General Maxima Discussion This a general area for Maxima discussions for all years. For more specific questions, visit one of the generation-specific forums.

zero to sixty in 4.8 seconds

Old Dec 4, 2002 | 04:49 PM
  #1  
turbo97SE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,035
From: Fort Collins, Colorado
zero to sixty in 4.8 seconds

Hi guys

I have never really thought about doing this test before. Today I decided to try it out. I did the measurement by two methods:

1. using my turbo timer which has a 0-60 function
2. g-tech pro

I consistently got below 5 seconds. I even got 5.5 seconds with passengers! I went up and down the same stretch of road to make sure that there was no gravity (going down hill) effects.

The g-tech consistently read about 0.1 to 0.2 seconds faster than the turbo timer. I know that these devices are not the most accurate, but they were pretty close considering they use two completely different methods of measuring.

It's fun but kind of rough on the engine and tranny!

By the way, this is at 5000 ft above sea level.
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 04:50 PM
  #2  
SuDZ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,530
Nice.

SuDZ
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 04:51 PM
  #3  
gtr_rider's Avatar
192.168.1.1
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 17,617
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 04:51 PM
  #4  
Bags's Avatar
VG Ridah's Biatch Hoe
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,472
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 04:54 PM
  #5  
emax02's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 8,162
Re: zero to sixty in 4.8 seconds

Originally posted by turbo97SE
Hi guys

I have never really thought about doing this test before. Today I decided to try it out. I did the measurement by two methods:

1. using my turbo timer which has a 0-60 function
2. g-tech pro

I consistently got below 5 seconds. I even got 5.5 seconds with passengers! I went up and down the same stretch of road to make sure that there was no gravity (going down hill) effects.

The g-tech consistently read about 0.1 to 0.2 seconds faster than the turbo timer. I know that these devices are not the most accurate, but they were pretty close considering they use two completely different methods of measuring.

It's fun but kind of rough on the engine and tranny!

By the way, this is at 5000 ft above sea level.

Check out this 0-60 calculator http://www.auburnextremeracing.com/info/60_times/ . You can put your track times in there and get a pretty accurate reading. I got 4.75 0-60 there (track's tire compound helps a bit)
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 04:56 PM
  #6  
SuDZ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,530
And you boost kicks in a bit high right? Like 4K or so? I wonder if you could get even better times with the boost hitting just a bit lower like 3K or at sea level.

SuDZ
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 06:20 PM
  #7  
nismo2020's Avatar
Needs non-Maxima Friends
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,764
can it do 1/4 times?
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 06:31 PM
  #8  
Jamsan's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,958
the g-tech does, but i ran a 14.9 on it

under 5 secs is swweeeeett
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 07:13 PM
  #9  
95emeraldgxe's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 8,653
your in dodge viper territory now
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 07:39 PM
  #10  
turbo97SE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,035
From: Fort Collins, Colorado
Originally posted by SuDZ
And you boost kicks in a bit high right? Like 4K or so? I wonder if you could get even better times with the boost hitting just a bit lower like 3K or at sea level.

SuDZ
I think I could do better at sea level. As far as boost hitting earlier, I don't think you want it too much earlier. Probably 3500 is as early as you should go. My tires started to lose traction as I pulled through the gears and they're much heavier than my stock '97 rims.

I have tried the 1/4 mile thing but I hit 100 mph very quickly before 1/4 measurement is done and I shut it down at 100mph.
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 07:50 PM
  #11  
Jamsan's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,958
Originally posted by turbo97SE


I think I could do better at sea level. As far as boost hitting earlier, I don't think you want it too much earlier. Probably 3500 is as early as you should go. My tires started to lose traction as I pulled through the gears and they're much heavier than my stock '97 rims.

I have tried the 1/4 mile thing but I hit 100 mph very quickly before 1/4 measurement is done and I shut it down at 100mph.
keep going
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 08:06 PM
  #12  
BEJAY1's Avatar
Conecarver
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,851
From: NW Chicago burbs
Re: Re: zero to sixty in 4.8 seconds

Originally posted by emax95

Check out this 0-60 calculator http://www.auburnextremeracing.com/info/60_times/ . You can put your track times in there and get a pretty accurate reading. I got 4.75 0-60 there (track's tire compound helps a bit)
Nice tool. Plugged in the last car I ran against. 1.57sec 0-60 I nearly had him.
Timeslips
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 09:25 PM
  #13  
KJ2THEMAX's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 131
And what was it, may I ask that pulled an E/T of 9.4?
Old Dec 4, 2002 | 09:33 PM
  #14  
Y2KSESteve's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,308
Wow thats fast.
Old Dec 5, 2002 | 04:43 AM
  #15  
carnal_c30's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 7,799
From: Everywhere, CA
very nice Nigel
Old Dec 5, 2002 | 05:06 AM
  #16  
BEJAY1's Avatar
Conecarver
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,851
From: NW Chicago burbs
Originally posted by KJ2THEMAX
And what was it, may I ask that pulled an E/T of 9.4?
Unfortunately I don't remember. It pulled up after me and trapped before I even hit the 1/8th. Maybe a plane.
Old Dec 5, 2002 | 06:07 AM
  #17  
Padsy's Avatar
Boost.....
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,628
Old Dec 5, 2002 | 06:12 AM
  #18  
Conrad283's Avatar
I need a truck
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 73,115
From: Naples, Fl
awesome
Old Dec 5, 2002 | 10:58 AM
  #19  
SuDZ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,530
I dont want to start the whole "Corrected time are crap, you will be killed for asking" like in the 1/4 mile talks all the time. But just for kicks is there a way to calculate out the 0 - 60 times difference for him being at such a high altitude and figure it out for if he was at sea level?

SuDZ
Old Dec 5, 2002 | 11:00 AM
  #20  
Padsy's Avatar
Boost.....
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,628
Originally posted by SuDZ
I dont want to start the whole "Corrected time are crap, you will be killed for asking" like in the 1/4 mile talks all the time. But just for kicks is there a way to calculate out the 0 - 60 times difference for him being at such a high altitude and figure it out for if he was at sea level?

SuDZ
It's all relative.
Old Dec 5, 2002 | 07:36 PM
  #21  
hlh0501's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,371
altitude does not effect turbo cars as it does n/a cars.. most turbo cars run very close to same at dif. altitudes
Old Dec 5, 2002 | 07:48 PM
  #22  
SuDZ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,530
Originally posted by hlh0501
altitude does not effect turbo cars as it does n/a cars.. most turbo cars run very close to same at dif. altitudes
Why is that?

SuDZ
Old Dec 5, 2002 | 10:33 PM
  #23  
fnkmaster's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 750
Originally posted by SuDZ


Why is that?

SuDZ
cos it compensates for air density and power loss at higher altitudes. a sc doesnt.
Old Dec 5, 2002 | 10:45 PM
  #24  
5.0THIS's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 136
Originally posted by SuDZ


Why is that?

SuDZ
a turbo can pump almost the same air pressure into the motor as it can at sea level, it just has to work harder to do it, and it takes slightly longer as well. A supercharger spins at the same rate via the motor, so it cant make the same boost as at sea level, but with those it's just a matter of spinning the blower faster.
Old Dec 6, 2002 | 07:42 AM
  #25  
JAIMECBR900's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,084
Re: Re: zero to sixty in 4.8 seconds

Originally posted by emax95



Check out this 0-60 calculator http://www.auburnextremeracing.com/info/60_times/ . You can put your track times in there and get a pretty accurate reading. I got 4.75 0-60 there (track's tire compound helps a bit)
I wish that calculator was accurate...it said I did 4.2 0-60 on my good 1/4 run....
Old Dec 6, 2002 | 08:45 PM
  #26  
jemartin's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 60
Was it a Lingenfelter Corvette

They do a quarter mile time of 9.2 seconds consistantly and have a 0-60 time of 1.97 Seconds making it the fastest STREET LEGAL car on the market. Also a Top speed of 250 MPH doesn't hurt either all for the penny pincher price of $150,000, you can buy 5 of them for every Mclaren F1 and it is even faster than that. Any buyers
Old Dec 7, 2002 | 05:23 AM
  #27  
nismo2020's Avatar
Needs non-Maxima Friends
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,764
Re: Re: Re: zero to sixty in 4.8 seconds

Originally posted by JAIMECBR900


I wish that calculator was accurate...it said I did 4.2 0-60 on my good 1/4 run....
its possible
Old Dec 7, 2002 | 08:03 AM
  #28  
dwapenyi's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 5,998
Just to elaborate, the wastegate or BOV in turbo cars does alot of work bleeding off excess boost that turbos almost always make. They open only at a certain pressure. At high altidudes, the pressure takes a wee bit longer to reach, and the wastegate still stays closed until that pressure is reached, so the turbo is still able to provide full boost.

I luuuuv turbos

DW


Originally posted by fnkmaster


cos it compensates for air density and power loss at higher altitudes. a sc doesnt.
Old Dec 7, 2002 | 10:50 AM
  #29  
BLaZin 2k MaX's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,019
Keep up the good work.
Old Dec 7, 2002 | 01:07 PM
  #30  
hakk97se's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,430
What were you boosting to? PSI? 11?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aw11power
Supercharged/Turbocharged
161
Oct 10, 2021 04:57 AM
AaronL
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
15
Aug 8, 2020 10:31 AM
TKHanson
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
6
Nov 24, 2018 01:39 AM
asianstyle
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
4
Sep 10, 2015 11:30 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:36 AM.