Advanced Suspension, Chassis, and Braking Talk about suspension geometry, advanced handling/chassis setup, custom brakes, etc. NOT your basic brake pads and "best drop" Information.

Possible Ball-Joint Extender

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-01-2006 | 06:43 PM
  #41  
Mxrider52's Avatar
I support for what?
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,949
From: Seymour, TN
Originally Posted by Black Maxima
I don't know if this was already answered but this will help my car not chew up axles, causing less noise when turning?
Yep I dont know how much your dropped but if you got a 1.5" extender and your dropped 3" it would be like having a 1.5" drop but your dropped 3". Get what I am saying? lol
Old 10-01-2006 | 06:50 PM
  #42  
d00df00d's Avatar
Old enuf to pick his own gears
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,036
Originally Posted by Black Maxima
I don't know if this was already answered but this will help my car not chew up axles, causing less noise when turning?
Most likely.
Old 10-01-2006 | 06:54 PM
  #43  
JSutter's Avatar
I'm nutty for Nissans
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,377
From: Maine
Originally Posted by Black Maxima
I don't know if this was already answered but this will help my car not chew up axles, causing less noise when turning?
No this will do nothing for your axles. Unless you raise the car, or raise the engine and tranny youre screwed. The ball joint extender will fix the control arm angle, and the bump steer kit will fix the tie rod angle. There is no way other than raising the car or the drive train to fix the axle issue. Youre one of many who think lower is better.... which is just not true. It looks cool and thats all. There are no other pros of being that low. Your suspension geometry is totally out of wack.
Old 10-01-2006 | 07:03 PM
  #44  
Black Maxima
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks for the replies guys. Some nice information!
Old 10-01-2006 | 07:27 PM
  #45  
irish44j's Avatar
retired moderator
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 27,289
From: Burke, VA
Originally Posted by JSutter
which is just not true. It looks cool and thats all. There are no other pros of being that low. Your suspension geometry is totally out of wack.
I agree with the suspension geometry comment, but there are some advantages of lowering (as long as it's not excessive or "slammed"), including a lower center of gravity and reduction of wheel hop/launch squat (assuming that there are no "performance springs" that sit the same height as stock, which there aren't).......oh, and the ability to drive underneath truck trailers like they did in "Fast and Furious"

As to BlackMaxima...yeah, there are NO PROS of being THAT low....at least in terms of ride and handling. Must be bumpsteer like a ****....
Old 10-01-2006 | 09:39 PM
  #46  
VQuick's Avatar
Chassis Freak
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,607
From: Portland, Ore.
I think one important factor that no one really thinks about is the relationship between the look from outside (i.e., the height and shape of the wheel wells) and what's inside. No car is going to ride or handle well if it's dropped 2 inches below what the engineers designed the suspension for. However, just think about how the Maxima would look and handle if the wheel well sheet metal came down a little lower (eliminating ugly wheelgap but keeping clearance nice and high) or if the suspension had been designed to be low like a sports car in the first place. You'd have no problem with ride/handling except more frequent scraping.

So yeah, if you lower simply with lowering springs, you're messing up everything else. To fix everything else takes a lot of work and possibly custom fabrication. It wouldn't be so much of a problem if the wheelgap and ride height weren't so high stock, but that's the nature of the beast.
Old 10-02-2006 | 05:26 AM
  #47  
JeremysBlkMax97's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 190
Sooo., the extenders with my Eibach springs would be almost like putting the geometry back to stock? If so, definitely count me in.
Old 10-02-2006 | 06:05 AM
  #48  
MaximaSE96's Avatar
Thread Starter
Maxima Owner
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,062
essentially yes.....i am expecting an email form the company sometime today....
Old 10-02-2006 | 09:51 AM
  #49  
javid's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1
Hello folks,

Javid here from 6Gun Racing. There seems to be a good bit of discussion already about lowering, geometry and handling. Most of you seem to understand why our kits would make a MacPherson strut car handle and or brake better. By moving the control arm the kit "prevents as much of a loss in camber during roll or bump". The improvement in camber will depend on your wheel/roll rates, geometry, and tires but most apps will see 0.75 to 1.5 deg of camber 'retained' at full roll.

In my time trial car I reduced the static camber somewhat to improve my braking. My car already had tremendous amounts of lateral grip but needed more stopping grip. Many other Impreza owners are focused on improving front lateral grip and are running similar amounts of camber to before.


We at 6Gun Racing are excited to expand this kit to other chassis's and we look forward to working with the Maxima community.

Javid Kelley
Engineer / Co-Owner / Driver
6 Gun Racing
www.6gunracing.com
Old 10-02-2006 | 01:39 PM
  #50  
illlojik's Avatar
I C U
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,307
Thanks, we look forward seeing the outcome and trying out this kit.
Old 10-02-2006 | 01:50 PM
  #51  
Kevlo911's Avatar
Kevlo for President
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 35,779
From: Lake Orion, MI
Interesting.
Old 10-02-2006 | 05:57 PM
  #52  
VQuick's Avatar
Chassis Freak
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,607
From: Portland, Ore.
Javid, thanks for posting, it's always nice to hear it direct from the company (and the engineer!). Given the sheer number of modified 4th and 5th gen Maximas I think you would have quite a market for a reasonably priced ball joint/tie rod extender kit.

So this kit would pretty much eliminate control arm problems, and shortened strut bodies would eliminate travel problems. Only thing left is the axle angle, right? But that doesn't seem to be a problem with a 1.5" drop.
Old 10-03-2006 | 04:32 AM
  #53  
MaximaSE96's Avatar
Thread Starter
Maxima Owner
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,062
Originally Posted by javid
Hello folks,

Javid here from 6Gun Racing. There seems to be a good bit of discussion already about lowering, geometry and handling. Most of you seem to understand why our kits would make a MacPherson strut car handle and or brake better. By moving the control arm the kit "prevents as much of a loss in camber during roll or bump". The improvement in camber will depend on your wheel/roll rates, geometry, and tires but most apps will see 0.75 to 1.5 deg of camber 'retained' at full roll.

In my time trial car I reduced the static camber somewhat to improve my braking. My car already had tremendous amounts of lateral grip but needed more stopping grip. Many other Impreza owners are focused on improving front lateral grip and are running similar amounts of camber to before.


We at 6Gun Racing are excited to expand this kit to other chassis's and we look forward to working with the Maxima community.

Javid Kelley
Engineer / Co-Owner / Driver
6 Gun Racing
www.6gunracing.com

WELCOME.....thanx for posting up....by the way this is Chris....I am the one that emailed you about this to begin with...i dont think I told you my user name in any e-mails
Old 10-12-2006 | 01:55 PM
  #54  
BlackBIRDVQ's Avatar
drag racing is for wussies
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,023
I dont know why you guys are having axle problems, my car has been lowered 2.5" for the last 150K miles and I still have the original driver's side axle with 170K on the car. My pass side axle needs repleacement- was repleaced at 100K due to clicking and now the inner boot is ripped after 70K miles.

I want the ball joint extenders but I need something like a 2" kit, my car is lowered approx 3" in the front and 2" in the rear. You can't put in a aftermarket ball joint into a 5th gen control arm- they are part of the control arm and if they go bad- you repleace the control arms.

BEJAY- as far as your swaybar question, it pivots on the 2 U shapped brackets that are mounted onto the subframe of the car. When the car is lowered the sway bar tilts and it compensates for the drop, if one side of the car corners and the wheel is pushed UPWARD, the swaybar acts as a torsion bar and brings the outside wheel downward to help the car controll body roll better. As long as both controll arms are mounted the same, and the car has even drop/height across the front end you have nothing to worry bout in temrs of sway bar. Its a bit hard to explain this without pictures etc...

I am down for tie rods and ball joint extenders. I need 2" minimum.... I over come bump steer with oversteer Why I have stiffer rear springs ! I also like the look of a lowered Maxima, and I hate rasing the car up and having to realign it before any major racing event. I have an aligment machine so its not hard to do....

ETA on the parts please ?
Old 10-12-2006 | 03:59 PM
  #55  
illlojik's Avatar
I C U
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,307
Any updates??
Old 10-12-2006 | 07:25 PM
  #56  
VQuick's Avatar
Chassis Freak
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,607
From: Portland, Ore.
Originally Posted by BlackBIRDVQ
I want the ball joint extenders but I need something like a 2" kit, my car is lowered approx 3" in the front and 2" in the rear. You can't put in a aftermarket ball joint into a 5th gen control arm- they are part of the control arm and if they go bad- you repleace the control arms.
The 4th gen control arms are the same. Although Nissan does not sell replacement ball joints separately, you can certainly replace the ball joints with aftermarket ball joints on a 4th or 5th gen. It's called a ball joint press. I've done it.

But that's kind of beside the point because these ball joint extenders attach to the stock ball joint, meaning (duh) you don't have to replace the ball joint....
Old 10-12-2006 | 07:33 PM
  #57  
BlackBIRDVQ's Avatar
drag racing is for wussies
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,023
I know you can put aftermarket ones in there... but aftermarket ball joints suck, I've repleaced enough of them on my 3rd gen.

I know you dont need to repleace the ball joints to install these, but it would be a wise idea to have fresh joints in there when doing the extenders. I got 170K on the original ones with zero play !
Old 10-20-2006 | 07:46 AM
  #58  
d00df00d's Avatar
Old enuf to pick his own gears
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,036
Any updates?
Old 10-22-2006 | 09:13 AM
  #59  
BlackBIRDVQ's Avatar
drag racing is for wussies
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,023
updates ???
Old 10-22-2006 | 10:01 AM
  #60  
Matt93SE's Avatar
STFU n00b!
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 18,095
From: Houston
Hmmm, the MOOG ball joints on my VE are doing just fine after 5 years and 70k miles- including some hefty road course duty..

I've 'improved' the geometry vie spacing the control arm down and the tie rod ends relocated as well. the steering is MUCH better, but it's still not where it needs to be. my car is dropped about 1.5" in front and I've moved the control down about 1". the tie rods APPEAR to be at the same angle as the control arm, but the control arms are basically level when at static ride height. they need to be pointing down a few degrees, but I don't know what the proper angles should be.. it's not shown in the FSM and I don't know anyone with a stock 3 gen to measure off of.

anyway, the kit you guys are talking about is a great idea, assuming you relocate both the ball joint mount AND the tie rod end. If/when it's completed, I'd be interested in test-fitting a set on my VE as well. Even though the ball joints are different, I believe the necessary dimensions (diameter, thread pitch, taper etc)
Old 10-23-2006 | 08:24 AM
  #61  
michaelnyden's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,431
From: Los Angeles, CA
hmm...I raised my till the control arms are almost parallel to the ground...I felt much improvement in grip up front since I wasn't loosing camber under compression...I don't think I would need this extender...as my car feels tons better and is still much lower than stock given that I have 2" shorter strut bodies (progress CO's)...my arms are nearly parallel the way it is...plus I enjoy the extra little clearance for bad roads and driveways...
Old 10-23-2006 | 08:32 AM
  #62  
BlackBIRDVQ's Avatar
drag racing is for wussies
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,023
mine are about 80deg vs 90- flat with the ground.... and when going around a corner at slower speed car hopps around the corner like I have a welded differential. If I go through the corner very fast then nothing happens as the car just kinda rotates through the corner.... stiffer rear springs FTW !
Old 10-23-2006 | 09:01 AM
  #63  
MaximaSE96's Avatar
Thread Starter
Maxima Owner
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,062
unfortunately no updates as of yet...i am actually going to send them an email today
Old 10-23-2006 | 10:02 AM
  #64  
Mxrider52's Avatar
I support for what?
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,949
From: Seymour, TN
Originally Posted by michaelnyden
hmm...I raised my till the control arms are almost parallel to the ground...I felt much improvement in grip up front since I wasn't loosing camber under compression...I don't think I would need this extender...as my car feels tons better and is still much lower than stock given that I have 2" shorter strut bodies (progress CO's)...my arms are nearly parallel the way it is...plus I enjoy the extra little clearance for bad roads and driveways...
About how much of a drop would you say you have now?
Old 10-23-2006 | 10:33 AM
  #65  
michaelnyden's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,431
From: Los Angeles, CA
hmm...I'll have to go measure it with a tape measurer after work...any idea of what the stock ride height is?

okay, so I did a search and it looks like these are the stock height specs for a 5th gen:
Front: 28"
Rear: 27 1/4"
with the stock 17's and 32psi of pressure all around...
now I have to go measure mine and take into account different pressures, 18" wheels, and different profile tires.
Old 10-23-2006 | 06:05 PM
  #66  
Mxrider52's Avatar
I support for what?
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,949
From: Seymour, TN
Alright cool. I was just curious as I want to increase my handling. I am dropped like 2.2". Just looking for a way to increase handling some.
Old 10-23-2006 | 07:24 PM
  #67  
VQuick's Avatar
Chassis Freak
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,607
From: Portland, Ore.
Originally Posted by michaelnyden
hmm...I'll have to go measure it with a tape measurer after work...any idea of what the stock ride height is?

okay, so I did a search and it looks like these are the stock height specs for a 5th gen:
Front: 28"
Rear: 27 1/4"
with the stock 17's and 32psi of pressure all around...
now I have to go measure mine and take into account different pressures, 18" wheels, and different profile tires.
You avoid any inaccuracy due to those variables if you measure ride height properly: from the top of the wheel well arch to the center of the wheel. You can get the stock values of this measurement from the FSM.
Old 10-29-2006 | 03:38 AM
  #68  
BEJAY1's Avatar
Conecarver
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,855
From: NW Chicago burbs
Originally Posted by VQuick
You avoid any inaccuracy due to those variables if you measure ride height properly: from the top of the wheel well arch to the center of the wheel. You can get the stock values of this measurement from the FSM.
Correct. Don't measure from fender to ground as tire sizes, profiles, are a pain to compare.
Old 10-31-2006 | 09:42 PM
  #69  
BlackBIRDVQ's Avatar
drag racing is for wussies
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,023
I think this product is pretty dead..... I mailed the company a few times and got zero response.

Not cool.
Old 10-31-2006 | 11:15 PM
  #70  
VQuick's Avatar
Chassis Freak
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,607
From: Portland, Ore.
That's annoying! Well, this seems like the kind of thing that an Org member with access to a machine shop (or eMachineShop.com?) could design, test, and build and sell for a nice profit. And there are plenty of other companies out there we could approach.
Old 11-15-2006 | 06:42 AM
  #71  
BlackBIRDVQ's Avatar
drag racing is for wussies
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,023
Deff dead now. I tried mailing the company a few times now as I really would like to get rid of the bump steer..... no response.

Basically promisses promisses, creating excitement, and then they vanish from the face of the eart.
Old 01-09-2007 | 05:18 PM
  #72  
Fr33way™'s Avatar
Wild for Width
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,520
From: Atlanta
I would be very interested in these.
Old 01-09-2007 | 07:22 PM
  #73  
trialt's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 408
im interested in this also.
Old 01-12-2007 | 09:21 PM
  #74  
BlackBIRDVQ's Avatar
drag racing is for wussies
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,023
This deal is dead..... someone should just close this thread.
Old 01-13-2007 | 10:23 AM
  #75  
MaximaSE96's Avatar
Thread Starter
Maxima Owner
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,062
yea i have been emailing atleast once a week and not getting any response
Old 03-18-2007 | 01:47 AM
  #76  
VQuick's Avatar
Chassis Freak
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,607
From: Portland, Ore.
bump
Old 03-19-2007 | 09:04 PM
  #77  
MainSource's Avatar
Hit 'em with the stun gun
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 368
I'd be interested in this as well, but since they haven't gotten back to anyone, I'm sure someone else would have to step up and do it.

MXRider52, would you still be interested?
Old 03-19-2007 | 09:11 PM
  #78  
BlackBIRDVQ's Avatar
drag racing is for wussies
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,023
I have to get a set of OEM control arms and a knuckle along with a tie rod.... send those out to a company to see if they can make us something that would work....

I am not promissing anything. I just know I have to have these.
Old 03-19-2007 | 10:49 PM
  #79  
VQuick's Avatar
Chassis Freak
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,607
From: Portland, Ore.
Mike, you gotta do that ASAP! Let us know when you do.
Old 03-21-2007 | 09:33 AM
  #80  
doublea's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,553
From: Montreal - Qc
Keep me posted as I'm interested.


Quick Reply: Possible Ball-Joint Extender



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:32 PM.