headers??
You actually supported what you're saying with "data," very impressive.
04-29-2012, 11:52 AM
#84
Wait a minute. Strike that. Reverse it.
04-29-2012, 12:37 PM
#85
I guess there are just too many variables that could affect the outcome, and there would never be a clear result. In a quarter mile, I will speculate that my set up vs. conventional long tube headers would be nearly identical traps, with a faster 60' time on my setup. 
Last edited by BobPezz; 04-29-2012 at 12:47 PM.
04-29-2012, 09:27 PM
#86
thas funny everyone i know that has cattman didnt have a issue on the install , i dont wanta get obx just because of the few moddin u gota do make it fit , and you know whas funny i wrote megan racing this LONGGG behind letter 2 times and never got a answer smh. so good for their customer service
05-01-2012, 11:08 PM
#87
0-60 now under 5.2 seconds... (on a sub par execution) I have a new mod to be released in a week... Half of the mod dropped my 0-60 from 5.4xx to 5.1xx...
This thing makes power!! You can undeniably hear a difference between videos.
First half: 5.4xx
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lZeK...feature=relmfu
With second half: 5.1xx (not even fully calibrated on a stock tune?!?! 95 miles after reset)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XyOm...ature=youtu.be
Intrigued? Or still convinced that I'm lost without a cause?!?!
I'd break a 0-60 in under 5 seconds no problem without a camera in my hand and a better 1-2 shift! 
Hah, I'll tell ya, I'll break it a week after saying it. STOCK TUNE! It's hard to drive tho, being so confused about even the smallest little things and "digging myself holes".
NAYSAYERS PROCEED.
This thing makes power!! You can undeniably hear a difference between videos.
First half: 5.4xx
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lZeK...feature=relmfu
With second half: 5.1xx (not even fully calibrated on a stock tune?!?! 95 miles after reset)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XyOm...ature=youtu.be
Intrigued? Or still convinced that I'm lost without a cause?!?!
TunerMaxima3000: Quote:
Originally Posted by LI_Max_WOT
Soon, I'll be tuning on the fly. I want to break below 5 second 0-60, hopefully down to mid 4s on street tires.
And give some exotics runs they won't forget
Originally Posted by LI_Max_WOT
Soon, I'll be tuning on the fly. I want to break below 5 second 0-60, hopefully down to mid 4s on street tires.
And give some exotics runs they won't forget
Hah, I'll tell ya, I'll break it a week after saying it. STOCK TUNE! It's hard to drive tho, being so confused about even the smallest little things and "digging myself holes".NAYSAYERS PROCEED.
05-02-2012, 04:42 AM
#88
0-60 now under 5.2 seconds... (on a sub par execution) I have a new mod to be released in a week... Half of the mod dropped my 0-60 from 5.4xx to 5.1xx...
This thing makes power!! You can undeniably hear a difference between videos.
First half: 5.4xx
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lZeK...feature=relmfu
With second half: 5.1xx (not even fully calibrated on a stock tune?!?! 95 miles after reset)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XyOm...ature=youtu.be
Intrigued? Or still convinced that I'm lost without a cause?!?!
I'd break a 0-60 in under 5 seconds no problem without a camera in my hand and a better 1-2 shift! Hah, I'll tell ya, I'll break it a week after saying it. STOCK TUNE! It's hard to drive tho, being so confused about even the smallest little things and "digging myself holes".
NAYSAYERS PROCEED.
This thing makes power!! You can undeniably hear a difference between videos.
First half: 5.4xx
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lZeK...feature=relmfu
With second half: 5.1xx (not even fully calibrated on a stock tune?!?! 95 miles after reset)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XyOm...ature=youtu.be
Intrigued? Or still convinced that I'm lost without a cause?!?!
I'd break a 0-60 in under 5 seconds no problem without a camera in my hand and a better 1-2 shift!
Hah, I'll tell ya, I'll break it a week after saying it. STOCK TUNE! It's hard to drive tho, being so confused about even the smallest little things and "digging myself holes".NAYSAYERS PROCEED.
VS. LAME claims & videos E.G. HEARSAY
= "Lost without a cause?" YES!!! Because.....
05-02-2012, 11:58 AM
#89
0-60 now under 5.2 seconds... (on a sub par execution) I have a new mod to be released in a week... Half of the mod dropped my 0-60 from 5.4xx to 5.1xx...
This thing makes power!! You can undeniably hear a difference between videos.
First half: 5.4xx
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lZeK...feature=relmfu
With second half: 5.1xx (not even fully calibrated on a stock tune?!?! 95 miles after reset)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XyOm...ature=youtu.be
Intrigued? Or still convinced that I'm lost without a cause?!?!
I'd break a 0-60 in under 5 seconds no problem without a camera in my hand and a better 1-2 shift! Hah, I'll tell ya, I'll break it a week after saying it. STOCK TUNE! It's hard to drive tho, being so confused about even the smallest little things and "digging myself holes".
NAYSAYERS PROCEED.
This thing makes power!! You can undeniably hear a difference between videos.
First half: 5.4xx
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lZeK...feature=relmfu
With second half: 5.1xx (not even fully calibrated on a stock tune?!?! 95 miles after reset)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XyOm...ature=youtu.be
Intrigued? Or still convinced that I'm lost without a cause?!?!
I'd break a 0-60 in under 5 seconds no problem without a camera in my hand and a better 1-2 shift!
Hah, I'll tell ya, I'll break it a week after saying it. STOCK TUNE! It's hard to drive tho, being so confused about even the smallest little things and "digging myself holes".NAYSAYERS PROCEED.
05-02-2012, 02:08 PM
#91
Let's assume for a second:
1. All of your equimpent to time this 'run' is actually calibrated, done by a triggered start, and triggered to stop precisely when you hit 60 MPH according to RADAR
2. You're doing this with a radar gun, not a dash speedo, which is on a good day, horribly inaccurate, even if we disregard the list of variables from tire size to tire wear
3. You're not just throwing numbers out, you actually did the above correctly, and have these numbers for sure, so much so, that you stating fractions of a second makes sense
Assuming all of this is true, that would put this car running about 13.3-13.8 seconds in a 1/4 mile, give or take a few points. None of this is impossible. By any stretch.
What you have to understand is, the way you're checking this is horribly inaccurate, you have no verified means for coming up with these numbers. You may as well have counted in your head once you pressed the pedal, and stopped when you saw your speedo hit 60 MPH. Do you understand this? I can go right now, drive my slow-**** DE-K and take a video of it, and claim the same thing. But it would be false, just as your claims could be, and the fact that you're trying to profit off these only intensifies the potential for these false claims.
This is the second by my count, of your increadeous claims.
1. These are somehow better than headers with mandrel bends, etc
2. This mod with supporting mods can bring your car into the 5second 0-60 range
Ridiculous, unsubstantiated nonsense.
Again, not saying your mod doesn't make power, or isn't good, but if this is what you consider proof that it's better than anything, even stock, then you're high off your a$$ son, and I wouldn't put on anything you made, because clearly your head is somewhere else.
sorry dude, but come on, what are you trying to do here?
1. All of your equimpent to time this 'run' is actually calibrated, done by a triggered start, and triggered to stop precisely when you hit 60 MPH according to RADAR
2. You're doing this with a radar gun, not a dash speedo, which is on a good day, horribly inaccurate, even if we disregard the list of variables from tire size to tire wear
3. You're not just throwing numbers out, you actually did the above correctly, and have these numbers for sure, so much so, that you stating fractions of a second makes sense
Assuming all of this is true, that would put this car running about 13.3-13.8 seconds in a 1/4 mile, give or take a few points. None of this is impossible. By any stretch.
What you have to understand is, the way you're checking this is horribly inaccurate, you have no verified means for coming up with these numbers. You may as well have counted in your head once you pressed the pedal, and stopped when you saw your speedo hit 60 MPH. Do you understand this? I can go right now, drive my slow-**** DE-K and take a video of it, and claim the same thing. But it would be false, just as your claims could be, and the fact that you're trying to profit off these only intensifies the potential for these false claims.
This is the second by my count, of your increadeous claims.
1. These are somehow better than headers with mandrel bends, etc
2. This mod with supporting mods can bring your car into the 5second 0-60 range
Ridiculous, unsubstantiated nonsense.
Again, not saying your mod doesn't make power, or isn't good, but if this is what you consider proof that it's better than anything, even stock, then you're high off your a$$ son, and I wouldn't put on anything you made, because clearly your head is somewhere else.
sorry dude, but come on, what are you trying to do here?
Last edited by TunerMaxima3000; 05-02-2012 at 02:11 PM.
05-02-2012, 02:31 PM
#93
05-02-2012, 02:34 PM
#95
05-02-2012, 02:52 PM
#98
0-60 now under 5.2 seconds... (on a sub par execution) I have a new mod to be released in a week... Half of the mod dropped my 0-60 from 5.4xx to 5.1xx...
This thing makes power!! You can undeniably hear a difference between videos.
First half: 5.4xx
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lZeK...feature=relmfu
With second half: 5.1xx (not even fully calibrated on a stock tune?!?! 95 miles after reset)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XyOm...ature=youtu.be
Intrigued? Or still convinced that I'm lost without a cause?!?!
I'd break a 0-60 in under 5 seconds no problem without a camera in my hand and a better 1-2 shift! Hah, I'll tell ya, I'll break it a week after saying it. STOCK TUNE! It's hard to drive tho, being so confused about even the smallest little things and "digging myself holes".
NAYSAYERS PROCEED.
This thing makes power!! You can undeniably hear a difference between videos.
First half: 5.4xx
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lZeK...feature=relmfu
With second half: 5.1xx (not even fully calibrated on a stock tune?!?! 95 miles after reset)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XyOm...ature=youtu.be
Intrigued? Or still convinced that I'm lost without a cause?!?!
I'd break a 0-60 in under 5 seconds no problem without a camera in my hand and a better 1-2 shift!
Hah, I'll tell ya, I'll break it a week after saying it. STOCK TUNE! It's hard to drive tho, being so confused about even the smallest little things and "digging myself holes".NAYSAYERS PROCEED.
The only way to make a claim is too back it up with actual numbers, actual data. People here aren't stupid.
Tough sell buddy. People here have been going far more in depth than you for a much longer period of time. Do some research before you start making claims, as far as I can tell you haven't got a leg to stand on.
05-02-2012, 03:00 PM
#99
Quoted from; http://www.physicsforums.com
05-02-2012, 03:16 PM
#103
There's some good reading here! http://forums.maxima.org/5th-generat...ml#post8456424
05-02-2012, 03:26 PM
#104
There is a guy on here from the Sentra forums I believe saying he is going to start making long tubes for the 30 and 35 engines. He says about $1k but if they work it will be about 35hpish. lol at least he posted pictures of his products and you can see they are legit
05-02-2012, 03:57 PM
#106
Heres the real deal if people are interested and happen to waste their time on this thread
http://forums.maxima.org/5th-generat...e-headers.html
http://forums.maxima.org/5th-generat...e-headers.html
05-02-2012, 11:19 PM
#107
Good. Very good. Now that I have your attention... The modification I will be putting for sale is not anything to do with exhaust, but I guess nobody here read the whole thread or misunderstood and went straight to flaming. The modification will alter the intake side of the engine. I only mention it here in this thread because of the publicity, and there's no such thing as "bad publicity." A for sale thread will be put up in about a week.
A teaser:
Here is a standard MAF adapter plate (about 2.75"ID) sitting inside my adapter plate (3.25"ID):
The modification will most likely be dyno'd next Monday or Tuesday, in comparison with a standard SRI system. And placed for sale shortly thereafter. I'm anticipation around 10$/hp gain on this mod (dyno'd at around 10-15 hp on a stock tune). You can't beat that. I can accept up to 9 pre-orders. PM me to reserve your spot. Limited supply only.
I was never trying to "sell" my "stock header" idea to anybody.
My monster SRI setup:
A teaser:
Here is a standard MAF adapter plate (about 2.75"ID) sitting inside my adapter plate (3.25"ID):
The modification will most likely be dyno'd next Monday or Tuesday, in comparison with a standard SRI system. And placed for sale shortly thereafter. I'm anticipation around 10$/hp gain on this mod (dyno'd at around 10-15 hp on a stock tune). You can't beat that. I can accept up to 9 pre-orders. PM me to reserve your spot. Limited supply only.
I was never trying to "sell" my "stock header" idea to anybody.
My monster SRI setup:
05-03-2012, 06:38 AM
#108
No dum dum, we went at you for the clear and stated reason that you said your stock manifold modification was BETTER than headers.
That's it.
So youve just made a bigger piece of intake ducting between the MAFS and the Air filter, is this correct?
If so, GL with that. It's dyno proven that a SRI isn't the best setup. And seeing as you're still running a stock MAFS, there isn't much point to this at all. Now, if you changed the MAFS for a 3.25" ID one (which is too big for a basically stock engine without boost, BTW), then it might make some sense.
What you should have done is make the Adapter the proper size to match the MAFS, whcih most of them dont. THAT would be very smart, because people would buy it, no question. I would.
I hated that the MAFS adapter was just a bit smaller in ID than the stock intake, it's ridiculous. The worst part is the one I got was for a 350Z, and they have an even bigger intake (3" ID, IIRC), so this MAF adapter is seriously too small for them.
That's it.
So youve just made a bigger piece of intake ducting between the MAFS and the Air filter, is this correct?
If so, GL with that. It's dyno proven that a SRI isn't the best setup. And seeing as you're still running a stock MAFS, there isn't much point to this at all. Now, if you changed the MAFS for a 3.25" ID one (which is too big for a basically stock engine without boost, BTW), then it might make some sense.
What you should have done is make the Adapter the proper size to match the MAFS, whcih most of them dont. THAT would be very smart, because people would buy it, no question. I would.
I hated that the MAFS adapter was just a bit smaller in ID than the stock intake, it's ridiculous. The worst part is the one I got was for a 350Z, and they have an even bigger intake (3" ID, IIRC), so this MAF adapter is seriously too small for them.
funniest **** i've seen all day
05-03-2012, 05:11 PM
#111
05-03-2012, 06:49 PM
#112
Here's a teaser... the mod I'm working on will create massive gains on a stock tune (even more with a/f controllers), in the 5-15hp/tq range depending on your modifications, and it will only cost $120 + core deposit. Improved throttle response, a bump in the entire powerband no matter what you're modifications are. This will not be dyno'd, it will be guaranteed or your money back. If you don't think it's worth the money just send it back and I'll refund your money. You won't be sending it back. PM if interested. First few sets available in a few days
YOU WILL UNDENIABLY FEEL IT! I'm guessing I gained about 15hp and 15tq, with my setup, and that is OVER a modification I'm sure you all have already.Last edited by Grand_hustle17; 05-03-2012 at 08:11 PM.
05-03-2012, 07:25 PM
#113
Heres the real deal if people are interested and happen to waste their time on this thread
http://forums.maxima.org/5th-generat...e-headers.html
http://forums.maxima.org/5th-generat...e-headers.html
05-03-2012, 08:03 PM
#116
05-05-2012, 01:30 AM
#118
TunerMaxima3000: What you should have done is make the Adapter the proper size to match the MAFS, whcih most of them dont. THAT would be very smart, because people would buy it, no question. I would.
Grand_hustle17 Quote:
Originally Posted by LI_Max_WOT
Here's a teaser... the mod I'm working on will create massive gains on a stock tune (even more with a/f controllers), in the 5-15hp/tq range depending on your modifications, and it will only cost $120 + core deposit. Improved throttle response, a bump in the entire powerband no matter what you're modifications are. This will not be dyno'd, it will be guaranteed or your money back. If you don't think it's worth the money just send it back and I'll refund your money. You won't be sending it back. PM if interested. First few sets available in a few days YOU WILL UNDENIABLY FEEL IT! I'm guessing I gained about 15hp and 15tq, with my setup, and that is OVER a modification I'm sure you all have already.
im kinda late on this... but i just have a question... whatever mod you make our making, how can you say the engine performance mod will not be tested yet you can tell what the gains are??? what device can you use to tell that???... by all means and with all due respect, dont you think its something you would want to test before you gurantee???.... when you went shopping for a TV, you dont walk into a store with all electronics off and just go off a sales man word of mouth do you???... in this case you cant guarantee any gains other than just blatantly say "its guranteed gains" that has no backbone to it... if you believe in your product so much man, get some solid facts to sell it...
Originally Posted by LI_Max_WOT
Here's a teaser... the mod I'm working on will create massive gains on a stock tune (even more with a/f controllers), in the 5-15hp/tq range depending on your modifications, and it will only cost $120 + core deposit. Improved throttle response, a bump in the entire powerband no matter what you're modifications are. This will not be dyno'd, it will be guaranteed or your money back. If you don't think it's worth the money just send it back and I'll refund your money. You won't be sending it back. PM if interested. First few sets available in a few days
YOU WILL UNDENIABLY FEEL IT! I'm guessing I gained about 15hp and 15tq, with my setup, and that is OVER a modification I'm sure you all have already.im kinda late on this... but i just have a question... whatever mod you make our making, how can you say the engine performance mod will not be tested yet you can tell what the gains are??? what device can you use to tell that???... by all means and with all due respect, dont you think its something you would want to test before you gurantee???.... when you went shopping for a TV, you dont walk into a store with all electronics off and just go off a sales man word of mouth do you???... in this case you cant guarantee any gains other than just blatantly say "its guranteed gains" that has no backbone to it... if you believe in your product so much man, get some solid facts to sell it...
05-05-2012, 06:29 AM
#119
That's what I did + half an inch larger. Cross-sectional area increased substantially, and a venturi cone in front of the MAF sensor, to speed up incoming air, as well as reduce turbulence in the entire intake system. But then again, I'm just theorizing and apparently I'm crazy.
... as stated before, comparison dyno monday or tuesday.. Gains will be substantiated and pricing scheduled accordingly. Don't expect this to be sold at a steal of a price anymore. That is all.
... as stated before, comparison dyno monday or tuesday.. Gains will be substantiated and pricing scheduled accordingly. Don't expect this to be sold at a steal of a price anymore. That is all.
05-05-2012, 07:16 AM
#120
When we proved him wrong about headers, he canned that idea and started talking about his larger maf adapter. Which can be made in about 5 minutes with parts from AutoZone I might add.
Last edited by essential1; 05-05-2012 at 07:21 AM.