5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

Theory on reason for MAF failures.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-20-2003 | 09:13 AM
  #1  
sascuderi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,329
From: South Jersey
Theory on reason for MAF failures.....

After reading over the last year multiple post about MAF failures I have my own theory that I would like to bounce off of the experts....

Many have said the failures are from a new intake, Apex filters, oil from K&N filters or vibration. However, a single cause for all the failures has yet to be found.

My understanding is that the MAF receives increasing amount of current as you accelerate.(to heat the wire which then measures air flow, correct?)

I have also noticed posts here that many MAFs suddenly stopped working during WOT. (a common story seems to be that "I was getting off the on ramp on to the highway and suddenly my car cut out")

Therefore, could the failures simply be from aggressive driving? Could subjecting the MAF to recurrent voltage spikes during repeated episodes of WOT be leading to an electrical failure of the unit???

This could explain why we have seen failures with all types of intakes. It could also explain why we seem to have more failures than the average Maxima drive...those on this board are more passionate about driving and are more likely to "floor it".

What do you think?
Old 07-20-2003 | 09:18 AM
  #2  
jjames's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 702
nah.
Old 07-20-2003 | 09:24 AM
  #3  
BioMaxDDS's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,442
maybe what you said is true.....but there are still more failed MAF than other vehicles
Old 07-20-2003 | 09:30 AM
  #4  
sascuderi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,329
From: South Jersey
Originally posted by BioMaxDDS
maybe what you said is true.....but there are still more failed MAF than other vehicles
Yes because the MAFs were poorly designed and can't handle the higher currents during repeated episodes of WOT. If the MAFs had better electronic guts we would not be seeing the problem.
Old 07-20-2003 | 09:31 AM
  #5  
soundmike's Avatar
Very sound, Mike
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 6,011
From: H-Town
It's a good theory but i don't think it holds. I'm sure there's also quite a number of people having the stock airboxes going WOT many a times - me being one of them.

28k miles and still holding. I also changed my filter several k miles ago with a dry-type from Microgard.

And to think i have one of the very first 2k2's made (July 2001 build date) - so i probably have the same problematic MAF's as everyone else.
Old 07-20-2003 | 09:41 AM
  #6  
MyownNismo's Avatar
Future Camaro SS owner
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,204
From: MN
Originally posted by soundmike
It's a good theory but i don't think it holds. I'm sure there's also quite a number of people having the stock airboxes going WOT many a times - me being one of them.

28k miles and still holding. I also changed my filter several k miles ago with a dry-type from Microgard.

And to think i have one of the very first 2k2's made (July 2001 build date) - so i probably have the same problematic MAF's as everyone else.
I have a PRCAI and my new Injen which bought from soundmike and I have had no problems with mine. It's more like a lightbulb the filament burns out or breaks like said it heats up and since it's colder air coming from it it tries to get hot and burns out.
Old 07-20-2003 | 10:07 AM
  #7  
mingo's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,542
From: Bay Area, CA
hrm.... maybe that's what's wrong with my other car.. dumb thing stalls when i get on an onramp, scares the bajeezes outa me
Old 07-20-2003 | 10:29 AM
  #8  
sascuderi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,329
From: South Jersey
Originally posted by mingo
hrm.... maybe that's what's wrong with my other car.. dumb thing stalls when i get on an onramp, scares the bajeezes outa me
Usually when the MAF goes you'll get a check engine light and the RPMs won't go above 2000. However, some have reported performance problems as the MAF starts to go bad before it goes completely.
Old 07-20-2003 | 12:40 PM
  #9  
Maximam's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,909
From: Reno, NV
My MAF went bad at 40k with a bone stock airbox and filter.
Old 07-20-2003 | 01:18 PM
  #10  
026spdMax's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 95
I agree. I drive very hard on my Maxima. Accelerating to redline daily. I have had 1 bad MAF. My check engine light is back on again 6,000 miles later after accelerating hard onto the freeway right @ redline. I have a stock intake.

I haven't had time to take it in. I'm going to guess its going to be the MAF again. I will let you guys know.

In California 3 repairs of the same part will make my car eligible for LEMON LAW
Old 07-20-2003 | 08:41 PM
  #11  
sascuderi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,329
From: South Jersey
Originally posted by 026spdMax
I agree. I drive very hard on my Maxima. Accelerating to redline daily. I have had 1 bad MAF. My check engine light is back on again 6,000 miles later after accelerating hard onto the freeway right @ redline. I have a stock intake.

I haven't had time to take it in. I'm going to guess its going to be the MAF again. I will let you guys know.

In California 3 repairs of the same part will make my car eligible for LEMON LAW

Yes, let us know if it is the MAF again.
Old 07-20-2003 | 09:15 PM
  #12  
Pir8 97's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 341
Originally posted by sascuderi


Usually when the MAF goes you'll get a check engine light and the RPMs won't go above 2000. However, some have reported performance problems as the MAF starts to go bad before it goes completely.
Wish I had some warning... WOT then dead stick.

BTW guys, I dont' buy the oiled filter theory. I had a K&N in the stock air box for about 20k miles w/ no problem... & I have a lead foot!
Old 07-21-2003 | 02:03 AM
  #13  
MiniRX7's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,875
I installed my frankencar w/Apexi filter on the same day i picked up my 2k3 brand new!..

So my car has never been driven with the stock airbox.. I now have 15,000kms.. drive my car hard, and ran it at the track on friday.. still no check engine light or MAF failure.

We are not the only one plagued with MAF failures.. Subarues had this as well...
Old 07-21-2003 | 08:02 AM
  #14  
mingo's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,542
From: Bay Area, CA
having a filter doesn't cause the maf to blow, it's when you over oil the filter.
Old 07-21-2003 | 08:25 AM
  #15  
TimW's Avatar
The silent but deadly Moderator
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,691
G35S/C's are also eating MAFs.. some with intakes, some w/o. Not just you guys.
Old 07-21-2003 | 08:55 AM
  #16  
spirilis's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,236
From: New Market, MD
I'm very inclined to believe the theory of the wire (or electronics supporting it) burning out like a filament due to the intense current... ESPECIALLY with the higher airflow of our V6's.
The sad part is, I doubt that will get any better, unless they design a MAF sensor with a thicker wire that can handle the extra current...
Old 07-21-2003 | 11:56 AM
  #17  
Zordburg's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 103
From: Toronto
Originally posted by spirilis
I'm very inclined to believe the theory of the wire (or electronics supporting it) burning out like a filament due to the intense current... ESPECIALLY with the higher airflow of our V6's.
The sad part is, I doubt that will get any better, unless they design a MAF sensor with a thicker wire that can handle the extra current...
Unfortunately you are probably right, With so many MAF failures there appears to be an inherent problem in design. Perhaps after market intakes and over-oiling the filter may exacerbate the problem
but with so many stock failures somethin just ain't right

If my second MAF goes someone at the nissan dealership is going to get a serious ***-kickin
Old 07-21-2003 | 12:41 PM
  #18  
2k2kev's Avatar
It's chrome alright...
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,009
Originally posted by 026spdMax
I agree. I drive very hard on my Maxima. Accelerating to redline daily. I have had 1 bad MAF. My check engine light is back on again 6,000 miles later after accelerating hard onto the freeway right @ redline. I have a stock intake.

I haven't had time to take it in. I'm going to guess its going to be the MAF again. I will let you guys know.

In California 3 repairs of the same part will make my car eligible for LEMON LAW
you don't really think that a failed MAF is going to be justification for them buying back the car, do you? That's like trying to get a new car because rotors warp... they'll just replace them again.

good luck if that's what you're thinking.
Old 07-21-2003 | 04:13 PM
  #19  
Rizzob's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 45
My MAF failed the same day I installed my Frankencar with Apexi. They forgot to send me a mounting bracket but I installed it anyway. Now, I'm positive my failure was due to vibration. There may be many causes, but mine seems obvious. I made a mount out of a 2x4 fastener from Home Depot and used a couple washers with rubber on one side to give it some play. There is no longer any harsh vibration, just dampened movement. We'll see how long this setup lasts.
Old 07-21-2003 | 06:34 PM
  #20  
10e's Avatar
10e
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 34
Ok,

For those of you whose MAFs died what was the weather like?

Here's the MAFs construction

1) Temperature Diode (measures hot film temperature)
2) Hot film with current (receives current based on diode reportings)

That's it. If it dies under WOT it's likely that the MAF is getting a lot of voltage into the hot film, and the diode is reporting a temperature. So either the hot film buys it, and the ECU realizes it's not getting any voltage back, or the diode buys it. Either way, you have a dead car.

Now, if this is happening in the winter time, then I would say, WAI or CAI might be at fault because it may subject the MAF to lower temperatures and freezes it. But in that case the car is in closed loop mode where NO sensors are being read, so when it finally warms up, the sensors are being scanned by the ECU and it then realizes "dead MAF".

It could be that somehow the hot film is not ready for some voltage spikes (and that it's getting more voltage than spec) and blowing, and if my hunch is right, usually in warm weather where it overheats and dies, especially if it's "on the line" for failure where a little extra voltage will blow it.

This may also be why Nissan specs a new MAF for the hesitation/lack of power TSBs because they have a better new part. The Altima guys are reporting the same problem over there. We should check which MAF we all have and see if it's the same part number. Someone started that thread a while back but a lot of people didn't know how to get the P/N.

It's a serious issue when you're in limp mode going home methinks. Nissan really should do something about this. I'll find out what the new MAF is like tomorrow on my Alty.

Regards, and luck,

10e
Old 07-21-2003 | 09:48 PM
  #21  
sascuderi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,329
From: South Jersey
The responses bring up two questions:

Has anyone had a MAF go bad who doesn't WOT on a regular basis??

Why isn't there an aftermarket MAF that's better made?
Old 07-21-2003 | 10:39 PM
  #22  
frencjas's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 65
My 2000 Max MAF failed at 37K, however I'm a frequent user of WOT and often encounter the rev limiter in gears 1 thru 3.

Nissan replaced it for free even though it was just out of warranty! (pretty cool, eh)

No problems since, and now have over 66K miles.

Jason French
2000 5sp Max
Old 07-22-2003 | 04:55 AM
  #23  
spirilis's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,236
From: New Market, MD
FYI, the TSB NTB01-036A states the part number for the new airflow meter assembly as "22680-2Y001". I'm not sure if this is any different from the stock one...
Old 07-22-2003 | 09:55 AM
  #24  
h2kFrosty's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 920
Originally posted by spirilis
I'm very inclined to believe the theory of the wire (or electronics supporting it) burning out like a filament due to the intense current... ESPECIALLY with the higher airflow of our V6's.
The sad part is, I doubt that will get any better, unless they design a MAF sensor with a thicker wire that can handle the extra current...
If this increased air flow theory were true, I would assume you would be seeing us force induction folks with superchargers and turbos blowing MAF's every few thousand miles... I still have my original MAF and I'm on 43,000 miles. My turbo is also running at 10psi, so I'm flowing lots of air.

Bryan
Old 07-22-2003 | 11:57 AM
  #25  
spirilis's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,236
From: New Market, MD
That's interesting. Maybe it's hit-or-miss regarding this issue?
Probably poor manufacturing (on whoever manufacturers the actual MAF)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JakeOfAllTrades
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
7
10-29-2024 07:55 PM
TallTom
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
50
07-08-2022 10:54 AM
-ReLLiK-
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
4
04-29-2016 07:25 PM
AboveDaCloudz
7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015)
3
10-09-2015 12:25 AM
homewrecker
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
2
09-24-2015 08:01 PM



Quick Reply: Theory on reason for MAF failures.....



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:27 PM.