7th Generation Maxima (2009-2015) Come in and talk about the 7th generation Maxima

Bullydog Feedback!! Got questions???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 13, 2009 | 10:38 AM
  #321  
swatcop's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 173
From: Louisiana
Ok, just got back and tried it in M mode, still 6200? makes you wanta go hummmm
Old Aug 13, 2009 | 02:41 PM
  #322  
MaxLoverAz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,450
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by ANNINO
Anyone have a guess as to how much HP/TQ we gain from the BD on premium tune and a +2 advance? I have no other mods yet and I'm curious how much power I just added. The butt-dyno tells me its considerable.
It's not possible because of the CVT unfortunately...
Old Aug 13, 2009 | 03:29 PM
  #323  
ANNINO's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 813
From: Mystic, CT
Originally Posted by MaxLoverAz
It's not possible because of the CVT unfortunately...
I know a dyno run is out of the question, but there must be some way to calculate a decent estimate, no?
Old Aug 13, 2009 | 06:20 PM
  #324  
swatcop's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 173
From: Louisiana
Well Nissan did it stock and said 290?????
Old Aug 13, 2009 | 08:03 PM
  #325  
bk2k3max's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,055
Originally Posted by swatcop
Well Nissan did it stock and said 290?????
Well what you guys have to realize is that Nissan is simply speaking of the engine's output dynoed by itself and in its' stock form makes 290HP but power/tq to the wheels is totally different once you hook a car to a manual, an auto or cvt tranny.

I believe that this engine makes 290HP on a dyno but it is just totally impossible to gauge how much it puts down to the ground through the cvt whether you are adding mods or not but especially moreso when you are adding mods.

IMO the best thing to do is run a baseline figure based on Nissan's stock rating then add in what the average calculations of such aftermarket mods are normally known to make (i.e., Intake is normally between 7-11HP) that gives you a baseline when added with 290 + 7-11 (whichever figure you take) will end up 297 to 301HP and that isn't to the wheels that I'm speaking of.

So in essence when you add in all your mods, Intake, Full Exhaust, lightweight UDP, Headers, Cams or whatever else then on a baseline (using the base specs the engine will rate well above 300HP) but going to the wheels you have to account for drivetrain loss (which we don't know about on a CVT).
Old Aug 13, 2009 | 08:12 PM
  #326  
MaxLoverAz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,450
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by ANNINO
I know a dyno run is out of the question, but there must be some way to calculate a decent estimate, no?
Well when it cools down we always have the dragstrip to test with...

Do you have a iPhone? I do but haven't played with this yet...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-DFbJQbeSY

Last edited by MaxLoverAz; Aug 13, 2009 at 08:15 PM.
Old Aug 14, 2009 | 05:17 AM
  #327  
1sik4dsc's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,204
From: NY
Originally Posted by bk2k3max
Well what you guys have to realize is that Nissan is simply speaking of the engine's output dynoed by itself and in its' stock form makes 290HP but power/tq to the wheels is totally different once you hook a car to a manual, an auto or cvt tranny.

I believe that this engine makes 290HP on a dyno but it is just totally impossible to gauge how much it puts down to the ground through the cvt whether you are adding mods or not but especially moreso when you are adding mods.

IMO the best thing to do is run a baseline figure based on Nissan's stock rating then add in what the average calculations of such aftermarket mods are normally known to make (i.e., Intake is normally between 7-11HP) that gives you a baseline when added with 290 + 7-11 (whichever figure you take) will end up 297 to 301HP and that isn't to the wheels that I'm speaking of.

So in essence when you add in all your mods, Intake, Full Exhaust, lightweight UDP, Headers, Cams or whatever else then on a baseline (using the base specs the engine will rate well above 300HP) but going to the wheels you have to account for drivetrain loss (which we don't know about on a CVT).
Theres about a 15percent loss of horsepower usually when you dyno a rwd car, I dont know if the number could is the same for the cvt, and a fwd car. But if you wanted to get a ballpark estimate of fwhp you could just do the 15 percent of what your total crank(engine horsepower) is
Old Aug 14, 2009 | 07:54 AM
  #328  
swatcop's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 173
From: Louisiana
Ok then I have approx 325hp :-)
Old Aug 16, 2009 | 10:56 PM
  #329  
MaxDOuT's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 209
From: Miami
Anything new on the WOT?
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 03:44 AM
  #330  
swatcop's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 173
From: Louisiana
Not yet, didnt someone mention that they were going to give a call to BD?
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 05:14 AM
  #331  
1sik4dsc's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,204
From: NY
Originally Posted by swatcop
Not yet, didnt someone mention that they were going to give a call to BD?
yea guys, ill give them a call today and see if i can get how their progress is going and im assuming i should ask for that guy tim(the tech) right?

Last edited by 1sik4dsc; Aug 17, 2009 at 05:18 AM.
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 07:46 AM
  #332  
swatcop's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 173
From: Louisiana
I believe bk2k3 is on top of this task!! Hopefully he will hear something soon!
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 07:54 AM
  #333  
1sik4dsc's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,204
From: NY
Originally Posted by swatcop
I believe bk2k3 is on top of this task!! Hopefully he will hear something soon!
ohh ok great, its been a while tho since i heard anything about the wot remover
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 08:18 AM
  #334  
Oolatec's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,578
From: Chicago suburbs
Originally Posted by swatcop
Ok then I have approx 325hp :-)
That would be 15% loss of power.
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 10:03 AM
  #335  
swatcop's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 173
From: Louisiana
Originally Posted by Oolatec
That would be 15% loss of power.
Yea, I know just wishing. But if there is know way of knowing, what the hell, dream on... 325hp
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 11:42 AM
  #336  
Alpha's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 253
From: Chicago, IL
Thumbs up

I just wanted to let you guys know that bumping up timing by 2 degrees is AWESOME!

It REALLY woke things up and I'm basically stock with a BD and UDP.

Shifts are quicker and the car pulls much harder throughout the band. Great mod!
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 01:06 PM
  #337  
Oolatec's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,578
From: Chicago suburbs
Originally Posted by swatcop
Yea, I know just wishing. But if there is know way of knowing, what the hell, dream on... 325hp
LOL Gotcha!

Hey Alpha... you coming to the Chicago Nissan meet on Aug. 30th? PM me so we don't derail this thread...
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 01:09 PM
  #338  
MaxDOuT's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 209
From: Miami
Ok so I figured that I'd entertain myself so i set my maxima back to stock and put the BD on my Qx56, put it on extreme mode with WOT, and holy smokes I couldn't believe what a beast my truck turned into. The minute I touched the pedal the truck just bounced and started hauling ***. I took it on the expressway and felt like i was in a very fast car, i completely forgot i was driving an SUV. That beast must of gone from 325hp to easily 350hp. I am in shock of what this little Triple Dog GT can do for our vehicles, if this WOT on the Maxima is anything like the truck then you guys are going to be in for a lot of fun. WoW unreal. So i put the Qx56 now to fuelsaver and it drives so slow and gentle but i feel proud to know that its doing better then 14mpg. So much fun.
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 02:31 PM
  #339  
1sik4dsc's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,204
From: NY
Originally Posted by MaxDOuT
Ok so I figured that I'd entertain myself so i set my maxima back to stock and put the BD on my Qx56, put it on extreme mode with WOT, and holy smokes I couldn't believe what a beast my truck turned into. The minute I touched the pedal the truck just bounced and started hauling ***. I took it on the expressway and felt like i was in a very fast car, i completely forgot i was driving an SUV. That beast must of gone from 325hp to easily 350hp. I am in shock of what this little Triple Dog GT can do for our vehicles, if this WOT on the Maxima is anything like the truck then you guys are going to be in for a lot of fun. WoW unreal. So i put the Qx56 now to fuelsaver and it drives so slow and gentle but i feel proud to know that its doing better then 14mpg. So much fun.
ughhhhh maxdout now your really making me want this wot removed already LOL
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 03:04 PM
  #340  
bk2k3max's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,055
Well guys the last email I got from Tim told me that it was going to be awhile, apparently there are some serious issues with the tuning in regards to the CVT but I will send another prodding email tonigh to Tim to see if he can turn the leaf over for me as to whether or not this is the issue.

Honestly, i suspect that the CVT is main issue here because if this wasn't the case then why is it that on all the other Nissan's cars and trucks they have a useable WOT but on our car they don't??

I'll give you guys an update when I hear something but please do not call them because they're looking at me as the Rep for this forum to pass on their info.

Thanks
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 03:28 PM
  #341  
1sik4dsc's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,204
From: NY
Originally Posted by bk2k3max
Well guys the last email I got from Tim told me that it was going to be awhile, apparently there are some serious issues with the tuning in regards to the CVT but I will send another prodding email tonigh to Tim to see if he can turn the leaf over for me as to whether or not this is the issue.



Thanks
that dont sound too good
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 04:19 PM
  #342  
swatcop's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 173
From: Louisiana
I would give up the CVT in a heart beat to get rid of the WOT!! Wish that was an option!!!
By the way, thanks for handling this for us, you have another test dummy here to!
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 06:35 PM
  #343  
MaxLoverAz's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,450
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by 1sik4dsc
ughhhhh maxdout now your really making me want this wot removed already LOL
I don't think it's ever going to happen. It's obviously in place for a reason and I bet BD doesn't want to be held responsible by Nissan/Owners for a bunch of dead CVT's across the country...
Old Aug 18, 2009 | 04:07 AM
  #344  
ANNINO's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 813
From: Mystic, CT
Originally Posted by bk2k3max
Well guys the last email I got from Tim told me that it was going to be awhile, apparently there are some serious issues with the tuning in regards to the CVT but I will send another prodding email tonigh to Tim to see if he can turn the leaf over for me as to whether or not this is the issue.

Honestly, i suspect that the CVT is main issue here because if this wasn't the case then why is it that on all the other Nissan's cars and trucks they have a useable WOT but on our car they don't??

I'll give you guys an update when I hear something but please do not call them because they're looking at me as the Rep for this forum to pass on their info.

Thanks
Does that mean that they will eventually release a 'partial WOT remover', like one that allows 90% WOT rather than the stock 80% (or whatever it is)? Regardless, I am very happy with the unit and am glad I got it. The car is so much more enjoyable to drive now. I'm amazed at how much of a difference it has made.
Old Aug 18, 2009 | 04:37 AM
  #345  
1sik4dsc's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,204
From: NY
Originally Posted by MaxLoverAz
I don't think it's ever going to happen. It's obviously in place for a reason and I bet BD doesn't want to be held responsible by Nissan/Owners for a bunch of dead CVT's across the country...
i was thinking the same thing
Old Aug 18, 2009 | 08:01 AM
  #346  
bk2k3max's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,055
Originally Posted by ANNINO
Does that mean that they will eventually release a 'partial WOT remover', like one that allows 90% WOT rather than the stock 80% (or whatever it is)? Regardless, I am very happy with the unit and am glad I got it. The car is so much more enjoyable to drive now. I'm amazed at how much of a difference it has made.
That is an excellent point, though I'm not 100% certain that the CVT itself is the issue, the point is though "what else can it be"?

I will suggest what you've stated here to them in case that's the issue.

HTML Code:
It's obviously in place for a reason and I bet BD doesn't want to be held responsible by Nissan/Owners for a bunch of dead CVT's across the country...

I don't think BD is worried about any of our problems with our cars because they have a disclaimer on their products.
Old Aug 20, 2009 | 04:15 AM
  #347  
ANNINO's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 813
From: Mystic, CT
So I've had the BD now for about 3/4 tank of gas. I know it may be a little premature to report on gas milage, but with the premium setting and +2 deg advance, I am right around my average fuel consumption BEFORE the BD. I'm pretty happy with that. I'm averaging like 22-24 MPG and I do a 50/50 split of HW and City driving. I will floor it occasionally, but typically act the same as before I had it. The car is sooo much more responsive with my regular style of driving, nevermind if I get the need for speed.
I am going on a trip to the adirondacks this weekend (A little over 4 hours away) so I am very interested to see what kind of milage I will get on purely highway. I plan to keep my settings the way they are.
Old Aug 20, 2009 | 06:10 AM
  #348  
swatcop's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 173
From: Louisiana
Let us know!
Old Aug 20, 2009 | 06:39 AM
  #349  
1sik4dsc's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,204
From: NY
Originally Posted by ANNINO
So I've had the BD now for about 3/4 tank of gas. I know it may be a little premature to report on gas milage, but with the premium setting and +2 deg advance, I am right around my average fuel consumption BEFORE the BD. I'm pretty happy with that. I'm averaging like 22-24 MPG and I do a 50/50 split of HW and City driving. I will floor it occasionally, but typically act the same as before I had it. The car is sooo much more responsive with my regular style of driving, nevermind if I get the need for speed.
I am going on a trip to the adirondacks this weekend (A little over 4 hours away) so I am very interested to see what kind of milage I will get on purely highway. I plan to keep my settings the way they are.
enjoy and have a safe trip
Old Aug 20, 2009 | 08:14 AM
  #350  
bk2k3max's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,055
Originally Posted by ANNINO
So I've had the BD now for about 3/4 tank of gas. I know it may be a little premature to report on gas milage, but with the premium setting and +2 deg advance, I am right around my average fuel consumption BEFORE the BD. I'm pretty happy with that. I'm averaging like 22-24 MPG and I do a 50/50 split of HW and City driving. I will floor it occasionally, but typically act the same as before I had it. The car is sooo much more responsive with my regular style of driving, nevermind if I get the need for speed.
I am going on a trip to the adirondacks this weekend (A little over 4 hours away) so I am very interested to see what kind of milage I will get on purely highway. I plan to keep my settings the way they are.
Set it for economy and put your timing back to stock if you're aiming at saving gas and drive slow (I know it's hard to do in these cars) and you'll be amazed how well your car performs on the highway as far as mileage is concerned.

Have a fun and safe weekend
Old Aug 24, 2009 | 07:05 AM
  #351  
MaxDOuT's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 209
From: Miami
Originally Posted by ANNINO
Ok, got the BD today () and just loaded up the Premium tune. I have a couple questions:
First, BK I pm'd you with my info, I hope its the right stuff. Thanks for doin that for me.
Second, I loaded up the premium tune and thats basically it. I rarely go over 90 so I have no need to modify the governer, and rev limiter I wasn't sure of so I left it. I want to test this setting out to get a feel for it before I advance the timing +2. When I went under "Current Settings" or whatever, it said:
WOT: N/A (obviously we know why)
Target Timing: -2

Is that what Nissan sets the car at? Why would it be set at -2? I just want to make sure this is normal and I didn't miss a major step. Thanks alot.
Quick question, did all of you start of with -2 on your Maxima, because when i hooked up my triple dog gt it was set at 0 and i put it at +2. So i'm at +2 now, so my question is are you guys at 0 now after you did +2 on ur timing or are you at +2 after you did your +2 on ur timing? Keep me updated if anyone can because I'm riding at +2 now and hoping that I haven't had an advance of +4 by accident.
Old Aug 24, 2009 | 07:15 AM
  #352  
ANNINO's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 813
From: Mystic, CT
Originally Posted by MaxDOuT
Quick question, did all of you start of with -2 on your Maxima, because when i hooked up my triple dog gt it was set at 0 and i put it at +2. So i'm at +2 now, so my question is are you guys at 0 now after you did +2 on ur timing or are you at +2 after you did your +2 on ur timing? Keep me updated if anyone can because I'm riding at +2 now and hoping that I haven't had an advance of +4 by accident.
Good question, I'm not sure of the answer except that I am at "Target Timing: +2". I hope this is really +2 and not +4 like you say. I'm curious myself now. Also, what should the stock setting be, 0 or -2? I want to know so when I set it back to stock before I go in for service I have the right settings.
Old Aug 24, 2009 | 09:40 AM
  #353  
bk2k3max's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,055
Originally Posted by MaxDOuT
Quick question, did all of you start of with -2 on your Maxima, because when i hooked up my triple dog gt it was set at 0 and i put it at +2. So i'm at +2 now, so my question is are you guys at 0 now after you did +2 on ur timing or are you at +2 after you did your +2 on ur timing? Keep me updated if anyone can because I'm riding at +2 now and hoping that I haven't had an advance of +4 by accident.
As far as I know, all of us started out with -2 on our timing and some of us advanced it to +2. If yours was at 0 then somehow (or maybe someone) your timing was already advanced to 0 (neutral) and if you do advance it you will be setting it at +4.

Either way, it won't hurt your car for you to advance your timing that far, now your car should idle 1000 RPMS higher than the normal (Stock) settings.

I wish I could advance mine at least another 500 RPMS.
Old Aug 24, 2009 | 09:45 AM
  #354  
ANNINO's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 813
From: Mystic, CT
Originally Posted by bk2k3max
As far as I know, all of us started out with -2 on our timing and some of us advanced it to +2. If yours was at 0 then somehow (or maybe someone) your timing was already advanced to 0 (neutral) and if you do advance it you will be setting it at +4.

Either way, it won't hurt your car for you to advance your timing that far, now your car should idle 1000 RPMS higher than the normal (Stock) settings.

I wish I could advance mine at least another 500 RPMS.
What is the "safe" range then? Is +2 pushing it and should I back down to 0? This is all new to me.
Old Aug 24, 2009 | 11:26 AM
  #355  
MaxDOuT's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 209
From: Miami
yeah same here, mine started at 0 and my triple dog gt lets me advance it to +4 but i have it at +2, i'm wondering if im losing power now, i will put it back to 0 and see if there is a difference. I haven't felt any knocking but just wondering if everyone who advance there timing with the BD if they all started out at -2. at it doesn't idle 1000rpms more then i know of. I will check when i get in my car and get back to you.
Old Aug 24, 2009 | 11:43 AM
  #356  
ANNINO's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 813
From: Mystic, CT
Originally Posted by MaxDOuT
yeah same here, mine started at 0 and my triple dog gt lets me advance it to +4 but i have it at +2, i'm wondering if im losing power now, i will put it back to 0 and see if there is a difference. I haven't felt any knocking but just wondering if everyone who advance there timing with the BD if they all started out at -2. at it doesn't idle 1000rpms more then i know of. I will check when i get in my car and get back to you.
Ya my RPM's did not change. If I upped the idle settings they would. I'm wondering now if maybe I should go back to 0. I'm changing it back to -2 anyway for my service appt on thursday (15k mile service and eibach springs installed). Anyone have any insight as to what settings would yeild the most performance gains while remaining in the without-question-safe-for-the-engine zone?
Old Aug 24, 2009 | 12:46 PM
  #357  
Alpha's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 253
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by ANNINO
Ya my RPM's did not change. If I upped the idle settings they would. I'm wondering now if maybe I should go back to 0. I'm changing it back to -2 anyway for my service appt on thursday (15k mile service and eibach springs installed). Anyone have any insight as to what settings would yeild the most performance gains while remaining in the without-question-safe-for-the-engine zone?
93 octane, Premium tune, +2 degrees over stock (0) and you're good to go. Safety, performance, and reliability in almost any climate/conditions.
Old Aug 24, 2009 | 01:06 PM
  #358  
ANNINO's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 813
From: Mystic, CT
Originally Posted by Alpha
93 octane, Premium tune, +2 degrees over stock (0) and you're good to go. Safety, performance, and reliability in almost any climate/conditions.
Awesome. Thanks for that.
Old Aug 24, 2009 | 01:16 PM
  #359  
swatcop's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 173
From: Louisiana
Stock setting was set at -2. I set it at +2 (+2 is displayed on the readout) with the Premium setting. As long as it starts well and it doesn't knock when you put your foot into it, you are good to go. Just listen for any abnormal engine noises, if so back it up to '0" and see were you stand. +2 should not be any problem for you as long as you are using 91 or higher fuel.
Old Aug 24, 2009 | 01:36 PM
  #360  
1sik4dsc's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,204
From: NY
ok wait guys im confused, why are some are at stock 0 and some are stock -2??



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:07 PM.