Supercharged/Turbocharged The increase in air/fuel pressure above atmospheric pressure in the intake system caused by the action of a supercharger or turbocharger attached to an engine.

exhaust question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 12:07 PM
  #1  
JClaw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
exhaust question

Forgive the FI newb question, but everyone seems to be contradicting each other reguarding exhaust diameter.

Say I threw on an SC kit on my 3.5 and ran very safe boost (base 7 psi), how bad would a 2.5" setup hurt power? I've seen conflicting dynos.

I currently have Cattman headers, hi flow cat and full 2.5" catback. Can anyone speculate the loss from 3.0" to 2.5"? I'm assuming a full 3.5 (heads, cams) boosting 7 psi with stock 3.0 timing would put down something in the neighboorhood of 350whp.
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 05:51 PM
  #2  
ewuzh's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,055
From: SoCal
If you already have a full 2.5" header-back mandrel bent exhaust, I don't think you will see huge gains going from 2.5" to 3.0" for SCing. It's more beneficial if you're turbo: quicker spool, lower EGTs, higher max boost, more power.

Are you making your own SC mounting plate? AFAIK, the stillen one doesn't bolt on to the VQ35 timing chain cover.
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 01:05 PM
  #3  
JClaw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
I swapped the VQ35 using Tilley's method: 3.0 timing chain covers, sprockets, water pump, timing chain and original 3.0 wiring harness/ECU on the 3.5. So the SC kit can be installed EXACTLY as it would be installed on a regular VQ30DE.
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 02:21 PM
  #4  
liqidvenom's Avatar
brotherhood of tq
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 8,849
do u think that the hp figures u guessed might be a tad high?
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 03:04 PM
  #5  
JClaw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Maybe you're right, I don't know. I was guestimating based on what Z's and G's with SC kits put down at 7-ish psi.
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 03:35 PM
  #6  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
Cheapest and best option in my opinion. Keep the setup you've got, add a cutout right after the headers.
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 03:38 PM
  #7  
JClaw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Excellent. Someone else just suggested the same thing to me.

Do you think 350whp on 7 psi is unreasonable given stock ECU, headers, cutout and a custom short runner IM?
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 03:58 PM
  #8  
diymaximakid's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,787
i think the stock ecu is whats gonna kill you the most
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 04:26 PM
  #9  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
Originally Posted by JClaw
Excellent. Someone else just suggested the same thing to me.

Do you think 350whp on 7 psi is unreasonable given stock ECU, headers, cutout and a custom short runner IM?

I don't know what the 350zs are putting out with SC because I don't bother to read posts about SC 350zs, but a little ricer math tells me it should be fairly close to that. Maybe like 330 or 340.
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 04:27 PM
  #10  
Nealoc187's Avatar
SLOW
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,617
From: West burbs, Chicago
Originally Posted by diymaximakid
i think the stock ecu is whats gonna kill you the most

Why do you say that?
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 04:54 PM
  #11  
JClaw's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,433
From: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Originally Posted by diymaximakid
i think the stock ecu is whats gonna kill you the most
Please elaborate. I was planning on keeping the stock ECU because the 3.0 ECU timing is very conservative for a VQ35, and acts as already-retarded timing for a 3.5. I was also going to run 94 Octane all the time anyway. This should make for a pretty reliable motor IMO. The A/F is important as ever, but I was planning on leaving the stock timing and rev limiter alone...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Maxboy23
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
6
Sep 4, 2015 06:04 PM
TheMafia
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
6
Sep 4, 2015 08:26 AM
Johnny9595
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
5
Sep 3, 2015 05:18 AM
Justin Kroll
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
7
Sep 2, 2015 11:06 AM
A32goldylocks
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
2
Sep 2, 2015 06:39 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:01 PM.