General Maxima Discussion This a general area for Maxima discussions for all years. For more specific questions, visit one of the generation-specific forums.

2000 VI is now on and running on my 96

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-20-2004, 06:56 AM
  #161  
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
SR20DEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 6,663
Originally Posted by Thaniel
Maybe the 2004 has 2 runners?
Nope.


And I am still not convinvced that the 2k1 manifold doesn't have two runners. I'll find the correct answer at lunch time.
SR20DEN is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 06:57 AM
  #162  
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
IceY2K1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Me either, but unless you disect one like Thaniel says, I don't think you can tell.

Originally Posted by SR20DEN
Nope.
And I am still not convinvced that the 2k1 manifold doesn't have two runners. I'll find the correct answer at lunch time.
IceY2K1 is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 07:10 AM
  #163  
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
SR20DEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 6,663
I know I have seen pictures of this thing and I have seen 6 butterflies. Sooner or later I will find that info again.
SR20DEN is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 07:29 AM
  #164  
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
IceY2K1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
I can say this...it's ONLY the main plenum-->box part I'm in question about.

The power valve side DEFINITELY has two runners merging, long over the top and short underneath. The short underneath runners(coming from the box) are covered by the power valve and if you turn the VIAS rod, it opens to uncover the shorter runners. However, the long runner is still open.

If the main plenum dumps into a second plenum box that at least the short runners ALL share, it's still a dual runner intake IMO. It just has a dual tank design vs. single like the 2K2s.

How does the MEVI work?
IceY2K1 is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 07:33 AM
  #165  
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
IceY2K1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Yes...IMO.

I think that would be the BEST way to go. However, getting all the vacuum lines/sensor connections/etc. converted would probably be a major task until a few people document what goes where.

I'd keep the old ECU of course. Hopefully, all the sensors are compatible.

Originally Posted by MaxSpeedSE
It was asked a couple pages back, and i dont recall anyone answering... with the manifold clearing the hood and firewall..Could a 2000-2001 just be swaped into the 4th gen?

-Chris
IceY2K1 is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 07:45 AM
  #166  
Senior Member
 
Thaniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 217
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
I know I have seen pictures of this thing and I have seen 6 butterflies. Sooner or later I will find that info again.
The MEVI has butterfly valves. The DE-K has one nylon bar with flats molded into it. It is one piece (nice thing is no chance for the screws to come loose and fall in the engine as there aren't any on bar). Each cylinder has only one opening into the chamber. The bar or Powervalve rotates to let air flow into the chamber. From there it has no where to go except out through a different cylinders runner. There is no second opening. one for each cylinder that's it.

Once ICE removes the power valve and looks in he can report back. I'll also try and get some pics looking in from the cut side, although I don't have a place to post them.

It still helps performance (dynos are proof) but It is not a 2 runner system as I had previously thought.

If I understand how the MEVI works it is the exact same. THE plate that bolts on to the top is the top of the chamber. when the butterflys open it allows the runners to be connected (throught the chamber). closed they breath through their own runner.

I think performance differences between MEVI and DE-K intakes would be subtle due to the slightly different contours of the runners and valves (all else being equal which it rarely is).

I just find the whole thing interesting. I like knowing how stuff works.
Thaniel is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 07:54 AM
  #167  
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
SteVTEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,060
SAE TECHNICAL
PAPER SERIES 2000-01-0668
Second Generation of High-Response V6
Engine Series (3.0 and 3.5 Liters)
Toshiya Arai, Junichi Yajima,
Keiichi Murata and Masahiro Hibino
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.

Cross Sectional view of the VQ35DE



You can clearly see the multiple path setup in the runners, and the red circle is where the valve is. When it's closed, air follows the long path with the 180 degree turn for low-end torque. At higher revs above 3800rpm the valve opens and air follows the shorter direct path from the upper into the lower intake manifold.

Unfortunately the document doesn't have a diagram of the DE-K. Also, I'm not sure "which" VQ35DE this is. If the 02-03 Maxima upper IM does NOT look like this then that would go a long way towards unravelling the whole VQ35DE "Series II, Series II.5, Series III" mystery.
SteVTEC is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 08:03 AM
  #168  
Hooooooonda.....
iTrader: (2)
 
DAVE Sz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chiiiii
Posts: 8,105
No one is disagreeing that there is one opening per cylinder. What ICE was saying that there are 2 runners inside the plenum that in the end use the same opening to push air into the cylinders. Look at the de-k manifold, it looks like it has a hump compared to the DE. The way it looks you can conclude that the longer runners are the ones the you see from the top and the short ones are under those. They aren't bent like the long ones making them starighter and shorter. When you hit 5k rpm, the butterflies open and the air takes the shorter path which is the lower runners. Where the MEVI uses the extra space to change the sound of the incoming air to make power, the DE-K uses a different path for the air to get power.
DAVE Sz is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 08:13 AM
  #169  
Dyno plot says I have the most area under the Administrator curve
 
SteVTEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,060
Rather, the MEVI (at least how I understand it from what I know), changes the resonant frequency of the upper IM itself such that the manifold works optimally at higher RPMs. From another technical document I have, it "looks like" a side branch resonator setup which would accomplish just that. Both setups (multiple path runners, or multiple resonance single path) are both just different ways of accomplishing the same thing.
SteVTEC is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 08:22 AM
  #170  
Bacon Lover
iTrader: (34)
 
Tatanko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 7,672
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
Yes...IMO.

I think that would be the BEST way to go. However, getting all the vacuum lines/sensor connections/etc. converted would probably be a major task until a few people document what goes where.

I'd keep the old ECU of course. Hopefully, all the sensors are compatible.
If it's possible to do all of this, I personally would (when I actually get the car) be willing to try this. However, I wouldn't want to do it if I couldn't use an older ECU (95 or 96 so it's reprogrammable). But, the only way to find out is to try I guess. Another thing that concerns me is the ability to do stuff like the stroker engine or a VQ35 shortblock swap like people have done/are doing with the VQ30DE. It seems like it should be able to be done the same way, but...?

Originally Posted by SteVTEC
Unfortunately the document doesn't have a diagram of the DE-K. Also, I'm not sure "which" VQ35DE this is. If the 02-03 Maxima upper IM does NOT look like this then that would go a long way towards unravelling the whole VQ35DE "Series II, Series II.5, Series III" mystery.
And if the 02-03 Maxima doesn't have it, there's another way those guys could go about getting power like we're doing with the DE-K manifold
Tatanko is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 08:30 AM
  #171  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
BSwithTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,410
It seems the DE-k manifold is quite similar to the MEVI. From what I can see on mine it looks like the box on the lower may shorten the path somewhat but it still uses the same runners. Almost like it opens up the manifold so that it can hold a greater volume of air and get it to the cylinders quicker. I haven't pulled the valve out but I did look up into the manifold and move the valve back and forth.

I've been looking at this IACV problem for the last couple of days. I had mentioned in a different thread about maybe running without the EGR. If this will work properly without the EGR, I have made a bracket that will mount the IACV in the hole presently used by the EGR. Now, I realize this is not for everyone as most have to run their EGR but it simplifies the install somwhat as now there is a simple plate that bolts to the bottom of the manifold. Keeps the throttle body from being so far away and the IACV is in relatively the same place. Only problem I can see is whether or not there is room for the IACV to hang down. I think there will be but haven't had time to fit it up to the motor yet.

Any thoughts on this? It really hinges on two things: 1) How will the motor run without an operating EGR? 2) Is there sufficient clearance for the IACV to hang below?
BSwithTF is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 08:35 AM
  #172  
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
IceY2K1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Originally Posted by Thaniel
Each cylinder has only one opening into the chamber.
Yes, into the primary chamber after the throttle-body, however there is a secondary chamber that feeds the short runners that the longer runner NEVER sees.

The bar or Powervalve rotates to let air flow into the chamber.
You mean cylinder, right? The power valve(nylon bar) prevents airflow EXITing the secondary chamber into the cylinder from the shorter runner.

Or are you saying that the power valve opens/closes airflow from the primary chamber to the secondary chamber?

From there it has no where to go except out through a different cylinders runner.
DEK manifold? I don't get that. Please explain.

There is no second opening. one for each cylinder that's it.
Agree...right after the power valve(nylon rod), the long and short MERGE into *ONE* runner before entering the lower manifold. That doesn't mean it's not a DUAL runner before that though.

My impression of the manifold showed the longer runner(over the top) connects to the primary chamber behind the throttle body. However, I *THINK* that runner was split into two paths, one continues as the long runner the other dumped into a secondary chamber(box underneath) that you say is common to all short runners.

If the power valve is closed, all air flow will travel through the long runner split bypassing the secondary chamber and merging AFTER the power valve with the SHORT runner.

If the power valve is open, all air flow will travel through the long runner split into the secondary chamber, past the power valve, and merging AFTER the power valve with the LONG runner.

Summary of 2-Paths:
-----------------------
Power valve CLOSED(long path):
TB-->Primary Plenum-->Long runner-->Merge-->LIM
Power valve OPEN(short path):
TB-->Primary Plenum-->Long runner-->Secondary Plenum-->Power valve-->Merge-->LIM

Once ICE removes the power valve and looks in he can report back. I'll also try and get some pics looking in from the cut side, although I don't have a place to post them.
Just throw them in a www.cardomain.com page.

It still helps performance (dynos are proof) but It is not a 2 runner system as I had previously thought.
I think we're getting there, but there is one ENTRANCE(a common starting point) and one EXIT(common finishing point), but it splits in the middle to form a second shorter path, isn't that a 2-runner system? I think so.

I think performance differences between MEVI and DE-K intakes would be subtle due to the slightly different contours of the runners and valves (all else being equal which it rarely is).

I just find the whole thing interesting. I like knowing how stuff works.
Ignoring the composite plastic vs. metal advantages, you don't consider the DEK to be a more "stream-lined" path for air to travel then the MEVI?
IceY2K1 is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 08:37 AM
  #173  
Old Timer
 
d_warner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Huntsville, TX
Posts: 1,433
OK. I've read this thread and nobody has asked, so I will. The piece that is custom fabricated mates the idle air control valve and other sensors to the 5th gen manifold. and also serves as an adapter plate for the throttle body. Would it be possible to just use the idle air control valve and throttle body from the DE-K motor in the 4th gen? You're already messing with wiring on the injectors, whats 3 more sensors and valves? Or was there another reason for fabricating this piece?

David
d_warner is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 08:38 AM
  #174  
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
IceY2K1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Definitely not a VQ35 Maxima IMO looking at SR's pics.

Originally Posted by SteVTEC
Unfortunately the document doesn't have a diagram of the DE-K. Also, I'm not sure "which" VQ35DE this is. If the 02-03 Maxima upper IM does NOT look like this then that would go a long way towards unravelling the whole VQ35DE "Series II, Series II.5, Series III" mystery.
IceY2K1 is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 08:45 AM
  #175  
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
IceY2K1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
I agree...a DEK throttle-body/IACV combo would be better, but doubt it would work withOUT the 5th gen ECU.

The reason I say that is that the IACV is a stepper motor that is controlled by the ECU.

Maybe the 4th gen uses a similar IACV?

Originally Posted by d_warner
OK. I've read this thread and nobody has asked, so I will. The piece that is custom fabricated mates the idle air control valve and other sensors to the 5th gen manifold. and also serves as an adapter plate for the throttle body. Would it be possible to just use the idle air control valve and throttle body from the DE-K motor in the 4th gen? You're already messing with wiring on the injectors, whats 3 more sensors and valves? Or was there another reason for fabricating this piece?

David
IceY2K1 is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 10:34 AM
  #176  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
BSwithTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,410
No go on the bracket. I did some test fitting to see if it'd squeeze back there and it won't. It's squeezed up to tight to the rear valve cover/head. Back to the drawing board.
BSwithTF is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 10:40 AM
  #177  
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
IceY2K1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
I mentioned it before, but if someone doesn't come up with a better way for the IACV, I can PROBABLY duplicate/mass produce those IACV adapter plates.

I'd just need one or at least some CAD type drawing to give a CNC machinest friend and see what he would charge for something like that. Wouldn't hurt to ask him.
IceY2K1 is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 11:34 AM
  #178  
wat
iTrader: (5)
 
BlueC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,628
Seems like it'd be cheaper to go find a 2k/2k1 engine at a junkyard. I see them on car-part.com for as low as $400. Either swap it in (if it works), or use the manifold, injectors, etc. Then you could part the rest of the stuff, or keep it for another project.
BlueC is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 11:44 AM
  #179  
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
IceY2K1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Exactly....

A complete DEK would be best, but you could probably part out the short-block/heads for half, if not more.

If anyone is thinking about try it, I may be interested in the heads w/all guts.
IceY2K1 is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 12:14 PM
  #180  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
BSwithTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,410
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
I mentioned it before, but if someone doesn't come up with a better way for the IACV, I can PROBABLY duplicate/mass produce those IACV adapter plates.

I'd just need one or at least some CAD type drawing to give a CNC machinest friend and see what he would charge for something like that. Wouldn't hurt to ask him.
That may be what we have to do. The more I look at it, that's about the only way to do it. Now if we can talk krismax into making another one. This piece is my only hurdle at this point.

As far as motors go, I watched Ebay forever and found mine. '00 DE-k w/ auto tranny: $465. The tranny had a small chunk out of the case so the guy just threw it in to get rid of it. Should be fixable but even if it's not, I got a '00 DE-k with 16k miles on it for dirt cheap. They're out there, just gotta look all over and be patient.

My swap will be a little different though. I've removed the A/C and I'll probably do away with the P/S to ease the swap. Maybe later doing the electric P/S like krismax did. I'll be sure to note any difference's and problems that I encounter going from a DE to a DE-k so I can pass them on.
BSwithTF is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 12:29 PM
  #181  
Bacon Lover
iTrader: (34)
 
Tatanko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 7,672
Originally Posted by BSwithTF
I'll be sure to note any difference's and problems that I encounter going from a DE to a DE-k so I can pass them on.
Thank you
Tatanko is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 12:34 PM
  #182  
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
IceY2K1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245


Dixit picked up his DEK w/tranny for SUPER cheap. Guys in junkyards on www.car-part.com seem to want BIG money, but little yards don't.

Just got to look hard enough, I guess.


Originally Posted by BSwithTF
That may be what we have to do. The more I look at it, that's about the only way to do it. Now if we can talk krismax into making another one. This piece is my only hurdle at this point.

As far as motors go, I watched Ebay forever and found mine. '00 DE-k w/ auto tranny: $465. The tranny had a small chunk out of the case so the guy just threw it in to get rid of it. Should be fixable but even if it's not, I got a '00 DE-k with 16k miles on it for dirt cheap. They're out there, just gotta look all over and be patient.

My swap will be a little different though. I've removed the A/C and I'll probably do away with the P/S to ease the swap. Maybe later doing the electric P/S like krismax did. I'll be sure to note any difference's and problems that I encounter going from a DE to a DE-k so I can pass them on.
IceY2K1 is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 02:29 PM
  #183  
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
SR20DEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 6,663
Originally Posted by SteVTEC
SAE TECHNICAL
PAPER SERIES 2000-01-0668
Second Generation of High-Response V6
Engine Series (3.0 and 3.5 Liters)
Toshiya Arai, Junichi Yajima,
Keiichi Murata and Masahiro Hibino
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.

Cross Sectional view of the VQ35DE


Notice the shape and directions of the exhaust manifolds. This is the Pathfinder engine.

Unless this is an overseas version. No other US spec RWD VQ35 uses a VI setup (other than Pathfinder/QX4).

Also take a look at the link on this page.

Variable Intake system
SR20DEN is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 02:34 PM
  #184  
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
SR20DEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 6,663
Originally Posted by Tatanko
And if the 02-03 Maxima doesn't have it, there's another way those guys could go about getting power like we're doing with the DE-K manifold
The 2k2 manifold is VI based just not the same as the other ones. And I already made mine peak out the way the DE-K manifold does.
SR20DEN is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 02:45 PM
  #185  
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
SR20DEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 6,663
Originally Posted by IceY2K1

I think we're getting there, but there is one ENTRANCE(a common starting point) and one EXIT(common finishing point), but it splits in the middle to form a second shorter path, isn't that a 2-runner system? I think so.



That IS a two runner system. The longer path goes over the top and the shorter 'bypass' path opens up underneith.
SR20DEN is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 03:09 PM
  #186  
Old Timer
 
d_warner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Huntsville, TX
Posts: 1,433
Yeah man, but I think what everyone is saying is that the US made VQ35's don't use the Dual runners like the overseas cars. That photo is a PathFinder 3.5. I could be wrong though. Maybe I just need to re-read.
d_warner is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 03:19 PM
  #187  
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
SR20DEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 6,663
Hmmmmm..... this Pathfinder setup looks veeerrryyy interesting.

SR20DEN is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 03:53 PM
  #188  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
BSwithTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,410
Now THAT is a dual runner set-up. Who's gonna try this one?
BSwithTF is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 04:04 PM
  #189  
Father of the 00 VI
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
krismax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: amsterdam ,new york
Posts: 3,330
Originally Posted by BlueC
Seems like it'd be cheaper to go find a 2k/2k1 engine at a junkyard. I see them on car-part.com for as low as $400. Either swap it in (if it works), or use the manifold, injectors, etc. Then you could part the rest of the stuff, or keep it for another project.
You guys need to understand that if you use the 2000-2001 engine all forth gen sensors need to be switched over or you can use 5 th gen ecu .No sensors can be used on 5th gen . Or you can wire a standalone ecu in.
I find it funny how I figured the easiest way to do this now people are looking for a more complex way of doing this. My adapter is just a square with holes in it with the 4th gen IACV face welded on .Solves alll the problems.
krismax is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 04:12 PM
  #190  
OT n00bs FTMFCSL
iTrader: (1)
 
Quicksilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,413
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
Hmmmmm..... this Pathfinder setup looks veeerrryyy interesting.

It does look doable, but the RWD thing might be hard to overcome. Anyway, Adam (maximaman777) and I are doing the G35 intake thing this Saturday. I'll make sure to take plenty of pictures and document everything...
Quicksilver is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 05:10 PM
  #191  
Bacon Lover
iTrader: (34)
 
Tatanko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 7,672
Originally Posted by krismax
You guys need to understand that if you use the 2000-2001 engine all forth gen sensors need to be switched over or you can use 5 th gen ecu .No sensors can be used on 5th gen . Or you can wire a standalone ecu in.
I find it funny how I figured the easiest way to do this now people are looking for a more complex way of doing this. My adapter is just a square with holes in it with the 4th gen IACV face welded on .Solves alll the problems.
Is a 4th gen ECU do-able with the entire DE-K? That way you wouldn't have to switch over to any of the 5th gen sensors.
Tatanko is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 05:13 PM
  #192  
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
SR20DEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 6,663
Originally Posted by Quicksilver
It does look doable, but the RWD thing might be hard to overcome. Anyway, Adam (maximaman777) and I are doing the G35 intake thing this Saturday. I'll make sure to take plenty of pictures and document everything...
I still don't think it's doable without excessive amounts of custom fabbing. But good luck.

Next week I plan to start on stage II of my secret sauce project. This one might fare better for the automatics.
SR20DEN is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 05:15 PM
  #193  
Father of the 00 VI
Thread Starter
iTrader: (15)
 
krismax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: amsterdam ,new york
Posts: 3,330
Originally Posted by Tatanko
Is a 4th gen ECU do-able with the entire DE-K? That way you wouldn't have to switch over to any of the 5th gen sensors.
You cant use 5th gen sensors without 5th gen ecu. Yes you can use the entire engine but it will take alot of work and time . And you still have to do the same thing I did with the DE-k manifold.
krismax is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 05:22 PM
  #194  
Bacon Lover
iTrader: (34)
 
Tatanko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 7,672
Originally Posted by krismax
You cant use 5th gen sensors without 5th gen ecu. Yes you can use the entire engine but it will take alot of work and time . And you still have to do the same thing I did with the DE-k manifold.
So then to use the entire DE-K engine you'd HAVE to have a 5th gen ECU? When I said 4th gen ECU I should have been more specific, I meant specifically from a 99.5.
Tatanko is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 05:26 PM
  #195  
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
SR20DEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 6,663
Originally Posted by Tatanko
So then to use the entire DE-K engine you'd HAVE to have a 5th gen ECU? When I said 4th gen ECU I should have been more specific, I meant specifically from a 99.5.
Using the A33 ECU would be ideal but I think the project can be done without it. You would need a rpm switch to control the VI though.
SR20DEN is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 05:35 PM
  #196  
wat
iTrader: (5)
 
BlueC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,628
Well, what if you only use the DE-K cyl heads and the intake manifold (and other accessories needed).... then will it still work with my ECU? (Im a 99.5 btw)
BlueC is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 06:05 PM
  #197  
Bacon Lover
iTrader: (34)
 
Tatanko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 7,672
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
Using the A33 ECU would be ideal but I think the project can be done without it. You would need a rpm switch to control the VI though.
Well the RPM switch is no big deal, it's just a matter of using the A32 ECU to keep everything you'd otherwise lose with an A33 ECU. Btw, does it matter what A32 ECU it is? Since there's like 4 different ones...
Tatanko is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 06:10 PM
  #198  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
BSwithTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,410
One thing I've noticed already is there is an additional coolant hose on the DE-k. It comes up from between the heads, in the valley where the knock sensor is located. Looks like it makes it impossible to get to the KS with the traditional method of extension with swivel. I think I may have to locate that pipe that connects the heads cause my '96 pipe isn't gonna work.

All the sensors/injectors/etc. on the DE-k use a different style connector. I noticed this while taking the wiring harness off. I like trhe new style much better than the DE style. Hell of a lot easier to disconnect.
BSwithTF is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 07:56 PM
  #199  
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
IceY2K1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Three words...YOU ARE CORRECT~!!!!!

First, I'd like to say WOW, what a fascinating, yet simple design. Explaining it withOUT pics will be tough, but I'll try.

There are two plenums, I'll call primary(behind throttle-body) and secondary(box underneath). The primary feeds the six LONG runners you see on top. These runners terminate into the lower intake manifold six ports. However, before they do, there is another path exiting the secondary plenum that merges, which is blocked by the power valve. The power valve is a long rectangular shaped rod which rotates somewhat like a vacuum cleaner brush, ie every section wall has a round O-ring, except it only turns 90-degrees. If the power valve is closed, it closes off the secondary plenum from any air entering or leaving, however inside it's ONE big open box, ie all six runners are connected.

When the power valve is closed, the primary plenum feeds the long runners and they dump into the lower intake manifold, nothing special.

Now, for the fascinating part, which I *THINK* I have figured out, but I could be wrong. When the power valve is open, the current cylinder performing an intake stroke draws from the closest source, ie secondary plenum, which the OTHER runners are now feeding. So, instead of the intake stroke drawing through a SINGLE long runner/primary plenum like under 5000rpm, it's now drawing through an effectively much LARGER volume contained in the secondary plenum, other FIVE long runners, and the primary plenum.

I don't have proof or anything, yet, however I'd be willing to bet this is a form of dynamic supercharging called "tuned-intake tube charging" or another version. Per my SAE handbook, tuned-intake tube charging is defined as:

In tuned-intake tube charging, short ducts connect groups of cylinders with the same ignition intervals to resonance chambers. These resonance chambers are connected to the atmosphere or a common chamber by tuned tubes, and act as Helmholtz resonators.

Helmholtz resonator damps sound in its natural frequency range and functions as a suction resonator. It is a through-flow resonator and amplifies at it's natural frequency, but thereafter it has a broad damping range.
Anyways, I'm GOING to take pics, I just have to find a digital camera and figure out a way to get clean shots.











Originally Posted by Thaniel
The DE-K has one nylon bar with flats molded into it. It is one piece (nice thing is no chance for the screws to come loose and fall in the engine as there aren't any on bar). Each cylinder has only one opening into the chamber. The bar or Powervalve rotates to let air flow into the chamber. From there it has no where to go except out through a different cylinders runner. There is no second opening. one for each cylinder that's it.

Once ICE removes the power valve and looks in he can report back. I'll also try and get some pics looking in from the cut side, although I don't have a place to post them.
IceY2K1 is offline  
Old 05-20-2004, 09:52 PM
  #200  
Hooooooonda.....
iTrader: (2)
 
DAVE Sz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chiiiii
Posts: 8,105
Why don't we all just ask VSAMAYLOV or whatever he's called what went into swapping the DE-K into the 4th gen? He said there was barely any modifications needed, moving the thermostat and stuff like that.
DAVE Sz is offline  


Quick Reply: 2000 VI is now on and running on my 96



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:39 AM.