3rd gen vs 4th gen
Originally Posted by VQuick
For all I know Klown has nitrous and is heavily modded. Given the 3rd gen/4th gen partisianship displayed here, I wouldn't be inclined to believe anyone who vouched for his mods.
I also don't put up money online over stupid mine-is-better-than-yours bets with people I've never met in person.

I also don't put up money online over stupid mine-is-better-than-yours bets with people I've never met in person.

maybe one day i'll finish my VE and go out one night looking for 4th gens, bring a video camera and post the results...should be entertaining to say the least.
Originally Posted by Mizeree_X
I believe slammed is a 5-speed and Aaron is an auto though.
Originally Posted by KLoWnPR109
I'd be willing to go from a stop or a roll. Standing mile would get a little faster than I would prefer to go on the street
I really don't see how you'd stand a chance.
O crap look like im going to have to apologize for my stupid comments. but imho i still think the 3rd gen is a cool car, but I do not think its cooler then the 4th gen, I like the stance of the 3rd gen, but the stock rims just are blah, the 4th gen se rims look dope on it, but ah yeah the 4th gen is like the best out of all the gens with like some combos from the 5th gen. yee
---Ninos
---Ninos
Originally Posted by Dave B
Are you really serious with this? I've watched a VQ auto with an intake, y-pipe, and exhaust dyno 151whp/163wtq along with a very short powerband. The next car was a 95 GLE with just a y-pipe. It rolled 168whp/178wtq with a much more significant powerband.
I really don't see how you'd stand a chance.
I really don't see how you'd stand a chance.
Originally Posted by 1FSTMAX
Slammed95(4thgen) beat Aaron92se(3rdgen) in the 1/4 mi.
and doesn't have carbon fiber weight savings, including the non stock engine cover!
Originally Posted by MaDMaX024
thats why you get a proud 4th gen driver or two to inspect/observe the race. i've known klown for a while now, and he wouldnt lie about his mods but obviously that means nothing coming from a fellow third gen driver.
maybe one day i'll finish my VE and go out one night looking for 4th gens, bring a video camera and post the results...should be entertaining to say the least.
maybe one day i'll finish my VE and go out one night looking for 4th gens, bring a video camera and post the results...should be entertaining to say the least.
Originally Posted by KLoWnPR109
Most definetely. My car vs. a 4th gen automagic
I'll just see if my Dad wants to play around one of these days, who knows, maybe he'll bite

I wont go into the twisties for his sake though
Originally Posted by MrGone
I concour, and it is quite funny how some of you guys think its easy to turbo a car. If you want to turbo a 3rd gen, you build it yourself, we dont have any kits avaliable like 4th gens do. That has not detered a few members, but klown is not one of them.
just got a new credit card so i dont have to wait 3 weeks for my original company to process my payments (in full obviously)....now i really need to decide on a turbo..
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by 1FSTMAX
Slammed95(4thgen) beat Aaron92se(3rdgen) in the 1/4 mi.
but I like a car that's also fun in the twisties myself..
The 3rd Gen was also pretty sharp for it's time...

GO IRS!!!!
Originally Posted by vqman
I guess if you live your life one 1/4 mile at a time then:
but I like a car that's also fun in the twisties myself..
The 3rd Gen was also pretty sharp for it's time...

GO IRS!!!!
but I like a car that's also fun in the twisties myself..
The 3rd Gen was also pretty sharp for it's time...

GO IRS!!!!
and 3rd gens seats look way better than the 4th gen boxes
i see a lot of you guys are taking this the wrong way. there are many reasons for beating somebody ex. bad tranny, poor condition, not really racing etc. here is my reasoning timetable
cars i have owned
1986 max se five speed- the most incredible max i have ever owned. suspension was adj and the best ever. the only thing they had available was the throttlebody at the time. smoked many and all doubters of that era car was a sleeper.
1988 max se-totaled max so got this one thats how much the 86 impressed me. did custom exhaust.
1992 max se-auto- wow what hp and the suspension was nice and tight and handles well with out upgrading suspension. did full custom 3 in exhaust open air filter. car whipped butt top end much more responsive than 4th gen and managed to earn respect from fellow b.m.w 5 series guys.
1996 max se five speed- stock the car didnt respond like my 92 but seemed to have a quicker take off but lower top end. actually raced side by side my 92 and 96 the 92 pulled a little harder upstairs but the 96 would take off quicker. after s/c install forget it the car was a monster.
1997 max se auto- s/c and nitrous set-up full suspension and exhaust. now this is by far the quickest and tightest set up i've owned and i loved it i loved each and everyone so i cant be bias but i can say from the original question that there is no winner unless you own a 2005 which is obviously in a different class alltogether.
cars i have owned
1986 max se five speed- the most incredible max i have ever owned. suspension was adj and the best ever. the only thing they had available was the throttlebody at the time. smoked many and all doubters of that era car was a sleeper.
1988 max se-totaled max so got this one thats how much the 86 impressed me. did custom exhaust.
1992 max se-auto- wow what hp and the suspension was nice and tight and handles well with out upgrading suspension. did full custom 3 in exhaust open air filter. car whipped butt top end much more responsive than 4th gen and managed to earn respect from fellow b.m.w 5 series guys.
1996 max se five speed- stock the car didnt respond like my 92 but seemed to have a quicker take off but lower top end. actually raced side by side my 92 and 96 the 92 pulled a little harder upstairs but the 96 would take off quicker. after s/c install forget it the car was a monster.
1997 max se auto- s/c and nitrous set-up full suspension and exhaust. now this is by far the quickest and tightest set up i've owned and i loved it i loved each and everyone so i cant be bias but i can say from the original question that there is no winner unless you own a 2005 which is obviously in a different class alltogether.
I bought my 93 VE for $2,350 with only the passenger-side window regulator wrong, everything else works and the body paint still shines. I couldn't be happier. IMHO This discussion shows how passionate we are of our Maxima's
Originally Posted by MaDMaX024
good scenario..how about you find two 4th gen guys in his area to vouch for legitimacy?
now how about someone take my bet of $100 on klown winning?
now how about someone take my bet of $100 on klown winning?
Originally Posted by zack342
i tried this i offered to race 1989Maxman a coupe pages back . he has a 3rd gen VE speed with i belive same mods as me I/E/Y. i got no response. he lived one town over from me.
Originally Posted by zack342
hey to each his own, i am not going to post in this thread anymore because i don't wanna get banned again...
Originally Posted by zack342
i tried this i offered to race 1989Maxman a coupe pages back . he has a 3rd gen VE speed with i belive same mods as me I/E/Y. i got no response. he lived one town over from me.
why is this thread still going? both cars where great in there time even though i think 3rd gens quality is better than 4th gen. at least the 95/96 anyway. pat we should race one of these days just for the hell of it. hehe.
Originally Posted by glass88jaw
why is this thread still going? both cars where great in there time even though i think 3rd gens quality is better than 4th gen. at least the 95/96 anyway. pat we should race one of these days just for the hell of it. hehe.
Originally Posted by MrGone
Aaron is an auto
and doesn't have carbon fiber weight savings, including the non stock engine cover!
and doesn't have carbon fiber weight savings, including the non stock engine cover!

aaron also took out his pillars out for weight savings..
Originally Posted by dmontzmax
No, he was auto at the time. He beat Aaron by around 1 bumper or 1' I was the only .org member that witnessed the race. It was CLOSE Slammed got a better reaction and had a slightly better 60'-1/8 then it was all Aaron on the top end.
he beat aaron two times.. out of the three that they raced
Originally Posted by 1FSTMAX
he beat aaron two times.. out of the three that they raced
I also wanted to throw something in here. Alot of 3rd gen members tend to think the 4th gen handles crappy. It actually handles surprisingly well for having a beam. I am impressed at how it sticks to some turns.
Originally Posted by MrGone
I concour, and it is quite funny how some of you guys think its easy to turbo a car. If you want to turbo a 3rd gen, you build it yourself, we dont have any kits avaliable like 4th gens do.
Originally Posted by VQuick
I was looking at the rear beam under a fellow 4G owner's car today and I almost jizzed my pants it was so sexy. IRS gives me the shivers. Therefore, beam > IRS. 

Originally Posted by VQuick
I was looking at the rear beam under a fellow 4G owner's car today and I almost jizzed my pants it was so sexy. IRS gives me the shivers. Therefore, beam > IRS. 

Originally Posted by dmontzmax
That must mean you dont know much about cars and looking at things you dont know about confuse the hell out of you and give you the shivers, look at it a little longer, it all makes sense.
Nothing. Let's let this thread die. There's nothing more to be said that hasn't been said already. Points have been made, counterpoints have been made, the thread degenerated into crap, so let's let it die.
Blah blah blah... Until a 3rd gen goes and gets it's lateral G's and slalom speed measured I'm going by Car and Driver's #'s that show that the 4G outgrips and outslaloms the 3rd gen SE. The question isn't whether or not IRS>Beam. The question is whether or not the 3rd gen outhandles the 4th gen mod for mod, period. No one has brought up any evidence, so I'll go by C&D's tests. And you can't go by the theory that body roll=poor handling. Look at the EVO. It handles with the best of them but looks like it's about to tip over around corners stock.
Superior design in one area doesn't necessarily mean the whole package is better. Case in point, the VE has VTC's and VI stock, yet is still slower than the 4G in the 1/4 mile mod for mod. Why? Because it just so happens to be strapped to a heavier chassis. (Besides, the VQ's extra torque doesn't hurt.
)
Superior design in one area doesn't necessarily mean the whole package is better. Case in point, the VE has VTC's and VI stock, yet is still slower than the 4G in the 1/4 mile mod for mod. Why? Because it just so happens to be strapped to a heavier chassis. (Besides, the VQ's extra torque doesn't hurt.
)
Originally Posted by nismology
Blah blah blah... Until a 3rd gen goes and gets it's lateral G's and slalom speed measured I'm going by Car and Driver's #'s that show that the 4G outgrips and outslaloms the 3rd gen SE. The question isn't whether or not IRS>Beam. The question is whether or not the 3rd gen outhandles the 4th gen mod for mod, period. No one has brought up any evidence, so I'll go by C&D's tests. And you can't go by the theory that body roll=poor handling. Look at the EVO. It handles with the best of them but looks like it's about to tip over around corners stock.
Superior design in one area doesn't necessarily mean the whole package is better. Case in point, the VE has VTC's and VI stock, yet is still slower than the 4G in the 1/4 mile mod for mod. Why? Because it just so happens to be strapped to a heavier chassis. (Besides, the VQ's extra torque doesn't hurt.
)
Superior design in one area doesn't necessarily mean the whole package is better. Case in point, the VE has VTC's and VI stock, yet is still slower than the 4G in the 1/4 mile mod for mod. Why? Because it just so happens to be strapped to a heavier chassis. (Besides, the VQ's extra torque doesn't hurt.
)
Originally Posted by Nealoc187
Nothing. Let's let this thread die. There's nothing more to be said that hasn't been said already. Points have been made, counterpoints have been made, the thread degenerated into crap, so let's let it die.
Originally Posted by dmontzsta
That must mean you dont know much about cars and looking at things you dont know about confuse the hell out of you and give you the shivers, look at it a little longer, it all makes sense.
Originally Posted by ScreamingVE
Aaron's 3rd gen is an automatic, which is why he traps at only 93mph.
Why does it make a freaking difference which is better, the 3rd or 4th? They both do what they are supposed to, so what if the 3rd gen cant hold over a g in a turn or close to one, when was the last time you were driving around and said, humm thats a empty parking lot lets see how many g's i can pull before spinning out. Case in point, is that almost no one here is pushing their maximas to their limits so why does it matter which is better? This thread should be closed its taking up valuble server space that i could be complaining about something else in!!!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MAXSE5SPD
General Maxima Discussion
33
Sep 17, 2022 04:00 AM
Violator
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
1
Sep 9, 2015 10:14 AM




