Dyno Discussion and Slips Discussion and a moderated "Dyno Slips" sub-forum to allow for posting of dyno slips.

vq35 17 deg. timing advance gains....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 04:04 PM
  #41  
HotshotVQ35's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 930
From: LI, NY
POP it is

Originally Posted by NmexMAX
They don't
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 04:17 PM
  #42  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Velocity stack > *
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 09:45 AM
  #43  
hacim105's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,063
From: Reno, NV
I have a question, if advancing timing only adds anything below 2300 rpms, then why are all those who have done the 3.5 swap so concerned with advancing timing on their engines?
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 10:18 AM
  #44  
Starchild2K2SE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 279
Damn, I gotta dyno my car already.....especially before I go boost this spring ......but I think I should be putting down atleast 240whp with intake,custom 2.5" exhaust(no res, no cats),headers,jet chip ecu(BS), 17*, ur udp....I think if I had a vafc I would be putting a little more because my car runs too effin rich, backfiring all over the place. But I should be putting up a dyno sheet real soon.....
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 11:31 AM
  #45  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by hacim105
I have a question, if advancing timing only adds anything below 2300 rpms, then why are all those who have done the 3.5 swap so concerned with advancing timing on their engines?
The timing you're referring to(and this thread as well) and the timing they're (JClaw) referring to is different.


Originally Posted by Starchild2K2SE
but I think I should be putting down atleast 240whp
SAE?

Are you taking bets
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 11:51 AM
  #46  
hacim105's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,063
From: Reno, NV
[QUOTE=NmexMAX]The timing you're referring to(and this thread as well) and the timing they're (JClaw) referring to is different.QUOTE]

Please elaborate, I didn't know that there is multiple kinds of timing. What is the difference between the 2?
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 12:04 PM
  #47  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by hacim105
Please elaborate, I didn't know that there is multiple kinds of timing.
Cam timing, iginition timing, base iginition timing

Dealer 17* = Base timing.
JClaw = wants to advance ignition timing thru powerband
A33B = CVTC, cam timing on Intake cam
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 06:29 AM
  #48  
Starchild2K2SE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 279
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
SAE?

Are you taking bets
I will now.......
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 06:40 AM
  #49  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by Starchild2K2SE
I will now.......
N/A ..
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 06:49 AM
  #50  
JClaw's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
Cam timing, iginition timing, base iginition timing

Dealer 17* = Base timing.
JClaw = wants to advance ignition timing thru powerband
A33B = CVTC, cam timing on Intake cam
JClaw = Timing is ultra conservative and I'm probably only putting down 22x-ish whp with Headers/Intake/Catback, UDP, no AC or Power Steering, 5-speed tranny and 15-inch wheels. Isn't that sad... a 2k2 with the same mods would probably be putting down 250whp or so. [/wild speculation]
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 06:55 AM
  #51  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
But the power to weight is still better for --> A32 > A33B.

I'll lend you my JWT ECU just for ***** and giggle.s
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 06:58 AM
  #52  
JClaw's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Even the JWT ECU doesn't run as much timing as a stock 2k2 does.

Tilley, with basically the same car as me, put down 233whp. But he has a JWT ECU and had the A/F tuned through SAFC-II. I have neither. So I was maybe at 220whp/220wtq when I ran my 13.3.
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 07:01 AM
  #53  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
How did he tune the A/F using JWT's static maps..

Originally Posted by JClaw
Even the JWT ECU doesn't run as much timing as a stock 2k2 does.
Just thought I'd offer geez..
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 07:05 AM
  #54  
JClaw's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Dunno but he said he had an SAFC-II. Maybe he was using the stock ECU at the time...

Anywho, to get back to the subject, you wont see much from a 1-2 degree advance.

I don't remember who, but someone advanced timing 8 degrees on a 3.0 and gained something like 12whp/10wtq throughout the powerband. He said we could probably get +15 degrees over stock 3.0 ECU timing with a VQ35.

And we have 94 Octane readily available 'round here...
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 07:08 AM
  #55  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,099
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by JClaw
Even the JWT ECU doesn't run as much timing as a stock 2k2 does.
That's a rumor that i may have had a hand in spreading. Jime has has logged his timing at WOT in his A33B and the his numbers were similar (~17-18* BTDC) to his stock A32 ECU. Not saying this is typical, but just throwing something out there.
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 07:13 AM
  #56  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
JWT still better than nothing... and 7200..

But you're a Crazy Canuck.. and customs are
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 07:17 AM
  #57  
JClaw's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
I have NO doubt that the car would be faster with your ECU, especially if the track was hot and soaked with VHT (that means 1.75-1.80 60 foots with slicks).

But yeah I'm a crazy canuck...

Originally Posted by nismology
That's a rumor that i may have had a hand in spreading. Jime has has logged his timing at WOT in his A33B and the his numbers were similar (~17-18* BTDC) to his stock A32 ECU. Not saying this is typical, but just throwing something out there.
A little slice-of-life...

Last September me and Jime (nice guy by the way) met at a Quebec-vs-Ontario event at a local dragstrip of mine.

Towards the end of qualification he offered to temporarily install his OBDII scanner in my car for a run to see what I'm reading for timing during the run (Also, interestingly, my idle is actually 1334-1340 rpms based on his scanner, even though it appears to be somewhere between 1400 and 1500 on the actual tach).

Anywho, unless it's the crack, I remember the scanner varying a lot between 13 and 23 degrees during the run (hard to say really, when you have to shift 3 times during the run).

On that day the car was particularly slow, trapping around 100 mph. On the very next day I realized my knock sensor bolt was alarmingly loose and tightened it good.

The trap speeds were hovering between 103.8 and 105.3 all Sunday long, vs the constant 99-100 mph traps from Saturday.

True story. And I have NO idea what to make of it.
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 07:33 AM
  #58  
Puppetmaster's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,551
From: Fairfax, VA
Originally Posted by Starchild2K2SE
I will now.......
Well, when are ya gonna post the dyno then?
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 09:27 AM
  #59  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by Puppetmaster
Well, when are ya gonna post the dyno then?
Dont forget to keep it SAE FTW.
Old Jan 18, 2006 | 05:22 PM
  #60  
aznsap's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,135
Originally Posted by NmexMAX
How did he tune the A/F using JWT's static maps..

Just thought I'd offer geez..

this might be off topic a little bit, but is it possible at all to adjust A/F with a JWT ecu?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ben2003GLE
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
31
Jul 17, 2016 08:13 AM
Starrider
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
4
Sep 17, 2015 07:26 AM
305head
Infiniti I30/I35
2
Aug 26, 2015 09:03 PM
Balkins
New Member Introductions
0
Aug 9, 2015 02:48 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:20 AM.