92 hh2a prelude cant be this quick.....
92 hh2a prelude cant be this quick.....
Hey guys, I found this video and can’t believe my eyes. Please tell me that guy couldn’t drive for crap.
http://boomland.no-ip.com:6968/movie...s-98maxima.mpg
http://boomland.no-ip.com:6968/movie...s-98maxima.mpg
You're too quick to judge the Honda as a slow car. That model Prelude, especially in the early year models was around 2850lbs, and the one in the video was a 5spd. H22A motor, thats 2.2L VTEC 200hp. 7400rpm or so indicated redline, 8k fuel cutoff. Prelude had intake and header, those cars with i/h/e are capable of mid 14s with like 95mph trap speeds. I don't get whats so hard to believe.
TK
TK
Looks like an auto GXE vs fastest generation Prelude. I must say that Prelude isn't that quick either because my Max winds out past 100mph much faster. It takes forever for him to go from 100 to 110. It took him nearly 23 seconds to reach 100mph. That's not very quick seeing that some of us of doing nearly 100mph in the 1/4 mile in the lower 14s and upper 13s.
Dave
Dave
Originally Posted by Dave B
Looks like an auto GXE vs fastest generation Prelude. I must say that Prelude isn't that quick either because my Max winds out past 100mph much faster. It takes forever for him to go from 100 to 110. It took him nearly 23 seconds to reach 100mph. That's not very quick seeing that some of us of doing nearly 100mph in the 1/4 mile in the lower 14s and upper 13s.
Dave
Dave
Don't those Ludes have VTEC? It just seems slow for a car that is supposed to be a highway monster 100-110 in 1/2 a minute
The race said it was a 92 Prelude with an H22A, the 92 model didn't come with a VTEC motor, so if it indeed is a 92 model, then its most definitely a swap. There were a few different transmissions that could be used with that swap. I think the stock transmission would bolt up to the H22, but had very wide gear 4 i believe.
Originally Posted by RastaManMax
Both of those cars look too slow for some reason... The Lude took ~22s to reach 100mph and the Max took even longer according to the vid?
LEMAR
LEMAR
Thanks for the input guys. I didn’t think that max should of lost by that much, if at all. That’s a vid from one of those guys who thinks their car can beat anything. Typical honda fanboy type. He does get smoked hard from an RSX-S though in one of his vids.
i used to have a 3rd gen prelude, and I know that 5th gen ludes all came stock witha 195hp VTEC 4 banger. that plus its light wieght, and performance characteristics, put it ahead of the max stock. aftermarket parts can change both cars dramatically.
the H22 was one of the best engines honda made, in my opinon. other 4cyl with SC and turbos have a hard time competing.
No reason to flame, the maxima is a great car, but I gotta defend quality honda engines, esp the H22.
No reason to flame, the maxima is a great car, but I gotta defend quality honda engines, esp the H22.

As stated, the Prelude body in this video was older/lighter and they also had mods, so I'm not surprised to see the Max get beat. A stock last-gen Lude doesn't have anything on a 4th gen 5spd until around 80-90 mph or so when the revs are finally up in the top-end long enough for VTEC to really shine. This was probably an automagic Max.
Originally Posted by SteVTEC

As stated, the Prelude body in this video was older/lighter and they also had mods, so I'm not surprised to see the Max get beat. A stock last-gen Lude doesn't have anything on a 4th gen 5spd until around 80-90 mph or so when the revs are finally up in the top-end long enough for VTEC to really shine. This was probably an automagic Max.
TK
Originally Posted by SkylineGTR
You're too quick to judge the Honda as a slow car. That model Prelude, especially in the early year models was around 2850lbs, and the one in the video was a 5spd. H22A motor, thats 2.2L VTEC 200hp. 7400rpm or so indicated redline, 8k fuel cutoff. Prelude had intake and header, those cars with i/h/e are capable of mid 14s with like 95mph trap speeds. I don't get whats so hard to believe.
TK
TK
My friends got a 95 prelude si and it can def move it's not even the vtec version and from 0-50 it's about quarter car length ahead we are both auto my first gear is much longer then his. Then we did from about 60-120 and he supposebly said he didn't punch it all the way but i believe he did cause he was probally about 1 car lengh ahead as we hit 120 but hes in the redline at that point i'm just getting up to about 5500 so i have a lot more room then him
Originally Posted by SkylineGTR
You're too quick to judge the Honda as a slow car. That model Prelude, especially in the early year models was around 2850lbs, and the one in the video was a 5spd. H22A motor, thats 2.2L VTEC 200hp. 7400rpm or so indicated redline, 8k fuel cutoff. Prelude had intake and header, those cars with i/h/e are capable of mid 14s with like 95mph trap speeds. I don't get whats so hard to believe.
TK
TK
h22a4 200hp (found in 97+ preludes)
but the 92-96 generation ended up being faster, because it was much lighter
Originally Posted by Kashoggio
ahh my girl has a 92 prelude si .. its quick but still not fast.. nor is the maxima. lets face it we have slow cars unless we turbo and even then its not without a high cost factor.
Prelude Si isn't the VTEC motor. The H22A is a VTEC. If I'm not mistaken, the 1992 Prelude came only in a S and an Si. I think 1993 was the first USDM VTEC Prelude.
We have slow cars unless we turbo?
TK
If the car in the video is indeed a 1992 Prelude, then the H22A has to have been swapped in. The standard 2.3L that came in the non VTEC Prelude of that year, I want to say Si but don't quote me, had a transmission that would bolt right up to the H22A. Downside being that the gearing wasn't the best for an H22a, but would be cheaper than getting a new transmission as well.
TK
TK
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sx7r
General Maxima Discussion
43
May 27, 2001 08:12 AM




