My rental 2K2 SE vs my rental 2K2 Taurus SES
#1
My rental 2K2 SE vs my rental 2K2 Taurus SES
I'm currently out of town working and I've got a rental 2k2 Taurus SES. My coworker somehow managed to get a 2k2 SE rental. As luck would have it, I'm doing work at an old Air Force base with lots of open and long taxiways and such. I grabbed the keys for the 2k2 and took it for a spin since I've never driven one. Things I noted about the 2k2 vs my 96 SE:
1) The 2k2 has a more comfortable driving position, maybe because it's an auto and I don't have to worry about my left foot.
2) I definately don't like the dashboard. The center pod is too narrow and the dash is too low. I like the larger and higher setup of the 4th gen dash. The gated shifter is cool.
3) The 2k2 doors rattle when you close them, especially with the windows down. Other rattles came from the center of the dash and thunks from the rear suspension.
4) The steering feel is much better in the 2k2 and everything that mounted to the steering column is awesome. I wish the 4th gens were like this. The turning radius is indeed laughable.
5) The ride of the 2k2 isn't great AT ALL. The 2k2 rides as rough as my 4th gen on Intrax. I even checked the air pressure for over inflation. My 96 also feels a bit more solid overall however I've got SFCs. The 2k2 does handle quite well for stock though, nothing like my 96 with a aftermarket susupension and grippy tires, but it's good for stock. The rear suspension feels particularly stiff. I can see why many people complain about the ride of the 2k2. If anything, it's probably that 52+lb tire/rim combo.
6) The power from the 3.5VQ is impressive. This car feels very much like a stock GTP I drove. 0-90 (manually shifting 1st and 2nd) felt very strong. I could definately tell that my 4th gen would pull on this car from 60mph on. From 0-60, it would be close. Launching the 2k2 is very easy and it never feels "laggy" off the line. Shifts are good, but could be more solid. This car feels like the only thing holding it back is a 5 speed auto.
My rental Taurus:
1) Excellent ride (16" with 215/60s)
2) Feels more solid than the (gulp) 2k2 Maxima
3) Quiet ride
4) Okay power (3.0 "Vulcan" V6 ~170hp)
5) Poor shifting auto
6) Poor handling
2k2 Max vs 2k2 Taurus
With me driving the Maxima and my coworker driving the Taurus, we lined up on a lone concrete taxiway. Both cars were manually shifted and the race went to 90mph, whomever got there first. On the 3rd honk we went. Immediately the Max takes the jump and never looked back. When I shut down at 90mph I guesstimated I was ahead by 6-7 cars. My coworker (engineer-type) thought it was close to 100' (close enough).
Dave
1) The 2k2 has a more comfortable driving position, maybe because it's an auto and I don't have to worry about my left foot.
2) I definately don't like the dashboard. The center pod is too narrow and the dash is too low. I like the larger and higher setup of the 4th gen dash. The gated shifter is cool.
3) The 2k2 doors rattle when you close them, especially with the windows down. Other rattles came from the center of the dash and thunks from the rear suspension.
4) The steering feel is much better in the 2k2 and everything that mounted to the steering column is awesome. I wish the 4th gens were like this. The turning radius is indeed laughable.
5) The ride of the 2k2 isn't great AT ALL. The 2k2 rides as rough as my 4th gen on Intrax. I even checked the air pressure for over inflation. My 96 also feels a bit more solid overall however I've got SFCs. The 2k2 does handle quite well for stock though, nothing like my 96 with a aftermarket susupension and grippy tires, but it's good for stock. The rear suspension feels particularly stiff. I can see why many people complain about the ride of the 2k2. If anything, it's probably that 52+lb tire/rim combo.
6) The power from the 3.5VQ is impressive. This car feels very much like a stock GTP I drove. 0-90 (manually shifting 1st and 2nd) felt very strong. I could definately tell that my 4th gen would pull on this car from 60mph on. From 0-60, it would be close. Launching the 2k2 is very easy and it never feels "laggy" off the line. Shifts are good, but could be more solid. This car feels like the only thing holding it back is a 5 speed auto.
My rental Taurus:
1) Excellent ride (16" with 215/60s)
2) Feels more solid than the (gulp) 2k2 Maxima
3) Quiet ride
4) Okay power (3.0 "Vulcan" V6 ~170hp)
5) Poor shifting auto
6) Poor handling
2k2 Max vs 2k2 Taurus
With me driving the Maxima and my coworker driving the Taurus, we lined up on a lone concrete taxiway. Both cars were manually shifted and the race went to 90mph, whomever got there first. On the 3rd honk we went. Immediately the Max takes the jump and never looked back. When I shut down at 90mph I guesstimated I was ahead by 6-7 cars. My coworker (engineer-type) thought it was close to 100' (close enough).
Dave
#4
Re: My rental 2K2 SE vs my rental 2K2 Taurus SES
Originally posted by Dave B
I'm currently out of town working and I've got a rental 2k2 Taurus SES. My coworker somehow managed to get a 2k2 SE rental. As luck would have it, I'm doing work at an old Air Force base with lots of open and long taxiways and such. I grabbed the keys for the 2k2 and took it for a spin since I've never driven one. Things I noted about the 2k2 vs my 96 SE:
1) The 2k2 has a more comfortable driving position, maybe because it's an auto and I don't have to worry about my left foot.
2) I definately don't like the dashboard. The center pod is too narrow and the dash is too low. I like the larger and higher setup of the 4th gen dash. The gated shifter is cool.
3) The 2k2 doors rattle when you close them, especially with the windows down. Other rattles came from the center of the dash and thunks from the rear suspension.
4) The steering feel is much better in the 2k2 and everything that mounted to the steering column is awesome. I wish the 4th gens were like this. The turning radius is indeed laughable.
5) The ride of the 2k2 isn't great AT ALL. The 2k2 rides as rough as my 4th gen on Intrax. I even checked the air pressure for over inflation. My 96 also feels a bit more solid overall however I've got SFCs. The 2k2 does handle quite well for stock though, nothing like my 96 with a aftermarket susupension and grippy tires, but it's good for stock. The rear suspension feels particularly stiff. I can see why many people complain about the ride of the 2k2. If anything, it's probably that 52+lb tire/rim combo.
6) The power from the 3.5VQ is impressive. This car feels very much like a stock GTP I drove. 0-90 (manually shifting 1st and 2nd) felt very strong. I could definately tell that my 4th gen would pull on this car from 60mph on. From 0-60, it would be close. Launching the 2k2 is very easy and it never feels "laggy" off the line. Shifts are good, but could be more solid. This car feels like the only thing holding it back is a 5 speed auto.
My rental Taurus:
1) Excellent ride (16" with 215/60s)
2) Feels more solid than the (gulp) 2k2 Maxima
3) Quiet ride
4) Okay power (3.0 "Vulcan" V6 ~170hp)
5) Poor shifting auto
6) Poor handling
2k2 Max vs 2k2 Taurus
With me driving the Maxima and my coworker driving the Taurus, we lined up on a lone concrete taxiway. Both cars were manually shifted and the race went to 90mph, whomever got there first. On the 3rd honk we went. Immediately the Max takes the jump and never looked back. When I shut down at 90mph I guesstimated I was ahead by 6-7 cars. My coworker (engineer-type) thought it was close to 100' (close enough).
Dave
I'm currently out of town working and I've got a rental 2k2 Taurus SES. My coworker somehow managed to get a 2k2 SE rental. As luck would have it, I'm doing work at an old Air Force base with lots of open and long taxiways and such. I grabbed the keys for the 2k2 and took it for a spin since I've never driven one. Things I noted about the 2k2 vs my 96 SE:
1) The 2k2 has a more comfortable driving position, maybe because it's an auto and I don't have to worry about my left foot.
2) I definately don't like the dashboard. The center pod is too narrow and the dash is too low. I like the larger and higher setup of the 4th gen dash. The gated shifter is cool.
3) The 2k2 doors rattle when you close them, especially with the windows down. Other rattles came from the center of the dash and thunks from the rear suspension.
4) The steering feel is much better in the 2k2 and everything that mounted to the steering column is awesome. I wish the 4th gens were like this. The turning radius is indeed laughable.
5) The ride of the 2k2 isn't great AT ALL. The 2k2 rides as rough as my 4th gen on Intrax. I even checked the air pressure for over inflation. My 96 also feels a bit more solid overall however I've got SFCs. The 2k2 does handle quite well for stock though, nothing like my 96 with a aftermarket susupension and grippy tires, but it's good for stock. The rear suspension feels particularly stiff. I can see why many people complain about the ride of the 2k2. If anything, it's probably that 52+lb tire/rim combo.
6) The power from the 3.5VQ is impressive. This car feels very much like a stock GTP I drove. 0-90 (manually shifting 1st and 2nd) felt very strong. I could definately tell that my 4th gen would pull on this car from 60mph on. From 0-60, it would be close. Launching the 2k2 is very easy and it never feels "laggy" off the line. Shifts are good, but could be more solid. This car feels like the only thing holding it back is a 5 speed auto.
My rental Taurus:
1) Excellent ride (16" with 215/60s)
2) Feels more solid than the (gulp) 2k2 Maxima
3) Quiet ride
4) Okay power (3.0 "Vulcan" V6 ~170hp)
5) Poor shifting auto
6) Poor handling
2k2 Max vs 2k2 Taurus
With me driving the Maxima and my coworker driving the Taurus, we lined up on a lone concrete taxiway. Both cars were manually shifted and the race went to 90mph, whomever got there first. On the 3rd honk we went. Immediately the Max takes the jump and never looked back. When I shut down at 90mph I guesstimated I was ahead by 6-7 cars. My coworker (engineer-type) thought it was close to 100' (close enough).
Dave
#5
Originally posted by Craig Mack
If your friend drove the 2k2 Auto maxima, and you were driving your '96 5spd, who would take who off the line and to 60mph?
If your friend drove the 2k2 Auto maxima, and you were driving your '96 5spd, who would take who off the line and to 60mph?
What's "off the line" mean to you? 0-20, 0-30? It would be close, but I think I could take the 2k2 auto from a complete stop if I launched well. If I FUBAR the launch, it will take me to 40mph to start pulling on the this auto. In 0-60, I would probably get the 2k2 by a car or so.
blizz20ma-
There's nothing "detuned" about a rental car. They don't have govenors, etc. A rental Max runs just like any other Max.
Dave
#6
Originally posted by Dave B
blizz20ma-
There's nothing "detuned" about a rental car. They don't have govenors, etc. A rental Max runs just like any other Max.
Dave
blizz20ma-
There's nothing "detuned" about a rental car. They don't have govenors, etc. A rental Max runs just like any other Max.
Dave
Subtract 10-15 HP. Unless Dave has specifically run the tank down and put 91+ in
#7
I heartily agree that the Maxima does have it's shortcomings. My trade in '98 Grand Am GT handled much much better than my '02 Maxima SE. The steering feel was better, and the Pontiac wasn't as floaty as my Maxima is on the highway.
But to make blanket statements based off a rental car is ridiculous. "The 2K2 doors rattle..." Since when? I have 5000 miles on my Max. No rattles, squeaks, or anything of that kind.
The interior does have other issues, but rattles are not of them. You really can't judge a car by a rental, because it's like someone else said. People generally abuse rentals. Truth is most rental cars are crap, irregardless of make and model.
But to make blanket statements based off a rental car is ridiculous. "The 2K2 doors rattle..." Since when? I have 5000 miles on my Max. No rattles, squeaks, or anything of that kind.
The interior does have other issues, but rattles are not of them. You really can't judge a car by a rental, because it's like someone else said. People generally abuse rentals. Truth is most rental cars are crap, irregardless of make and model.
#8
Originally posted by Dave B
Craig-
What's "off the line" mean to you? 0-20, 0-30? It would be close, but I think I could take the 2k2 auto from a complete stop if I launched well. If I FUBAR the launch, it will take me to 40mph to start pulling on the this auto. In 0-60, I would probably get the 2k2 by a car or so.
Craig-
What's "off the line" mean to you? 0-20, 0-30? It would be close, but I think I could take the 2k2 auto from a complete stop if I launched well. If I FUBAR the launch, it will take me to 40mph to start pulling on the this auto. In 0-60, I would probably get the 2k2 by a car or so.
#10
Re: My rental 2K2 SE vs my rental 2K2 Taurus SES
Originally posted by Dave B
2) Feels more solid than the (gulp) 2k2 Maxima
2k2 Max vs 2k2 Taurus
2) Feels more solid than the (gulp) 2k2 Maxima
2k2 Max vs 2k2 Taurus
#11
Originally posted by Mystical2k2SE
But to make blanket statements based off a rental car is ridiculous. "The 2K2 doors rattle..." Since when? I have 5000 miles on my Max. No rattles, squeaks, or anything of that kind.
The interior does have other issues, but rattles are not of them. You really can't judge a car by a rental, because it's like someone else said. People generally abuse rentals. Truth is most rental cars are crap, irregardless of make and model.
But to make blanket statements based off a rental car is ridiculous. "The 2K2 doors rattle..." Since when? I have 5000 miles on my Max. No rattles, squeaks, or anything of that kind.
The interior does have other issues, but rattles are not of them. You really can't judge a car by a rental, because it's like someone else said. People generally abuse rentals. Truth is most rental cars are crap, irregardless of make and model.
Dave
#12
Re: Re: My rental 2K2 SE vs my rental 2K2 Taurus SES
Originally posted by F23A4
A Taurus more solid than a Maxima!?! Own one for more than 3 months and you'll change that assertion.
A Taurus more solid than a Maxima!?! Own one for more than 3 months and you'll change that assertion.
Dave
#13
Originally posted by ericdwong
Yes we all know by now nissan doesnt seem to do anything right. they try for performance and luxury but it falls short on both categories. They also try for safety, convenience and resale value but once again that also fails. My car does not feel solid whatsoever and theres no sound deadener on the roof! No wonder whwen it rains it sounds like a tin can.
Yes we all know by now nissan doesnt seem to do anything right. they try for performance and luxury but it falls short on both categories. They also try for safety, convenience and resale value but once again that also fails. My car does not feel solid whatsoever and theres no sound deadener on the roof! No wonder whwen it rains it sounds like a tin can.
Honda/Toyota have made huge marketing ploys stressing thier reliablity. Nissan hasn't done this. Resale is based largely on demand. Most Americans are pretty damn boring for the most part and don't care that much about handling and acceleration. 0-60 in 8 seconds is considered "strong" by most of the buying public. Take a look at the best selling cars in this country. You've got the Civic, Accord, Camry, and Taurus. There's nothing performance oriented about these cars. They get good gas mileage, ride soft, are relatively cheap, and are pretty reliable. In this country, that's truely what counts. 8 times out of 10, when people find out you have a Maxima, they so "oh, that's too nice of a car for me. I got the Accord instead."
You should remember that resale doesn't mean the car has to be reliable. It's demand. Corvettes, Grand Nationals, 94-96 Impala SS, and Supra TT aren't the most reliable cars on the yet they all have great resale. Same goes for SUV/trucks. It's all about demand because most of these cars have very poor reliabilty.
Has for for Maxima sounds like a tin can in the rain, that rental Taurus is the same way. Even though it's a bit quieter on the inside and feels more soild, rain is still noisy in the cabin. I don't know of many cars that aren't noisy in the rain.
Dave
#16
Having owned a Taurus for 4 years, I can attest to the reliability and workmanship of them. My taurus had abolutely no problems. Supple ride, no interior squeeks at all. They handle like crap however and unless you get the 200+ horsepower engine, you'll notice how underpowered the car is. The one big drawback is when you go to sell the car. I bought mine for 2500 less than blue book and I traded it in for 2800 less than I owed. Ouch is right, but the damn Maxima just realed me in! Needless to say, I'll be keeping this one for at least 5 years.
#17
Originally posted by Dave B
You should remember that resale doesn't mean the car has to be reliable. It's demand. Corvettes, Grand Nationals, 94-96 Impala SS, and Supra TT aren't the most reliable cars on the yet they all have great resale. Same goes for SUV/trucks. It's all about demand because most of these cars have very poor reliabilty.
You should remember that resale doesn't mean the car has to be reliable. It's demand. Corvettes, Grand Nationals, 94-96 Impala SS, and Supra TT aren't the most reliable cars on the yet they all have great resale. Same goes for SUV/trucks. It's all about demand because most of these cars have very poor reliabilty.
I drove it for 10 hours with the new single put in and it didnt even ave a single problem(went to g/f's friends house).
Right now i can boost 2 bar and my best run was 10.1@130 or around there. don't have the time slips handy now. It's a toyota for goodness sake, they have some of the most reliable cars ever and the 2JZ-GTE is that.
#18
Originally posted by 8702
Dave B, when you say your car can pull on the 2k2 auto, how much do you mean exactly? we've seen people with 2k2 autos running around the same 1/4 times as you get on your max.
Dave B, when you say your car can pull on the 2k2 auto, how much do you mean exactly? we've seen people with 2k2 autos running around the same 1/4 times as you get on your max.
Dave
#19
My family used to rent Tauri fairly often. Every time we'd go on a trip and rent a car, we'd request a Taurus. Why? Because they're a very well-built car. Sure they're not increidly fast (The exception being the Taurus SHO, which I have heard there is a rivalry between Max and SHO owners), but they've never broken down on us before. Hell 5 years ago we rented one for a few months before buying a new car, and that thing went upto Dallas, Houston, all round, and got beat up pretty good in the rain, up and down hills, and no problems. Ever. The 200 HP Duratec is a good engine, but if you're comparing that to a 2k2 Maxima's 255 HP VQ engine...I don't see how they can compete. Maybe a 220 HP V-6 SHO? They run high 14s - low 15s. I haven't seen a Duratec break the upper 15s. I'm not surprised you smoked him.
#20
Originally posted by almostki
Very poor reliability in a Toyota SUPRA? Sorry but i gotta chime in. Supras are one of the most reliable sports cars, ever. I know people who drive 900hp supras as daily drivers with NO problems.. these are 10-11 second 1/4 cars daily driven. My car is daily driven too. Before i got the single turbo put in, my supra had stock twins, BPU, pushing 437RWHP and 444ft/lbs without n20. So thats close to 500 flywheel. Every single day I abused that car like no other, Turning the boost up to 2 BAR on stock internals and stock turbos.....
I drove it for 10 hours with the new single put in and it didnt even ave a single problem(went to g/f's friends house).
Right now i can boost 2 bar and my best run was 10.1@130 or around there. don't have the time slips handy now. It's a toyota for goodness sake, they have some of the most reliable cars ever and the 2JZ-GTE is that.
Very poor reliability in a Toyota SUPRA? Sorry but i gotta chime in. Supras are one of the most reliable sports cars, ever. I know people who drive 900hp supras as daily drivers with NO problems.. these are 10-11 second 1/4 cars daily driven. My car is daily driven too. Before i got the single turbo put in, my supra had stock twins, BPU, pushing 437RWHP and 444ft/lbs without n20. So thats close to 500 flywheel. Every single day I abused that car like no other, Turning the boost up to 2 BAR on stock internals and stock turbos.....
I drove it for 10 hours with the new single put in and it didnt even ave a single problem(went to g/f's friends house).
Right now i can boost 2 bar and my best run was 10.1@130 or around there. don't have the time slips handy now. It's a toyota for goodness sake, they have some of the most reliable cars ever and the 2JZ-GTE is that.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TallTom
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
50
07-08-2022 09:54 AM
spencerwh1
Maximas for Sale / Wanted
4
06-30-2016 05:44 AM
viperboy
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
4
09-27-2015 07:05 PM