3rd gen vs 4th gen
Originally Posted by MaDMaX024
functional VTC?? dont give me that "it only affects low end" BS. someone was shooting off how the difference between good and bad VTC is something like 12hp top end along with obvious low end differences.
ahh i cant wait to get my VE dyno'ed! even though i know i'm in for a big disappointment
ahh i cant wait to get my VE dyno'ed! even though i know i'm in for a big disappointment

Originally Posted by Maximan190
forgot to mention another little feature... VEs have a locking diff tranny and 4th gens have an open
Originally Posted by Dave B
It doesn't help you in the straightline though. In highspeed sweepers then it may help you, but I've never lite up my inside tire on a high speed turn. Maybe if I had the stock suspension and tires this would be a problem though.
Originally Posted by MrGone
I'm sorry, did you just say a LSD tranny does not help in straight line performance?
Well the RWD drag guys all use posi/lockers etc.. in their rear ends. And a LSD diffs are more suited to low speed tight turns where the weight of the car is dramaticly shifted to one side, unloading the inside tire(thus transfering more power to that inside tire *on a non-lsd equipped tranny*. ) Having a better suspension would help because the inside tire is less likely to lift off the ground or get as unweighted. But if it didn't help, why did Nissan go to the Helical lsd when they introduced the new 3.5 liter VQ in the maxima?
Originally Posted by Dave B
It doesn't help you in the straightline though. In highspeed sweepers then it may help you, but I've never lite up my inside tire on a high speed turn. Maybe if I had the stock suspension and tires this would be a problem though.
Originally Posted by Dave B
It doesn't help you in the straightline though. In highspeed sweepers then it may help you, but I've never lite up my inside tire on a high speed turn. Maybe if I had the stock suspension and tires this would be a problem though.
Hey Dave B I need 6 spark plugs and fuel filter for my VE
Originally Posted by MrGone
I'm sorry, did you just say a LSD tranny does not help in straight line performance?
Well the RWD drag guys all use posi/lockers etc.. in their rear ends. And a LSD diffs are more suited to low speed tight turns where the weight of the car is dramaticly shifted to one side, unloading the inside tire(thus transfering more power to that inside tire *on a non-lsd equipped tranny*. ) Having a better suspension would help because the inside tire is less likely to lift off the ground or get as unweighted. But if it didn't help, why did Nissan go to the Helical lsd when they introduced the new 3.5 liter VQ in the maxima?
I get some torque steer even in my VE now that I have the jwt ecu and mods. Most mags complain about torque steer in the 3.5 maximas not only in the turns but even in a straight line. What is torque steer? It's one wheel overtaking the other. So if you have enough power, LSDs are beneficial. It's also why all the 4-gen guys love to convert to the Canadian lsd. The reason why older maxima lsds probably don't do as much as they could is they are a viscous type. It only "locks" to about 25%. This is probably the reason why Nissan went helical in teh 3.5VQs. To get the "lock" up to about 30-35%. Better traction in the staight line launches/turns/etc....
What you saying about fwd/rwds don't make sense. Both need traction. Either both need it or not.
Originally Posted by Dave B
Agreed. I think the reason the HLSD is available is for 3.5 VQ is because all the torque. This car is a lot more suseptable to lighting up it's inside tire when the chassis is unloaded. It may also stop some of the strong torque steer when accelerating hard on uneven surfaces. It doesn't help for the straightline though.
Having owned both LSD and non-LSD VE's and a non LSD VQ, having the LSD helps out alot. There is substanically less unwanted wheel spin and torque steer and much more stable in the rain/snow/ice. Maybe its the amsoil, but it takes less than a second to get both wheels putting power to the ground.
My first maxima didn't have one, and I thought no biggy, it's not so bad, but after owning my 5spd I would never go back.
My first maxima didn't have one, and I thought no biggy, it's not so bad, but after owning my 5spd I would never go back.
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
I get some torque steer even in my VE now that I have the jwt ecu and mods.
It's also why all the 4-gen guys love to convert to the Canadian lsd.
What you saying about fwd/rwds don't make sense. Both need traction. Either both need it or not.
The 04 SRT4 with the LSD is no quicker in the 1/4 mile than the open diff 03 SRT4, but put these cars on a road course and the 04 is about 1.5 seconds quicker because it doesn't melt it's inside tire when boost comes online in the turn.
Originally Posted by KLoWnPR109
Find me a similarily modded VQ and I can settle this debate on video
Originally Posted by Dave B
Now if I saw all the VEs showing this type of high rpm breathing, I'd totally believe they posses better 70+mph acceleration than a VQ30DE....but not a VQ30DE with the MEVI/JWT ECU. You're making 175whp at 6500rpms where as we're making 190-195whp 

I'm not sure what you 4th gen guys know about the VE 'heat soak' but when I dyno'd my car was exihibiting as bad 'heat soak' as I've ever felt in it. I almost wussed out of the dyno as this was at a H-T.com event and I figured I was about to make a fool of myself by putting down 115 whp or something.
I really do believe had I dyno'd under better conditions and/or ECU I could've put down 190ish whp, but then again that's speculation that I cant really hang my hat on
Originally Posted by James92SE
True, but I'd venture to say that if I had the JWT ECU and/or a better condition engine, I believe my VE would put down 190-195ish whp as well.
I'm not sure what you 4th gen guys know about the VE 'heat soak' but when I dyno'd my car was exihibiting as bad 'heat soak' as I've ever felt in it. I almost wussed out of the dyno as this was at a H-T.com event and I figured I was about to make a fool of myself by putting down 115 whp or something.
I really do believe had I dyno'd under better conditions and/or ECU I could've put down 190ish whp, but then again that's speculation that I cant really hang my hat on
I'm not sure what you 4th gen guys know about the VE 'heat soak' but when I dyno'd my car was exihibiting as bad 'heat soak' as I've ever felt in it. I almost wussed out of the dyno as this was at a H-T.com event and I figured I was about to make a fool of myself by putting down 115 whp or something.
I really do believe had I dyno'd under better conditions and/or ECU I could've put down 190ish whp, but then again that's speculation that I cant really hang my hat on

I haven't dynoed with my JWT ECU, but this is what I made with the MEVI, Y-pipe, intake, and muffler (81 degree intake temp):

The JWT ECU on average is good for about 8-10whp/wtq at peak. I imagine I should be in the 200-205whp range with 95 octane and my stock sawblades.
Have you ever run your VE at the track?
Originally Posted by 1989MaxMan
3rd gen VE autos... might be a dead heat, but 5spd with same mods would kill you, even if the person sucked at the clutch...
Just because your car is newer doesnt mean that it is better
Brian
Just because your car is newer doesnt mean that it is better

Brian
Too bad I have a chemistry lab until 6pm... DOH
How about a saturday or sunday test session time 23rd or 24th? It is only another $8.
I havent read the IHRA rules, does a bad muffler need to be fixed b4 racing?
I know a nice straight road in Quincy.... game?
Brian
How about a saturday or sunday test session time 23rd or 24th? It is only another $8.
I havent read the IHRA rules, does a bad muffler need to be fixed b4 racing?
I know a nice straight road in Quincy.... game?
Brian
Different strokes for different folks people.
If everyone liked the same thing we would all have the same cars in our driveway. all of our houses would look alike etc. etc. Variety is the spice of life. {maximas rule
}
If everyone liked the same thing we would all have the same cars in our driveway. all of our houses would look alike etc. etc. Variety is the spice of life. {maximas rule
}
Originally Posted by 1989MaxMan
Too bad I have a chemistry lab until 6pm... DOH
How about a saturday or sunday test session time 23rd or 24th? It is only another $8.
I havent read the IHRA rules, does a bad muffler need to be fixed b4 racing?
I know a nice straight road in Quincy.... game?
Brian
How about a saturday or sunday test session time 23rd or 24th? It is only another $8.
I havent read the IHRA rules, does a bad muffler need to be fixed b4 racing?
I know a nice straight road in Quincy.... game?
Brian
Quincy, randolph Braintree. take your pic
. i would love to see a VE in action
Originally Posted by zack342
Quincy, randolph Braintree. take your pic
. i would love to see a VE in action
. i would love to see a VE in actioni'm owned by inspection sticker on the max (or lack there of for ANOTHER FREAKIN' WEEK!)
well just thought i would share that i did make it up to NE drageway last friday and was dissapointed that there were no third gen maximas. in any event i ran a 14.7@93MPH with a 2.2 60ft time. Also i have crappy sumitomo SRIXON4 all season tires. who needs a VLSD when you know how to launch. i also had a bunch of 14.9's and a 14.8@90MPH even thoughi missed 4th gear and rolled over the finish line.
Whoa look here, I took my boat out yesterday and look what I missed...
MrGone I live in SoCal: What is winter?
I own both now with almost the exact same mods, one car has more than 100k more miles than the other, so these arguments somewhat tell the truth now to me, but some people are still in denial.
MrGone I live in SoCal: What is winter?

I own both now with almost the exact same mods, one car has more than 100k more miles than the other, so these arguments somewhat tell the truth now to me, but some people are still in denial.
Originally Posted by zack342
i am going to settle this once and for alll...
the 4th gen is better looking than the 3rd gen and that is what decided it.
the 4th gen is better looking than the 3rd gen and that is what decided it.
Originally Posted by DanNY
that bubble butt tree trunk suspension 4th gen? 

My car has 110,XXX miles.
ps it has no top end and i don't even try i shifted at 6000rpm in every gear to achieve that 14.7 copies of some of my time slips can be found in the 1/4 mile forums.
have a nice day
Originally Posted by zack342
i stand by my observation, the truth is exactly that, the truth.
My car has 110,XXX miles.
ps it has no top end and i don't even try i shifted at 6000rpm in every gear to achieve that 14.7 copies of some of my time slips can be found in the 1/4 mile forums.
have a nice day
My car has 110,XXX miles.
ps it has no top end and i don't even try i shifted at 6000rpm in every gear to achieve that 14.7 copies of some of my time slips can be found in the 1/4 mile forums.
have a nice day
what are you talking about?
you said 4th gen is better looking...i said not that bubble butt tree trunk in the back. damn you new guys get overly sensitive about your 4th gens.
Originally Posted by DanNY
what are you talking about?
you said 4th gen is better looking...i said not that bubble butt tree trunk in the back. damn you new guys get overly sensitive about your 4th gens.
you said 4th gen is better looking...i said not that bubble butt tree trunk in the back. damn you new guys get overly sensitive about your 4th gens.
Originally Posted by DanNY
what are you talking about?
you said 4th gen is better looking...i said not that bubble butt tree trunk in the back. damn you new guys get overly sensitive about your 4th gens.
you said 4th gen is better looking...i said not that bubble butt tree trunk in the back. damn you new guys get overly sensitive about your 4th gens.
i am just bored at work.
Originally Posted by Ni_Nos_Maxima
o quite, you 3rd genners are just mad cause 4th gens look cooler 

NO WAY.... I would never buy a 4th gen based on looks, nor on handling.
Perhaps on reliability, but since we are tuning engines, that isnt a consideration for me.
Brian




right
