Supercharged/Turbocharged The increase in air/fuel pressure above atmospheric pressure in the intake system caused by the action of a supercharger or turbocharger attached to an engine.

FI vs. NA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 12:04 PM
  #81  
TJ_Max's Avatar
Thread Starter
Paradox Systems Vendor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,436
This great topic started with me saying I can beat anything with a 3.5L in it. Correction though, I can beat anything stock with just a 3.5L in it at 10psi. That's closer . LOL. Great, interesting info in here though. Keep it coming.
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 12:05 PM
  #82  
SDot82's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 555
Originally Posted by TJ_Max
S/C @ 7psi =
corrected, lol (sorry i'm bored at work)
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 12:09 PM
  #83  
ajcool2's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 10,550
From: Baltimore, Md
Very good info I'm learning alot.
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 12:17 PM
  #84  
ajcool2's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 10,550
From: Baltimore, Md
Originally Posted by michaelnyden
so your vq35's dyno looks like this? lol I did this in a minute or so and I am not an artist so excuse the simplicity/inacurracies...


that's crazy...you peak at 4.5K in both torque and hp at the wheels and hold it there till 7K? c'mon now...you cited stephen max as an example...and at 4.5K, he is making more than most vq35de's ever hope to...so from a roll...I don't think it would be contest....but with a lesser s/c'ed 3.0...of course...I mean guys running 7 or 8 psi are putting out 270 peak or so and a lot less at 4.5K where the race would begin...but when we are talking a real s/c'ed car...putting out 260 at where you start the race and gaining linearly from there to 360...well you get the picture...
Nice artistry.
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 12:25 PM
  #85  
TJ_Max's Avatar
Thread Starter
Paradox Systems Vendor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,436
Originally Posted by SDot82
corrected, lol (sorry i'm bored at work)

No, it's the first thing SC people do before they install. LOL, change that damn pulley size. 7psi feels too damn close to stock.
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 12:31 PM
  #86  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by virgilio7
and in regards the comment saying a car having 260 whp at 4.5k and holding it to redline at 7200? PLAIN BULL****.
listen kid, don't come in here running your mouth when you have no clue what you are talking about. SR20DEN has already made 262whp WITHOUT aftermarket cams. He is also ran a 12.8 @ 108 still with stock cams. He does peak around 4.5-5k and it does flatline all the way to 7200ish and barely drops off to 7500. I hate when d@mn new guys come in here acting like they know everything when actually they dont know ****.
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 12:38 PM
  #87  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by michaelnyden
so your vq35's dyno looks like this? lol I did this in a minute or so and I am not an artist so excuse the simplicity/inacurracies...


that's crazy...you peak at 4.5K in both torque and hp at the wheels and hold it there till 7K? c'mon now...you cited stephen max as an example...and at 4.5K, he is making more than most vq35de's ever hope to...so from a roll...I don't think it would be contest....but with a lesser s/c'ed 3.0...of course...I mean guys running 7 or 8 psi are putting out 270 peak or so and a lot less at 4.5K where the race would begin...but when we are talking a real s/c'ed car...putting out 260 at where you start the race and gaining linearly from there to 360...well you get the picture...
its not my car its SR20DEN's car and yes thats pretty close to what his graph looks like. The car might gain 10 or so whp after 5k but its pretty much a flat line all the way until 7200ish and slowly falls off to 7500. His torque is also a flat line as shown, its all in his mods and how they work together.

I cited Stephen Max strictly to show there isnt much gained before 6k going to a smaller pulley. I should hope he would make more than a NA Maxima considering everything he's done to get to that milestone

It doesn't take rocket science to figure out a 370whp SC'ed Maxima would run around a 260whp NA Maxima but like I said line up a 300whp SC'ed Maxima and they would be door to door or d@mn close at any speeds. Like I've said 4000 times that some of you can't grasp I've ran SR when I was making approx 320whp and didn't pull from him hardly at all, I'd say maybe a car at most running up to some high triple didget speeds. If some of you can't comprehend it Im sorry but it is what it is.
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 12:40 PM
  #88  
TJ_Max's Avatar
Thread Starter
Paradox Systems Vendor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,436
Where the hell is SR20DEN, I think he is a made up character.















Maybe that'll get him to chime in.
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 12:40 PM
  #89  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by virgilio7
wow. in order to get 260 whp u need cams on a 3.5 NA.
shows how much you know
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 12:42 PM
  #90  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by TJ_Max
Where the hell is SR20DEN, I think he is a made up character.















Maybe that'll get him to chime in.
Search his posts if you want to see his numbers. Also he is out of town on business which is why hes not online.
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 05:11 PM
  #91  
Starchild2K2SE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 279
Originally Posted by TJ_Max
This great topic started with me saying I can beat anything with a 3.5L in it. Correction though, I can beat anything stock with just a 3.5L in it at 10psi. That's closer . LOL. Great, interesting info in here though. Keep it coming.

....... ........
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 05:25 PM
  #92  
michaelnyden's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,431
From: Los Angeles, CA
when then I apologize blu...I thougth you were using stephen max as a an example for this entire scenario...didn't realize you were referring to only the comparisons of pullies...in either case, sr is not the norm either which is what we need to keep in mind...in addition, if his powerband truly peaks that early on and keeps it flat all the way through...than I am thoroughly impressed (not being sarcastic)...
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 07:19 PM
  #93  
virgilio7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 165
well smart ***. you are only choosing whats best for you. this guy sr20den is 1 case in a million. i don't know of anybody else running stock cams and 260 whp besides velicos with the eu. but the point is that a regular 3.5 does 240 whp. so you can't base your assumptions on 1 car when the rest of cars are not like that. u want to chose any 300 whp sc 3.0 against a factory freak owned by sr20den.
grow some ***** and compare apples to apples.
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 07:25 PM
  #94  
SDot82's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 555
Originally Posted by virgilio7
well smart ***. you are only choosing whats best for you. this guy sr20den is 1 case in a million. i don't know of anybody else running stock cams and 260 whp besides velicos with the eu. but the point is that a regular 3.5 does 240 whp. so you can't base your assumptions on 1 car when the rest of cars are not like that. u want to chose any 300 whp sc 3.0 against a factory freak owned by sr20den.
grow some ***** and compare apples to apples.
He is comparing apples to apples, Sr20den has done work to his car just like a person with a sc 3.0 with 300 whp.
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 07:31 PM
  #95  
virgilio7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 165
its just 1 car. did somebody replicate this 260 whp without cams?
300 whp has been done quite a few times lol
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 07:36 PM
  #96  
michaelnyden's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,431
From: Los Angeles, CA
on 350z's 300whp has been done NA...they have many more NA mods available that we haven't tried out yet...not to mention they start out with much more aggressive cams from the factory among other things such as more aggressive timing and AFR's
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 07:36 PM
  #97  
SDot82's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 555
I don't think anybody has the same setup as sr20den.
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 07:50 PM
  #98  
virgilio7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 165
nobody knows for sure what is the advantage from a z to others like maxima or altima for sure. everybody speculates but don't show proof.
the z's without the revup motor do the smae numbers as a regular maxima or altima with bolt ons. and by the way, i have yet to see an NA z passing the 300whp barrier with proof.
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 08:31 PM
  #99  
Deckdout2's Avatar
Play with my balls
iTrader: (151)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,541
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by vortechpower
I go with the boost! I drive on the streets 99.999% of the time. My maxima enjoyment comes from driving, not so much as drag racing... I ran a 13.6 with 10psi on a V1, fully loaded with 26.5lb wheels/street tires. Racing from a stop is all good but it is much harder on the car. Both are nice in there own ways.. Nothing beats the pull of boost kicking in.
Putting in de-k with all new blower and emanaget his week..w/2.87
Too bad I took the bottle out. It'd be nice to get another run in sometime. Good times......
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 08:32 PM
  #100  
michaelnyden's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,431
From: Los Angeles, CA
I've seen one with my own eyes on a dynojet 2 months back...and there have been a handful of other from what I have heard...but it took every bolt on in the book to get there I here...
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 08:39 PM
  #101  
virgilio7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 165
i will love to see that myself.
Old Apr 21, 2006 | 09:04 PM
  #102  
Puppetmaster's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16,551
From: Fairfax, VA
Originally Posted by virgilio7
well smart ***. you are only choosing whats best for you. this guy sr20den is 1 case in a million. i don't know of anybody else running stock cams and 260 whp besides velicos with the eu. but the point is that a regular 3.5 does 240 whp. so you can't base your assumptions on 1 car when the rest of cars are not like that. u want to chose any 300 whp sc 3.0 against a factory freak owned by sr20den.
grow some ***** and compare apples to apples.
Didn't his car dyno something like 198 whp when he first got it? If that's true, I'm not sure you'd call that a factory freak.

We've seen other VQ35 Maximas here with just intake, headers, and exhaust hit 240s N/A easily, so I don't see why you think that 260 is so unattainable, Virg. It just that no one else has really put in the time and work that SR has. And plus, Velicos did it on stock cams too, so that makes 2 of em (even though it seems that he dynoed at CPR, which throws those numbers in doubt).
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 06:28 AM
  #103  
virgilio7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 165
velico's car is always in florida and drove all the way to north carolina to install the eu and dyno. he got those numbers there when it was freaking cold as hell. the numbers were std and when he came back to florida the tune got screwed up so basically he got those numbers only 1 day lol.
My bad, I shouldn't have said factory freak but eventually nobody got those numbers before or after with those mods. and talk about powerband. only vq35 NA with that powerband with stock cams.
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 06:31 AM
  #104  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,099
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by virgilio7
nobody knows for sure what is the advantage from a z to others like maxima or altima for sure. everybody speculates but don't show proof.
We already know the difference. It's the intake manifold design, the wider range of advance and retard with the VTC components, and the more aggressive timing maps, especially after 5000 RPM.
the z's without the revup motor do the smae numbers as a regular maxima or altima with bolt ons. and by the way, i have yet to see an NA z passing the 300whp barrier with proof.
What are you talking about? 350Z's dyno in the 230's stock. An N/a FWD 3.5 won't see those numbers without bolt-ons.
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 06:37 AM
  #105  
virgilio7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 165
i dynoed at 245 whp with i/h/e/p and safc2 tuned. i believe 260 is attainable because there is proof with sr20den. But, It's only 1 car out of thousands of maximas and altimas.
What i'm trying to say is that 260 whp vq35 NA won't beat a supercharged 3.0 with 300+ whp. only 1 car has done that type of powerband that he describes and i bet it's going to be VERY VERY difficult to duplicate even by sr20den.
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 06:40 AM
  #106  
virgilio7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 165
Originally Posted by nismology
We already know the difference. It's the intake manifold design, the wider range of advance and retard with the VTC components, and the more aggressive timing maps, especially after 5000 RPM.

What are you talking about? 350Z's dyno in the 230's stock. An N/a FWD 3.5 won't see those numbers without bolt-ons.
I guess you don't understand the part where i say "the z's without the revup motor do the same numbers as a regular maxima or altima with bolt ons"
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 06:46 AM
  #107  
virgilio7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 165
where did you read about the vtc components advancing or retarding more on the z? where is the proof so i can read about it?
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 06:58 AM
  #108  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,099
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by virgilio7
I guess you don't understand the part where i say "the z's without the revup motor do the same numbers as a regular maxima or altima with bolt ons"
OK. But what's your point by saying that? Even if a bolt-on 3.5 motor makes the same peak numbers as a stock 350Z, it won't quite hold the power to redline as well as the 350Z.
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 07:03 AM
  #109  
virgilio7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 165
I have not seen a Z even on my350z.com that has gone past the 300whp barrier NA.

you know where is the proof about the vtc?
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 07:09 AM
  #110  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,099
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by virgilio7
where did you read about the vtc components advancing or retarding more on the z? where is the proof so i can read about it?
My mistake. I must've read wrong originally. I went back to take a look at the Nissan Technical Paper and it was comparing the 350Z motor to the 2001-2004 Pathfinder 3.5 when it referred to the wider range of VTC movement.
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 07:17 AM
  #111  
virgilio7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 165
I don't want to sound like an azz but all of the differences between the altima and z is guesswork. the only thing we know for sure is timing and intake manifold. even if we tune the altima with the best tuner ever and install bolt ons plus Z intake manifold it doesn't get the same numbers that the z get with bolts ons and tunning. why? i don't know yet.
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 07:33 AM
  #112  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,099
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by virgilio7
I don't want to sound like an azz but all of the differences between the altima and z is guesswork. the only thing we know for sure is timing and intake manifold. even if we tune the altima with the best tuner ever and install bolt ons plus Z intake manifold it doesn't get the same numbers that the z get with bolts ons and tunning. why? i don't know yet.
There is one thing that we're still not accounting for....the 350Z VTC maps. Even if they don't have higher VTC adjustment angles, perhaps the 350Z VTC maps were designed with the 350Z intake manifold and straighter-path lower manifold in mind. Different intake manifold design = different intake pulse resonance and the VTC would need to be optimized for that, right? I know for sure that it was a combination of intake manifold design and VTC's that allowed the 350Z motor to acheive 105% VE at 5600 RPM based on the technical paper that i read. I think that's the gap that needs to be bridged. It's plausible, and i can't think of anything else...
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 07:40 AM
  #113  
virgilio7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 165
this is something technosquare can do for you. copy the map for the vtc and timing from a z and flash it in your ecu.
but nobody has done it before?
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 07:42 AM
  #114  
michaelnyden's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,431
From: Los Angeles, CA
this is rediculous...the Z's start at 230-240whp...and yes there has been a handful of guys with every bolt on imaginable that have hit the magic 300whp with cams...I don't know how to prove it to you, I have seen one of maybe 10 that dynoed right in front of me that hit that....you have to remember that they have many, many NA mods out right now...ones we have haven't even attempted to try out or have made for our cars...
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 07:43 AM
  #115  
nismology's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,099
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by virgilio7
this is something technosquare can do for you. copy the map for the vtc and timing from a z and flash it in your ecu.
but nobody has done it before?
To my knowledge there are only 2 users on this site that have successfully installed the 350Z intake manifold and only one of them is using the 3.5 ECU with operational VTC's. He would be the first to try the 350Z VTC maps if that's the route he decided to take.

But once again, i believe that's the difference maker when it comes to bridging the power gap since that's the only variable that's been left out so far.
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 07:57 AM
  #116  
virgilio7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 165
Originally Posted by michaelnyden
this is rediculous...the Z's start at 230-240whp...and yes there has been a handful of guys with every bolt on imaginable that have hit the magic 300whp with cams...I don't know how to prove it to you, I have seen one of maybe 10 that dynoed right in front of me that hit that....you have to remember that they have many, many NA mods out right now...ones we have haven't even attempted to try out or have made for our cars...
i'm not saying you are lying, just big names like crawford and others didn't reach the 300whp but got close with everything possible.
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 08:01 AM
  #117  
michaelnyden's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,431
From: Los Angeles, CA
the crawford plenum was actually dynoed a good deal lower than the rev up manifold with these new spacers they came out with....which are much cheaper, and hence a slap in the face to their super expensive manifold...
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 08:30 AM
  #118  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by virgilio7
What i'm trying to say is that 260 whp vq35 NA won't beat a supercharged 3.0 with 300+ whp. only 1 car has done that type of powerband that he describes and i bet it's going to be VERY VERY difficult to duplicate even by sr20den.
Nobody has larger injectors that increase timing, no one has a 7500 rev limit, no one has a 77mm homemade MAF and only one other guy has his manifold that dynoed.

I guess you can't read that I've already ran SR20DEN and pulled about a car and a half up to 150ish making 322whp SC'ed at the time. Like I said I've done it so I know, Im not just making up stuff to please my opinion. I just don't understand how some of you can't comprehend what Im typing.
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 08:32 AM
  #119  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by virgilio7
i'm not saying you are lying, just big names like crawford and others didn't reach the 300whp but got close with everything possible.
big names like crawford cars are 100% street legal with cats and every other part needed to pass inspection. Their power made to the wheels could pass inspections in Cali without problem. If they ran the car illegal without cats and a few other tweaks I'd bet they would make 320whp with there setup.
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 08:37 AM
  #120  
Blu's Avatar
Blu
the tits
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,987
From: Charlotte, NC
For those wondering SR20DEN's car dynoed 201whp stock and was only running low-mid 14's @ 95-96mph with a pop charger only. There is nothing abnormal about his car, it started out exactly the same as any other 5.5 gen. Now he has only made about 60 more whp than stock but with his power band and how the mods work together he is now trapping 108+ with stock cams. The nismo 262's will be going in soon and the car will be ready and running at Maxus if any of you SC'ed guys will be there and want to test my knowledge.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:46 AM.