Got my PRCAI
01-03-2002, 10:14 PM
#41
Alright guys...he would feel an increase in his low end, because he had a cone intake before the CAI, so that solves the little issue everyone is having. The guy that started (Dario) this thread stated that he had noticed some low end gain and given the fact that he had a Stillen intake before hand that would make his statement true! Why is everyone getting all fussy about this.
01-03-2002, 10:22 PM
#43
Originally posted by Dustyroads
Alright guys...he would feel an increase in his low end, because he had a cone intake before the CAI, so that solves the little issue everyone is having. The guy that started (Dario) this thread stated that he had noticed some low end gain and given the fact that he had a Stillen intake before hand that would make his statement true! Why is everyone getting all fussy about this.
Alright guys...he would feel an increase in his low end, because he had a cone intake before the CAI, so that solves the little issue everyone is having. The guy that started (Dario) this thread stated that he had noticed some low end gain and given the fact that he had a Stillen intake before hand that would make his statement true! Why is everyone getting all fussy about this.
01-04-2002, 05:33 AM
#44
Guest
Posts: n/a
I see 164 hp on the stock dyno....get some reading glasses.
Originally posted by MichaelAE
On your stock dyno you have 150.1hp@5400
On your post-cai dyno you have 182.4@5400 & 178.9@5400
That's 28.8hp and 32.3hp. I'm not going to argue with you, but that would seem to far exceed the generally accepted gains from a CAI. Am I reading these wrong?
On your stock dyno you have 150.1hp@5400
On your post-cai dyno you have 182.4@5400 & 178.9@5400
That's 28.8hp and 32.3hp. I'm not going to argue with you, but that would seem to far exceed the generally accepted gains from a CAI. Am I reading these wrong?
01-04-2002, 05:34 AM
#45
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by MichaelAE
On your stock dyno you have 150.1hp@5400
On your post-cai dyno you have 182.4@5400 & 178.9@5400
That's 28.8hp and 32.3hp. I'm not going to argue with you, but that would seem to far exceed the generally accepted gains from a CAI. Am I reading these wrong?
On your stock dyno you have 150.1hp@5400
On your post-cai dyno you have 182.4@5400 & 178.9@5400
That's 28.8hp and 32.3hp. I'm not going to argue with you, but that would seem to far exceed the generally accepted gains from a CAI. Am I reading these wrong?
01-04-2002, 09:36 AM
#46
Originally posted by RussMaxManiac
Well, everyone goes by peak HP, not per RPM. You might be reading it wrong. 164 hp peak stock, for a auto 2k with heavy momo wheels, then with CAI it did 184 hp. dynos don't lie, and they will vary a little 1-4 hp betweent them.
Well, everyone goes by peak HP, not per RPM. You might be reading it wrong. 164 hp peak stock, for a auto 2k with heavy momo wheels, then with CAI it did 184 hp. dynos don't lie, and they will vary a little 1-4 hp betweent them.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Paradoxish
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
14
05-02-2002 11:19 AM
Snoop
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
16
03-04-2002 05:00 PM
Y2KevSE
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
62
03-03-2002 05:04 PM
sleepermax
General Maxima Discussion
4
02-11-2002 02:36 PM