VQ35 internals in VQ30 makes VQ33 stroker, bolt on! PICS!
Originally Posted by krismax
What kind of times did it run?
Unfortunatly, the car was never finished. I do not have a time slip or proof of any times. However that really wasnt my point.
My point wasnt that I beat every maxima in existence, it was that with a few hundred bucks the money really showed. The $:HP ratio i guess.
Originally Posted by VQvroom
Unfortunatly, the car was never finished. I do not have a time slip or proof of any times. However that really wasnt my point.
My point wasnt that I beat every maxima in existence, it was that with a few hundred bucks the money really showed. The $:HP ratio i guess.
My point wasnt that I beat every maxima in existence, it was that with a few hundred bucks the money really showed. The $:HP ratio i guess.
People might not want a k-car or a mustang thats why we do it.
Yes there are a lot of cars that can be made faster for less money. But look around you. EVERYONE has done it. I think a lot of the people that seriously mod their max's like the idea of doing something no one else has, to break new ground. It's a challenge. The longer I'm on this board the more I wonder if this is the way it was for Hondas when they first started doing hybrids. Now look how far they've come. Who knows what we'll discover. R&D for anything costs money, sometimes a lot of money. Without people getting tired of doing the same thing over and over, we'd all still be riding horses.
Originally Posted by krismax
Then you did not get the best hp per dollar people are taking those turbo k-cars i think something like that . putting rods ,pistons . Lots of nitrous and running 10's ,11's 12's. And spending less than you did on your mustang.
People might not want a k-car or a mustang thats why we do it.
People might not want a k-car or a mustang thats why we do it.

Originally Posted by krismax
Then you did not get the best hp per dollar people are taking those turbo k-cars i think something like that . putting rods ,pistons . Lots of nitrous and running 10's ,11's 12's. And spending less than you did on your mustang.
People might not want a k-car or a mustang thats why we do it.
People might not want a k-car or a mustang thats why we do it.

Ofcourse my example didnt work out and I obviously didnt get the best HP per dollar bc it was a total loss.
I can understand your comment and the point about why...
I dont want to get into comparing any v8 vs a maxima. This could get very ugly and Im not interested in making enemies.
your right.
this is a great find for the maxima and hopefully a great alternative to the bottle of NOS used to gain low times. Props to the fellas working on this.
Originally Posted by theMax
Whats a Kcar?
1)Don't know, but that's the least of his worries.
2)Don't think so because of variable valve system on VQ35.
3)Neither, the rods/crank are from a 240hp VQ35 Pathfinder that ate a screw.
2)Don't think so because of variable valve system on VQ35.
3)Neither, the rods/crank are from a 240hp VQ35 Pathfinder that ate a screw.
Originally Posted by BluFlame
1)stock starter may not turn the motor over because of high-compression?
2)can you use the 3.5 heads?
3) this 3.5 from 03 or 04 maxima?
2)can you use the 3.5 heads?
3) this 3.5 from 03 or 04 maxima?
Based on the displacement change alone, its a 10% increase in displacement so you could expect a rough estimate of 10% increase in power output just because its got 10% more air moving. then you have to factor in the compression ratio being 11:1 rather than 10:1.
Originally Posted by Nealoc187
Based on the displacement change alone, its a 10% increase in displacement so you could expect a rough estimate of 10% increase in power output just because its got 10% more air moving. then you have to factor in the compression ratio being 11:1 rather than 10:1.
Id like to guess with proper tuning you can see at least 30whp from this. I dont have a doubt that number is fairly accurate.
BAGS, I did this actually friday at 5pm when I got home from work.
Starter not being able to turn this engine, not an issue. That starter is more than capable of cranking this engine if it was even a 12:1 compression.
Dixit
BAGS, I did this actually friday at 5pm when I got home from work.
Starter not being able to turn this engine, not an issue. That starter is more than capable of cranking this engine if it was even a 12:1 compression.
Dixit
ok with the new parts which ecu do you plan to use since the stock VQ30 ecu may not work and would the starter from a VQ35 engine work and also would it be possible to transfer the injectors from the 35 to the 30?
Originally Posted by Chinkzilla

Originally Posted by BigDogJonx
Plan is to lower the CR down to 8.5:1 for the turbo.
hehe, nice work!
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
That pic advertizes the 90mm stroke that I have been saying the new VQ40DE would have to be. This one appears to have the sleeves and bores cut paper thin and they added a custom made one piece deck cap/bore sleeve. Notice the solid iron deck. This is what will carry the VQ into the 1000+ hp 2JZ territory and will propel the 350Z intot he super tuner car catagory. Very nice find. 

. Now obviously no one in their right mind will run 55 psi of boost but can you imagine 4.3 liters of nissan v6 running 18psi of boost? i cackle at the very thought.
That picture is also full of misprints.
It lists the following:
Turbo 8.5:1 with 100mm bore and 90mm stroke = 4231.16cc
That does not add up. That equals 4241.15cc
NA (Both compressions) 101.5mm bore and 90mm stroke = 4269.35cc
That is also wrong. The correct product for that is 4369.39cc
So my question is which of these posted dimensions are correct and which ones are not?
I should call these people and ask them how they can machine a block to such a degree but they can't do simple auto math.
It lists the following:
Turbo 8.5:1 with 100mm bore and 90mm stroke = 4231.16cc
That does not add up. That equals 4241.15cc
NA (Both compressions) 101.5mm bore and 90mm stroke = 4269.35cc
That is also wrong. The correct product for that is 4369.39cc
So my question is which of these posted dimensions are correct and which ones are not?
I should call these people and ask them how they can machine a block to such a degree but they can't do simple auto math.
VQ30-K injectors are 290cc-295cc vs. VQ35 Maxima which are only 270cc because they run 3.5bar fuel pressure.
Originally Posted by naijai
also would it be possible to transfer the injectors from the 35 to the 30?
Originally Posted by SprintMax
How on earth do you decide with boosted Atlanta Owners nuts you are going to swing from each day? 


Man I needed that Sprint.
Dixit
Originally Posted by SR20DEN
That picture is also full of misprints.
It lists the following:
Turbo 8.5:1 with 100mm bore and 90mm stroke = 4231.16cc
That does not add up. That equals 4241.15cc
NA (Both compressions) 101.5mm bore and 90mm stroke = 4269.35cc
That is also wrong. The correct product for that is 4369.39cc
So my question is which of these posted dimensions are correct and which ones are not?
I should call these people and ask them how they can machine a block to such a degree but they can't do simple auto math.
It lists the following:
Turbo 8.5:1 with 100mm bore and 90mm stroke = 4231.16cc
That does not add up. That equals 4241.15cc
NA (Both compressions) 101.5mm bore and 90mm stroke = 4269.35cc
That is also wrong. The correct product for that is 4369.39cc
So my question is which of these posted dimensions are correct and which ones are not?
I should call these people and ask them how they can machine a block to such a degree but they can't do simple auto math.

012345657543
Originally Posted by SprintMax
How on earth do you decide with boosted Atlanta Owners nuts you are going to swing from each day? 


I think you misspelled "which"... that confused me for a sec
Originally Posted by Oxidizer2k
Will that help my maxima get more MPG?
But seriously, great thread, I'm assuming you would have to remove the engine to swap these parts? Doesn't look like something you can pull the head off etc.
Looks like a good candate for people doing an engine rebuild.




