7 Psi
#43
Sweet!
Originally posted by BriGuyMax
It may underboost...but that thing hauls @ss!
here's a pic of the engine bay..he's putting a S/C cai in soon....intercooler is all custom
It may underboost...but that thing hauls @ss!
here's a pic of the engine bay..he's putting a S/C cai in soon....intercooler is all custom
#47
What size is the SC outlet?
What size is the SC crossover pipe?
http://www.activeautowerke.com/turbo/parts/default.asp
TURBO DISCHARGE ELBOW 2"
What size is the SC crossover pipe?
http://www.activeautowerke.com/turbo/parts/default.asp
TURBO DISCHARGE ELBOW 2"
#49
Originally posted by MardiGrasMax
What size is the SC outlet?
What size is the SC crossover pipe?
http://www.activeautowerke.com/turbo/parts/default.asp
TURBO DISCHARGE ELBOW 2"
What size is the SC outlet?
What size is the SC crossover pipe?
http://www.activeautowerke.com/turbo/parts/default.asp
TURBO DISCHARGE ELBOW 2"
#55
#56
Originally posted by Y2KevSE
BTW, we're much larger than you guys.
BTW, we're much larger than you guys.
#57
Originally posted by MardiGrasMax
With a little rigging it can be replaced...
http://www.turboneticsinc.com/catalog/silicone.html
With a little rigging it can be replaced...
http://www.turboneticsinc.com/catalog/silicone.html
#59
Originally posted by SprintMax
well technically.. because our width 3 inches errect and yours is 3.125 errect ;wink doesn't make you larger.. it just means that your ***** in lenth is a tad big larger than mine in width :eek :eek
well technically.. because our width 3 inches errect and yours is 3.125 errect ;wink doesn't make you larger.. it just means that your ***** in lenth is a tad big larger than mine in width :eek :eek
Also, it's how you use it.
#60
Originally posted by Y2KevSE
Not quite right. You have 3 inches, but due to the curviness it isn't that useful (limps downwards). My diameter is 3.125" compared to your 3", so technically, mine is wider.
Also, it's how you use it.
Not quite right. You have 3 inches, but due to the curviness it isn't that useful (limps downwards). My diameter is 3.125" compared to your 3", so technically, mine is wider.
Also, it's how you use it.
is that what your gf tells you
mine is bigger than yours.. end of story
#65
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 1,756
I have a question
Originally posted by MardiGrasMax
Thanks!
Yep that Stillen 90deg piece is awefull. I wonder if...
Thanks!
Yep that Stillen 90deg piece is awefull. I wonder if...
I don't know if this has been talked about before but here goes.
It doesn't make sense to have the supercharger on the opposite side of the throttle body, but in our case it has to be because of the belt drive...or does it. I have seen ( I don't know what car or company) a gear drive supercharger where there is a shaft that runs from the belt drive across the engine bay to the actual blower, which sits right by the throttle body. To me that makes a lot of sense. Without a lot of tubing and bends in piping, there is not a lot of places for boost to leak out of. The blower could be putting air right into the engine in a straight path. Maybe they did it to leave room for intercooler piping? Or maybe they didn't think about it at all.
#67
Re: I have a question
Originally posted by 96sleeper
Maybe Kev can answer this.?
I don't know if this has been talked about before but here goes.
It doesn't make sense to have the supercharger on the opposite side of the throttle body, but in our case it has to be because of the belt drive...or does it. I have seen ( I don't know what car or company) a gear drive supercharger where there is a shaft that runs from the belt drive across the engine bay to the actual blower, which sits right by the throttle body. To me that makes a lot of sense. Without a lot of tubing and bends in piping, there is not a lot of places for boost to leak out of. The blower could be putting air right into the engine in a straight path. Maybe they did it to leave room for intercooler piping? Or maybe they didn't think about it at all.
Maybe Kev can answer this.?
I don't know if this has been talked about before but here goes.
It doesn't make sense to have the supercharger on the opposite side of the throttle body, but in our case it has to be because of the belt drive...or does it. I have seen ( I don't know what car or company) a gear drive supercharger where there is a shaft that runs from the belt drive across the engine bay to the actual blower, which sits right by the throttle body. To me that makes a lot of sense. Without a lot of tubing and bends in piping, there is not a lot of places for boost to leak out of. The blower could be putting air right into the engine in a straight path. Maybe they did it to leave room for intercooler piping? Or maybe they didn't think about it at all.
One advantage of the cross-car setup on the max is that it makes room for an I/C with a minimum of extra piping. There really isnt any reason to have the SC blowing right into the TB, as opposed to some pipes. If the pipes have a lot fo bends (as the stillen ones do) they can cause a slight pressure drop and temp increase.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nismo87SE
3rd Generation Maxima (1989-1994)
8
01-14-2002 02:56 AM