Maxus Archives Discussions From Past Maxus Meets

2006 Maxus - MSR Dyno Data

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 3, 2006 | 10:56 PM
  #1  
6spd_Hayes's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 595
From: Harvest, AL
2006 Maxus - MSR Dyno Data

For those of you who dynoed, if you are interested in having your run files emailed to you, please PM either I or SR20DEN.

It was a great turnout!!

And yes, a previous N/A Maxima record fell.... bur I will let him speak for himself....
Old Jun 3, 2006 | 10:57 PM
  #2  
Zack342's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (89)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,226
From: Quincy, MA
Hmmm Joe I wonder how that DEK is doing.....
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 12:59 AM
  #3  
Ceasars Chariot's Avatar
Old Maxima Legend
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,058
From: Paraparaumu, NZ
are you going to post up the list ? highest to lowest or by generations ?
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 06:15 AM
  #4  
6spd_Hayes's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 595
From: Harvest, AL
Originally Posted by Ceasars Chariot
are you going to post up the list ? highest to lowest or by generations ?
Not unless given permission. All of these guys (and gal) paid $55 for their pulls, so the data and info belong to them.

But I will say they dynoed two turbo cars, three 5.5 gens, one 6th gen, one 5th gen (I think), a Porsche, and a Supra.

I will have the data at the car show today, so if any of you have a laptop, I can give it to you on USB Memory stick. Otherwise, I or Matt can email it to you sometime this week.
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 10:12 AM
  #5  
Zack342's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (89)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,226
From: Quincy, MA
No 4th gens?
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 06:29 PM
  #6  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
I know at least one 4th gen (I30) dyno'd but the #s were crap.
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 10:58 AM
  #7  
Glude's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,780
I wanna see some numbers.
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 11:22 AM
  #8  
gurlie_J_gurl's Avatar
I wanna be at my maximum
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 336
From: DFW
mine were 212/212 on all 3 pulls .... well after the figured out my auto.... i think i should have reset my ECU before hand.... but hey... it's all a learning experience
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 11:26 AM
  #9  
JNCoRacer's Avatar
Just the tip.
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,983
From: Plano, TX
212/212? Booo! Thats weak. Making a car pretty does nothing for performance. Just ask Dwayne(Mr.Maxx). LOL

j/k, nice 6th gen btw. I may be able to post up the video of it sliding around the parking lot.
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 01:46 PM
  #10  
gurlie_J_gurl's Avatar
I wanna be at my maximum
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 336
From: DFW
Originally Posted by JNCoRacer
212/212? Booo! Thats weak. Making a car pretty does nothing for performance.
So the Nismo cold air intake and custom cat-back exhaust you consider just "pretty" not a performace mod? (not much, but a good start) ... I blame the 'not so great' hp/torque on it being an auto and not resetting the ecu b4 the pulls ...

What would you suggest ole' wise one?
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 02:10 PM
  #11  
xlcrew's Avatar
I’m Back
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,524
From: Oklahoma City, OK
well i put down 175/191 with the VIAS not working and then after i pulled the rod out i put down 190/170 with a bad knock sensor. didn't find that out till the next day. i was the lowest powered car there, but then again i was the only NA 3.0 all in all it was a fun day. and gurlie j gurl your car sounds sweet and girl you car drive whenever you don't have an ich at a 130 mph. jk
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 03:49 PM
  #12  
SR20DEN's Avatar
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,661
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by gurlie_J_gurl
mine were 212/212 on all 3 pulls .... well after the figured out my auto.... i think i should have reset my ECU before hand.... but hey... it's all a learning experience

Looking over your runfiles, you actually got 214/214 on run #3.
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 03:53 PM
  #13  
SR20DEN's Avatar
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,661
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by xlcrew
well i put down 175/191 with the VIAS not working and then after i pulled the rod out i put down 190/170 with a bad knock sensor. didn't find that out till the next day. i was the lowest powered car there, but then again i was the only NA 3.0 all in all it was a fun day. and gurlie j gurl your car sounds sweet and girl you car drive whenever you don't have an ich at a 130 mph. jk

You got 171.54/191.66 on run #2 and 192.10/177.97 on run #4 after we removed the PV.

(SAE smoothing 5)
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 04:11 PM
  #14  
SR20DEN's Avatar
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,661
From: Charlotte, NC
This is all I managed to do (blue line) but with all accessories ON the car this time (AC, PS, etc.)

The red line is my old record which was without A/C, PS, etc.



Old Jun 5, 2006 | 05:48 PM
  #15  
gurlie_J_gurl's Avatar
I wanna be at my maximum
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 336
From: DFW
Originally Posted by xlcrew
gurlie j gurl your car sounds sweet and girl you car drive whenever you don't have an ich at a 130 mph. jk
it's not always an itch, sometimes... something outside the car distracts me.... like a wild animal, or a slow 5th gen beating me
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 09:48 AM
  #16  
deezo's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,285
From: FV, NC
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
This is all I managed to do (blue line) but with all accessories ON the car this time (AC, PS, etc.)

The red line is my old record which was without A/C, PS, etc.



That's good Matt.
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 11:58 AM
  #17  
sloppymax's Avatar
IMBOUTTOBUSTSOMEGHOSTS
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,695
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by xlcrew
well i put down 175/191 with the VIAS not working and then after i pulled the rod out i put down 190/170 with a bad knock sensor. didn't find that out till the next day. i was the lowest powered car there, but then again i was the only NA 3.0 all in all it was a fun day. and gurlie j gurl your car sounds sweet and girl you car drive whenever you don't have an ich at a 130 mph. jk
im not trying to pick but im curious how you put 190 down and had a bad knock sensor. a bad knock sensor would have put your most likely in the 160's. your dyno sounds pretty dead on with the mods and pv removed.
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 12:58 PM
  #18  
Loren00Miata's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 234
I would like to find out if anyone has my run files? I did find out about how to dyno a 911 properly from Ruf Auto Centre and the Porsche boards. It is not just a drive on an go like the Maxima. A fan needs to be used directed at the rear lid to get proper airflow or it will run out of air. This means it has to be proped up to be directed properly. I will be re-dynoing soon. Even running out of airflow at 6200 rpms (power peak is normally 6800 and the redline is 7200 rpms), it was still able to pull 270.1 RWHP in the 97 degree heat stock from air filter to exhaust tip.
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 01:28 PM
  #19  
SR20DEN's Avatar
VQ Wizard
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,661
From: Charlotte, NC
I have your runfiles. And I knew your problems were the result of airflow, which is why I mentioned that the rear garage door needed to be opened. I couldn't let you leave there with only 235whp.
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 05:11 PM
  #20  
Loren00Miata's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 234
Actually 237 the first run and 242 the second with the lid open and no airflow past 5500 rpms. Closeing the lid improved to 247 hp, but still no airflow above 5500 rpms. Opening the back door helped, but still no airflow above 6200 rpms. I needed more than just the door open.

Originally Posted by SR20DEN
I have your runfiles. And I knew your problems were the result of airflow, which is why I mentioned that the rear garage door needed to be opened. I couldn't let you leave there with only 235whp.
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 05:30 PM
  #21  
xlcrew's Avatar
I’m Back
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,524
From: Oklahoma City, OK
Originally Posted by sloppymax
im not trying to pick but im curious how you put 190 down and had a bad knock sensor. a bad knock sensor would have put your most likely in the 160's. your dyno sounds pretty dead on with the mods and pv removed.
we pulled the code from the car the next day and it said it was a knock sensor. what do our cars usually put down stock? just curious
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 06:30 PM
  #22  
sloppymax's Avatar
IMBOUTTOBUSTSOMEGHOSTS
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,695
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by xlcrew
we pulled the code from the car the next day and it said it was a knock sensor. what do our cars usually put down stock? just curious
i would say manuals are around 170-175hp and around the same for torque. i believe the dyno may be a little low but certainly not anywhere in the power robbbing status of a bad knock sensor. were there any other codes when you scanned because i know the knock will show up with a multiple number of other codes and typically goes away when those other issues are repaired.
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 08:15 PM
  #23  
xlcrew's Avatar
I’m Back
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,524
From: Oklahoma City, OK
the other code we pulled was for a bad rear o2 sensor i believe

also could either of you two guys that has the run files send me the ones from my car? my email is hbandrews24@juno.com thanks

also elon where did you get that program for your computer. thanks
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 05:00 AM
  #24  
sloppymax's Avatar
IMBOUTTOBUSTSOMEGHOSTS
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,695
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by xlcrew
the other code we pulled was for a bad rear o2 sensor i believe

also could either of you two guys that has the run files send me the ones from my car? my email is hbandrews24@juno.com thanks

also elon where did you get that program for your computer. thanks
thats your culprit. luckily the secondary o2 sensors do not adjust a/f so that will not affect power.
Old Jun 7, 2006 | 05:14 AM
  #25  
maximum810's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 508
Originally Posted by gurlie_J_gurl
mine were 212/212 on all 3 pulls .... well after the figured out my auto.... i think i should have reset my ECU before hand.... but hey... it's all a learning experience
Those numbers really aren't that bad, especially considering you just ran 4 sessions on the road course.
Old Jun 21, 2006 | 07:29 PM
  #26  
xlcrew's Avatar
I’m Back
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,524
From: Oklahoma City, OK
vid of mine with a broken vias

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/c...b45f97e201.htm
Old Jun 21, 2006 | 09:12 PM
  #27  
97Maximus's Avatar
Shift_custom
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 908
From: Carollton, Tx
Originally Posted by gurlie_J_gurl
it's not always an itch, sometimes... something outside the car distracts me.... like a wild animal, or a slow 5th gen beating me
haha.. only a girl.. ill admit youre still the best chick driver ive seen, aside from the itching..
Old Jun 21, 2006 | 09:24 PM
  #28  
97Maximus's Avatar
Shift_custom
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 908
From: Carollton, Tx
Originally Posted by xlcrew
i didnt remember your car sounding that good.. man i can shoot a vid.. haha.. i just wish i could have gotten it shooting out the a/f sensor.. next time mine will be up there with the 00vi and manny swap.. (hopefully)
Old Jun 22, 2006 | 12:57 PM
  #29  
LatinMax's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,587
Originally Posted by sloppymax
thats your culprit. luckily the secondary o2 sensors do not adjust a/f so that will not affect power.
If he is talking about the o2 sensor in the exhaust manifold, then it will messing thins up. But if it is just the one by the cat, then no difference and I would recommend doing an o2 simm.
I have a write up on how to do it if you want I can send it to you..... and it is alot cheaper than replacing the o2 sensor.
Old Jun 22, 2006 | 01:30 PM
  #30  
sloppymax's Avatar
IMBOUTTOBUSTSOMEGHOSTS
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,695
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by LatinMax
If he is talking about the o2 sensor in the exhaust manifold, then it will messing thins up. But if it is just the one by the cat, then no difference and I would recommend doing an o2 simm.
I have a write up on how to do it if you want I can send it to you..... and it is alot cheaper than replacing the o2 sensor.
i just assumed he meant secondary when he used the terminology for rear oxygen sensor.
Old Jun 30, 2006 | 11:18 AM
  #31  
6spd_Hayes's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 595
From: Harvest, AL
Runfiles Emailed

Sorry I have been away form the Org a while. I have emailed all of the runfiles that have been requested via PM.

I have emailed XLCREW, Tommy, and Loren their files. I am awaiting an email from Brad.

Sarah, are you interested in your data? I also have a Mike and Ky that I haven't heard from.
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 10:14 AM
  #32  
gurlie_J_gurl's Avatar
I wanna be at my maximum
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 336
From: DFW
Originally Posted by 6spd_Hayes
Sorry I have been away form the Org a while. I have emailed all of the runfiles that have been requested via PM.

I have emailed XLCREW, Tommy, and Loren their files. I am awaiting an email from Brad.

Sarah, are you interested in your data? I also have a Mike and Ky that I haven't heard from.

Yea you can send it to me, Ky's you can probably just send that to kimson (maximum810) because ky isn't an orger....
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pktaske
6th Generation Classifieds (2004-2008)
1
May 6, 2016 07:49 AM
BkGreen97
Maximas for Sale / Wanted
2
Apr 2, 2016 05:47 AM
gustavison
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
4
Oct 4, 2015 06:50 PM
TxBroncosFan
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
2
Sep 21, 2015 06:54 PM
pktaske
6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008)
0
Sep 4, 2015 08:40 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:51 PM.