MEVI or '00vi?
#81
ok just reading this has made my head hurt... i thought i was understanding all this but Blah Blah Blah...
Mevi w/o ECU only good for high end power only
Mevi W/ ecu Good all bands?
00vi good in all bands but more work and breakable
that the jist of it? with out getting all Dyno-techie-guru like on me...Please
Mevi w/o ECU only good for high end power only
Mevi W/ ecu Good all bands?
00vi good in all bands but more work and breakable
that the jist of it? with out getting all Dyno-techie-guru like on me...Please
#82
Just to clarify - I DID NOT say, nor do I think that the addition of a MEVI w/o an ecu upgrade w/ extended rev limit was useless, or unnoticable. I am fully aware that the increase in power with a MEVI begins at say 5500 rpms compared to the USIM, and is a very noticable increase. Again, I'm fully aware of this.
However, what I said (if anything that was replied after I posted was directed to me) was what I had read awhile back when reading through the faqs and supporting threads. I do not have a MEVI, nor have I driven a MEVI equipped Maxima. I'm sure the power increase for those 1000 rpms is a very noticable difference, however my argument (or should I say: the argument of previous .orgers that I paraphrased) was that without an extended rev limit, the power increase from 5500-6500 isn't enough to counteract the loss of tq in the midrange in order to produce a better acceleration/quarter mile time. After the qtr mile point, however, I know that the MEVI will walk a USIM. I hope what I just clarified was a given if it wasn't clearly stated in my first post...
However, what I said (if anything that was replied after I posted was directed to me) was what I had read awhile back when reading through the faqs and supporting threads. I do not have a MEVI, nor have I driven a MEVI equipped Maxima. I'm sure the power increase for those 1000 rpms is a very noticable difference, however my argument (or should I say: the argument of previous .orgers that I paraphrased) was that without an extended rev limit, the power increase from 5500-6500 isn't enough to counteract the loss of tq in the midrange in order to produce a better acceleration/quarter mile time. After the qtr mile point, however, I know that the MEVI will walk a USIM. I hope what I just clarified was a given if it wasn't clearly stated in my first post...
#83
Originally Posted by BigLou93SE
After the qtr mile point, however, I know that the MEVI will walk a USIM. I hope what I just clarified was a given if it wasn't clearly stated in my first post...
But as stated without the rev limiter removed I agree the MEVI is still making some power but negligable without that ECU IMO. In other words I just don't see it making up for its cost or the labor put in without the ECU in place.
This has all been said and debated before.. just thought I'd throw that 1/4 figure int here as stated that was my only contibution the rest is a repeat of things said years ago.
But hell if I know, I'm starting to partly doubt myself. goodnight.
/thread
#84
looks like i caught the tail end of this one, im going 00VI, just by looking at my recent dyno with USIM I had 196 hp around 5500 rpms but at around 6500 the USIM drops off to 155 hp i think it was compared to someone like dandymax that has the same mods but OOVI and greddy EU, at 6500 rpms he was making around 220 hp. will have to look over the dyno charts again but that is a huge difference in top end power.
#85
Originally Posted by konak85
take note that the mevi is useless without an extended rev limit ecu.
#86
Originally Posted by nismology
I never said he lied. I just called his results anomalous and not consistent with dyno's that have been posted with similar mods through the years. Nothing wrong with that. Once again, what's your point?
The Question Is what is your POINT? Did you ever have MEVI on your car? Unless you have had MEVI and 00VI your statements are as subjective as anyone elses and probally worth less than a grain of salt. Bottom line.
I know many member who are VERY happy with there MEVI. I am, Obviously i30ds is and many other. You claim 00VI equiped maximas are so much faster I am still waiting for dyno and numerical proof?
To the Orignal poster either way you go your better off than you are now with your stock manifold.
#88
Originally Posted by MaximaSE96
zack did u ever Dyno before u put the MEVI on...
#89
Originally Posted by Zack342
The Question Is what is your POINT? Did you ever have MEVI on your car? Unless you have had MEVI and 00VI your statements are as subjective as anyone elses and probally worth less than a grain of salt. Bottom line.
BTW, my point is summarized in post #71.
I know many member who are VERY happy with there MEVI. I am, Obviously i30ds is and many other. You claim 00VI equiped maximas are so much faster I am still waiting for dyno and numerical proof?
#93
Originally Posted by BigLou93SE
I'm sure the power increase for those 1000 rpms is a very noticable difference, however my argument (or should I say: the argument of previous .orgers that I paraphrased) was that without an extended rev limit, the power increase from 5500-6500 isn't enough to counteract the loss of tq in the midrange in order to produce a better acceleration/quarter mile time. After the qtr mile point, however, I know that the MEVI will walk a USIM. I hope what I just clarified was a given if it wasn't clearly stated in my first post...
This has been common knowledge in the 4G community on the org for years now. (Not directed at you)
IBnismologyhatesthemevi
#94
Originally Posted by nismology
Yes i used to have a MEVI on my car and sold it. But that's completely irrelevant. What does that have to do with anything?
BTW, my point is summarized in post #71.
I dare you to find a post in this thread with me saying 00VI cars are soo much faster than cars with a MEVI.
BTW, my point is summarized in post #71.
I dare you to find a post in this thread with me saying 00VI cars are soo much faster than cars with a MEVI.
if its not going to be faster then what is the advantage. Your claim continualy states more power. what is the over all effect of more power?
It is implied that a car with 00Vi would be faster.
#95
Originally Posted by nismology
This has been common knowledge in the 4G community on the org for years now. (Not directed at you)
IBnismologyhatesthemevi
IBnismologyhatesthemevi
Anyways, that's what I've been saying - that it's been known but since no one had stated it yet in this thread, I decided to throw that in. And because it's been known...I couldn't really figure out why I caught heat for it, like:
Originally Posted by NMexMAX
Are you kidding me?
#96
Originally Posted by Zack342
if its not going to be faster then what is the advantage. Your claim continualy states more power. what is the over all effect of more power?
It is implied that a car with 00Vi would be faster.
It is implied that a car with 00Vi would be faster.
#100
Originally Posted by Kevlo911
#107
Here's a summary:
USIM
- Stock (in the US)
- Torque peaks at 4,000 rpm and then drops off sharply
- At redline, power is 25-30hp lower than peak
- Power curve is relatively rough
- ECU upgrade makes power gains but does not smooth out the power curve or reduce high end loss
- Extended rev limit is of very little use due to rapidly falling torque above 4,000 rpm
MEVI
- Relatively easy install (everything bolts up like stock)
- Low chance of disabling the engine even if the MEVI fails
- Slightly weaker midrange than USIM
- Slightly higher peak power and torque than USIM
- Power curve is VERY smooth
- Torque drops off very slowly after peak
- Peak power lasts much longer than with USIM
- ECU upgrade makes good power gains
- Most breathing mods yield better results than with USIM due to cumulative effects with the high-end efficiency
- Extended rev limit is a significant improvement because the slow torque dropoff will allow power to continue to be made long past stock rev limit
00VI
- Harder install, some custom work involved
- Some chance of problems affecting the engine's ability to run at all
- Prone to cracking
- Higher peak power than MEVI or USIM
- More power than MEVI or USIM over the entire rev range
- Power curve smoother than USIM (not as smooth as MEVI)
- Torque drops off very slowly after peak
- Peak power lasts much longer than with USIM
- ALL power mods yield better results than with USIM or MEVI due to cumulative effects with better breathing at all RPMs
- Extended rev limit is a significant improvement because the slow torque dropoff will allow power to continue to be made long past stock rev limit
USIM
- Stock (in the US)
- Torque peaks at 4,000 rpm and then drops off sharply
- At redline, power is 25-30hp lower than peak
- Power curve is relatively rough
- ECU upgrade makes power gains but does not smooth out the power curve or reduce high end loss
- Extended rev limit is of very little use due to rapidly falling torque above 4,000 rpm
MEVI
- Relatively easy install (everything bolts up like stock)
- Low chance of disabling the engine even if the MEVI fails
- Slightly weaker midrange than USIM
- Slightly higher peak power and torque than USIM
- Power curve is VERY smooth
- Torque drops off very slowly after peak
- Peak power lasts much longer than with USIM
- ECU upgrade makes good power gains
- Most breathing mods yield better results than with USIM due to cumulative effects with the high-end efficiency
- Extended rev limit is a significant improvement because the slow torque dropoff will allow power to continue to be made long past stock rev limit
00VI
- Harder install, some custom work involved
- Some chance of problems affecting the engine's ability to run at all
- Prone to cracking
- Higher peak power than MEVI or USIM
- More power than MEVI or USIM over the entire rev range
- Power curve smoother than USIM (not as smooth as MEVI)
- Torque drops off very slowly after peak
- Peak power lasts much longer than with USIM
- ALL power mods yield better results than with USIM or MEVI due to cumulative effects with better breathing at all RPMs
- Extended rev limit is a significant improvement because the slow torque dropoff will allow power to continue to be made long past stock rev limit
#108
Originally Posted by d00df00d
Here's a summary:
USIM
- Stock (in the US)
- Torque peaks at 4,000 rpm and then drops off sharply
- At redline, power is 25-30hp lower than peak
- Power curve is relatively rough
- ECU upgrade makes power gains but does not smooth out the power curve or reduce high end loss
- Extended rev limit is of very little use due to rapidly falling torque above 4,000 rpm
USIM
- Stock (in the US)
- Torque peaks at 4,000 rpm and then drops off sharply
- At redline, power is 25-30hp lower than peak
- Power curve is relatively rough
- ECU upgrade makes power gains but does not smooth out the power curve or reduce high end loss
- Extended rev limit is of very little use due to rapidly falling torque above 4,000 rpm
MEVI
- Relatively easy install (everything bolts up like stock)
- Low chance of disabling the engine even if the MEVI fails
- Slightly weaker midrange than USIM
- Slightly higher peak power and torque than USIM
- Power curve is VERY smooth
- Torque drops off very slowly after peak
- Peak power lasts much longer than with USIM
- ECU upgrade makes good power gains
- Most breathing mods yield better results than with USIM due to cumulative effects with the high-end efficiency
- Extended rev limit is a significant improvement because the slow torque dropoff will allow power to continue to be made long past stock rev limit
- Relatively easy install (everything bolts up like stock)
- Low chance of disabling the engine even if the MEVI fails
- Slightly weaker midrange than USIM
- Slightly higher peak power and torque than USIM
- Power curve is VERY smooth
- Torque drops off very slowly after peak
- Peak power lasts much longer than with USIM
- ECU upgrade makes good power gains
- Most breathing mods yield better results than with USIM due to cumulative effects with the high-end efficiency
- Extended rev limit is a significant improvement because the slow torque dropoff will allow power to continue to be made long past stock rev limit
00VI
- Harder install, some custom work involved
- Some chance of problems affecting the engine's ability to run at all
- Prone to cracking
- Higher peak power than MEVI or USIM
- More power than MEVI or USIM over the entire rev range
- Power curve smoother than USIM (not as smooth as MEVI)
- Torque drops off very slowly after peak
- Peak power lasts much longer than with USIM
- ALL power mods yield better results than with USIM or MEVI due to cumulative effects with better breathing at all RPMs
- Extended rev limit is a significant improvement because the slow torque dropoff will allow power to continue to be made long past stock rev limit
- Harder install, some custom work involved
- Some chance of problems affecting the engine's ability to run at all
- Prone to cracking
- Higher peak power than MEVI or USIM
- More power than MEVI or USIM over the entire rev range
- Power curve smoother than USIM (not as smooth as MEVI)
- Torque drops off very slowly after peak
- Peak power lasts much longer than with USIM
- ALL power mods yield better results than with USIM or MEVI due to cumulative effects with better breathing at all RPMs
- Extended rev limit is a significant improvement because the slow torque dropoff will allow power to continue to be made long past stock rev limit
#111
Originally Posted by d00df00d
The dyno graphs that I've seen, like the one in the All-Motor stickies.
#112
Originally Posted by MaximaSE96
ok we know 00vi > MEVI........i dont know exactly what BigLou was trying to get at because I have looked at that dyno many times and know its better....but I was defending the gains of the MEVI w/Stock ECU....
Nowhere did I say one was better than the other, I was just presenting that fact. If you're looking for top end power, then MEVI even without a rev limiter upgrade will still impress you. All I was saying, (which nismology agreed with...) was that without that rev limit extended, a MEVI equipped car won't be THAT much faster to the quarter mile point than the USIM, if any.
Yes, there are gains, and that's not what I was arguing. It just depends on what you want to do with your car (stated by you, I think). What's funny though, is I believe you yourself said that for autocross, you'd rather have the USIM instead of a MEVI a long time ago, however I could just be thinking of someone else. To maybe refresh your memory, someone then said "why not downshift to first" and that sprung into another debate on why it's retarded to force first gear at 20 mph just to get the MEVI's gains.
<-----exactly what this thread is doing...I've said the same thing over and over...haha
#113
Originally Posted by nismology
I never said he lied. I just called his results anomalous and not consistent with dyno's that have been posted with similar mods through the years. Nothing wrong with that. Once again, what's your point?
#114
Originally Posted by i30ds
What's your point?!? You made a claim. I said I have seen dynos that refute that, and instead of responding to that, you post the estimated dynos from the sticky that everybody has seen 10,000 time before.
Just so i understand, what are you disputing, the fact that the USIM makes solid power to 5500 RPM, or that the MEVI doesn't make any more power than the USIM until around that same 5500 RPM mark?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
litch
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
123
01-04-2024 07:01 PM
t6378tp
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
11
09-29-2018 04:27 PM
Maximeltman
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
0
08-31-2015 01:01 PM