FI vs. NA

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Apr 22, 2006 | 09:48 AM

#121

chris'smax

Senior Member

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 2,447

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blu←

For those wondering SR20DEN's car dynoed 201whp stock and was only running low-mid 14's @ 95-96mph with a pop charger only. There is nothing abnormal about his car, it started out exactly the same as any other 5.5 gen. Now he has only made about 60 more whp than stock but with his power band and how the mods work together he is now trapping 108+ with stock cams. The nismo 262's will be going in soon and the car will be ready and running at Maxus if any of you SC'ed guys will be there and want to test my knowledge.

I'd like to rep the S/C crew in that race

j/k

Apr 22, 2006 | 10:22 AM

#122

virgilio7

Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2005

Posts: 165

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blu←

Nobody has larger injectors that increase timing, no one has a 7500 rev limit, no one has a 77mm homemade MAF and only one other guy has his manifold that dynoed.

I guess you can't read that I've already ran SR20DEN and pulled about a car and a half up to 150ish making 322whp SC'ed at the time. Like I said I've done it so I know, Im not just making up stuff to please my opinion. I just don't understand how some of you can't comprehend what Im typing.

i guess u r the one that doesn't remember why this thread started.
u said you don't see any 3.0 sc beating a modded 3.5l.
and then now you want to grab sr20den peniz and kiss him up to death. why didn't you specify any 3.0 superchaged BEATING SR20DEN CAR?

Apr 22, 2006 | 11:16 AM

#123

PharoNDmist

Senior Member

iTrader: (4)

Joined: May 2002

Posts: 504

From: Uniondale NY

Well with all of this curiosity floating around, later down the road, I have it in my plans to do the 3.5 swap and upgrade to the t-trim. We'll see what happens

Apr 23, 2006 | 05:50 AM

#124

Nealoc187

SLOW

iTrader: (23)

Joined: Mar 2001

Posts: 14,617

From: West burbs, Chicago

Quote:

Originally Posted by virgilio7

No, this thread started because TJ Max said that no N/A maxima could take a 3.0 SC maxima...

Apr 23, 2006 | 06:50 AM

#125

Blu

the tits

iTrader: (63)

Joined: Mar 2002

Posts: 9,987

From: Charlotte, NC

Quote:

Originally Posted by virgilio7

See thats where you come in when you have no clue why this thread was created. You wanted to come in here running your mouth like billy bad a$$ acting like you know it all when you have no clue what this discussions about. In the other thread the questioned car was a 3.0 running 7 psi would beat any 3.5l Maxima out there. Thats when I came in saying thats not the case because I barely outran SR running 11psi will full bolt ons dynoing 322whp. But you are cool with all your "peniz" comments and stuff

Apr 23, 2006 | 08:50 AM

#126

virgilio7

Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2005

Posts: 165

lol my bad. I don't read all threads and understood the opposite. but yes, i would say a fully modded sc 3.0 will beat a 3.5NA.
you install cams on n/a car, then do the same for the sc and will gain more.
i guess this is very general and it's impossible to get an agreement unless we use an example on each side.