vbmod owners whay are your 1/4 times???
#1
vbmod owners whay are your 1/4 times???
i just want to know what all of you guys are running...my car doesnt pull hard in 3rd anymore??? do you guys think that a broken RT cat is the problem...i hope soo...i ran a 15.37 before vbmod now i just ran a 15.91(both g-tech)??? kinda ****es me off... o well....
#2
Re: vbmod owners whay are your 1/4 times???
Originally posted by BLacKMax69
i just want to know what all of you guys are running...my car doesnt pull hard in 3rd anymore??? do you guys think that a broken RT cat is the problem...i hope soo...i ran a 15.37 before vbmod now i just ran a 15.91(both g-tech)??? kinda ****es me off... o well....
i just want to know what all of you guys are running...my car doesnt pull hard in 3rd anymore??? do you guys think that a broken RT cat is the problem...i hope soo...i ran a 15.37 before vbmod now i just ran a 15.91(both g-tech)??? kinda ****es me off... o well....
I guess what happens is with the stock supension the car leans a lot during a hard launch and this screws up the G-Techs readings, when you lower it your car does not squat on a hard launch so the G-Tech get's all screwd up. Thats my take on it atleast, even my I30 and 95 max did the same thing to the G-Tech after I lower the car.
#3
Re: Re: vbmod owners whay are your 1/4 times???
Originally posted by emax95
Hey Franko, I bet your car is running slow on the G-Tech because you changed your suspension to a much stiffer setup. The same thing happened to me with my G-tech times, I am usually about .3-.5 slower with a stiff suspension.
I guess what happens is with the stock supension the car leans a lot during a hard launch and this screws up the G-Techs readings, when you lower it your car does not squat on a hard launch so the G-Tech get's all screwd up. Thats my take on it atleast, even my I30 and 95 max did the same thing to the G-Tech after I lower the car.
Hey Franko, I bet your car is running slow on the G-Tech because you changed your suspension to a much stiffer setup. The same thing happened to me with my G-tech times, I am usually about .3-.5 slower with a stiff suspension.
I guess what happens is with the stock supension the car leans a lot during a hard launch and this screws up the G-Techs readings, when you lower it your car does not squat on a hard launch so the G-Tech get's all screwd up. Thats my take on it atleast, even my I30 and 95 max did the same thing to the G-Tech after I lower the car.
#7
My best is a 15.05. Usually my worst these days is 15.5's (depending on how much gas I have). I have CAI, y-pipe, JWT ECU, high-flow cat, and an A'Pexi N1 muffler. That's running on 17" rims too.
#8
Me and Ant95SE both did our VBs together. It actually didnt do much as far as time for me. Unless you are running over 300fwhp, you wont notice too much in times.
Following times are with VB.
VB, CAI - 15.5@89mph (i actualy ran the same times with and w/o VB mod wiht same 60fts)
VB, CAI, Y-pipe - 15.3@90mph
VB, CAI, Y-pipe, 50 shot - 14.3@97mph
VB, CAI, Y-pipe, 100 shot - 14.00@100mph
Following times are with VB.
VB, CAI - 15.5@89mph (i actualy ran the same times with and w/o VB mod wiht same 60fts)
VB, CAI, Y-pipe - 15.3@90mph
VB, CAI, Y-pipe, 50 shot - 14.3@97mph
VB, CAI, Y-pipe, 100 shot - 14.00@100mph
#10
Re: vbmod owners whay are your 1/4 times???
Originally posted by BLacKMax69
i just want to know what all of you guys are running...my car doesnt pull hard in 3rd anymore??? do you guys think that a broken RT cat is the problem...i hope soo...i ran a 15.37 before vbmod now i just ran a 15.91(both g-tech)??? kinda ****es me off... o well....
i just want to know what all of you guys are running...my car doesnt pull hard in 3rd anymore??? do you guys think that a broken RT cat is the problem...i hope soo...i ran a 15.37 before vbmod now i just ran a 15.91(both g-tech)??? kinda ****es me off... o well....
l8tr -- SS
#11
Originally posted by Lime
VB only saves the tranny. doesn't speed up the car.
VB only saves the tranny. doesn't speed up the car.
and on don's website it says it makes the car faster cus it shifts
quicker
rite?
#12
Re: Re: vbmod owners whay are your 1/4 times???
I have been on this board ever since it started and have not recalled one person who has lost .4-.6 besides Don.
Don't get me wrong, he is a VERY respectable man and knows a lot about Maximas but i don't see it dropping as much as claimed.
I have done plenty of baseline runs with similar conditions with and w/o VB mod. It did not yield that much off. I have seen about .1 of a difference but no more then that. Unless these people who "claimed" it took that much off w/o even having a baseline run, I wouldn't call it legit information.
Now if this was true, the autos would be running almost identical times as a 5spd but they aren't.
Some food for thought.
Don't get me wrong, he is a VERY respectable man and knows a lot about Maximas but i don't see it dropping as much as claimed.
I have done plenty of baseline runs with similar conditions with and w/o VB mod. It did not yield that much off. I have seen about .1 of a difference but no more then that. Unless these people who "claimed" it took that much off w/o even having a baseline run, I wouldn't call it legit information.
Now if this was true, the autos would be running almost identical times as a 5spd but they aren't.
Some food for thought.
#13
I also have the Don's VB. Last time I went to the track, I didn't see any improvement. Unless you are going to run nitrous and/or SC, I say skip the VB. Better spent on a JWT ECU for example. I wouldn't say the VB make your car faster, besides protecting the tranny, the shifts are firmer/faster. I thought by getting the VB, the lag that I would get from time to time with the darn automagic tranny would be eliminated. Nope, still have the lag. The upshifts are nicer, but the downshifts aren't any better.
#14
vb mod
i have to agree with you cumalot. the shifts are really nice and firm. but the lag is still there. i personally like it. i also dont see how it wouldnt increase times if you go through the gears a lot faster. i think its a good mod and it supposed to save the tranny.
Lenny.
Lenny.
#15
Re: Re: Re: vbmod owners whay are your 1/4 times???
Originally posted by mattattax
I'm a little confused--does the lower suspension make you slower or does it just make the G-tech say your slower? I would think it's the latter
I'm a little confused--does the lower suspension make you slower or does it just make the G-tech say your slower? I would think it's the latter
#16
BSwithTF: what were you running before the VB?
This thread is very interesting to me as I just purchased a spare VB while I ponder the investment into the modification. I ran a 15.13 last weekend with a JWT Intake/JWT ECU/Y Pipe on stock fronts but im at 15.3 consistently. Most people have told me that I'll be in the high 14's consistently with the VB. Im wondering if the $450 could be better spent somewhere else such as a CAI or a catback exhaust or something to that effect?
Any input is appreciated.
This thread is very interesting to me as I just purchased a spare VB while I ponder the investment into the modification. I ran a 15.13 last weekend with a JWT Intake/JWT ECU/Y Pipe on stock fronts but im at 15.3 consistently. Most people have told me that I'll be in the high 14's consistently with the VB. Im wondering if the $450 could be better spent somewhere else such as a CAI or a catback exhaust or something to that effect?
Any input is appreciated.
#21
Re: Re: for $450, I'd get NOS or Zex.
Originally posted by DCmax
450 for the kit, then it all adds up after that depending on where you want to go with the setup.
450 for the kit, then it all adds up after that depending on where you want to go with the setup.
I agree. I want to get nitrous too. The kit itself isn't too expensive, but after all the accessories it adds up.
DC: I got my VB at a special price, under $400, IIRC Don had some kind of special at that time. So I jumped all over the great deal. Unless you can get the mod at a good price, I say skip the VB. Maybe spend the money on some drag radials?
#22
Re: vb mod
Originally posted by sp6040
i have to agree with you cumalot. the shifts are really nice and firm. but the lag is still there. i personally like it. i also dont see how it wouldnt increase times if you go through the gears a lot faster. i think its a good mod and it supposed to save the tranny.
Lenny.
i have to agree with you cumalot. the shifts are really nice and firm. but the lag is still there. i personally like it. i also dont see how it wouldnt increase times if you go through the gears a lot faster. i think its a good mod and it supposed to save the tranny.
Lenny.
#23
I never ran it before the VB.
Originally posted by DCmax
BSwithTF: what were you running before the VB?
This thread is very interesting to me as I just purchased a spare VB while I ponder the investment into the modification. I ran a 15.13 last weekend with a JWT Intake/JWT ECU/Y Pipe on stock fronts but im at 15.3 consistently. Most people have told me that I'll be in the high 14's consistently with the VB. Im wondering if the $450 could be better spent somewhere else such as a CAI or a catback exhaust or something to that effect?
Any input is appreciated.
BSwithTF: what were you running before the VB?
This thread is very interesting to me as I just purchased a spare VB while I ponder the investment into the modification. I ran a 15.13 last weekend with a JWT Intake/JWT ECU/Y Pipe on stock fronts but im at 15.3 consistently. Most people have told me that I'll be in the high 14's consistently with the VB. Im wondering if the $450 could be better spent somewhere else such as a CAI or a catback exhaust or something to that effect?
Any input is appreciated.
#24
Re: Re: vb mod
Originally posted by Don in Texas
Can you contradict yourself more iRe: vb mod
Quoted Message:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by sp6040
....the shifts are really nice and firm, but the lag is still there. ......... i also dont see how it wouldnt increase times if you go through the gears a lot faster.......
Lenny.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Can you contradict yourself more in one paragraph?
n one paragraph?
Can you contradict yourself more iRe: vb mod
Quoted Message:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by sp6040
....the shifts are really nice and firm, but the lag is still there. ......... i also dont see how it wouldnt increase times if you go through the gears a lot faster.......
Lenny.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Can you contradict yourself more in one paragraph?
n one paragraph?
Lenny
#25
this isn't an apples to apples comparison but...
all you 5-speeders out there: go to the track and shift quickly through the gears, get your time, run again with slower more 'luxurious' shifts and see if there's a time difference
if you're selling your max in 6 months don't get the vb mod, if you're keeping it, get it and don't worry about your tranny when you add some power
all you 5-speeders out there: go to the track and shift quickly through the gears, get your time, run again with slower more 'luxurious' shifts and see if there's a time difference
if you're selling your max in 6 months don't get the vb mod, if you're keeping it, get it and don't worry about your tranny when you add some power
#26
Re: Re: Re: vb mod
Originally posted by sp6040
to clear things up a little i am not contradicting myself. i stated the lag is there, but i only notice it from time to time. i am more than happy with this mod. as far as it increasing times i dont know. i dont take my car to the track at all. but again i dont see how it wouldnt increase your times if the shifts are a lot quicker.
Lenny
to clear things up a little i am not contradicting myself. i stated the lag is there, but i only notice it from time to time. i am more than happy with this mod. as far as it increasing times i dont know. i dont take my car to the track at all. but again i dont see how it wouldnt increase your times if the shifts are a lot quicker.
Lenny
#27
Re: Re: for $450, I'd get NOS or Zex.
Originally posted by DCmax
450 for the kit, then it all adds up after that depending on where you want to go with the setup.
450 for the kit, then it all adds up after that depending on where you want to go with the setup.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MatthewsMaxima
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
12
09-11-2015 03:21 AM
Team STILLEN
Autocrossing and Road Course Racing
0
08-10-2015 04:29 PM