UNEQUAL exhaust runner length?(Y-pipe related)
#1
UNEQUAL exhaust runner length?(Y-pipe related)
Anybody think an aftermarket Y-pipes' removal of 18-20" of exhaust runner(piece from exhaust manifold to Y-collector) length from the REAR bank could cause long term damage? Is this even a possible issue?
I know the VQ will last forEVER, but is it even worth worrying about uneven backpressures, uneven combustion gases exchanging, whatever reasons Nissan had for purposefully INCLUDING the extra 180* bend and extra 18-20" of tubing in the OEM Y-pipe? If not, why?
Today, I ROUGHLY measured the STOCK exhaust vs. Cattmans' Y-pipe and the rear bank loses ~18-20" of exhaust runner length, while the front stays the same. I'm wondering if Nissan engineered the equal length runners for a reason(balancing/coordinating exhaust pulses?), other than trying to fit the precat.
Any ideas appreciated. Thanks.
I know the VQ will last forEVER, but is it even worth worrying about uneven backpressures, uneven combustion gases exchanging, whatever reasons Nissan had for purposefully INCLUDING the extra 180* bend and extra 18-20" of tubing in the OEM Y-pipe? If not, why?
Today, I ROUGHLY measured the STOCK exhaust vs. Cattmans' Y-pipe and the rear bank loses ~18-20" of exhaust runner length, while the front stays the same. I'm wondering if Nissan engineered the equal length runners for a reason(balancing/coordinating exhaust pulses?), other than trying to fit the precat.
Any ideas appreciated. Thanks.
#3
Originally posted by BigDogJonx
Im not following you on the unuequal part of the Ypipe. I still have my stock Ypipe and the only thing different seems the extended flex section where the Cattman has a shorter one.
Dixit
Im not following you on the unuequal part of the Ypipe. I still have my stock Ypipe and the only thing different seems the extended flex section where the Cattman has a shorter one.
Dixit
If not, maybe I was looking at a different year, since there were about 2-DOZEN Y-pipes laying around.
Got pics?
#4
You are SOOOOOO right. Last night I was right, now you 100% right.
And yes it is almost 3am here and I am taking pics of a freagin stock Ypipe. Does that not constitute a true modder and need for help?
But you can see it is very very restrictive. That bend has to kill the flow bigtime.
Dixit
And yes it is almost 3am here and I am taking pics of a freagin stock Ypipe. Does that not constitute a true modder and need for help?
But you can see it is very very restrictive. That bend has to kill the flow bigtime.
Dixit
#5
Whoah.....Nice toes....
Just play'n.
Yeah, I know why the Y-pipe gains so much, but I'm wondering about the side-effects. There could even be some more power in there if the runners were equal length, but designed with flow/exhaust optimized as Nissan did. Wait, so why is that 180* there again?
I don't know, that's why I'm asking for help. BTW, thanks for the pics again.
Yeah, I know why the Y-pipe gains so much, but I'm wondering about the side-effects. There could even be some more power in there if the runners were equal length, but designed with flow/exhaust optimized as Nissan did. Wait, so why is that 180* there again?
I don't know, that's why I'm asking for help. BTW, thanks for the pics again.
#6
Re: Whoah.....Nice toes....
Originally posted by IceY2K1
Just play'n.
Yeah, I know why the Y-pipe gains so much, but I'm wondering about the side-effects. There could even be some more power in there if the runners were equal length, but designed with flow/exhaust optimized as Nissan did. Wait, so why is that 180* there again?
I don't know, that's why I'm asking for help. BTW, thanks for the pics again.
Just play'n.
Yeah, I know why the Y-pipe gains so much, but I'm wondering about the side-effects. There could even be some more power in there if the runners were equal length, but designed with flow/exhaust optimized as Nissan did. Wait, so why is that 180* there again?
I don't know, that's why I'm asking for help. BTW, thanks for the pics again.
I dont see if there would be any advantage to making it equal length. I mean it all translate in one big pipe regardless. So backpressure cant play a part in that if you think equal length might be better.
Man I need to get some type of sleep pill. Here I am up at 3am, and need to get ready for work in 3hrs. Yeah think im an insomniac.
Dixit
#7
Re: Re: Whoah.....Nice toes....
Originally posted by BigDogJonx
Yeah my toes look a bit retarded cause I compressed the image to get it below the 50k limit on the board so I guess that part of the pic got screwed. Honestly they dont look like that!!! hahaha Just messing.......
I dont see if there would be any advantage to making it equal length. I mean it all translate in one big pipe regardless. So backpressure cant play a part in that if you think equal length might be better.
Man I need to get some type of sleep pill. Here I am up at 3am, and need to get ready for work in 3hrs. Yeah think im an insomniac.
Dixit
Yeah my toes look a bit retarded cause I compressed the image to get it below the 50k limit on the board so I guess that part of the pic got screwed. Honestly they dont look like that!!! hahaha Just messing.......
I dont see if there would be any advantage to making it equal length. I mean it all translate in one big pipe regardless. So backpressure cant play a part in that if you think equal length might be better.
Man I need to get some type of sleep pill. Here I am up at 3am, and need to get ready for work in 3hrs. Yeah think im an insomniac.
Dixit
Same here, except the 3hrs. part.
#8
Re: UNEQUAL exhaust runner length?(Y-pipe related)
Originally posted by IceY2K1
Anybody think an aftermarket Y-pipes' removal of 18-20" of exhaust runner(piece from exhaust manifold to Y-collector) length from the REAR bank could cause long term damage? Is this even a possible issue?
I know the VQ will last forEVER, but is it even worth worrying about uneven backpressures, uneven combustion gases exchanging, whatever reasons Nissan had for purposefully INCLUDING the extra 180* bend and extra 18-20" of tubing in the OEM Y-pipe? If not, why?
Today, I ROUGHLY measured the STOCK exhaust vs. Cattmans' Y-pipe and the rear bank loses ~18-20" of exhaust runner length, while the front stays the same. I'm wondering if Nissan engineered the equal length runners for a reason(balancing/coordinating exhaust pulses?), other than trying to fit the precat.
Any ideas appreciated. Thanks.
Anybody think an aftermarket Y-pipes' removal of 18-20" of exhaust runner(piece from exhaust manifold to Y-collector) length from the REAR bank could cause long term damage? Is this even a possible issue?
I know the VQ will last forEVER, but is it even worth worrying about uneven backpressures, uneven combustion gases exchanging, whatever reasons Nissan had for purposefully INCLUDING the extra 180* bend and extra 18-20" of tubing in the OEM Y-pipe? If not, why?
Today, I ROUGHLY measured the STOCK exhaust vs. Cattmans' Y-pipe and the rear bank loses ~18-20" of exhaust runner length, while the front stays the same. I'm wondering if Nissan engineered the equal length runners for a reason(balancing/coordinating exhaust pulses?), other than trying to fit the precat.
Any ideas appreciated. Thanks.
#9
Re: Re: UNEQUAL exhaust runner length?(Y-pipe related)
Originally posted by Smooth Operator
I'm speculating that the rear bank's precat is the reason behind the extra piping/bend. If Nissan installed the rear bank's precat without the extra piping bend it would've prevented them from using the looooong flex section.
I'm speculating that the rear bank's precat is the reason behind the extra piping/bend. If Nissan installed the rear bank's precat without the extra piping bend it would've prevented them from using the looooong flex section.
#10
Re: Re: UNEQUAL exhaust runner length?(Y-pipe related)
Originally posted by Smooth Operator
I'm speculating that the rear bank's precat is the reason behind the extra piping/bend. If Nissan installed the rear bank's precat without the extra piping bend it would've prevented them from using the looooong flex section.
I'm speculating that the rear bank's precat is the reason behind the extra piping/bend. If Nissan installed the rear bank's precat without the extra piping bend it would've prevented them from using the looooong flex section.
Dixit
#11
Re: Re: Re: UNEQUAL exhaust runner length?(Y-pipe related)
Originally posted by IceY2K1
I thought of that too, but they could have integrated it into the exhaust manifold like they did on the front(CALI spec only) and still had room.
I thought of that too, but they could have integrated it into the exhaust manifold like they did on the front(CALI spec only) and still had room.
Did you ever see DesertPearl's Cali-spec to FedSpec conversion in the HOW TO in the 5thgen? You can see how big that cali-spec manifold is.
Dixit
#12
Re: Re: Re: Re: UNEQUAL exhaust runner length?(Y-pipe related)
Originally posted by BigDogJonx
Yeah but the Cali spec manifold is not part of the exhaust manifold. It is the very large 6" diameter pipe. That is why the Ypipe is straight on the frontback side, unlike the 2k ones that also bend upwards like the rear back Ypipe.
Did you ever see DesertPearl's Cali-spec to FedSpec conversion in the HOW TO in the 5thgen? You can see how big that cali-spec manifold is.
Dixit
Yeah but the Cali spec manifold is not part of the exhaust manifold. It is the very large 6" diameter pipe. That is why the Ypipe is straight on the frontback side, unlike the 2k ones that also bend upwards like the rear back Ypipe.
Did you ever see DesertPearl's Cali-spec to FedSpec conversion in the HOW TO in the 5thgen? You can see how big that cali-spec manifold is.
Dixit
#13
You know what I just thought about??? That the headers that OBX planning on putting out in a month or two are not going to work for Calispec. Unless they putting out two different types.
Cause its obvious that the header is different cause the cali one has like 6 bolts where the cali-spec manifold is connected, the regular one has three. Only reason Im interested in the headers is for the supercharger, i think I should be able to get a good amount off it with a boosted car. Damn this ****es me off.
I guess I jumped cause i saw the 2000-2001, I know they probably just messed up, unless if for the very remote chance they planning on making two different front headers. I mean I could do what DesertPearl did but that means all this crap of getting a new Ypipe and rewiring the O2s and all that, I dont want to go through that.
Dixit
Cause its obvious that the header is different cause the cali one has like 6 bolts where the cali-spec manifold is connected, the regular one has three. Only reason Im interested in the headers is for the supercharger, i think I should be able to get a good amount off it with a boosted car. Damn this ****es me off.
I guess I jumped cause i saw the 2000-2001, I know they probably just messed up, unless if for the very remote chance they planning on making two different front headers. I mean I could do what DesertPearl did but that means all this crap of getting a new Ypipe and rewiring the O2s and all that, I dont want to go through that.
Dixit
#14
...
Originally posted by BigDogJonx
You know what I just thought about??? That the headers that OBX planning on putting out in a month or two are not going to work for Calispec. Unless they putting out two different types.
Cause its obvious that the header is different cause the cali one has like 6 bolts where the cali-spec manifold is connected, the regular one has three. Only reason Im interested in the headers is for the supercharger, i think I should be able to get a good amount off it with a boosted car. Damn this ****es me off.
I guess I jumped cause i saw the 2000-2001, I know they probably just messed up, unless if for the very remote chance they planning on making two different front headers. I mean I could do what DesertPearl did but that means all this crap of getting a new Ypipe and rewiring the O2s and all that, I dont want to go through that.
Dixit
You know what I just thought about??? That the headers that OBX planning on putting out in a month or two are not going to work for Calispec. Unless they putting out two different types.
Cause its obvious that the header is different cause the cali one has like 6 bolts where the cali-spec manifold is connected, the regular one has three. Only reason Im interested in the headers is for the supercharger, i think I should be able to get a good amount off it with a boosted car. Damn this ****es me off.
I guess I jumped cause i saw the 2000-2001, I know they probably just messed up, unless if for the very remote chance they planning on making two different front headers. I mean I could do what DesertPearl did but that means all this crap of getting a new Ypipe and rewiring the O2s and all that, I dont want to go through that.
Dixit
#15
the reason for the bend is to add length and to give EQUAL LENGTH exhaust tubes from both side which in theory should give a better power distribution since the exhaust pulses will precisecly meet at the collector. they make headers like that for mustangs and stuff i know and the ones that emax got for his 4th gen from new zealand were like that too. it won't hurt the car but maybe that's why 5th gen guys don't see as much of a gain from a y-pipe.
#16
Originally posted by dmbmaxima2k2
the reason for the bend is to add length and to give EQUAL LENGTH exhaust tubes from both side which in theory should give a better power distribution since the exhaust pulses will precisecly meet at the collector. they make headers like that for mustangs and stuff i know and the ones that emax got for his 4th gen from new zealand were like that too. it won't hurt the car but maybe that's why 5th gen guys don't see as much of a gain from a y-pipe.
the reason for the bend is to add length and to give EQUAL LENGTH exhaust tubes from both side which in theory should give a better power distribution since the exhaust pulses will precisecly meet at the collector. they make headers like that for mustangs and stuff i know and the ones that emax got for his 4th gen from new zealand were like that too. it won't hurt the car but maybe that's why 5th gen guys don't see as much of a gain from a y-pipe.
The Stillen and Cattman Y-pipes are clearly NOT designed with this in mind. They were more concerned with eliminating one precat and the O2-sensor squished portion of the tubing along with MUCH CHEAPER production cost.
#17
Originally posted by dmbmaxima2k2
the reason for the bend is to add length and to give EQUAL LENGTH exhaust tubes from both side which in theory should give a better power distribution since the exhaust pulses will precisecly meet at the collector. they make headers like that for mustangs and stuff i know and the ones that emax got for his 4th gen from new zealand were like that too. it won't hurt the car but maybe that's why 5th gen guys don't see as much of a gain from a y-pipe.
the reason for the bend is to add length and to give EQUAL LENGTH exhaust tubes from both side which in theory should give a better power distribution since the exhaust pulses will precisecly meet at the collector. they make headers like that for mustangs and stuff i know and the ones that emax got for his 4th gen from new zealand were like that too. it won't hurt the car but maybe that's why 5th gen guys don't see as much of a gain from a y-pipe.
Equal length in exhaust cant do much, pipe is a pipe, like two water hoses meeting a T, it dont matter how long one end of the T is, the water is still going to meet at the T and mix and then flow. There is no restriction.
Dixit
#19
Originally posted by BigDogJonx
Equal length in exhaust cant do much, pipe is a pipe, like two water hoses meeting a T, it dont matter how long one end of the T is, the water is still going to meet at the T and mix and then flow. There is no restriction.
Dixit
Equal length in exhaust cant do much, pipe is a pipe, like two water hoses meeting a T, it dont matter how long one end of the T is, the water is still going to meet at the T and mix and then flow. There is no restriction.
Dixit
Basically, with headers it's VERY critical to time the firing, ehaust valves opening, and the ehaust valves closing BETWEEN all the cylinders. Ideally, you want a COLUMN of air moving out the exhaust NOT a waveform(high-low-high-....). Now for this to happen the cylinders firing sequence between the two banks must be accounted for when the exhaust gasses leave each cylinder and meet at the collector. You don't want for example cylinder #1 and #4(example I don't know the firing sequence) to "run into" eachother at the collector. You want cylinder #1 to just finish entering the collector as cylinder #4 begins. The reason for this is that previous fired cylinder "pulls" the following exhaust pulse and thus aides in creating a constant column of air that flows with the proper velocity to clear the exhaust. Somewhat, similar to the reason you don't want to go to big on the exhaust tubing, because all though you decrease backpressure, you'll lose air velocity which can cause side effects such as turbulance, hot spots, etc...
#20
Originally posted by IceY2K1
I'm going to try and get this right, but don't hold me to it being 100% accurate.
Basically, with headers it's VERY critical to time the firing, ehaust valves opening, and the ehaust valves closing BETWEEN all the cylinders. Ideally, you want a COLUMN of air moving out the exhaust NOT a waveform(high-low-high-....). Now for this to happen the cylinders firing sequence between the two banks must be accounted for when the exhaust gasses leave each cylinder and meet at the collector. You don't want for example cylinder #1 and #4(example I don't know the firing sequence) to "run into" eachother at the collector. You want cylinder #1 to just finish entering the collector as cylinder #4 begins. The reason for this is that previous fired cylinder "pulls" the following exhaust pulse and thus aides in creating a constant column of air that flows with the proper velocity to clear the exhaust. Somewhat, similar to the reason you don't want to go to big on the exhaust tubing, because all though you decrease backpressure, you'll lose air velocity which can cause side effects such as turbulance, hot spots, etc...
I'm going to try and get this right, but don't hold me to it being 100% accurate.
Basically, with headers it's VERY critical to time the firing, ehaust valves opening, and the ehaust valves closing BETWEEN all the cylinders. Ideally, you want a COLUMN of air moving out the exhaust NOT a waveform(high-low-high-....). Now for this to happen the cylinders firing sequence between the two banks must be accounted for when the exhaust gasses leave each cylinder and meet at the collector. You don't want for example cylinder #1 and #4(example I don't know the firing sequence) to "run into" eachother at the collector. You want cylinder #1 to just finish entering the collector as cylinder #4 begins. The reason for this is that previous fired cylinder "pulls" the following exhaust pulse and thus aides in creating a constant column of air that flows with the proper velocity to clear the exhaust. Somewhat, similar to the reason you don't want to go to big on the exhaust tubing, because all though you decrease backpressure, you'll lose air velocity which can cause side effects such as turbulance, hot spots, etc...
Dixit
#21
Originally posted by IceY2K1
You don't want for example cylinder #1 and #4(example I don't know the firing sequence) to "run into" eachother at the collector. You want cylinder #1 to just finish entering the collector as cylinder #4 begins.
You don't want for example cylinder #1 and #4(example I don't know the firing sequence) to "run into" eachother at the collector. You want cylinder #1 to just finish entering the collector as cylinder #4 begins.
R 135
F 246
or
R 246
F 135
#22
Originally posted by IceY2K1
I'm going to try and get this right, but don't hold me to it being 100% accurate.
Basically, with headers it's VERY critical to time the firing, ehaust valves opening, and the ehaust valves closing BETWEEN all the cylinders. Ideally, you want a COLUMN of air moving out the exhaust NOT a waveform(high-low-high-....). Now for this to happen the cylinders firing sequence between the two banks must be accounted for when the exhaust gasses leave each cylinder and meet at the collector. You don't want for example cylinder #1 and #4(example I don't know the firing sequence) to "run into" eachother at the collector. You want cylinder #1 to just finish entering the collector as cylinder #4 begins. The reason for this is that previous fired cylinder "pulls" the following exhaust pulse and thus aides in creating a constant column of air that flows with the proper velocity to clear the exhaust. Somewhat, similar to the reason you don't want to go to big on the exhaust tubing, because all though you decrease backpressure, you'll lose air velocity which can cause side effects such as turbulance, hot spots, etc...
I'm going to try and get this right, but don't hold me to it being 100% accurate.
Basically, with headers it's VERY critical to time the firing, ehaust valves opening, and the ehaust valves closing BETWEEN all the cylinders. Ideally, you want a COLUMN of air moving out the exhaust NOT a waveform(high-low-high-....). Now for this to happen the cylinders firing sequence between the two banks must be accounted for when the exhaust gasses leave each cylinder and meet at the collector. You don't want for example cylinder #1 and #4(example I don't know the firing sequence) to "run into" eachother at the collector. You want cylinder #1 to just finish entering the collector as cylinder #4 begins. The reason for this is that previous fired cylinder "pulls" the following exhaust pulse and thus aides in creating a constant column of air that flows with the proper velocity to clear the exhaust. Somewhat, similar to the reason you don't want to go to big on the exhaust tubing, because all though you decrease backpressure, you'll lose air velocity which can cause side effects such as turbulance, hot spots, etc...
i was not wrong and i did not say that 5th gen's did not see enough of a gain just not as much, 8-12 is good but 4th gen guys see more, WHY because the stock 5th gen y-pipe was designed a little better.
#23
Originally posted by Smooth Operator
I dont have the factory service manual in front of me, but i believe the firing order is
R 135
F 246
or
R 246
F 135
I dont have the factory service manual in front of me, but i believe the firing order is
R 135
F 246
or
R 246
F 135
#24
I posted a thread on this a couple of weeks ago -- http://forums.maxima.org/showthread....hreadid=141608
Does anyone know what the Middle East Y-pipe looks like? They don't have emissons equipment, right? If we could see a ME ypipe we would know what Nissan thought was the best way to make a y without precats.
Does anyone know what the Middle East Y-pipe looks like? They don't have emissons equipment, right? If we could see a ME ypipe we would know what Nissan thought was the best way to make a y without precats.
#25
Originally posted by Anachronism
I posted a thread on this a couple of weeks ago -- http://forums.maxima.org/showthread....hreadid=141608
Does anyone know what the Middle East Y-pipe looks like? They don't have emissons equipment, right? If we could see a ME ypipe we would know what Nissan thought was the best way to make a y without precats.
I posted a thread on this a couple of weeks ago -- http://forums.maxima.org/showthread....hreadid=141608
Does anyone know what the Middle East Y-pipe looks like? They don't have emissons equipment, right? If we could see a ME ypipe we would know what Nissan thought was the best way to make a y without precats.
VERY intriguing idea about the Middle East Y-pipe. If someone can get one, I'll see if I can get it made for a reasonable price. However, I've been told at least $1K for a prototype, so the cost-to-benefit would probably not be worth it.
Maybe one of the guys supplying the ME VI manifold would be able to find one.
#26
Did anyone ever notice that the Budget Y-pipes took this into account? They use a smaller diameter pipe in the rear to make up for the larger, longer front pipe. This is supposed to equal out the exhaust pulses much like the equal length piping.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
My Coffee
New Member Introductions
15
06-06-2017 02:01 PM