General Maxima Discussion This a general area for Maxima discussions for all years. For more specific questions, visit one of the generation-specific forums.

trend towards FWD/AWD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-2005 | 03:12 AM
  #1  
Frank Fontaine's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,883
trend towards FWD/AWD

It's interesting how in our gradpa's era, FWD came along and saved the car mfgs. tons of money as they could start using a transaxle design. The campaign to "sell" buyers on FWD was extremely successful. Now we even have 300 HP, 8 cyl. cars with FWD (caddy, new Chevy). Anyone notice the same pattern with AWD? How many vehicles are now available with AWD, a feature that is of little use to most? The sad part is once again the push to propel by the front wheels. Even the 2k6 STi is being tuned in that fashion. Last year, it had a 65/35 RWD bias, with 50/50 available by dialing it in. For 2k6, the engineers pushed the bias 9% in the direction of the front.

Funny, Nissan seems to have missed the whole market for AWD products and continues with FWD!
Old 10-18-2005 | 06:04 AM
  #2  
njmaxseltd's Avatar
Member who somehow became The President of The SE-L Club
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 16,033
Nissan makes the Infiniti line up with Intelligent AWD.
They didn't miss the market, they target it through their higher end division.
Old 10-18-2005 | 06:39 AM
  #3  
TXT-1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,159
Originally Posted by Frank Fontaine
How many vehicles are now available with AWD, a feature that is of little use to most? The sad part is once again the push to propel by the front wheels. Even the 2k6 STi is being tuned in that fashion. Last year, it had a 65/35 RWD bias, with 50/50 available by dialing it in. For 2k6, the engineers pushed the bias 9% in the direction of the front.

Funny, Nissan seems to have missed the whole market for AWD products and continues with FWD!
I'm not understanding your point here. You say in one sentence that AWD is of little use to most, but then you say Nissan missed the market for AWD products. Are you saying that is good or bad???

Also, I've owned two AWD cars (Audi A4 Quattro, Talon TSi) and I found them very useful actually in adverse weather.
Old 10-18-2005 | 07:42 AM
  #4  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,720
Originally Posted by TXT-1
I'm not understanding your point here. You say in one sentence that AWD is of little use to most, but then you say Nissan missed the market for AWD products. Are you saying that is good or bad???

Also, I've owned two AWD cars (Audi A4 Quattro, Talon TSi) and I found them very useful actually in adverse weather.
I'm a little confused by the original post also.

And for the record, if Nissan "missed" the AWD market then so did Honda and Toyota. Exc. SUVs/Minivans, Toyota/Lexus has 2 AWD sedans (IS250, GS300...both just recently introduced), Honda/Acura has 1 (RL) and Nissan/Infiniti has 2 (G35X, M35X).
Old 10-18-2005 | 08:23 AM
  #5  
NismoMax80's Avatar
SuPeRmOd
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,378
Originally Posted by njmaxseltd
Nissan makes the Infiniti line up with Intelligent AWD.
They didn't miss the market, they target it through their higher end division.

Originally Posted by TXT-1
I'm not understanding your point here. You say in one sentence that AWD is of little use to most, but then you say Nissan missed the market for AWD products. Are you saying that is good or bad???.


404: thread failure
Old 10-18-2005 | 05:52 PM
  #6  
Frank Fontaine's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,883
Originally Posted by TXT-1
I'm not understanding your point here. You say in one sentence that AWD is of little use to most, but then you say Nissan missed the market for AWD products. Are you saying that is good or bad???

Also, I've owned two AWD cars (Audi A4 Quattro, Talon TSi) and I found them very useful actually in adverse weather.
Yes, and yes. AWD is of use in only 2 situations--when trying to get unstuck (a car is a car, a Subaru can get stuck. Ask my friend Lisa.), and when applying power in slippery conditions. Other than that, it's a means of generating more friction and consuming more fuel. If you live in Arizona, you too may like to drive a CR-V. But you'd be a moron to get a 4WD version. Ditto for the A4/A6.

The latter part of your question, well, the marketing campaign has been very successful in convincing car buyers that AWD is da bomb. So Nissan failed in not making one of the Sentra/Altima/Maxima in AWD versions, much missed money.

There is such a desire to remove any possiblity of oversteer from cars that even the 2k6 STi went 9% more power to the front wheels over 2k5. There are really only 2 car makes under 50k that seem to go for performance only--Porsche and BMW. No fake duals, no V6's...
Old 10-18-2005 | 07:06 PM
  #7  
liqidvenom's Avatar
brotherhood of tq
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,855
they changed that for the sti because people began to have issues launching, and taking high speed turns. the back of that car would slide out like its nothing
Old 10-18-2005 | 08:26 PM
  #8  
Supermax95's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,263
Originally Posted by Frank Fontaine
Yes, and yes. AWD is of use in only 2 situations--when trying to get unstuck (a car is a car, a Subaru can get stuck. Ask my friend Lisa.), and when applying power in slippery conditions. Other than that, it's a means of generating more friction and consuming more fuel. If you live in Arizona, you too may like to drive a CR-V. But you'd be a moron to get a 4WD version. Ditto for the A4/A6.

The latter part of your question, well, the marketing campaign has been very successful in convincing car buyers that AWD is da bomb. So Nissan failed in not making one of the Sentra/Altima/Maxima in AWD versions, much missed money.

There is such a desire to remove any possiblity of oversteer from cars that even the 2k6 STi went 9% more power to the front wheels over 2k5. There are really only 2 car makes under 50k that seem to go for performance only--Porsche and BMW. No fake duals, no V6's...

AWD is also good for launching at 5k rpm....= ]
Old 10-18-2005 | 09:27 PM
  #9  
Ceasars Chariot's Avatar
Old Maxima Legend
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,069
From: Paraparaumu, NZ
^ no kidding watch those best motoring favorites tear it up around the track (nissan skyline gtr, EVO's, STI's) nice for performance ! a certain target market for sure
Old 10-18-2005 | 09:53 PM
  #10  
frankd121's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,028
Originally Posted by Frank Fontaine
It's interesting how in our gradpa's era, FWD came along and saved the car mfgs. tons of money as they could start using a transaxle design. The campaign to "sell" buyers on FWD was extremely successful. Now we even have 300 HP, 8 cyl. cars with FWD (caddy, new Chevy). Anyone notice the same pattern with AWD? How many vehicles are now available with AWD, a feature that is of little use to most? The sad part is once again the push to propel by the front wheels. Even the 2k6 STi is being tuned in that fashion. Last year, it had a 65/35 RWD bias, with 50/50 available by dialing it in. For 2k6, the engineers pushed the bias 9% in the direction of the front.

Funny, Nissan seems to have missed the whole market for AWD products and continues with FWD!
Nissan didn't miss the market for AWD drive products, its just the fact that AWD adds thousands on top of manufacturing and development costs. They still wanted to remain competitive in the market and at the same time maintain a healthy profit margin. Additionally, seeing how Nissan was in pretty deep financial trouble a couple years ago, it wouldn't have made much sense to try to cut their profit margins just to feed into the AWD market.

Cars with price tags >$30k usually carry a larger profit margin and therefore can introduce more features into the vehicle. The WRX's are able to offer the AWD performance for under $25k, but if you think about it, the interiors aren't as nice as those found in a family sedan of comparable price. Having to diversify a company's markets requires dumping money into research and development and manufacturing; these are costs that the company must seriously weigh into consideration before making business decisions.
Old 10-19-2005 | 12:03 AM
  #11  
Brushedpewter's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 633
Why would you even want AWD on a nissan??? The more crap they add the worse the interior will be. Instead of seats we'll have lawn chairs. Instead of seat belts it will be rope.

I'm fine with FWD, the only time for that is was bad was when I had Kelly tires on it. Trying to stop in rain would of been better if I had a hole in the floor and using my feet as my brakes.
Old 10-19-2005 | 10:50 AM
  #12  
MaximaPolak's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,426
From: Passaic County, NJ
Originally Posted by Frank Fontaine
Funny, Nissan seems to have missed the whole market for AWD products and continues with FWD!
I guess you don't know Infiniti and Nissan are the same company. Infinity has plenty AWDs.
Old 10-19-2005 | 12:34 PM
  #13  
NisMoN00B's Avatar
+Cru OG
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 29,564
From: Island Hopper
Originally Posted by MaximaPolak
I guess you don't know Infiniti and Nissan are the same company. Infinity has plenty AWDs.
my thoughts exactly, but you'd be surprised as to how many people doesn't know one company's relation to the other. just the other day, a chevy loyalist swears that the Cobalt SS is entirely different from an Ion Redline.
Old 10-19-2005 | 03:56 PM
  #14  
ColdSHO's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,553
even the 87-91 ford tempos were aviable with an awd option, although it didnt use a center diff and relied on the wet ground to compensate for the difference in wheel speed. but no awd max, that would nice to have, id buy one in a second as long as i could get it in stick, g35x auto only, whats up with that. the second an awd 6mt comes out its mine.
Old 10-19-2005 | 05:08 PM
  #15  
Northern Maxima's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,805
From: Manitoba
Most people won't actually need AWD, but for my family, we have to drive 20 km. to get into town on hilly/windy highways and back roads. In the winter they can be pretty treacherous, especially since they aren't always plowed very quickly and often its too cold for the road salt to take effect.

AWD really doesn't help out with handling though, but through marketing I think many consumers are convinced it does. The only time I like driving my Mom's Subaru in the winter is when there is 12+ inches of snow on the ground and I'm worried about my Maxima getting stuck and the underbody dragging. Otherwise, I find that the Max handles much better in slippery conditions and I think its a great winter car (especially cause I've got TCS and LSD). We still always have at least one AWD/4X4 vehicle in my family.

As for RWD, I love driving them but I would not want one out here in the winter. FWD's handle great in the snow as they don't get stuck as easily and they are less prone to the tail sliding out on ice causing you to lose control. That's why FWD cars are much more popular up here.
Old 10-19-2005 | 05:19 PM
  #16  
Frank Fontaine's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,883
Originally Posted by NisMoN00B
my thoughts exactly, but you'd be surprised as to how many people doesn't know one company's relation to the other. just the other day, a chevy loyalist swears that the Cobalt SS is entirely different from an Ion Redline.
Wha? Nissan and Infiniti are the same company?? Next thing you know you'll be telling me Chevy and Pontiac are related. FWD 4 Ever!!
Old 10-20-2005 | 06:56 PM
  #17  
Turk's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,154
AWD cars, ROCK!!!!
Old 10-23-2005 | 11:11 AM
  #18  
Maximum Tune's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 149
Yes, full time 4WD is not really needed, hence ATTESA-ETS as found on the GT-R. RWD in normal mode, but 4WD when needed; the G35X has this system.

Honda = Acura
Toyota = Lexus
Nissan = Infinity
Toyota = Scion

I would also like to point out that most people don't even know a Lexus is a Toyota and is made in Japan. Infinity is the luxury division of Nissan. Besides the 350Z, all the RWD cars are marketed under Infinity, and so will the new GT-R. It seems that Nissan thinks it could be a problem if the GT-R was marketed as a Nissan along with the 350Z. I guess that they want to have the 350Z as the Nissan top sports car in the USA. Also, it could be that with the rumored $90,000 price tag, I guess they could also think that no one would buy a $90K Nissan no mater how good it is; look at the MSRP of the 1996 300ZXTT and you will see that people just don't want to buy a Japanese "brand" name for over the mid 30K level. I guess that is why Nissan Toyota and Honda have "brands" that they market upper-level cars under; brands that are not thought of by most buyers as " = Japanese".

There are many connections in the auto world; look at things like who owns how much of who.
Old 10-23-2005 | 01:01 PM
  #19  
MrGone's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 40,647
From: 127.0.0.1
Originally Posted by Northern Maxima
Most people won't actually need AWD, but for my family, we have to drive 20 km. to get into town on hilly/windy highways and back roads. In the winter they can be pretty treacherous, especially since they aren't always plowed very quickly and often its too cold for the road salt to take effect.

AWD really doesn't help out with handling though, but through marketing I think many consumers are convinced it does. The only time I like driving my Mom's Subaru in the winter is when there is 12+ inches of snow on the ground and I'm worried about my Maxima getting stuck and the underbody dragging. Otherwise, I find that the Max handles much better in slippery conditions and I think its a great winter car (especially cause I've got TCS and LSD). We still always have at least one AWD/4X4 vehicle in my family.

As for RWD, I love driving them but I would not want one out here in the winter. FWD's handle great in the snow as they don't get stuck as easily and they are less prone to the tail sliding out on ice causing you to lose control. That's why FWD cars are much more popular up here.
The one thing I like about driving my Moms outback in the snow/ice is that it is light and you have a good ammount of control, but at the same time it can float aswell. I still prefer driving the Durango. Heck even in 2wd it gets around farther than most in 4wd. Plus I just throw some tow straps in the back when it starts getting icey out and make $20-50+ a pop just pulling people out of ditches and up hills.
Old 10-23-2005 | 05:00 PM
  #20  
Northern Maxima's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,805
From: Manitoba
Originally Posted by MrGone
The one thing I like about driving my Moms outback in the snow/ice is that it is light and you have a good ammount of control, but at the same time it can float aswell. I still prefer driving the Durango. Heck even in 2wd it gets around farther than most in 4wd. Plus I just throw some tow straps in the back when it starts getting icey out and make $20-50+ a pop just pulling people out of ditches and up hills.
Yeah, we used to have a 98 Durango when they first came out. Nice SUV, especially since its truck based but it sucked learning how to parallel park in that beast!
Old 10-23-2005 | 05:15 PM
  #21  
MrGone's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 40,647
From: 127.0.0.1
Originally Posted by Northern Maxima
Yeah, we used to have a 98 Durango when they first came out. Nice SUV, especially since its truck based but it sucked learning how to parallel park in that beast!
bah, once you can do it in a <2000 Surburban you can do just about anything
I used the Durango on my license drive test, oh so long ago
Old 10-23-2005 | 05:59 PM
  #22  
RockfordMax's Avatar
Back from the dead
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,621
From: Rockford
Originally Posted by Maximum Tune
Yes, full time 4WD is not really needed, hence ATTESA-ETS as found on the GT-R. RWD in normal mode, but 4WD when needed; the G35X has this system.

Honda = Acura
Toyota = Lexus
Nissan = Infinity
Toyota = Scion

I would also like to point out that most people don't even know a Lexus is a Toyota and is made in Japan. Infinity is the luxury division of Nissan. Besides the 350Z, all the RWD cars are marketed under Infinity, and so will the new GT-R. It seems that Nissan thinks it could be a problem if the GT-R was marketed as a Nissan along with the 350Z. I guess that they want to have the 350Z as the Nissan top sports car in the USA. Also, it could be that with the rumored $90,000 price tag, I guess they could also think that no one would buy a $90K Nissan no mater how good it is; look at the MSRP of the 1996 300ZXTT and you will see that people just don't want to buy a Japanese "brand" name for over the mid 30K level. I guess that is why Nissan Toyota and Honda have "brands" that they market upper-level cars under; brands that are not thought of by most buyers as " = Japanese".

There are many connections in the auto world; look at things like who owns how much of who.
Thats only too true, how many snobby moronic old ladies would be caught dead driving Toyotas! And integra drivers get really mad when you call their cars a honda. i was like, you want JDM, throw a H on your trunk and have fun!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
soloist3
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
11
09-02-2015 01:59 PM
fst96se
General Maxima Discussion
34
04-02-2002 07:36 AM
fst96se
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
1
03-29-2002 11:02 AM
bigbadboss101
General Maxima Discussion
14
10-16-2001 08:08 AM
Maxima95GLE
General Maxima Discussion
22
01-03-2001 05:41 PM



Quick Reply: trend towards FWD/AWD



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:12 AM.