My 2002 SE 6-speed dyno 204.4 hp 219.3 ft lbs tq bone stock
#11
Originally Posted by maximadave
I haven't seen a bone stock 2K2 6-speed do 215 FWHP.
#13
Originally Posted by 190hpKiLLA
ok so we have 255HP with 15% driveline loss, it comes out to 218FWHP, I know its not that accurate but still it should be around that number, 200HP is really weak. Im not argueing just want to know the truth about 2k2's. Thats really weak HP #s.
maximadave got.
#14
Originally Posted by 03BlkSETE
The truth is our cars really have about 240 HP at the crank. Factor in a 15% drivetrain loss and you end up with 204 HP. That's exactly what
maximadave got.
maximadave got.
Dont the 2k2 Altima guys Dyno better then us stock.
I need some explaining cause Im really ****ed of at the #'s.
Thank you.
#16
Originally Posted by Cdriven
Can you guys explain the large dip in the torque curve starting at 3.5k rpms.
Is that normal?
Is that normal?
**goes to check other 5th gen '02 dyno plots**
#18
Don't let the non 2k2 owners freak you out dave. Your numbers are right in line with the average 2k2 6 speed. usually stock it's about 200-208 hp stock. Is it possible for you to get the SAE corrected numbers? I dyno'ed 205 hp and 219.5 tq, stock. I have a feeling the 6-speed tranny eats a lot of power, like... 18% maybe. Also what your seeing at 3900-4000 rpm is the VI switchover.
#19
Originally Posted by IwANnAMaX96
Dam. And I thought the 4th gen had no top-end!!!
Those are nice good #'s for 6MT. I hope to dyno about the same when I get my car put on a dynojet sometime in the next few weeks. Ypipe is on, and her pickup is insane at 50mph+...
Yeah, rating should be 240hp/260tq factory ratings. 15% for sticks and 20-23% for autos. FWD can't exactly help on the dynos either.
#20
I thought the typical driveline loss for a 2WD vehicle was closer to 18%.
I believe most 350Z's dyno around 235 hp, but they are RWD...so I guess thats a bad comparison. If Nissan overrated the Maxima's we are entitled to some compensation.
I believe most 350Z's dyno around 235 hp, but they are RWD...so I guess thats a bad comparison. If Nissan overrated the Maxima's we are entitled to some compensation.
#22
Very nice 12hp gain. Our ecu's suck and need help with their a/f. An safc would net you some more ponies when tuned right. I was able to get approximately an extra 8hp outta my safc on my last dyno tune.
#23
detailerdaveb@gmail.com
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 6,242
Originally Posted by PhxBlue
Very nice 12hp gain. Our ecu's suck and need help with their a/f. An safc would net you some more ponies when tuned right. I was able to get approximately an extra 8hp outta my safc on my last dyno tune.
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by 02MaximizedVQ
If Nissan overrated the Maxima's we are entitled to some compensation.
there used to be a sticky in the 5th Gen section about this...everyone was taking their 5.5 Gen's out to get dynoed to help out with the law suit...
Nothing ever became of it. BTW, my car dyno'd at 204 hp and 218 lb ft.
I guess nothing ever became of it because there is an extra 15 lb feet of torque that they didn't advertise...who knows.
-vq
#26
Originally Posted by VQMAN
there used to be a sticky in the 5th Gen section about this...everyone was taking their 5.5 Gen's out to get dynoed to help out with the law suit...
Nothing ever became of it. BTW, my car dyno'd at 204 hp and 218 lb ft.
I guess nothing ever became of it because there is an extra 15 lb feet of torque that they didn't advertise...who knows.
-vq
Nothing ever became of it. BTW, my car dyno'd at 204 hp and 218 lb ft.
I guess nothing ever became of it because there is an extra 15 lb feet of torque that they didn't advertise...who knows.
-vq
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MaxLvr21
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
14
10-17-2015 12:11 PM