HP per litre
#41
Originally Posted by Kevlo911
The way I see it. Who gives a ****? I just want my car to make me happy. Could care less about the "numbers" it puts down as long as I am happy with it. I just want to keep up with all these new cars with too much stock power
Damn I need a VQ35...
#43
Originally Posted by Nealoc187
Finally if you can't beat a malibu then you should never race again, ever lol.
-from a review of the 2005 Chevy Malibu, see http://www.automotive.com/2005/43/ch...ons/index.html
- correct me if I'm wrong, but that is 10HP more than my Max. Which is why I am not exactly keen on trying my luck against Malibus. This town is infested with them.
#44
Originally Posted by clive
"GM's newly developed 3.5-liter V6 delivers 200 horsepower"
-from a review of the 2005 Chevy Malibu, see http://www.automotive.com/2005/43/ch...ons/index.html
- correct me if I'm wrong, but that is 10HP more than my Max. Which is why I am not exactly keen on trying my luck against Malibus. This town is infested with them.
-from a review of the 2005 Chevy Malibu, see http://www.automotive.com/2005/43/ch...ons/index.html
- correct me if I'm wrong, but that is 10HP more than my Max. Which is why I am not exactly keen on trying my luck against Malibus. This town is infested with them.
#46
I think HP does matter, and more is better, to a limit. My new car is 255/220, which is pretty wimpy and bordering on unacceptable given the price. A while back, I got completely stuck in the snow, despite having 4 snows on my RWD. At that time, I felt pretty stupid with a brand-new car, with everybody and their CR-V driving their 160 HP bad-boys like there was no tomorrow. My i-Drive, sport seats, 6 man, whatever were useless as my car could not move short of being towed. Sometimes I wonder if I shoulda opted for the AWD model, but I wanted to be a purist. And active steering or EPS was not available in the AWD model.
My point is you need to be able to deliver the power to the road. And it matters how you do that. I'd rather have a 4th gen Maxima over a 2k6 Malibu, but that's me.
My point is you need to be able to deliver the power to the road. And it matters how you do that. I'd rather have a 4th gen Maxima over a 2k6 Malibu, but that's me.
#47
Originally Posted by Frank Fontaine
I think HP does matter, and more is better, to a limit. My new car is 255/220, which is pretty wimpy and bordering on unacceptable given the price. A while back, I got completely stuck in the snow, despite having 4 snows on my RWD. At that time, I felt pretty stupid with a brand-new car, with everybody and their CR-V driving their 160 HP bad-boys like there was no tomorrow. My i-Drive, sport seats, 6 man, whatever were useless as my car could not move short of being towed. Sometimes I wonder if I shoulda opted for the AWD model, but I wanted to be a purist. And active steering or EPS was not available in the AWD model.
My point is you need to be able to deliver the power to the road. And it matters how you do that. I'd rather have a 4th gen Maxima over a 2k6 Malibu, but that's me.
My point is you need to be able to deliver the power to the road. And it matters how you do that. I'd rather have a 4th gen Maxima over a 2k6 Malibu, but that's me.
#48
You can't compare output from engines back in the day to current engines. As others have said, the HP was measured differently. In addition, there was no emmissions or fuel economy standards to speak of and leaded high octane gas was available which allowed engines to have higher compression ratios and more aggressive timing.
Area under the curve is probably the best comparison between two engines. It's not that difficult to build a high-revving high output engine. The formula one engines were 3.0L until this year and got up to 950hp. Money is no object with these engines either.
Those motors aren't very streetable though. Their low end torque sucks so much **** that the pit crew has to push the car to get it moving. In addition, those motors only have to last 1 race and aren't subject to emmissions and fuel economy standards.
The Honda S2000 had 250hp out of 2.0L, but it sucks to drive in the city with it. The thing has no low end torque and feels like any other POS 4 banger until 7-8k rpm.
Engineering is all about compromises. The VQ happens to be one of the best examples of compromise between cost, durability, output, emissions, and fuel economy.
Area under the curve is probably the best comparison between two engines. It's not that difficult to build a high-revving high output engine. The formula one engines were 3.0L until this year and got up to 950hp. Money is no object with these engines either.
Those motors aren't very streetable though. Their low end torque sucks so much **** that the pit crew has to push the car to get it moving. In addition, those motors only have to last 1 race and aren't subject to emmissions and fuel economy standards.
The Honda S2000 had 250hp out of 2.0L, but it sucks to drive in the city with it. The thing has no low end torque and feels like any other POS 4 banger until 7-8k rpm.
Engineering is all about compromises. The VQ happens to be one of the best examples of compromise between cost, durability, output, emissions, and fuel economy.
#49
Originally Posted by Frank Fontaine
I'm not even sure what his point is, as the Maxima is a FWD car, how much power do you really want? If Nissan were smart, they could offer up a 4 cyl. model, with higher mpgs, and probably around what, the orig. 190 HP that the 4th gen had from 95-99?
#50
Originally Posted by nismology
This fact alone invalidates your numbers. There are DEFINITELY peak torque losses when the MEVI is installed.
I still laugh at "factory freak" Maxima's. Sure, maybe if you were dynoing stock 6th gens that were all broken in the same way, or are fresh off the truck and one somehow consistantly pulled significatly higher numbers than the rest and eliminating as many variables as possible then sure.
But considering most people here are not the original owners of their cars, and I find it hard to believe line workers at Nissan pulled random engines aside to work them over, I'll just continue laughing.
#51
Originally Posted by Kevlo911
The way I see it. Who gives a ****? I just want my car to make me happy. Could care less about the "numbers" it puts down as long as I am happy with it. I just want to keep up with all these new cars with too much stock power
Damn I need a VQ35...
Damn I need a VQ35...
#53
Originally Posted by D-Bo
Definitely an interesting trend. The last decade (5 years especially) has seen a marked increase in power and even the Japanese couldn't hold to their gentlemen's agreement.
#54
This thread is gay yo.....!!!
WHY OOH WHY GOD!!! did you bother us with this poor soul, by telling him that our maximas suck..Bla bla bla... it only makes us depressed...
You know what is funny, this guy is comparing a car which used to compete in "LE MAnS" ............................shouldn't that be enough to make him understand that he is trying to compare oranges and apples, it is like saying, my old Ferrari if faster then you 95 maxima..... of course it is, it is a freaking 100K car com-pared to a 20K car.... people knew how to make power of the car then just like they know how to make power now... the difference is.... environment, people didn't care about gasoline, etc
Have you never seen "Sea biscuit" -> (can't spell) horse racing movie form 2 years ago....they dude learned that if you cool down the engine with water, it would produce a ton of more power...
Engines are all figure it out, all engineers do is, try different set ups... That is all.
WHY OOH WHY GOD!!! did you bother us with this poor soul, by telling him that our maximas suck..Bla bla bla... it only makes us depressed...
You know what is funny, this guy is comparing a car which used to compete in "LE MAnS" ............................shouldn't that be enough to make him understand that he is trying to compare oranges and apples, it is like saying, my old Ferrari if faster then you 95 maxima..... of course it is, it is a freaking 100K car com-pared to a 20K car.... people knew how to make power of the car then just like they know how to make power now... the difference is.... environment, people didn't care about gasoline, etc
Have you never seen "Sea biscuit" -> (can't spell) horse racing movie form 2 years ago....they dude learned that if you cool down the engine with water, it would produce a ton of more power...
Engines are all figure it out, all engineers do is, try different set ups... That is all.
#55
Originally Posted by SR-71 Blackbird
The problem is that along with that increase in power, cars became more and more obese, just like the people that drive them. Why can't cars be like sport bikes, which get lighter and more powerful all the time.
As far as the Maxima goes, I'm satisfied with the 190/205 setup in the 4th gen. In my new car, sure, 333 HP would be nice like the E46, but the E90 will probably have 400+, but will be priced way beyond what I can or would pay.
#56
Originally Posted by MrGone
Why would offering a 4 cylinder Maxima be smart? To make the Altima worthless?
#57
Originally Posted by Guinader
Engines are all figure it out, all engineers do is, try different set ups... That is all.
There is however some interesting new technologies coming down the pike like the possibility of a 5 stroke engine, electronic valves (solenoids), and more widespread use of direct injection.
#58
Originally Posted by MrGone
Up till recently (2005-2006ish) it has been pretty easy to keep up with new cars, but by the time 07-08 rolls around it's going to get closer and closer. There will also be an increase of "I got owned by a stock (insert some pickup truck here)" threads.
#59
I've seen a 6 stroke POC (http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dl...60222004/1024), but never 5. Any links for it? Quick google didn't come up with anything.
#60
Originally Posted by MrGone
Up till recently (2005-2006ish) it has been pretty easy to keep up with new cars, but by the time 07-08 rolls around it's going to get closer and closer. There will also be an increase of "I got owned by a stock (insert some pickup truck here)" threads.
Ha yeah but now its getting hard IMO. 13 second stock IS350's AUTO's man. Thats pretty crazy. All these HP wars throughout the brands is crazy. A 26x hp RAV4????? WTF do you need that for. Nissan's next. Watch the next 350z have 320hp and the G35 do the same. Low 13 second cars stock....
#61
Originally Posted by Frank Fontaine
Yep, a coworker got a new Escalade, and you may have guessed--that thing broke the 400 HP barrier. There are times when I do think we get what we deserve for wasting resources--we're back to $3 gal for premium at some stations. Another coworker makes his own biodiesel, pretty interesting. He gets used cooking oil from Chinese restaurants and turns it into fuel.
As far as the Maxima goes, I'm satisfied with the 190/205 setup in the 4th gen. In my new car, sure, 333 HP would be nice like the E46, but the E90 will probably have 400+, but will be priced way beyond what I can or would pay.
As far as the Maxima goes, I'm satisfied with the 190/205 setup in the 4th gen. In my new car, sure, 333 HP would be nice like the E46, but the E90 will probably have 400+, but will be priced way beyond what I can or would pay.
#62
Originally Posted by pmohr
I've seen a 6 stroke POC (http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dl...60222004/1024), but never 5. Any links for it? Quick google didn't come up with anything.
#63
Originally Posted by Kevlo911
Ha yeah but now its getting hard IMO. 13 second stock IS350's AUTO's man. Thats pretty crazy. All these HP wars throughout the brands is crazy. A 26x hp RAV4????? WTF do you need that for. Nissan's next. Watch the next 350z have 320hp and the G35 do the same. Low 13 second cars stock....
Granted they were always more about being small and well balanced, but still.
Cars are getting a little too powerful for street use, kinda worries me when you think of some of the idiots on the road.
#64
Originally Posted by Frank Fontaine
If Nissan were that smart, they'd be competing with Toyota, VW, and Honda I guess (Camry, Passat, and Accord all have 4 and 6 offerings). There are people who want the larger car, but don't care about 180-200 vs. 260 HP. Besides, we're talking FWD anyway. From everything coming down the pike, the new Camry is a slam-dunk. More bad news for Maxima sales. Toyota comes out with cars like the RAV4, FJ Cruiser, Camry. Nissan comes out with what? A 350Z that can't handle and a muffler with two pipes to simulate duals?
One of the underlying reasons why Maxima's have always been regarded as rather quick is because there no 4 cylinder Maximas, there is no guesswork. Lets face it, 3rd gens pretty much no one knows there are 2 different engines, and 5th gens people just ask "is that the one with the 6 speed? those are FAST!" (well, used to be the case anyway).
#65
Originally Posted by MrGone
I really think they need to pick it up with the Z's
Granted they were always more about being small and well balanced, but still.
Cars are getting a little too powerful for street use, kinda worries me when you think of some of the idiots on the road.
Granted they were always more about being small and well balanced, but still.
Cars are getting a little too powerful for street use, kinda worries me when you think of some of the idiots on the road.
Yupp that is the problem. Too much power.
Look at the 90's, Maximas had about 190hp, as did the competition. Was that plenty of power? Yes.
Now look at 00-06, power has increased by 40-60HP. Why can't it stay a 50hp increase for all 10 years?
#66
Originally Posted by Kevlo911
Yupp that is the problem. Too much power.
Look at the 90's, Maximas had about 190hp, as did the competition. Was that plenty of power? Yes.
Look at the 90's, Maximas had about 190hp, as did the competition. Was that plenty of power? Yes.
#67
Originally Posted by Kevlo911
Yupp that is the problem. Too much power.
Look at the 90's, Maximas had about 190hp, as did the competition. Was that plenty of power? Yes.
Now look at 00-06, power has increased by 40-60HP. Why can't it stay a 50hp increase for all 10 years?
Look at the 90's, Maximas had about 190hp, as did the competition. Was that plenty of power? Yes.
Now look at 00-06, power has increased by 40-60HP. Why can't it stay a 50hp increase for all 10 years?
I was extremely happy with the power in my old 93 SE Auto. I wasn't even modding my 92 SE 5spd because I wanted mad powah, I was just modding it because I can't leave anything alone
I say if people want powah make them work for it
#68
Originally Posted by MrGone
I was extremely happy with the power in my old 93 SE Auto. I wasn't even modding my 92 SE 5spd because I wanted mad powah, I was just modding it because I can't leave anything alone
I say if people want powah make them work for it
I say if people want powah make them work for it
Exactly, make insurance go down and MPG go up
#74
back to the first post...... put a triumph and a maxima next to eachother, run them hard as ****!!! , and see which motor lasts longer..... or just rev it to the redline for a bout 10 minutes and see which will let loose first..... i bet the maxima will win both
#75
Originally Posted by SR-71 Blackbird
The only "new" engine technology that has come out recently is EFI and variable cam timing. EFI has been around since the 80's and VTEC was born in 1990 or so. Engineers have known how to make good power for a very long time. The trick has been to have an engine that is cost-effective, durable, powerful, has low emissions, and good gas mileage.
There is however some interesting new technologies coming down the pike like the possibility of a 5 stroke engine, electronic valves (solenoids), and more widespread use of direct injection.
There is however some interesting new technologies coming down the pike like the possibility of a 5 stroke engine, electronic valves (solenoids), and more widespread use of direct injection.
Oh yeah, don't forget the leaf blower supercharger.
#76
This isn't the best source of info but it was easy to find on short notice;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horsepo...oss_horsepower
http://www.conceptcarz.com/vehicle/z900/default.aspx
I haven't found any data that shows new SAE hp ratings.
"Weight 2280 lbs | 1034.2 kg
Performance
0-60 mph 10.8 seconds."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horsepo...oss_horsepower
http://www.conceptcarz.com/vehicle/z900/default.aspx
I haven't found any data that shows new SAE hp ratings.
"Weight 2280 lbs | 1034.2 kg
Performance
0-60 mph 10.8 seconds."
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
avalon65
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
17
12-19-2004 03:04 PM
shumax
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
46
11-07-2000 02:32 PM