistake, I'm curious to hear what the solution is. Hopefully it won't put you behind your schedule


Quick Reply: 3rd gen VQ35DE Full ECU Swap Progress Thread



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:46 PM.