200whp MEVI vs. 200whp 00VI dyno comparison.
#42
Originally Posted by Tatanko
Still waiting for Dandy to PM me back
BTW, I'm wondering what you guys are trying to compare here...just the shape of the curves for MEVI vs 00VI? But the graphs are all different cars with different mods on different dynos so....?
#43
Supporting Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (89)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Quincy, MA
Posts: 6,255
Originally Posted by DandyMax
Just did... I had several to catch up on.. still haven't got through them all yet...
BTW, I'm wondering what you guys are trying to compare here...just the shape of the curves for MEVI vs 00VI? But the graphs are all different cars with different mods on different dynos so....?
BTW, I'm wondering what you guys are trying to compare here...just the shape of the curves for MEVI vs 00VI? But the graphs are all different cars with different mods on different dynos so....?
mainly the shap of the curves.... I have seem many different setups. Yours is the only i have seen NA to ever really exceed 200whp.
#46
Timing is where you make or lose power. Air fuel has very little effect on HP until you start to get really crazy with it.
Case in point, I30tMikeD's turbo dyno WITH MEVI in which he made 75WHP LESS with a conservatively timed JWT ECU with a 7000 rev limit as opposed to a stock ECU, that's WITH MEVI. The rev limiter alone should have made him additional power, but his car was WAYYY more powerful with the stock ECU.
Case in point, I30tMikeD's turbo dyno WITH MEVI in which he made 75WHP LESS with a conservatively timed JWT ECU with a 7000 rev limit as opposed to a stock ECU, that's WITH MEVI. The rev limiter alone should have made him additional power, but his car was WAYYY more powerful with the stock ECU.
#47
Originally Posted by Nealoc187
Timing is where you make or lose power. Air fuel has very little effect on HP until you start to get really crazy with it.
Case in point, I30tMikeD's turbo dyno WITH MEVI in which he made 75WHP LESS with a conservatively timed JWT ECU with a 7000 rev limit as opposed to a stock ECU, that's WITH MEVI. The rev limiter alone should have made him additional power, but his car was WAYYY more powerful with the stock ECU.
Case in point, I30tMikeD's turbo dyno WITH MEVI in which he made 75WHP LESS with a conservatively timed JWT ECU with a 7000 rev limit as opposed to a stock ECU, that's WITH MEVI. The rev limiter alone should have made him additional power, but his car was WAYYY more powerful with the stock ECU.
#49
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,431
I agree, timing is the key on our engines...and dandy even in his old dyno was running some timing advance from the JWT ecu...5 or 6 extra degrees I think is what you typically see with the JWT ecu's...plus he is really dialed in well (his A/F) most of us are really not to be honest. I think all of us could see 220whp like his car if we tuned really well and ran a good deal of timing advance.
#50
Originally Posted by IceY2K1
There was definitely a loss post fastcat, but your car was moved to use the lift and then restrapped down. That alone could have accounted for ~3-5whp loss.
#52
Originally Posted by Nealoc187
In my opinion you guys are not making a valid comparison for a number of reasons, the most obvious of which is that different dynos read differently. That and the fact that Zacks dyno is atypically high further invalidates the results for me.
#57
Originally Posted by Kevlo911
Prob, mines starting to slip...
I am lookin at things with 7 gears now
I am lookin at things with 7 gears now
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
litch
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
123
01-04-2024 07:01 PM
t6378tp
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
11
09-29-2018 04:27 PM
Maximeltman
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
0
08-31-2015 01:01 PM