Dyno numbers with Cattman Headers!!!!!
06-24-2005, 12:51 PM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SouthSide Jamaica Queens
Posts: 1,153
Dyno numbers with Cattman Headers!!!!!
That's right I just got my car off the dyno at L&T AUTO's in Jamaica queens. There I did 3 pulls with my car, and the number are-
Run 1- 233whp
Run 2- 235whp after playing with the AFC-2
Run 3- 238whp again with the AFC-2
Guys I KNOW so would believe it but I have the graph in hand ready post if so one would help me??? If someone live in the NYC area and would like to do it pm meee.
BTW torque was not measure, because the guy wanted an extra $50 dollars.
Run 1- 233whp
Run 2- 235whp after playing with the AFC-2
Run 3- 238whp again with the AFC-2
Guys I KNOW so would believe it but I have the graph in hand ready post if so one would help me??? If someone live in the NYC area and would like to do it pm meee.
BTW torque was not measure, because the guy wanted an extra $50 dollars.
06-24-2005, 01:02 PM
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SouthSide Jamaica Queens
Posts: 1,153
Originally Posted by Kevlo911
TQ was not measured? WTF. That is BS. Did you get the DynoJet run files sent to you? If so, email them to me and I will host.
06-24-2005, 01:03 PM
#8
Originally Posted by Ghase
I will try to email it to you if I get someone two scan the paper for me. BTW I'am not the type to BS around, and it wasn't done on a dynojet or mustang, some type I never heard of.
Was it a Dynapack?
06-24-2005, 01:33 PM
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SouthSide Jamaica Queens
Posts: 1,153
One of my boys is going to put the graph up tomorrow. Most likely in the afternoon. Stay tuned.....
BTW if you guys don't have anything good to say, keep it to your self until the graphs are up. Thank you
BTW if you guys don't have anything good to say, keep it to your self until the graphs are up. Thank you
06-24-2005, 01:55 PM
#15
Originally Posted by D Love
I thought HP numbers were derived from the TQ numbers?
I'm having a hard time understanding why they want to charge you another $50 for your Torque numbers...
06-24-2005, 02:07 PM
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SouthSide Jamaica Queens
Posts: 1,153
Originally Posted by looslip
Yes, or the other way around.
I'm having a hard time understanding why they want to charge you another $50 for your Torque numbers...
I'm having a hard time understanding why they want to charge you another $50 for your Torque numbers...
If you want call the place and ask them- 718-479-0399
06-24-2005, 02:18 PM
#17
Your numbers are definitely realistic for your mods. I'm actually suprised you didn't get into the 240's with tuning. BTW are the figures SAE corrected? Also what kind of wheels are you using?
06-24-2005, 02:32 PM
#19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SouthSide Jamaica Queens
Posts: 1,153
Originally Posted by 03BlkSETE
Your numbers are definitely realistic for your mods. I'm actually suprised you didn't get into the 240's with tuning. BTW are the figures SAE corrected? Also what kind of wheels are you using?
Thanks 03BlkSETE, that's what I'am want to hear. The wheels are stock oem 17's with falken 512 tires. I also asked to guy about SAE, he told me that the dyno doesn't measure power the same as a dynojet, but it is more direct and the numbers come corrected.
06-24-2005, 02:39 PM
#20
Donating Maxima.org Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 342
There are numerous ways to boost numbers on a Dyno. Anyway, 233-238whp is not too bad. I found these numbers for a 02 Maxima 6 spd. 02 Maxima 216.5 HP and 221.3 - Cattman Y-Pipe, PowerTech Exhaust, Berk Intake
So the question one has to ask themselves is it worth the extra moola to get another 10-15 hp from headers vs. Y-pipe, intake, etc. I guess that is a personal choice. Where do you feel the power with the headers? How is the noise vs. your old setup? Good luck I think we would all like headers if possible.
So the question one has to ask themselves is it worth the extra moola to get another 10-15 hp from headers vs. Y-pipe, intake, etc. I guess that is a personal choice. Where do you feel the power with the headers? How is the noise vs. your old setup? Good luck I think we would all like headers if possible.
06-24-2005, 04:06 PM
#22
Originally Posted by Ghase
Thanks 03BlkSETE, that's what I'am want to hear. The wheels are stock oem 17's with falken 512 tires. I also asked to guy about SAE, he told me that the dyno doesn't measure power the same as a dynojet, but it is more direct and the numbers come corrected.
My apologies. I was wrong in my initial post. For some reason I thought you had a VQ35 in which case your numbers would be on target. Honestly I don't think I've seen a non boosted VQ30 with such high numbers but then again I don't follow the VQ30 dyno results that regularly. Something appears to be up. Find out the exact type of dyno you used and let us know.
06-24-2005, 05:00 PM
#23
again i ask what else do you have. I have the cattman CAI and Catback and wil soon be adding the headers so i am very interested in the mods you have or those numbers. Side question how much did it cost
06-24-2005, 05:30 PM
#28
238 to the wheels with an auto = 309.09 crank
there is simply no way you make that power with the mods you listed. Also, SAE correction is a MUST or else everywhere where its cold will dyno high and vice versa where its hot. My best guess is that the machine is a bosch dyno, which doesnt show a torque graph (it has to be derived, hence the extra 50 bucks). However, they are run on an eddy current, which is totally operator dependent. The load settings are probably set incorrectly, as was the vehicle weight. Go find a dynojet shop here and have the runfiles ready for examination. Otherwise, stop complaining when ppl call BS
there is simply no way you make that power with the mods you listed. Also, SAE correction is a MUST or else everywhere where its cold will dyno high and vice versa where its hot. My best guess is that the machine is a bosch dyno, which doesnt show a torque graph (it has to be derived, hence the extra 50 bucks). However, they are run on an eddy current, which is totally operator dependent. The load settings are probably set incorrectly, as was the vehicle weight. Go find a dynojet shop here and have the runfiles ready for examination. Otherwise, stop complaining when ppl call BS
06-24-2005, 06:10 PM
#29
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SouthSide Jamaica Queens
Posts: 1,153
Originally Posted by traderfjp
There are numerous ways to boost numbers on a Dyno. Anyway, 233-238whp is not too bad. I found these numbers for a 02 Maxima 6 spd. 02 Maxima 216.5 HP and 221.3 - Cattman Y-Pipe, PowerTech Exhaust, Berk Intake
So the question one has to ask themselves is it worth the extra moola to get another 10-15 hp from headers vs. Y-pipe, intake, etc. I guess that is a personal choice. Where do you feel the power with the headers? How is the noise vs. your old setup? Good luck I think we would all like headers if possible.
So the question one has to ask themselves is it worth the extra moola to get another 10-15 hp from headers vs. Y-pipe, intake, etc. I guess that is a personal choice. Where do you feel the power with the headers? How is the noise vs. your old setup? Good luck I think we would all like headers if possible.
There is no difference in noise compared to the factory y-pipe, but with my new Sp-2 muffler, it's kinda loud!!!!!!! And the power take over around 2400rpm. Hope this helps.
Jay
06-24-2005, 06:16 PM
#31
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SouthSide Jamaica Queens
Posts: 1,153
Originally Posted by 03BlkSETE
Ghase,
My apologies. I was wrong in my initial post. For some reason I thought you had a VQ35 in which case your numbers would be on target. Honestly I don't think I've seen a non boosted VQ30 with such high numbers but then again I don't follow the VQ30 dyno results that regularly. Something appears to be up. Find out the exact type of dyno you used and let us know.
My apologies. I was wrong in my initial post. For some reason I thought you had a VQ35 in which case your numbers would be on target. Honestly I don't think I've seen a non boosted VQ30 with such high numbers but then again I don't follow the VQ30 dyno results that regularly. Something appears to be up. Find out the exact type of dyno you used and let us know.
06-24-2005, 06:18 PM
#32
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SouthSide Jamaica Queens
Posts: 1,153
Originally Posted by amomaxima
again i ask what else do you have. I have the cattman CAI and Catback and wil soon be adding the headers so i am very interested in the mods you have or those numbers. Side question how much did it cost
06-24-2005, 06:19 PM
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Ghase
Thankyou!!!!
06-24-2005, 06:23 PM
#34
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SouthSide Jamaica Queens
Posts: 1,153
Originally Posted by E55AMG2
238 to the wheels with an auto = 309.09 crank
there is simply no way you make that power with the mods you listed. Also, SAE correction is a MUST or else everywhere where its cold will dyno high and vice versa where its hot. My best guess is that the machine is a bosch dyno, which doesnt show a torque graph (it has to be derived, hence the extra 50 bucks). However, they are run on an eddy current, which is totally operator dependent. The load settings are probably set incorrectly, as was the vehicle weight. Go find a dynojet shop here and have the runfiles ready for examination. Otherwise, stop complaining when ppl call BS
there is simply no way you make that power with the mods you listed. Also, SAE correction is a MUST or else everywhere where its cold will dyno high and vice versa where its hot. My best guess is that the machine is a bosch dyno, which doesnt show a torque graph (it has to be derived, hence the extra 50 bucks). However, they are run on an eddy current, which is totally operator dependent. The load settings are probably set incorrectly, as was the vehicle weight. Go find a dynojet shop here and have the runfiles ready for examination. Otherwise, stop complaining when ppl call BS
06-24-2005, 06:25 PM
#35
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 5,432
Originally Posted by Rob01ski
WHY WHY Why do you doubt the power of the vq30 you young punks with your new fancy 3.5's muahahha 3.0 are where its at man Blackbird back me up dude and make these ladies with their 3.5's cry. Thank You have a nice day vq30 love baby
...the only person i see arguing which engine is better is you....and there is no way that a VQ30 with headers and tunning can make those numbers....maybe a VQ35, but not a 3.0....i'll wait till the dynojet numbers come out before i believe it...
06-24-2005, 06:25 PM
#36
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SouthSide Jamaica Queens
Posts: 1,153
Originally Posted by Rob01ski
WHY WHY Why do you doubt the power of the vq30 you young punks with your new fancy 3.5's muahahha 3.0 are where its at man Blackbird back me up dude and make these ladies with their 3.5's cry. Thank You have a nice day vq30 love baby
06-24-2005, 06:29 PM
#39
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SouthSide Jamaica Queens
Posts: 1,153
Guys let not fight over this. Like I said before if you don't have anything good to say, don't post because it's just going to lock the trend. Please wait until the chart is posted.
Thanks
James
Thanks
James
06-24-2005, 06:32 PM
#40
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 5,432
Originally Posted by Ghase
Guys let not fight over this. Like I said before if you don't have anything good to say, don't post because it's just going to lock the trend. Please wait until the chart is posted.
Thanks
James
Thanks
James
Originally Posted by Ghase
See what happen when you share info....LOL I also can make a 3.5 cry.