Shell "Nitrogen Enriched Gas" ?
I didn't read through the entire thread, but wanted to add some comments I didn't observe in skimming.
The Nitrogen is part of a deposit control additive. All gasolines are required by law to contain deposit control additives, which all contain Nitrogen; Shell just chose to market their fuel based upon this element. The dose rates for these additives are in parts per million (ppm), and will not affect fueling, air to fuel ratio or however one wants to examine the situation.
The hydrocarbon portion of gasoline is a fungible product (interchangeable from source to source) and is generally locally sourced. The distinction between gasoline brands is the additive package and dose rate.
Since the base hydrocarbon stock is usually interchangeable, large differences in fuel economy are hard to believe as the energy density (content) doesn't vary greatly at a point in time. The main source of differences in FE are generally from comparisons between E10 and non-ethanol fuels, and fuels across seasonal changes.
Ethanol is not really a scam, it's more a subsidy to farmers, IMHO. Although it does have some credence in the energy independence argument.
The Nitrogen is part of a deposit control additive. All gasolines are required by law to contain deposit control additives, which all contain Nitrogen; Shell just chose to market their fuel based upon this element. The dose rates for these additives are in parts per million (ppm), and will not affect fueling, air to fuel ratio or however one wants to examine the situation.
The hydrocarbon portion of gasoline is a fungible product (interchangeable from source to source) and is generally locally sourced. The distinction between gasoline brands is the additive package and dose rate.
Since the base hydrocarbon stock is usually interchangeable, large differences in fuel economy are hard to believe as the energy density (content) doesn't vary greatly at a point in time. The main source of differences in FE are generally from comparisons between E10 and non-ethanol fuels, and fuels across seasonal changes.
Ethanol is not really a scam, it's more a subsidy to farmers, IMHO. Although it does have some credence in the energy independence argument.
Ethanol will ruin certain parts on your car after time (catalytic converter,certain rubberized parts) in your motor and so on. It just takes longer when there is 10% in the fuel supply. And for it being energy independent ok yes you can keep growing corn however the amount of water and land that it would use is not efficient at all. Hydrogen is the way to go we have plenty of sea water that can be used once you clean it up. And for gasoline they can make automobiles get over 100 miles to the gallon they just chose not to it would bankrupt the oil companies!!! And I had a flex fuel car and used E85 in it the gas mileage went from 20 to 13 miles to the gallon that is pretty bad makes you fill your car up twice as much and it is diffidently not cost efficient when E85 is only .25 less a gallon then gas.
OMGWTF!?, big business is killing technological innovation to stay alive. Where are the black silent helicopters?
Please note the sarcasmic nature of this post, but with real points.
Psh getting ethanol from corn is a scam. Not only do food prices go up, but all the tractors and fertilizers that are used to grow the corn are fueled by DINO OIL.
So basically we're spending oil to get ethanol. Not really saving oil are we? =)
So basically we're spending oil to get ethanol. Not really saving oil are we? =)
This is correct. I saw a CBC "Nature of Things" documentary years ago, and in an aerial view of harvest machinery in operation, the commentator said: "it takes more energy to plant and harvest this grain than we can get out of it as ethanol". So yes, the business is largely a government subsidy to corn growers. Stupid in the long run, but politicians are blind to the long run.
Locally, we make ethanol from straw, a waste product.
And Ferrari used it last weekend, quite successfully.
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/ottawa/stor...rari-fuel.html
And Ferrari used it last weekend, quite successfully.
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/ottawa/stor...rari-fuel.html
Nitrogen is an inert gas. It does nothing for an engine to add it to the fuel. Will it hurt anything? Probably not. But I, for one, and boycotting Shell because marketing this whole nitrogen-enriched gas thing to consumers shows me that they take us for idiots.
Anyone else seen the movie "Idiocracy?" Brawndo - it's got electrolytes!
Anyone else seen the movie "Idiocracy?" Brawndo - it's got electrolytes!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amine
Many people think of nitrogen gas(N2), the inert gas that makes up 80% of our atmosphere. That's not the case here. Nitrogen when combined with other elements, particularly hydrogen and oxygen is quite reactive. NH3(ammonia), NO2(TNT), and NO3(Ammonium Nitrate, another great explosive).
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
Many people think of nitrogen gas(N2), the inert gas that makes up 80% of our atmosphere. That's not the case here. Nitrogen when combined with other elements, particularly hydrogen and oxygen is quite reactive. NH3(ammonia), NO2(TNT), and NO3(Ammonium Nitrate, another great explosive).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Maxima_Joe
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
0
Aug 27, 2015 12:01 AM
Chebosto
General Maxima Discussion
87
Jun 12, 2001 07:31 AM





