4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999) Visit the 4th Generation forum to ask specific questions or find out more about the 4th Generation Maxima.

Anyone with a HHO intake kit?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 16, 2008 | 10:55 AM
  #481  
Geophrum's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 475
Just a FYI

Lowes

Drain cleaner

100% Sodium Hydroxide

$7 for 2lbs
Old Jul 17, 2008 | 01:09 PM
  #482  
Ron1's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6
Hey n0ypi,

Do you have any updates on your system? If so post some pics and tell us about the fuel savings.

Your system looks like it should really be pumping out the hho.
Old Jul 17, 2008 | 02:26 PM
  #483  
FallenOne's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,890
From: Kankakee, Illinois
yes do share N0ypi id really like some good grounds upon which for me to start my own experimentation!
Old Jul 18, 2008 | 10:06 PM
  #484  
danger300z's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 892
very interesting thread
Old Jul 19, 2008 | 12:29 AM
  #485  
n0ypi's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 73
it's been a long day, its really late here, i'm actually about ready to hit the sack. yeah, why not upload some photos...

booster is not running in full throttle, diluted electrolyte, 8amps, 13.v, only 500ml- 600ml/min, No other mods or whatsoever... just for now, mileage gain is +6to7mpg (from 31mpg to 38mpg) when cruising at around 65mph.

though my booster can actually pull 20-30 amps from alt and increase gas production, and the alt can surely provide that current, but there's a cost for pulling too much amps of course... it has to come from somewhere, i found that my optimum mileage gains is when my booster is pulling 7-9amps, but not done experimenting yet, theres more to test. so little time, i'm only doing tweaks over the weekends.

will be doing testing on high concentration of electrolyte later, currently working on PWM, to better control amps, and console guages/displays and switches.

later...

The Big Brother:


at rest after testing...






Last edited by n0ypi; Aug 12, 2008 at 09:42 PM.
Old Jul 19, 2008 | 06:25 AM
  #486  
Kevlo911's Avatar
Kevlo for President
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 35,755
From: Lake Orion, MI
Make me one!
Old Jul 19, 2008 | 07:51 AM
  #487  
FallenOne's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,890
From: Kankakee, Illinois
thats quite the little booster ya got there n0ypi. Im just curious, how did you get the acrillic material to seal watertight?
Old Jul 19, 2008 | 03:46 PM
  #488  
danger300z's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 892
wow that Baby Booster looks real nice....can you take closer pics of the plates please.
Old Jul 19, 2008 | 09:48 PM
  #489  
maxgtr2000's Avatar
KH3 by popular demand
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,102
From: Detroit, MI
Man that is awesome work. With all those plates that thing should put out too, and it doesn't take up much space.
Old Jul 19, 2008 | 10:23 PM
  #490  
black_maxed95's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,403
From: Braidwood, IL
no bubbler or arrestor? arent you worried about flash backs or what about water spilling over into the engine when driving over a bump?

good build tho, I like the location in the engine you have it at.

also did you do anything with the 02 sensors?
Old Jul 19, 2008 | 10:45 PM
  #491  
n0ypi's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 73
Originally Posted by FallenOne
thats quite the little booster ya got there n0ypi. Im just curious, how did you get the acrillic material to seal watertight?
Thanks.

I just use gasket.
Old Jul 19, 2008 | 11:08 PM
  #492  
n0ypi's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 73
Originally Posted by danger300z
wow that Baby Booster looks real nice....can you take closer pics of the plates please.
Will do later, I've changed the design of the baby booster, made it similar to the the big boy, this booster is efficient, it's just too big to fit behind the grille , made a mistake in the dimensions, it's now in my truck. It's a 2 parallel of 5 series cell group, partially isolated, I split some of the cells and put them in their compartment, thought some are sharing compartments here (2cells), but that'll surely minimize current leaks, I can still make it better by fully isolating every cell. just didn't have enought time, will work on the next design later.

The baby booster you see here is old, that's a 3 parallel of 5 series cell groupings, the 5 series cell groups is in their open bath compartment. like this:

-NNNN+ [DIVIDER] -NNNN+ [DIVIDER] -NNNN+

Open bath design is actually inneficient, too much current leaks and heats up quickly, unless you seal the sides, bottom and top of the cells. Or put a step gap (like the way smack is doing it), but there's still current leaks in there since, it's an open bath.

I've changed it, redesigned it again, now getting twice the efficiency. Will show it later.

Glad that this is generating interest.

Last edited by n0ypi; Jul 19, 2008 at 11:16 PM.
Old Jul 19, 2008 | 11:12 PM
  #493  
n0ypi's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 73
Originally Posted by black_maxed95
no bubbler or arrestor? arent you worried about flash backs or what about water spilling over into the engine when driving over a bump?

good build tho, I like the location in the engine you have it at.

also did you do anything with the 02 sensors?

Do have a bubbler.

The location was temporary, dont like it there, too much heat, its now between the grille and radiator. Preferably, i'll put this in the trunk, later when I have enough time.

Last edited by n0ypi; Jul 19, 2008 at 11:14 PM.
Old Jul 19, 2008 | 11:15 PM
  #494  
FallenOne's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,890
From: Kankakee, Illinois
Twice The Output!?!? Saweeet, you should share your exact designs with us
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 07:29 AM
  #495  
maxihari77SE96's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 476
From: Chicago, IL
http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/24/r...to-the-gallon/

For the non - believers... i guess.

Good luck guys and enjoy it.
Old Jul 28, 2008 | 07:42 AM
  #496  
black_maxed95's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,403
From: Braidwood, IL
Originally Posted by maxihari77SE96
http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/24/r...to-the-gallon/

For the non - believers... i guess.

Good luck guys and enjoy it.
Ya Ive read about this car before. Its basically the same thing we all have been doing but professionally executed as far as HHO is concerned. The only advantage that car has over ours (i think) is that the ECU is designed for HHO. Otherwise its just a fancy shell over a TT acura. Its good to know though that companies are looking into this too, hopefully it will push big car manufacturers to follow.
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 01:14 PM
  #497  
danmaz's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 33
Originally Posted by maxihari77SE96
http://www.autoblog.com/2008/07/24/r...to-the-gallon/

For the non - believers... i guess.

Good luck guys and enjoy it.
Non-believer I stay. Until we see an actual car delivering 450hp at 40 MPG, this is just yet another HHO scam (but this time, a very expensive one)
Old Jul 29, 2008 | 01:19 PM
  #498  
black_maxed95's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,403
From: Braidwood, IL
Originally Posted by danmaz
Non-believer I stay. Until we see an actual car delivering 450hp at 40 MPG, this is just yet another HHO scam (but this time, a very expensive one)
um ok...a prototype has already been made and tested...you think they just pulled those numbers out of their a$$es?

What is there to not believe. Hydrogen increases the efficiency of the combustion of gasoline. If you think 100% of the gasoline that is put into your engine is burned, then you need to read up some more.
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 09:39 AM
  #499  
SolarWind's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 29
he's in denial mode.
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 09:53 AM
  #500  
Hexon's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 877
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by danmaz
Non-believer I stay. Until we see an actual car delivering 450hp at 40 MPG, this is just yet another HHO scam (but this time, a very expensive one)
Even if it gives +5 MPG, all of this hard work will pay off. Your not going to see 450hp from something as simple as HHO (I say simple because even I can understand the concept). And I highly doubt you'll see 40 MPG unless this is highway cruising, and even then. Once I see someone with a working kit I will have to start building my own.

How's the progress on this project going anyways?
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 09:58 AM
  #501  
Hexon's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 877
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by n0ypi
Do have a bubbler.

The location was temporary, dont like it there, too much heat, its now between the grille and radiator. Preferably, i'll put this in the trunk, later when I have enough time.
Do you really want hydrogen gas that close to your gas tank (in the trunk)? Although I realize even if something does happen, it won't go off like a bomb and it would probably just flash. But I would still feel uncomfortable knowing that I have hydrogen running underneath me.
Old Aug 5, 2008 | 09:59 AM
  #502  
black_maxed95's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,403
From: Braidwood, IL
Originally Posted by Hexon
Even if it gives +5 MPG, all of this hard work will pay off. Your not going to see 450hp from something as simple as HHO (I say simple because even I can understand the concept). And I highly doubt you'll see 40 MPG unless this is highway cruising, and even then. Once I see someone with a working kit I will have to start building my own.

How's the progress on this project going anyways?
The 450HP is not from the HHO, its from the 3.5L TT Vtec...
I have a working setup that I ran for awhile but it took it off until I can get my wideband hooked up. I didnt test for MPG but the car definitely ran smoother/quieter/better.
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 11:02 AM
  #503  
danmaz's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 33
Originally Posted by black_maxed95
um ok...a prototype has already been made and tested...you think they just pulled those numbers out of their a$$es?
Has any independent organization (without any financial interest) has seen this prototype and conducted the performance tests? Until you can answer yes and present the results, "they just pulled those numbers out of their a$$es" is exactly what it is!

350Z delivers 306hp at 25mpg highway. If you believe in Ronn's 450hp at 40mpg - keep dreaming.

Originally Posted by black_maxed95
What is there to not believe. Hydrogen increases the efficiency of the combustion of gasoline. If you think 100% of the gasoline that is put into your engine is burned, then you need to read up some more.
Actually, I KNOW that not all the gasoline burns in ICE, and it is definitely possible that hydrogen improves the combustion. I just wonder why there're no scientific experiments showing a financially significant improvement? And why after months of attempts, nobody in this community has presented any dependable mpg improvement data, and all we continue to see is things like

I didnt test for MPG but the car definitely ran smoother/quieter/better.
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 11:14 AM
  #504  
black_maxed95's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,403
From: Braidwood, IL
Originally Posted by danmaz
Actually, I KNOW that not all the gasoline burns in ICE, and it is definitely possible that hydrogen improves the combustion. I just wonder why there're no scientific experiments showing a financially significant improvement? And why after months of attempts, nobody in this community has presented any dependable mpg improvement data, and all we continue to see is things like
Because our maximas are EFI, and the amount of fuel injectected is controlled by the oxygen sensors. Running hydrogen causes the o2 sensors to read very lean and therefore dump more fuel in. Because of this reason, people havent come up with a long term solution for our cars.

If you research, people are doing this with carburated cars and are finding significant mpg gains since they dont have to worry about EFI.

I hate even responding to this thread anymore cause people are so ignorant and they argue stuff they have NO experience with. I have actually made one and used it on my car, seen the mpg gains. But because of what I said, I cant run it for longterm.

I can tell you this, running my car normally, I can drive about 100-120 miles before the gas tank hits 3/4 from full. With my HHO I got 140-150 before that same mark. Thats the best I can come up with for numbers. But I know it will never be good enough for some of you. Personally I dont care what you think. Im filling up only my gas tank, not yours. I just wish people would open their mind and stop being so ignorant.

/rant
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 11:19 AM
  #505  
mowgli29's Avatar
Horizontally opposed.
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,172
From: St. Louis, MO
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 11:24 AM
  #506  
black_maxed95's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,403
From: Braidwood, IL
by the way you (danmaz) should be thankful the world isnt full of people like you. If everyone just sat around waiting for someone else to come up with proven numbers, nothing would get done.

You want to know why its been months and I still havent come up with a solid working design? Because Im a college student who is, studying engineering, working two jobs, paying tuition and rent, paying for other car mods, having a social life, and entertaining other hobbies. Sorry satisfying you with proven MPG gains isnt on the top of my priorities.

//rant
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 02:57 PM
  #507  
Ron1's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6
IF YOU DON'T LIKE THE SUBJECT, TOPIC OR DISCUSSION ON THIS THREAD, PLEASE MOVE ON!!!

This thread started out with lots of positive input and was very informative. Lets keep it that way.

nOypi, blackmaxed95 and to all those who quit posting, keep up the experiments and do post the results.

Even if something does'nt work the first time does'nt mean the whole idea is bad.

Good god how many light bulbs did it take to get one that worked?

Just a thought,

Ronnie
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 06:24 PM
  #508  
deezo's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 14,285
From: FV, NC
Originally Posted by black_maxed95
Because our maximas are EFI, and the amount of fuel injectected is controlled by the oxygen sensors. Running hydrogen causes the o2 sensors to read very lean and therefore dump more fuel in. Because of this reason, people havent come up with a long term solution for our cars.

If you research, people are doing this with carburated cars and are finding significant mpg gains since they dont have to worry about EFI.

I hate even responding to this thread anymore cause people are so ignorant and they argue stuff they have NO experience with. I have actually made one and used it on my car, seen the mpg gains. But because of what I said, I cant run it for longterm.

I can tell you this, running my car normally, I can drive about 100-120 miles before the gas tank hits 3/4 from full. With my HHO I got 140-150 before that same mark. Thats the best I can come up with for numbers. But I know it will never be good enough for some of you. Personally I dont care what you think. Im filling up only my gas tank, not yours. I just wish people would open their mind and stop being so ignorant.

/rant
You obviously know more about this than anyone that hasn't built one, so don't answer ignorance. Keep doing your thing. If you were to get it to work 100%, people would want you to build one for them so don't get caught up in arguments that go nowhere.
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 06:31 PM
  #509  
danmaz's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 33
Originally Posted by black_maxed95
Because our maximas are EFI, and the amount of fuel injectected is controlled by the oxygen sensors. Running hydrogen causes the o2 sensors to read very lean and therefore dump more fuel in. Because of this reason, people havent come up with a long term solution for our cars.
Oh, you are studying engineering! Maybe, you can explain, why it is needed to reprogram the ECU to adjust O2 sensor reading:
1. The electrolysis converts water (H2O) into what you call HHO. In this mixture the proportion of hydrogen to oxygen is 2 atoms to 1 atom. This means that the combustion of the hydrogen in the engine utilizes exactly the same amount of oxygen that was generated during the electrolysis.
2. The O2 sensor measures the amount of oxygen in the gases exiting the engine – after hydrogen combustion.
So how is it possible that injecting HHO into the intake manifold changes the reading of the O2 sensor?

Last edited by danmaz; Aug 6, 2008 at 06:36 PM.
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 06:50 PM
  #510  
Hexon's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 877
From: Knoxville, TN
danmaz, Injecting HHO into the fuel creates more oxygen exiting through the exhaust. The O2 sensors pick up on this extra oxygen because that is their job, and they tell the ECU to dump for fuel into the engine, which defeats the whole purpose of HHO. By reprogramming the ECU you are able to bypass the O2's readings and get better gas mileage sense you are no longer dumping extra fuel into the engine.

I get all of this information from reading this thead. Perhaps you should actually read the thread before posting?
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 07:05 PM
  #511  
danmaz's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 33
Originally Posted by Hexon
danmaz, Injecting HHO into the fuel creates more oxygen exiting through the exhaust. The O2 sensors pick up on this extra oxygen because that is their job, and they tell the ECU to dump for fuel into the engine, which defeats the whole purpose of HHO. By reprogramming the ECU you are able to bypass the O2's readings and get better gas mileage sense you are no longer dumping extra fuel into the engine.

I get all of this information from reading this thead. Perhaps you should actually read the thread before posting?
You either didn’t read or didn’t fully understand what I wrote in the question. You inject 1 atoms of oxygen per each 2 atoms of hydrogen. This is the exact proportion of hydrogen combustion, which means all the injected oxygen oxidizes the injected hydrogen, producing H2O (steam). Having excessive oxygen in the exhaust would mean that not all the hydrogen combusted. Naturally, this would actually significantly decrease the efficiency and the MPG ratio.
BTW, I did read this thread, and I specifically wanted to ask somebody with engineering/technical/scientific knowledge, who understands (is supposed to understand) this kind of stuff.
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 07:13 PM
  #512  
Hexon's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 877
From: Knoxville, TN
"Oxygen is not a fuel. It is an oxidizer. It helps other fuels to burn more efficiently. It WILL increase the amount of oxygen not used in the combustion process to your catalytic converter. Your O2 sensor normally picks up oxygen as too much air and too little fuel or excess oxygen because too little pump gas has been added. The EEC (electronic engine control) then adds gas to the motor as a result to correct the lean condition.

When you inject hydrogen and oxygen back into the motor you increase the oxygen. Some of that passes through to the O2 sensor which picks up this normally lean condition and adds gas to the motor, making the subsequent mixture too rich. As a result you get lots of power but no increase in fuel economy."

Pulled from Yahoo, BTW. I'm only a second year biochemistry student so I don't completely understand this entire procedure, but sounds logical to me.
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 07:24 PM
  #513  
danmaz's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 33
As a biochemistry student, do you really need yahoo to understand this: you inject 1 atom of oxygen for each 2 atoms of hydrogen; oxygen oxidizes hydrogen and you get H2O (=1 atom of oxygen for each 2 atoms of hydrogen). So ALL the injected oxygen is used to oxidize (burn) the hydrogen -> there’s no additional oxygen in the exhaust. How come the O2 sensor reports elevated level of oxygen?
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 07:49 PM
  #514  
Hexon's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 877
From: Knoxville, TN
Oxidation doesn't imply that oxygen is burnt. Oxidation simply means that an oxygen atom is removed. 2(H2O) => 2(H2) + O2. By saying that there is no more oxygen you are implying that the oxygen just disappears. It has to exit the equation somehow. It should exit the exhaust as H2O and O2. Do you happen to know the formula for gasoline off hand? I would like to try to work out a balanced equation to see if I'm right.

Edit: Actually, from looking around all hydrogen powered cars produce water as the final product. It shouldn't contribute any extra O2 the the environment.
2nd Edit: ^^ This is just from pure hydrogen powered cars. What the HHO project implies is a type of fuel cell which uses oxygen to complete the burn of hydrogen in the internal combustion engine. The result of this is water vapor and oxygen gas.

Last edited by Hexon; Aug 6, 2008 at 08:02 PM.
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 08:04 PM
  #515  
Hexon's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 877
From: Knoxville, TN
Brown's gas: This is the most perfect fuel of all for running our vehicles. Like pure hydrogen, it is made from water, i.e., hydrogen and oxygen, but it burns in the combustion engine so that, depending on the setup, it may actually release oxygen into the atmosphere. In that case, what comes out of the tail pipe is oxygen and water vapor, just as with fuel cells; but the oxygen comes from the water that's being used to create the Brown's gas fuel. So burning Brown's gas as fuel can add oxygen to the air and thus increase the oxygen content of our atmosphere.
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 08:08 PM
  #516  
danmaz's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 33
Are you really a biochemistry student?
Oxidation=reaction of fuel with oxygen=burning=combustion
The formula that you mentioned 2(H2O) => 2(H2) + O2 is the opposite of oxidation=the chemical formula of electrolysis!
The formula of hydrogen burning/oxidation/combustion is 2(H2)+O2 => 2(H2O).

So you start with two molecules of H2O, the electrolysis converts them into 2 molecules of H2 and one molecule of O2 and this is what's injected into the engine. During the combustion, the two molecules of H2 react with one molecule of O2 and you get back 2 molecules of H2O - no additional oxygen around O2 sensor!

Oxidation of gasoline (trimethylpentane): 2(C8H18)+25(O2) => 16(CO2)+18(H2O)
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 08:08 PM
  #517  
Hexon's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 877
From: Knoxville, TN
Has any of the HHO people in here tried the Rothman Technologies' method of producing hydrogen? Apparently, it produces pure hydrogen that doesn't need the aid of oxygen to combust. Instead of the normal salt and water method there is some sort of inexpensive metal alloy involved.
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 08:16 PM
  #518  
Hexon's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 877
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by danmaz
Are you really a biochemistry student?
One chemistry class so far. I have one more this semester before I start into organic chemistry. I don't claim to know much about this at all. But from what I've read about this, from different sources other than this thread, the exhaust from the HHO system is CO+H2O(gas)+O2.

Instead of arguing with the people in this thread, I would try to argue in some of the forums elsewhere that are more dedicated to this project. They might be able to answer your questions better.

Anyways, I'm sure some of the guys actually working on this experiment will contribute later. But I've been procrastinating on a bioethics final paper, so I'll check back later to see what's going on.
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 08:24 PM
  #519  
Hexon's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 877
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by danmaz
Are you really a biochemistry student?
Oxidation=reaction of fuel with oxygen=burning=combustion
The formula that you mentioned 2(H2O) => 2(H2) + O2 is the opposite of oxidatation
Wow, your right. How embarrassing. I was thinking about the electrolysis equation when writing that, and I just type the wrong equation. 2H2 + O2 -> 2H2O is the example of oxidation reduction that I was should have typed. Oxygen is being reduced. Oh well. At least I gave you a good opportunity to prove your superiority.
Old Aug 6, 2008 | 08:29 PM
  #520  
maximus_pr's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,065
From: Florida
well guys my brother installed a system on his 2006 sonata v6 like three months ago and so far the mpg improved by as much as 14mpg more and the average is 10 more mpg for me that's a lot, i myself was a disbeliever but he prove me wrong i'm planning to install mine whiting the next 2 weeks i let you guys know how it goes

Last edited by maximus_pr; Aug 6, 2008 at 08:33 PM.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:46 PM.