Did you guys read that scathing report about the 2002 Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec V ...
Originally posted by mAdD MAX
Your friend already picked up the car?? I didn't know they were released already..
Shouldn't he wait till the engine is broken in till he pushes it hard?? Well, atleast it handles good..
Your friend already picked up the car?? I didn't know they were released already..
Shouldn't he wait till the engine is broken in till he pushes it hard?? Well, atleast it handles good..
Originally posted by nismo2020
love the pic!
love the pic!
Note to self:Motor Trend is all about burnouts, and how long it can do it
i gotta agree....production units or pre-production......is it good to do a double wheel burn out like that? Obviously that car has the HLSD
But really....i thought clutches needed like 500 miles to break in....same with brakes. If someone else has beat the snot out of an unbroken in car....and you test it....maybe its not perfect?????
But really....i thought clutches needed like 500 miles to break in....same with brakes. If someone else has beat the snot out of an unbroken in car....and you test it....maybe its not perfect?????
Originally posted by axion
Well, I wouldn't trust their times to be good. They ran the turbo maxima 0-60 in 6.7. I don't remember the 1/4 time, but i'm sure it wasn't very good at all.
Well, I wouldn't trust their times to be good. They ran the turbo maxima 0-60 in 6.7. I don't remember the 1/4 time, but i'm sure it wasn't very good at all.
Someone doesnt know how to drive!
That was due to a burnt-out, stock clutch. Just about all the other car mags got their hands on the JWT Turbo 5th gen before SCC did, and flogged the **** out of it, like good testers do. The guys at SCC are good testers too, and that's why they're doing such a monster burnout in a new SE-R. Besides, its not like they're going to keep the thing for themselves.
The other thing about the SE-R is that Nissan did lower their final power rating...by 5hp. SCC's point is that the SE-R Spec-V made a lot less power than they thought(and I thought) it should have. With 180hp(or 175, for that matter), the fwhp really should have been more than 141. The dyno doesn't lie.
The other thing about the SE-R is that Nissan did lower their final power rating...by 5hp. SCC's point is that the SE-R Spec-V made a lot less power than they thought(and I thought) it should have. With 180hp(or 175, for that matter), the fwhp really should have been more than 141. The dyno doesn't lie.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ah2002
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
13
Mar 9, 2016 01:42 PM
fastcarny
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
8
Aug 12, 2015 03:50 PM
yat70458
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
2
Aug 3, 2015 01:16 PM




