All Motor All Motor Advanced Performance. Talk about Engine Swaps, Internal Engine work. Not your basic Y pipe and Intake Information.

fuel rail question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-2006 | 08:53 PM
  #1  
chris'smax's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,447
fuel rail question

Does anyone know if the dimensions of the DEK fuel rail is the same as the 3.5L? Also is there any ECU or sensor problems i could experience?

Sorry if i am asking alot questions but i don't have any info on a 5th gen w/ a 3.5 swap.
Old 02-14-2006 | 06:08 AM
  #2  
Kevlo911's Avatar
Kevlo for President
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 35,779
From: Lake Orion, MI
As for the fuel rail, if you are planning to swap it, I dont think it will work. You can use your old injectors though. From what I have read, the returnless fuel system is better anyways. There is a diagram in the 35swap Stickie on how to run the fuel lines.

The sensor problems are the Cam and Crank sensors which why you will swap the 30timing chains and covers to reuse the stock cam and crank sensors. Since you have a 2000, it is likely that you have an EGR system. The 02-03 motors do not have an EGR system, some people just leave it the electrical connector in the EGR vavle and do not get CEL's(but I believe you will get a CEL if you do it this way), other put resistors on the connector to fool the ECU into thinking the EGR is working.
Old 02-14-2006 | 08:07 AM
  #3  
chris'smax's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,447
Originally Posted by Kevlo911
As for the fuel rail, if you are planning to swap it, I dont think it will work. You can use your old injectors though. From what I have read, the returnless fuel system is better anyways. There is a diagram in the 35swap Stickie on how to run the fuel lines.

The sensor problems are the Cam and Crank sensors which why you will swap the 30timing chains and covers to reuse the stock cam and crank sensors. Since you have a 2000, it is likely that you have an EGR system. The 02-03 motors do not have an EGR system, some people just leave it the electrical connector in the EGR vavle and do not get CEL's(but I believe you will get a CEL if you do it this way), other put resistors on the connector to fool the ECU into thinking the EGR is working.

My egr is already disconnected so that isn't a concern, but thanks for the info kevlo. I saw that the 3.5 fuel rail is returnless, but i was just asking since it is topfeed and shaped just like my DEK rail
Old 02-14-2006 | 09:34 AM
  #4  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Swap either the VQ30 rail or search for the couple threads in here on how to add a FPR to convert the VQ35 rail to a return style.

You want to run return style.
Old 02-14-2006 | 09:36 AM
  #5  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Here's how to keep the VQ35 rail and convert it to return style:
http://forums.maxima.org/showpost.ph...8&postcount=17

Or another way:
http://forums.maxima.org/showpost.ph...5&postcount=10
Old 02-14-2006 | 09:50 AM
  #6  
Kevlo911's Avatar
Kevlo for President
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 35,779
From: Lake Orion, MI
Well I guess the pic I reference in my post meant to convert it to return style, my bad.
Old 02-14-2006 | 09:56 AM
  #7  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Returnless is ideal for NA, but for FI you want return style since it linearly increases fuel pressure with boost.

Plus, return style is easier to do, since the VQ30 doesn't have a FPR in the fuel tank and he already has the return line.
Old 02-14-2006 | 10:04 AM
  #8  
Stephen Max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,869
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
Returnless is ideal for NA, but for FI you want return style since it linearly increases fuel pressure with boost.

Plus, return style is easier to do, since the VQ30 doesn't have a FPR in the fuel tank and he already has the return line.

If you use the method that you give a link to above, the fuel rail is returnless, but you still have the fpr and fmu, hence you retain the linear increase in fuel pressure with boost pressure.

fuel tank
|
filter
|
tee --> fuel rail
|
fpr
|
fmu
|
return to tank



.
Old 02-14-2006 | 10:22 AM
  #9  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
It's still return style, ie fuel returns to the tank vs. deadheaded at the rail.
Old 02-14-2006 | 10:30 AM
  #10  
Stephen Max's Avatar
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,869
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
It's still return style, ie fuel returns to the tank vs. deadheaded at the rail.
It's both.

The only difference between this method and the oem returnless system is the placement of the fpr. The oem fpr is in the tank, and the modified returnless has the fpr in the engine bay (but removed from the fuel rail). So you will still get some heating of the fuel from traveling into the engine bay, but you don't get anywhere near the temp rise of the 4th gen system because the fuel doesn't travel through the fuel rail and back to the tank.
Old 02-14-2006 | 10:37 AM
  #11  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
True....

It's still a return style fuel SYSTEM, you just created a returnless fuel RAIL hybrid.

Just to keep it simple, returnless style = VQ35 and return style = VQ30 in my posts.
Old 02-14-2006 | 10:47 AM
  #12  
chris'smax's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,447
Originally Posted by Stephen Max
If you use the method that you give a link to above, the fuel rail is returnless, but you still have the fpr and fmu, hence you retain the linear increase in fuel pressure with boost pressure.

fuel tank
|
filter
|
tee --> fuel rail
|
fpr
|
fmu
|
return to tank



.
I don't have a fmu so wouldn't that cause a problem with this setup?
Old 02-14-2006 | 10:51 AM
  #13  
chris'smax's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,447
isn't this the option i should go with return style just using the 3.5L with 3.0 fpr and damper? Also if i did this i could keep my fuel line as is which would be much easier.
Old 02-14-2006 | 10:52 AM
  #14  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
"I don't have a fmu so wouldn't that cause a problem with this setup?"

No, your filter is also in the tank compared to that setup.
Old 02-14-2006 | 10:54 AM
  #15  
chris'smax's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,447
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
"I don't have a fmu so wouldn't that cause a problem with this setup?"

No, your filter is also in the tank compared to that setup.

so the 3.5l fuel rail with 3.0 fpr and damper is a no go?
Old 02-14-2006 | 10:57 AM
  #16  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
I'm not sure which is easier/better....nismo3112's way or StephenMax way.

I was just saying your not having a FMU didn't matter.
Old 02-14-2006 | 10:58 AM
  #17  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Have you decided which heads/LIM/UIM you're using?

1)Pathy heads/DEK LIM/DEK UIM
or
2)Full VQ35
Old 02-14-2006 | 11:00 AM
  #18  
chris'smax's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,447
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
Have you decided which LIM you're using?

right now i am thinking of just using the 3.5 upper and lower IM. I would like to do the PF heads but i hear there are concerns of whether or not they will actually cause a power loss
Old 02-14-2006 | 11:03 AM
  #19  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
I would buy an adjustable FPR and just use either the SX7R fuel rail fitting or drill the guts out of the stock FPR like SM did.

Originally Posted by chris'smax
so the 3.5l fuel rail with 3.0 fpr and damper is a no go?
Old 02-14-2006 | 11:05 AM
  #20  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Okay, then that means you can't use the VQ30 fuel rail IIRC, so you need to pick either nismo3112 or StephenMax route.

Originally Posted by chris'smax
right now i am thinking of just using the 3.5 upper and lower IM. I would like to do the PF heads but i hear there are concerns of whether or not they will actually cause a power loss
Old 02-14-2006 | 11:05 AM
  #21  
chris'smax's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,447
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
I would buy an adjustable FPR and just use either the SX7R fuel rail fitting or drill the guts out of the stock FPR like SM did.
already done and done. Got the SARD FPR w/ SX7R fuel rail fitting
Old 02-14-2006 | 11:06 AM
  #22  
chris'smax's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,447
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
Okay, then that means you can't use the VQ30 fuel rail IIRC, so you need to pick either nismo3112 or StephenMax route.

Just so i am clear on this, nismo3112 just took the 3.5L fuel rail and bolted on the 3.0 Fpr and damper, correct? If so i will just do that.
Old 02-14-2006 | 11:14 AM
  #23  
IceY2K1's Avatar
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
The VQ35 rail has a damper on each end(fpr is in the fuel tank). He then took a '95 FPR and somehow modified it to fit inplace of one of the dampers.

I think the SX7R adapter or a VQ35 fuel rail adapter I've seen for N20 kits would be cleaner, but I don't know how easy/clean nismo3112's way turned out.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
VQ'ed
Forced Induction
8
02-29-2016 08:05 AM
bumpypickle
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
10
09-20-2015 08:22 AM
conansriver
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
0
09-11-2015 10:26 AM
Hdnseek
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
3
09-09-2015 05:55 AM



Quick Reply: fuel rail question



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:24 PM.