2002 Altima runs 14.4 @ 100 MPH, 0-60 in 5.9
Originally posted by NYCe MaXiMa
That's just about as fast as the RSX type S.
Niceee... A VQ 5spd would need nearly every bolt on mod to run that well
Imagine the Alty with bolt ons.. Low 13s N/A? hehehheheh,
That's just about as fast as the RSX type S.
Niceee... A VQ 5spd would need nearly every bolt on mod to run that well
Imagine the Alty with bolt ons.. Low 13s N/A? hehehheheh,
Altima:
0-60 / 6.3 sec
1/4-mile / 14.8 sec @ 96.5 mph
RSX-S:
0-60 / 6.7 sec
1/4-mile / 15.2 sec @ 92.7 mph
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by dmbmaxima88
ok, sorry my bad. so 46 lbs but doens't the max come with more options standard included in that weight so mose 3.5SE altimas will run heavier will options. but 50lbs none the less. i still think the max will eeek it by .1
ok, sorry my bad. so 46 lbs but doens't the max come with more options standard included in that weight so mose 3.5SE altimas will run heavier will options. but 50lbs none the less. i still think the max will eeek it by .1
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: AMOC
Originally posted by theblue
I have a feeling I should be saying bye now before she reads this and kills you
emax: you didn't make it to my list because we've never crossed paths yet... maybe you'll be at this next meet, either way you should get an award for most money spent on mods that were removed.
I have a feeling I should be saying bye now before she reads this and kills you
emax: you didn't make it to my list because we've never crossed paths yet... maybe you'll be at this next meet, either way you should get an award for most money spent on mods that were removed.
How much exactly are we talking about one of these things anyway? 14.xxx might sound great but if we gotta fork over $25K I'll be thinkin twice to see if its worth it. Further, is the resale on this one gonna be any better then most Nissan cars are now?
Originally posted by emax95
Those are some damn good #'s! It looks like the Altima did the exact oppisite of what the Q45 was supposed to do. Meaning that, hte Q was suppose to run 0-60= 5.9 but in most of the test it could not beat 6.5, the Altima did just oppisite, Nissan claimed 0-60=6.5 and it did 5.9!
.
BTW thanks for the great info
Those are some damn good #'s! It looks like the Altima did the exact oppisite of what the Q45 was supposed to do. Meaning that, hte Q was suppose to run 0-60= 5.9 but in most of the test it could not beat 6.5, the Altima did just oppisite, Nissan claimed 0-60=6.5 and it did 5.9!
.BTW thanks for the great info
and the altima is friggin fast and the max will be faster
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by dmbmaxima88
that's what i thought and said too but if you look at the www.nissandriven.com website it gives the numbers i refered too. either way they weight almost the same. a me driving the altima and ethan driving the new maxima since he's a tall lanky bish would equal it out. under 50lbs in my book is the same. that's like a few gallons of gas. if those are wet weights maybe the max holds more gas.
that's what i thought and said too but if you look at the www.nissandriven.com website it gives the numbers i refered too. either way they weight almost the same. a me driving the altima and ethan driving the new maxima since he's a tall lanky bish would equal it out. under 50lbs in my book is the same. that's like a few gallons of gas. if those are wet weights maybe the max holds more gas.
Dang...i'm just happy on what's happening to nissan cars these days...they're getting faster...hahah! Can't wait to see how fast the next model maxima will be. Hopefully it won't look like that one everyone posted about...it had a flat back and was just plain ugly. Hopefully, by the time im done with my payments(3 years), i'll be able to trade in for a newer max.
It's possible. Please site an example of accuracy.
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac
www.nissandriven.com is not as reliable as nissannews.com. nissannews is more of a detail site on specs, etc.
www.nissandriven.com is not as reliable as nissannews.com. nissannews is more of a detail site on specs, etc.
Originally posted by kevlo911
actually when car and driver did a comparo of luxo's they got the Q to 6.0 sec 0-60
and the altima is friggin fast and the max will be faster
actually when car and driver did a comparo of luxo's they got the Q to 6.0 sec 0-60
and the altima is friggin fast and the max will be faster
Key word "most"

Steve, all right there stumpy
.Russ, The #'s on nissannews.com are old, they were posted up before production, most likely they changed weigh slitely and now the new "exact" weights are posted on nissandriven.com. Nissannews, is more of a prieview site then nissandriven. BTW nissannews had also listed the 02 max as 260 HP.
Thank you! I've been trying to tell Russ that. 

Originally posted by emax95
Ohh, I know about that, thats why I said{quote} the Q was suppose to run 0-60= 5.9 but in "most" of the test it could not beat 6.5.
Key word "most"
Steve, all right there stumpy
.
Russ, The #'s on nissannews.com are old, they were posted up before production, most likely they changed weigh slitely and now the new "exact" weights are posted on nissandriven.com. Nissannews, is more of a prieview site then nissandriven. BTW nissannews had also listed the 02 max as 260 HP.
Ohh, I know about that, thats why I said{quote} the Q was suppose to run 0-60= 5.9 but in "most" of the test it could not beat 6.5.
Key word "most"

Steve, all right there stumpy
.Russ, The #'s on nissannews.com are old, they were posted up before production, most likely they changed weigh slitely and now the new "exact" weights are posted on nissandriven.com. Nissannews, is more of a prieview site then nissandriven. BTW nissannews had also listed the 02 max as 260 HP.
Originally posted by emax95
Ohh, I know about that, thats why I said{quote} the Q was suppose to run 0-60= 5.9 but in "most" of the test it could not beat 6.5.
Key word "most"
Steve, all right there stumpy
.
Russ, The #'s on nissannews.com are old, they were posted up before production, most likely they changed weigh slitely and now the new "exact" weights are posted on nissandriven.com. Nissannews, is more of a prieview site then nissandriven. BTW nissannews had also listed the 02 max as 260 HP.
Ohh, I know about that, thats why I said{quote} the Q was suppose to run 0-60= 5.9 but in "most" of the test it could not beat 6.5.
Key word "most"

Steve, all right there stumpy
.Russ, The #'s on nissannews.com are old, they were posted up before production, most likely they changed weigh slitely and now the new "exact" weights are posted on nissandriven.com. Nissannews, is more of a prieview site then nissandriven. BTW nissannews had also listed the 02 max as 260 HP.
Re: hmmm
Originally posted by pmar
have to admit, that makes a person drool. Is it the fastest Nissan to date? What did the 300ZX twin do?
Any chance Nissan will improve the interior for 2003 and maybe do the 6-spd for Altima? I doubt the Max can do these numbers because 15 hp has to carry more weight I think.
have to admit, that makes a person drool. Is it the fastest Nissan to date? What did the 300ZX twin do?
Any chance Nissan will improve the interior for 2003 and maybe do the 6-spd for Altima? I doubt the Max can do these numbers because 15 hp has to carry more weight I think.
Re: Re: hmmm
Originally posted by Newman96SE
isnt horsepower the power to weight ratio or something like that? so 255 HP in a 2000 lb car and 255 HP in a 3000 lb car should have similar specs (assuming that the cars are exactly the same except for the weight which is only hypothetical)thats just what i always thought, i definitely could be mistaken. but does that make sense?
isnt horsepower the power to weight ratio or something like that? so 255 HP in a 2000 lb car and 255 HP in a 3000 lb car should have similar specs (assuming that the cars are exactly the same except for the weight which is only hypothetical)thats just what i always thought, i definitely could be mistaken. but does that make sense?
6 speed slower!?
WTF???
I got this on altimas.net:
luv2race wrote:
I think the biggest thing to look for is not the horsepower but the torque of Altima vs. Maxima. This is what you will notice in 0-60 times. By the way all the Nissan dealers here in Phoenix just had their ride and drive, everyone has been telling me that the 5 spd Altima beat the 6 spd Maxima they had. Don't know if its true, but I'd like to think so since I have a 5 spd 3.5.
http://www.altimas.net/forum/showthr...&threadid=6686
I hope they don't know how to drive a 6 speed OR that they are lying to make the sales more worth it.
Damn car salesman!
I got this on altimas.net:
luv2race wrote:
I think the biggest thing to look for is not the horsepower but the torque of Altima vs. Maxima. This is what you will notice in 0-60 times. By the way all the Nissan dealers here in Phoenix just had their ride and drive, everyone has been telling me that the 5 spd Altima beat the 6 spd Maxima they had. Don't know if its true, but I'd like to think so since I have a 5 spd 3.5.
http://www.altimas.net/forum/showthr...&threadid=6686
I hope they don't know how to drive a 6 speed OR that they are lying to make the sales more worth it.
Damn car salesman!
Re: 6 speed slower!?
Originally posted by Amazing2
WTF???
I got this on altimas.net:
luv2race wrote:
I think the biggest thing to look for is not the horsepower but the torque of Altima vs. Maxima. This is what you will notice in 0-60 times. By the way all the Nissan dealers here in Phoenix just had their ride and drive, everyone has been telling me that the 5 spd Altima beat the 6 spd Maxima they had. Don't know if its true, but I'd like to think so since I have a 5 spd 3.5.
http://www.altimas.net/forum/showthr...&threadid=6686
I hope they don't know how to drive a 6 speed OR that they are lying to make the sales more worth it.
Damn car salesman!
WTF???
I got this on altimas.net:
luv2race wrote:
I think the biggest thing to look for is not the horsepower but the torque of Altima vs. Maxima. This is what you will notice in 0-60 times. By the way all the Nissan dealers here in Phoenix just had their ride and drive, everyone has been telling me that the 5 spd Altima beat the 6 spd Maxima they had. Don't know if its true, but I'd like to think so since I have a 5 spd 3.5.
http://www.altimas.net/forum/showthr...&threadid=6686
I hope they don't know how to drive a 6 speed OR that they are lying to make the sales more worth it.
Damn car salesman!
I drove the 2K2 Max auto and Alty 3.5SE auto, and the Altima didnt feel nearly as fast as the Max. The Altima felt exactly as smooth, fast, quiet as a 4th auto, while the Maxima felt like a hot rod, torque monster. So strictly judging by that, I'd now say the 6 spd Maxima definitely has to be faster than the Altima. What I cant believe is if it is in fact faster, that basically means the Maxima 6 spd will eat up or keep up with a GS 430, 540i, E430 and the likes, which is pretty incredible.
Originally posted by NYC GXE
What I cant believe is if it is in fact faster, that basically means the Maxima 6 spd will eat up or keep up with a GS 430, 540i, E430 and the likes, which is pretty incredible.
What I cant believe is if it is in fact faster, that basically means the Maxima 6 spd will eat up or keep up with a GS 430, 540i, E430 and the likes, which is pretty incredible.
(assuming we are talking about the 2002 Altima and Maxima manual)
Since Consumer Guide tested the new Maxima automatic at 7.0second without breaking in, therefore, the Maxima automatic will do a mid 6 second broken in.
Since manual is faster than automatic, therefore, the Maxima manual will do a low 6 second with manual.
However, with a 6 speed and Helical limited slip differential, 0-60 should be up by a notch, bumping it to high 5.
The Altima is just as fast as GS400 and E430, therefore, if the Max is faster than the Altima, it will be faster than the GS400 and E430.
Therefore, the new Maxima will be as fast as GS400, if not faster.
Originally posted by LoveSick
We can use some conductive conclusion to estimate how fast the new Max will be!
(assuming we are talking about the 2002 Altima and Maxima manual)
Since Consumer Guide tested the new Maxima automatic at 7.0second without breaking in, therefore, the Maxima automatic will do a mid 6 second broken in.
Since manual is faster than automatic, therefore, the Maxima manual will do a low 6 second with manual.
However, with a 6 speed and Helical limited slip differential, 0-60 should be up by a notch, bumping it to high 5.
The Altima is just as fast as GS400 and E430, therefore, if the Max is faster than the Altima, it will be faster than the GS400 and E430.
Therefore, the new Maxima will be as fast as GS400, if not faster.
We can use some conductive conclusion to estimate how fast the new Max will be!
(assuming we are talking about the 2002 Altima and Maxima manual)
Since Consumer Guide tested the new Maxima automatic at 7.0second without breaking in, therefore, the Maxima automatic will do a mid 6 second broken in.
Since manual is faster than automatic, therefore, the Maxima manual will do a low 6 second with manual.
However, with a 6 speed and Helical limited slip differential, 0-60 should be up by a notch, bumping it to high 5.
The Altima is just as fast as GS400 and E430, therefore, if the Max is faster than the Altima, it will be faster than the GS400 and E430.
Therefore, the new Maxima will be as fast as GS400, if not faster.
Re: 6 speed slower!?
6-speed VS 5-speed from a 6-speed Corvette owner's point of view:
You may what to take into account that a 6-speed manuel may have more drivetrain loss than a 5-speed manuel, as in C5 land MN6 only dyno a couple percentages high than the Automatic aviable in corvettes...GM rates them as 15% loss for MN6s and 18% for A4s. Often, they acutally dyno very close to each other. Of course, the GM A4 is a very effent Transmission, which could account for some of the small difference.
As far as the Maxima vs. Altima transmissions, the Altima has lower 1st and 2nd gears..... 3rd and 4th are lower in the Max.... Acutally 5th is to, but insignificatly.. .800 to .809. The lower 1/2 will be a benefit for the Altima 5-sp... and 3rd gear may not be such a bad thing, espicaly if the Altima is able to finish the quarter in 3rd, and the Max may requre a 3-4 shift in the quarter, which will slow down ETs.
You may what to take into account that a 6-speed manuel may have more drivetrain loss than a 5-speed manuel, as in C5 land MN6 only dyno a couple percentages high than the Automatic aviable in corvettes...GM rates them as 15% loss for MN6s and 18% for A4s. Often, they acutally dyno very close to each other. Of course, the GM A4 is a very effent Transmission, which could account for some of the small difference.
As far as the Maxima vs. Altima transmissions, the Altima has lower 1st and 2nd gears..... 3rd and 4th are lower in the Max.... Acutally 5th is to, but insignificatly.. .800 to .809. The lower 1/2 will be a benefit for the Altima 5-sp... and 3rd gear may not be such a bad thing, espicaly if the Altima is able to finish the quarter in 3rd, and the Max may requre a 3-4 shift in the quarter, which will slow down ETs.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: 6 speed slower!?
Sorry, but you are not fully correct. The Maxima will not see the decrease in drivetrain loss from a 5spd to a 6spd like the C5 does. Remember the C5 design of drivetrain makes it LOOSE that much more for the 6spd. The FBODYs do not lose near as much compared to your car. You should know this, but so far every post you have done is not correct.
The maxima will loose the same amount of loss like others, 12-15%. The vette looses more like 18%
The maxima will loose the same amount of loss like others, 12-15%. The vette looses more like 18%
Originally posted by c5hardtop
6-speed VS 5-speed from a 6-speed Corvette owner's point of view:
You may what to take into account that a 6-speed manuel may have more drivetrain loss than a 5-speed manuel, as in C5 land MN6 only dyno a couple percentages high than the Automatic aviable in corvettes...GM rates them as 15% loss for MN6s and 18% for A4s. Often, they acutally dyno very close to each other. Of course, the GM A4 is a very effent Transmission, which could account for some of the small difference.
As far as the Maxima vs. Altima transmissions, the Altima has lower 1st and 2nd gears..... 3rd and 4th are lower in the Max.... Acutally 5th is to, but insignificatly.. .800 to .809. The lower 1/2 will be a benefit for the Altima 5-sp... and 3rd gear may not be such a bad thing, espicaly if the Altima is able to finish the quarter in 3rd, and the Max may requre a 3-4 shift in the quarter, which will slow down ETs.
6-speed VS 5-speed from a 6-speed Corvette owner's point of view:
You may what to take into account that a 6-speed manuel may have more drivetrain loss than a 5-speed manuel, as in C5 land MN6 only dyno a couple percentages high than the Automatic aviable in corvettes...GM rates them as 15% loss for MN6s and 18% for A4s. Often, they acutally dyno very close to each other. Of course, the GM A4 is a very effent Transmission, which could account for some of the small difference.
As far as the Maxima vs. Altima transmissions, the Altima has lower 1st and 2nd gears..... 3rd and 4th are lower in the Max.... Acutally 5th is to, but insignificatly.. .800 to .809. The lower 1/2 will be a benefit for the Altima 5-sp... and 3rd gear may not be such a bad thing, espicaly if the Altima is able to finish the quarter in 3rd, and the Max may requre a 3-4 shift in the quarter, which will slow down ETs.
Re: Re: Re: 6 speed slower!?
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac
Sorry, but you are not fully correct. The Maxima will not see the decrease in drivetrain loss from a 5spd to a 6spd like the C5 does. Remember the C5 design of drivetrain makes it LOOSE that much more for the 6spd. The FBODYs do not lose near as much compared to your car. You should know this, but so far every post you have done is not correct.
The maxima will loose the same amount of loss like others, 12-15%. The vette looses more like 18%
Sorry, but you are not fully correct. The Maxima will not see the decrease in drivetrain loss from a 5spd to a 6spd like the C5 does. Remember the C5 design of drivetrain makes it LOOSE that much more for the 6spd. The FBODYs do not lose near as much compared to your car. You should know this, but so far every post you have done is not correct.
The maxima will loose the same amount of loss like others, 12-15%. The vette looses more like 18%
I was compairing the difference in drivetrain loss between a A4 and a MN6 in Corvette. You will notice only a small difference between the two maybe only 1-2% difference, yet in say a 01 Maxima, the difference in HP between a Automatic and 5-speed is much more... to the tune of 5% from what I understand. Engineers have found that using a 6speed resulting in a slighty higher drivetrain loss, as the extra gear ats weight and friction. Fbodys have the same gap... you will find that 6-speed fbodys hardly put out any more hp than Automatic Fbodys... considering the differences found in other makes with Autos vs 5-speeds.
Originally posted by Mike S.
So...C5 man...which are you getting?
PS-why are people so cought up in .1 here .1 there? I mean...anything in the low 15's let alone 14's feels fast...so who cares if runs 14.4 .6 or .8?
Mike S.
So...C5 man...which are you getting?
PS-why are people so cought up in .1 here .1 there? I mean...anything in the low 15's let alone 14's feels fast...so who cares if runs 14.4 .6 or .8?
Mike S.
Originally posted by Mike S.
So...C5 man...which are you getting?
PS-why are people so cought up in .1 here .1 there? I mean...anything in the low 15's let alone 14's feels fast...so who cares if runs 14.4 .6 or .8?
Mike S.
So...C5 man...which are you getting?
PS-why are people so cought up in .1 here .1 there? I mean...anything in the low 15's let alone 14's feels fast...so who cares if runs 14.4 .6 or .8?
Mike S.






