Thaks for good words guys. I am done with big org, ain't nothing but e-thugs and dumb asses over there.

the other org is.....bad. All they can talk about is why there are no nude pictures of Oleg's wife on the site...seriously. Don't listen to guys like that.

http://forums.maxima.org/showpost.ph...&postcount=272

Science > you

You will have to forgive us for the misprints for our website is still relatively new, and there still may be contents in there that may need to be corrected by our editor.

Indeed there are a couple of areas that have the word "hydrogen" carbons" when they should be "hydrocarbons." However, if you noticed, there are some areas where it is actually stated as "hydrocarbons," as they should be. Also indeed, electrons are a "negative" charge and the word "positive" should not have been the word there. I may not have a doctorate in biochemistry, but I do know that electrons have a negative charge.

Please do forgive our text errors for we were in quite a hurry to get things up, and as I have said in the above, there still may be contents in there that may have been overlooked. Also if you would, forgive our editor. Although her english knowlege is extensive, she is indeed a native Japanese.

Sincerely,

Masazumi Kudo

Also that character, "Metalmax," failed to fully disclose that the only reason why he had one of our catalysts to begin with, was because he was to run a non-biased test for us last year, when this was not yet available in the market. However, he had failed to run these tests following our specifications and had failed to gain on the MPG ( you have to follow certain rules if you wish to save big with Dr. Fuelmax, and you have to be sensitive to notice all the different changes with the behavior of your car ). He has then since been bad mouthing "mroleg" accusing him of working with us to make a quick sale.

Good question Mrs. Oleg. To answer your question, it is my pleasure to inform you that you may choose to continue running on 93 octane, switch to 87, or even alternate between the two whenever the mood may strike you. Dr. Fuelmax's state of the art technology and its ultra high fuel burning efficiency ( 99.86% ) allows for this.

I guarantee that your vehicle's performance / computer will not be compromised in the least amount. Utilize 87 octane, and your vehicle will still feel as though it is running on 93. Dr. Fuelmax was specifically designed with the purpose of maximizing fossil fuel, and this is merely one of countless merits that it can offer.

Utilizing 87 octane gas during these tough times with surging gas prices can save you a lot of money too.


Sincerely,

Masazumi Kudo

For Release: August 22, 2006
FTC Halts Bogus Claims For “Fuel Saving” Device
Four Million Dollar Settlement Imposes Lifetime Ban on the Sale or Manufacture of Devices
The manufacturer of a magnetic “fuel saving” and emissions-reduction device that did not save fuel or reduce emissions will pay $4.2 million to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that his advertising claims were false. The FTC will seek to provide redress to consumers who bought the device based on the false advertising claims. In addition, the defendants will be banned from selling or manufacturing magnetic fuel savings and emissions reduction devices.

“Consumers are looking for ways to increase fuel efficiency and save money at the pump,” said Lydia Parnes, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “There are some practical ways to do that, like following the maintenance schedule in your owner's manual, combining errands, and avoiding jack-rabbit starts. The fact is that many products that claim to save fuel don't work, and worse yet, may damage your car and end up costing you more.”

In October 2004, the FTC filed a suit in U.S. district court alleging that marketers, and the resellers working with them, were making deceptive claims for FuelMAX and Super FuelMax products. The Web site operators and their affiliates – spammers who drove traffic to their sites – made claims such as:

Increases gas mileage 27%;
Reduces Fuel Consumption;
Reduces Emissions;
The FTC alleged that the magnetic “fuel saver” does not save fuel, does not increase gas mileage, and does not reduce emissions. The agency charged that the false claims violate the FTC Act. The agency also alleged that by providing promotional materials with false claims to affiliates, the defendants provided them with the means to violate the FTC Act.

In May 2005, the Web site marketers and spammers who promoted the products settled the FTC suits. The settlements barred violations of the FTC Act and the CAN-SPAM Act and barred them from making deceptive claims. The action announced today settles charges against the manufacturer, International Research & Development Corp. of Nevada, and its principal, Anthony Renda.

The settlement imposes a lifetime ban on the manufacture, advertising, or sale of FuelMAX, Super FuelMAX, or any similar fuel saving or emissions-decreasing product. It bars false or unsubstantiated claims and misrepresentations that products increase gas mileage or reduce emissions. The settlement bars the defendants from misrepresenting the contents, validity, results, conclusions, or interpretations of studies and bars them from performance or efficacy claims unless they possess and rely upon competent and reliable evidence. It also bars them from assisting others or providing others with the means and instrumentalities to commit deception. Finally, the defendants will pay $4.2 million for consumer redress.

The FTC has established a hotline containing a recorded message for consumers who think they are entitled to a refund. Consumers should call 1-877-382-2020 for more information about obtaining a refund.

These cases were brought with the assistance of the Environmental Protection Agency.

The FTC has tips on increasing fuel efficiency and saving money at the pump at http://www.ftc.gov/savegas

The Commission vote to approve the settlement was 5-0.

NOTE: Stipulated final judgments and orders are for settlement purposes only and do not constitute an admission by the defendant of a law violation. Consent judgments have the force of law when signed by the judge.

Copies of the complaint and stipulated final order are available from the FTC’s Web site at http://www.ftc.gov and also from the FTC’s Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580. The FTC works for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices in the marketplace and to provide information to help consumers spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish (bilingual counselors are available to take complaints), or to get free information on any of 150 consumer topics, call toll-free, 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357), or use the complaint form at http://www.ftc.gov/ftc/complaint.htm. The FTC enters Internet, telemarketing, identity theft, and other fraud-related complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to thousands of civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad.

Media Contact:
Claudia Bourne Farrell,
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-2181
Staff Contact:
Steven M. Wernikoff or James H. Davis,
FTC Midwest Region
312-960-5634

(FTC File No. X05 0002)