DrFuelMax review and real life test! Amazing results.
#201
Originally Posted by Kevlo911
Oh noes NISSAN GOT THE MILEAGE RIGHT! Could it be, omg just could it be, that he had a bad tank of gas! No it can't be. It must be this magic product that brought the MPG back to stock.
Originally Posted by MrsOleg
Oleg drove 90% of the way back, I drove most of the way there. There was a lot of stop and go traffic if that makes a difference.
#202
If this thread is offensive, or this board is, DONT READ IT! its that simple, you wont be offended by sometihng that you dont see...
Now, i assume there is no way to get access to the OT section without a donation?
Now, i assume there is no way to get access to the OT section without a donation?
#204
Originally Posted by MrGone
19mpg out of a Maxima on a highway trip means your car needs to go in for service, or you'll be posting bail soon.
Originally Posted by tochihashi
I have never mentioned anything about our research being funded through Toyota. However, a great part of our research did indeed take place within their facilities under our discretion. We were lucky in a sense that the regional director for the facility we have utilized in particular, was a close friend who had given us the privilege of the facility use.
Originally Posted by tochihashi
Double Kei Inc. wanted to make this transition more affordable to environmentally conscientious consumers, by providing a one time application fuel catalyst at a low price instead of upgrading the cars that they all ready have.
Originally Posted by tochihashi
As for the "hawking" accusation; "I resent that." It just so happened that my business partner was the president and founder of <nyc.maximas.org>, and my partner and I have decided to offer this catalyst to a small group of individuals within that site just to break the ice and ease the way.
http://forums.maxima.org/showpost.ph...2&postcount=84
Originally Posted by tochihashi
Also my friend, it seems that you could use some remedial English yourself, for "handling and engine performance and not interchangeable terms makes for a run-on sentence and does not make sense."
Originally Posted by tochihashi
I would seriously advise that you think before you make absurd accusations. Thank you.
#205
Originally Posted by mroleg
Metal Maxima: Dude after I met you I thought you were a decent guy but you are just a f.a.g. I want you to tell this to my wife when I am standing right next to her.
So I made a sarcastic response towards her AS SHE HAD TOTALLY MISCONSTRUED WHAT A POSTED.
All of my responses have been gear at the vendor, NOT YOU OR YOUR WIFE!!!! HOW IN THE HELL IT WAS READ OTHERWISE IS BEYOND MY COMPREHENSION
#207
Originally Posted by packetattack
Dan, please send the catalyst back to Tim, I expect he will pick it up from you in Jersey.
#208
Originally Posted by D Love
IMO, you're the one who's way out of line. If Metal is like me, then he probably thought that that post was made by MrOleg. Afterall, that was the first time that we ever heard from his wife, and it's not hard to miss that little 's.'
Originally Posted by D Love
BTW, isn't e-thugging a violation of the rules?
4) Personal attacks and/or moderator bashing will not be tolerated under any circumstances. No exceptions. This is a ZERO-Tolerance policy. Attacking a member via PM, Instant Messenger, and Email will also be considered a personal attack. Violation of this rule results in immediate Level 4 sanctions.
Sanction Levels:
Level 1 - Private Warning
Level 2 - Temporary Banishment (1 Week)
Level 3 - Temporary Banishment (2 Weeks to 1 Month - Dependent on Offense)
Level 4 - Permanent Banishment
#213
ok this thread is done... lets stop this before it turns into another My MPG>Yours Please...
Wait for MrGone to do some testing. BTW I'd love to help you out any way I can, making graphs, webpage, anything really. I would love to attack this with the same scientific attitude that they (try) to use on Myth Busters.
#214
Originally Posted by mroleg
Going to North Carolina without DrFuelMax
602 Miles -- 93 Octane gas used 31.8 Gallons
Coming back from North Carolina with DrFuelMax installed:
598 Miles -- 93 Octane gas used 21.2 Gallons
As you can see it is almost 30% fuel economy. I can tell you guys if we didnt hit stop-and-go traffic for about 2 hours we would probably have made it on one tank.
Few other things I have noticed. The engine works a lot more quiet. For example at the cruising speed of 70 Mph and RPMs abot 2200 I didn't hear the engine at all.
Accelerator response imroved as well. I used to have a little lag as I step hard on gas. The delay is gone now.
All in all this is an amazig product and IMHO worth every penny. Especially for us driving 1200 miles every other week.
DrFuelMax can be found here. Make sure you read FAQ.
602 Miles -- 93 Octane gas used 31.8 Gallons
Coming back from North Carolina with DrFuelMax installed:
598 Miles -- 93 Octane gas used 21.2 Gallons
As you can see it is almost 30% fuel economy. I can tell you guys if we didnt hit stop-and-go traffic for about 2 hours we would probably have made it on one tank.
Few other things I have noticed. The engine works a lot more quiet. For example at the cruising speed of 70 Mph and RPMs abot 2200 I didn't hear the engine at all.
Accelerator response imroved as well. I used to have a little lag as I step hard on gas. The delay is gone now.
All in all this is an amazig product and IMHO worth every penny. Especially for us driving 1200 miles every other week.
DrFuelMax can be found here. Make sure you read FAQ.
You can't possibly expect massive amounts of people to spend this kind of money just because you posted some trial on a message board and now substantial proof to back it up.
#215
Originally Posted by Metal Maxima
No, MrsOleg made the retorrt towards me, WHICH WAS A RETORT TO MY COMMENT TO THE 'INVENTOR'. Completley misinterpreted.
#216
[QUOTE=SilverMaxima06]If this is so revolutionary, why don't car manufactures do this?
Car manufactures and oil companies just want to suck your money out of your pocket.
Who knows how many inventers were paid off by these companies.
Car manufactures and oil companies just want to suck your money out of your pocket.
Who knows how many inventers were paid off by these companies.
#217
Are you convinced based solely on the report that was posted here? I mean you have to admit, there's alot to be desired with that "report".
[QUOTE=ramberg]
[QUOTE=ramberg]
Originally Posted by SilverMaxima06
If this is so revolutionary, why don't car manufactures do this?
Car manufactures and oil companies just want to suck your money out of your pocket.
Who knows how many inventers were paid off by these companies.
Car manufactures and oil companies just want to suck your money out of your pocket.
Who knows how many inventers were paid off by these companies.
#218
Originally Posted by ramberg
Car manufactures and oil companies just want to suck your money out of your pocket.
Consider how well it would serve the entire auto indutrsy to have but 3, 4 cars that would have exceptional gas mileage without sacrificing performance.
The reduction in fuel sales for an increase in auto sales would indeed be one that'd behoove the entire market economy.
Better gas mileage = more money in one's pocket = larger OVERALL sales in ALL facets of the economy.
I simply cannot buy high fossil fuel prices is a function of a 'conspiracy theory'. Exxon had RECORD PROFITS, as did the Oil Cartels.
#219
I dunno, a company that has sold 1 million units in one country would be expected to bomb into another market.. they wouldn't wasn't time on small time forums - they'd go to companies and make millions in foreign countries.
Who knows though..I still like to dream it might be real...
Who knows though..I still like to dream it might be real...
#223
Originally Posted by kcryan
Car manufactures want to make money, they make money by selling cars, if they have a car that has a big V8, but gets 4cyl econ, it will sell, they would use this, IF it worked
#224
Hey guys im selling a tampon that gives you 100000 miles to the tank for 1,000 dollars who wants it?!?! Oh yeah it will make ur car's headlights brigher, handle bumps better, and best of all it restores the transmission to new! And all ya gotta do is shove it in your gastank!
#225
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Metal Maxima
Read Rishi's post.
i have no clue who rishi is nor do i care but i read everything and there is a mention of randevouz (can't decipher the spanglish on this one) in NJ or something like that......
so i take it no. expected.
#226
Originally Posted by chopstix2nrz
Hey guys im selling a tampon that gives you 100000 miles to the tank for 1,000 dollars who wants it?!?! Oh yeah it will make ur car's headlights brigher, handle bumps better, and best of all it restores the transmission to new! And all ya gotta do is shove it in your gastank!
#228
Originally Posted by † ErV †
i have no clue who rishi is nor do i care but i read everything and there is a mention of randevouz (can't decipher the spanglish on this one) in NJ or something like that......
so i take it no. expected.
so i take it no. expected.
It's French for 'gimme a liter of cola.'
Yes, Gone will be recieving it once Facey is done with it.
#238
Originally Posted by 89blackse
Wait for MrGone to do some testing. BTW I'd love to help you out any way I can, making graphs, webpage, anything really. I would love to attack this with the same scientific attitude that they (try) to use on Myth Busters.
edit: Actually, an alternative might be to just idle the car for an hour with the device in and see how much gas is burned. Then compare that to how much gas is burned idling for an hour without the device. That would better eliminate differences caused by variability in driving styles and driving conditions. That would also be easier to repeat/reproduce. Of course, because the device displaces some gas in the tank, you must remember to top off after removing the device. Otherwise, it would look like you used more gas without the device in your tank. Good luck with your experiments. Keep us posted.
#239
there are several ways to test this product. You could idle the engine forever, but in the end it is not a real world test and would only leave more questions like "yeah but what if he ran the car at higher RPMs?" and such.
bigEL I agree with you that we need a control run, but the best (cheapest) way to do this is just to have one of Gone’s friends go in and install the unit for one run, then take it out for then next (or vica versa ) but don’t tell Gone. To remove (some) statistical error, the test should be preformed at least 3 times I think.
1 test = 1 tank w/ unit installed + 1 tank w/o unit installed
bigEL I agree with you that we need a control run, but the best (cheapest) way to do this is just to have one of Gone’s friends go in and install the unit for one run, then take it out for then next (or vica versa ) but don’t tell Gone. To remove (some) statistical error, the test should be preformed at least 3 times I think.
1 test = 1 tank w/ unit installed + 1 tank w/o unit installed
#240
[QUOTE=ramberg]
do you seriously believe the garbage you write? Why wouldn't a car manufacturer put this in all their cars and advertise the EPA MPG figures with teh 30% increase as opposed to the old numbers? Gas is expensive so people would believe it...
Originally Posted by SilverMaxima06
If this is so revolutionary, why don't car manufactures do this?
Car manufactures and oil companies just want to suck your money out of your pocket.
Who knows how many inventers were paid off by these companies.
Car manufactures and oil companies just want to suck your money out of your pocket.
Who knows how many inventers were paid off by these companies.