dual intake
12-08-2005, 01:21 PM
#41
In your quest to be the comedian, you forgot to answer the gentleman's question 
Originally Posted by ajcool2
Yeah somebody should make a message board where people can ask questions and have their questions answered.
12-08-2005, 01:25 PM
#42
Originally Posted by ajcool2
Yeah somebody should make a message board where people can ask questions and have their questions answered.
okay whatever start over.....
------
Q: "does anyone have any idea whether or not this is a good intake or have u had any experience with input is greatly appreciated
click here"
looks like a hoax or sumthin to me
------
A: No.
12-08-2005, 01:47 PM
#43
The idea behind this intake is to reduce the air velocity through the filter material, thereby lowering flow resistance. Resistance to flow is proportional to the air velocity through the filter medium, so increasing the filter area reduces velocity, resulting in less pressure drop through the filter.
So the principle is sound, but the application is pretty gimmicky, since it would make more sense to just use a larger single filter. So, this item is obviously intended to attract buyers who are after that high performance twin-turbo look. I would have to label it as rice.
So the principle is sound, but the application is pretty gimmicky, since it would make more sense to just use a larger single filter. So, this item is obviously intended to attract buyers who are after that high performance twin-turbo look. I would have to label it as rice.
12-08-2005, 07:06 PM
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 152
I think the ORG should create an exam on Maxima knowledge. Then they can place everyone by their scores in a specific category and let them post on certain threads. Those that score low can join a children's thread where they can post stupid threads like this one all day long. Those that actually enjoy learning and reading about the true works of mechancial knowledge can post in a Grown up thread. Lets get working on this ORG.
12-08-2005, 08:27 PM
#45
Originally Posted by SRJesse
I think the ORG should create an exam on Maxima knowledge. Then they can place everyone by their scores in a specific category and let them post on certain threads. Those that score low can join a children's thread where they can post stupid threads like this one all day long. Those that actually enjoy learning and reading about the true works of mechancial knowledge can post in a Grown up thread. Lets get working on this ORG.
12-09-2005, 01:55 PM
#46
Originally Posted by Vlasic
Thats because when someone converts from the stock twin turbo setup to a single turbo they still have 2 mafs sitting there so an intake like this is required to house both mafs.
12-09-2005, 06:52 PM
#47
http://tirintionet.neostrada.pl/nissanklub/rb26dett.jpg
http://www.victoryperformance.com/ou...d4fc2068a8.jpg
looks like there is two...cant quite tell though
http://www.victoryperformance.com/ou...d4fc2068a8.jpg
looks like there is two...cant quite tell though
12-10-2005, 12:49 AM
#49
my mistake, ive seen a few rb26's running two mafs and had assumed that they had 2 stock. here is a pic of an intake that i was talking about that is similar to what is pictured above;
thats actually an rb26 in an s13, but you get the idea.
thats actually an rb26 in an s13, but you get the idea.
12-10-2005, 03:20 AM
#51
Skyline GT-R comes with 2 MAFs. Always.
All other Skyline trim levels come with one MAF.
Notice both MAFs are plugged in on that GT-R. On just about any Z32 running 2 MAFs, one is a dummy and is not connected.
All other Skyline trim levels come with one MAF.
Notice both MAFs are plugged in on that GT-R. On just about any Z32 running 2 MAFs, one is a dummy and is not connected.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BPuff57
Advanced Suspension, Chassis, and Braking
33
04-16-2020 05:15 AM
maxima297
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
4
09-30-2015 03:32 PM