1/4 and 1/8 Mile Racing Talk about track times, launch techniques, strategies, etc. Check out the "Timeslips" subforum for posted times.No discussion of street racing will be tolerated.

N/A 5.5 gen new street tire PB

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 07:29 AM
  #81  
sparks03max's Avatar
Thread Starter
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
Originally Posted by 1swtmax
Hey Sparks, I`ve been looking at the Kinetix for some time also. Is it the SSV or the old version. I`ve been talking to Tim from Speed force Racing and they also sell there version of the IM, with no real dyno numbers he`s telling me 25-30 whp on a FI car. I`ve been back and forth on this thing for some time and just don`t know. Some people say its just a shinny piece of metal that looks good in the bay. What numbers do you expect?

And btw man is that a big filter.lol
It is the newest version of the FWD IM (the SSV), and with port matching I expect somewhere in the 10-15hp range throughout the powerband, and probably 20-30+ at redline where the stock IM drops off hard.

I'd expect on a F/I car that you would not notice the lower IM missmatch too much since forced air flows so much differently. If the SFR manifold actually does match the ports to our stock lower IM, then I'd go that route to avoid the need for port matching.
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 12:34 PM
  #82  
1swtmax's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 459
From: Carlisle, PA
Originally Posted by sparks03max
It is the newest version of the FWD IM (the SSV), and with port matching I expect somewhere in the 10-15hp range throughout the powerband, and probably 20-30+ at redline where the stock IM drops off hard.

I'd expect on a F/I car that you would not notice the lower IM missmatch too much since forced air flows so much differently. If the SFR manifold actually does match the ports to our stock lower IM, then I'd go that route to avoid the need for port matching.
Yea, I believe I will get the SFR version, get it tuned, then posts numbers. I should be somewhere around 425-430 whp. Hoping my torque doesn`t increase by 25-30, I would like it to stay where its at 412. I would be interested to know what numbers you dyno out of the SSV. Do you know what you are now, before and after. I know you said that you were doing more than just the SSV.
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 01:12 PM
  #83  
sparks03max's Avatar
Thread Starter
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
Originally Posted by 1swtmax
Yea, I believe I will get the SFR version, get it tuned, then posts numbers. I should be somewhere around 425-430 whp. Hoping my torque doesn`t increase by 25-30, I would like it to stay where its at 412. I would be interested to know what numbers you dyno out of the SSV. Do you know what you are now, before and after. I know you said that you were doing more than just the SSV.
Before and after looks like this:

107.5 trap on street tires.
3330 raceweight
0ish DA
SRI with spectra filter
vias delete stock IM
headers + open Y-pipe
6700 redline
25-27 degrees of timing at WOT

Next track day it will be like this:

around 3290 race weight
SRI with velocity stack and AEM dry flow
kinetix with port matched LIM (long as it comes in the mail this week)
headers + open Y-pipe
7200 redline
27-33 degrees of timing at WOT
Power steering belt removed

Should I have the same DA and see good gains from the kinetix, I'd like to see a 109ish trap.

Last edited by sparks03max; Dec 9, 2009 at 01:17 PM.
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 01:16 PM
  #84  
1swtmax's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 459
From: Carlisle, PA
Good luck with that 109 mph.
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 01:28 PM
  #85  
sparks03max's Avatar
Thread Starter
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
Originally Posted by 1swtmax
Good luck with that 109 mph.
Ever take your car to a track? You'd probably trap 115-120 were you to get traction.
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 01:36 PM
  #86  
1swtmax's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 459
From: Carlisle, PA
Originally Posted by sparks03max
Ever take your car to a track? You'd probably trap 115-120 were you to get traction.
Yea, I went several times and my best mph is 116. And yea out of the gate, well lets say it sucks. Spun all of first and second. Need slicks, drs won`t do it.
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 01:44 PM
  #87  
1swtmax's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 459
From: Carlisle, PA
I`m also looking into the AMS 500. So I can launch at a lower (maybe none) boost in first, then shift and get all of the boost in second. That should help with the launch. I tried starting out slow=fail. I tried starting at 2500 rpm falls on its face then spins after 3500 rpm=fail. I tried shifting quick into second=fail. I know I need slicks but I`m telling you, I think its more than just slicks. I need to get ride of some boost out of the gate.
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 01:48 PM
  #88  
sparks03max's Avatar
Thread Starter
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
Originally Posted by 1swtmax
Yea, I went several times and my best mph is 116. And yea out of the gate, well lets say it sucks. Spun all of first and second. Need slicks, drs won`t do it.
Yeah 26x10.5 slicks would probably be perfect for your application. I fully hooked on a 75 shot trapping nearly 113 mph with 24.5x8 slicks, and that was probably 350ish whp.
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 01:50 PM
  #89  
sparks03max's Avatar
Thread Starter
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
Originally Posted by 1swtmax
I`m also looking into the AMS 500. So I can launch at a lower (maybe none) boost in first, then shift and get all of the boost in second. That should help with the launch. I tried starting out slow=fail. I tried starting at 2500 rpm falls on its face then spins after 3500 rpm=fail. I tried shifting quick into second=fail. I know I need slicks but I`m telling you, I think its more than just slicks. I need to get ride of some boost out of the gate.
with 10.5" width slicks on a prepped track, you should be able to launch at 5k+ RPMs and would probably even gain by spraying nitrous to spool earlier in first.

A WOT box so you can no lift shift and maintain boost would probably gain you 4-5 MPH and some ET, as well. Most of them have the added feature of being able to build some boost on the starting line with the 2-step.

Last edited by sparks03max; Dec 9, 2009 at 01:55 PM.
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 01:59 PM
  #90  
1swtmax's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 459
From: Carlisle, PA
Ok newb. question for you. What rim is that (26x10.5). 16" or 17"?
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 02:00 PM
  #91  
1swtmax's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 459
From: Carlisle, PA
What company makes a good WOT box.
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 02:04 PM
  #92  
sparks03max's Avatar
Thread Starter
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
Mickey Thompson makes a 26x10.5x16 slick you could put on some lightweight 16x8" wheels. Or you can do like I did and shave your calipers so you can run 26x10.5x15" slicks!

These guys make a pretty well featured WOT box http://www.npcompleteperformance.com/wotbox
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 02:08 PM
  #93  
1swtmax's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 459
From: Carlisle, PA
Well I need at least a 17" rim to fit around the BBK. It keeps getting better doesn`t it.
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 02:16 PM
  #94  
sparks03max's Avatar
Thread Starter
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
Originally Posted by 1swtmax
Well I need at least a 17" rim to fit around the BBK. It keeps getting better doesn`t it.
Hmm I know MT and hoosier make some 17" slicks, but you won't get the traction you would on a 15" slick due to sidewall.
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 02:20 PM
  #95  
sparks03max's Avatar
Thread Starter
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
15" ftw!

Old Dec 9, 2009 | 02:33 PM
  #96  
1swtmax's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 459
From: Carlisle, PA
Yea I know what your saying. I ran into this problem with the drs. Thats why I was saying about dumping off the boost at the launch.

Thanks for all the info. Now I have something to reseach.lol I really like the WOT box. Sounds like a very good idea.
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 02:52 PM
  #97  
sparks03max's Avatar
Thread Starter
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
Originally Posted by 1swtmax
Yea I know what your saying. I ran into this problem with the drs. Thats why I was saying about dumping off the boost at the launch.

Thanks for all the info. Now I have something to reseach.lol I really like the WOT box. Sounds like a very good idea.
A cool side effect of the WOT box is that you will throw flames while 2-stepping and during no lift shifts. Some of them also have the option to use it for a rev limiter too, and an ignition cut rev limiter is better for the engine than fuel cut.
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 07:31 PM
  #98  
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,825
15's are FTW
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 05:15 PM
  #99  
sparks03max's Avatar
Thread Starter
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
Well my new LIM came in this morning, so I spent the day (yes, entire day... ugh) port matching the new LIM and my spacers to the Kinetix ports. I must say it came out GREAT!!! I was really worried about doing this myself since I've never done anything like it before, but after reading some online tutorials, it was pretty easy.

I first drilled alignment holes with everything assembled to get a perfect match. After that, I pulled everything apart and marked how much material needed to be taken off the spacer to match the Kinetix ports. On the spacer, I used a 120 grit sanding wheel to remove material. Once I got it perfectly matching the Kinetix ports, I smoothed and worked with the gradient/radius where it meets the LIM. Then, (again using alignment holes) I matched up my ported spacer to the LIM, and marked how much material needed to be taken off. Using a carbide cutting bit, I went about 1" into the runners where I took off the most material so it would be a smooth transition to the smaller diameter. I cleaned and smoothed that up with another 120 grit sanding wheel, and viola! finished!

If I'd had a flexible extention for the dremel, it would have been nice to clean up the casting beads in the LIM, but I don't... Maybe next time. If I'm in there porting again, it'll be in conjunction with some ported heads.

If I remember, I'll take a couple of pics before I reassemble everything. I'm letting the RTV dry on all the gasket surfaces now so I don't end up with beads inside. When I took it apart today, there were HUGE beads on the inside because I had to overdo the RTV to make up for having a stripped bolt on my old LIM, and it was the only way I could get it to seal (ghetto, i know...).
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 08:26 PM
  #100  
sparks03max's Avatar
Thread Starter
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
Well got it all installed. Aside from a complication with one of the fuel rail bolt holes in the LIM, it all went well.

Initial impression upon trying it out is a noticeable increase in throttle responsiveness below WOT, and that I can't seem to keep traction in 1st anymore. I'll blame that on it being a little colder than earlier today when I got on it. I noticed a little dip around 5k-5100 but I'm guessing I was running lean. I didn't datalog, just went out and tried it. Guess I'll see what happens with a better tune.
Old Dec 12, 2009 | 01:57 PM
  #101  
1swtmax's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 459
From: Carlisle, PA
Very interesting, and sounds like you did a very good job. Congrats!! So next, its to the tune shop. Interested to see how much your whp increases.

Again, good job. I made my mind up and I will be going with the one from SFR ordering it Monday.

And yea post some pics.
Old Dec 12, 2009 | 03:01 PM
  #102  
sparks03max's Avatar
Thread Starter
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
Originally Posted by 1swtmax
Very interesting, and sounds like you did a very good job. Congrats!! So next, its to the tune shop. Interested to see how much your whp increases.

Again, good job. I made my mind up and I will be going with the one from SFR ordering it Monday.

And yea post some pics.
I forgot to take pics before/after the porting. Oh well, lol.

I did go out and tune for it today, and had to add a ton of fuel from around 3500 right up to redline.

I think I am now maxing my injectors out around 7000 because even adding 20-30% fuel at 7100-7200, it leans out to low 13s (when I'm trying to get high 12s) and up to mid 13s just as it touches 7200.

Although that's annoying b/c I'm going to need injectors before I add more power, it gives me the impression that the Kinetix needs port matching (since it's mismatched to stock) in order to gain power.
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 03:08 AM
  #103  
Gemner's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,393
From: Hayward, CA
Originally Posted by sparks03max
A cool side effect of the WOT box is that you will throw flames while 2-stepping and during no lift shifts. Some of them also have the option to use it for a rev limiter too, and an ignition cut rev limiter is better for the engine than fuel cut.
a bad side affect to ignition cut instead of fuel cut is that the fuel accumulates on your cats (if you have any) and then you run the risk of blowing them up. I know this because I am 3 for 3 on exploded cats (both precats and the main cat)
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 08:20 AM
  #104  
sparks03max's Avatar
Thread Starter
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
Originally Posted by Gemner
a bad side affect to ignition cut instead of fuel cut is that the fuel accumulates on your cats (if you have any) and then you run the risk of blowing them up. I know this because I am 3 for 3 on exploded cats (both precats and the main cat)
Oh.. yeah I would never run anything but a straight exhaust (straight-through designed resonators and mufflers are ok) in that situation.
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 05:03 PM
  #105  
krazy6's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,565
From: Yorba Linda, CA
With a 17" wheel you are very limited on the tires that you can run.
You could run a 17" MT Bias ply ET Street. The size is a 26x11.5-17.
Old Dec 16, 2009 | 10:47 PM
  #106  
sparks03max's Avatar
Thread Starter
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
Got a vid of my 13.010



And a video of me vs the cobalt on street tires (my street tire PB 13.2)

Old Dec 16, 2009 | 11:39 PM
  #107  
Aaron92SE's Avatar
NWP Engineering.com
iTrader: (128)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,065
From: Walstonburg, NC
12s are going to happen this weekend!
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 12:06 AM
  #108  
sparks03max's Avatar
Thread Starter
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
Originally Posted by Aaron92SE
12s are going to happen this weekend!
Yeah man I think I'd go 12s on the 5-6 degrees extra timing and 500 extra RPMs on rev limiter alone. Much less adding in the Kinetix (assuming gains, which i'm 95% sure of) and probably pulling the PS belt.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Finkle
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
13
Sep 27, 2015 09:53 PM
tcb_02_max
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
5
Sep 11, 2015 12:23 PM
Cant_Get_Ryte
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
3
Aug 28, 2015 06:41 AM
MikesChevelle
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
4
Aug 19, 2015 07:19 AM
MaxStock
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
7
Aug 12, 2015 08:33 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:07 AM.