Alternative to a flex section?
#1
Alternative to a flex section?
As many of us here know, we have flex sections that tend to bust on our Y pipes, particularly aftermarket ones. I was talkin to a friend with a Integra, and he says that his car does not have a flex section but a slip joint. I recall that Stillen's Y pipe uses a slip joint I believe. I dont remember if they still use that design or not.
In any case, I'm wondering if theres a way we could utilize a different design to the flex section so it wont bust as easy. My car with a ruptured flex is gettin annoying and embaressing.
In any case, I'm wondering if theres a way we could utilize a different design to the flex section so it wont bust as easy. My car with a ruptured flex is gettin annoying and embaressing.
#2
I know exactly how you feel! I'm still waiting to get my flex fixed. I remember reading in a post a little while back that our cars need the flex section because of the movement the engine makes under acceleration since it is mounted sideways. The exhaust hangers don't allow it to move enough. I considered having someone just weld in a regular piece of pipe, but decided against it since I'm sure it would end up breaking. It seems inevitable that the flex joints just "fail". I too wish there was something that could be done.
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Cattman's original stainless ypipe used a slip joint instead of a flex. Didn't work so well. The increased vibration and stress tended to break welds. He eventually settled on the flex joint.
He already did the work for you. Flex joints work better than slip joints on our car. You could try to re-engineer the wheel, but you're almost certainly going to end up with the same result.
He already did the work for you. Flex joints work better than slip joints on our car. You could try to re-engineer the wheel, but you're almost certainly going to end up with the same result.
#9
The problems with broken flex sections is quite simple really. Take a look at a Stillen/Cattman y-pipe vs the stock y-pipe. Do you notice that the stock Y-pipe's flex is almost 2X as long? The longer flex allows for more movement and less risk of a tear, it's welds won't be torqued nearly as bad as the Stillen/Cattman flex, and less vibration is transmitted back to the motor and ultimately back into the cabin. My Stillen Y-pipe developed a leak at the flex after 2 years use. I didn't want to bother getting it fixed so I sold it to a friend who works at an auto parts store and I bought the Warpspeed non-mandrel Y-pipe. The longer lined flex has reduced vibration and noise. I couldn't be happier.
BTW, I wondering out this. Some cars with the shorter flex sections me be experiencing knock-retard simply because of the extra vibration coming back thru the motor. I know that this has happened with LT1 F-Bodies with headers/y-pipes. Just something to consider.
Dave
BTW, I wondering out this. Some cars with the shorter flex sections me be experiencing knock-retard simply because of the extra vibration coming back thru the motor. I know that this has happened with LT1 F-Bodies with headers/y-pipes. Just something to consider.
Dave
#10
i have cattman's old y-pipe the one with the slip joint. it doesn't work every well. it was fine then all of sudden one day i was on WOT and i hear this loud sound coming from underneath my car. i figured out that the slop joint slipped out a little and started to leak. cattman says he'll put on a flex section for $100 w/ shipping to my door. not sure what i'm gonna do yet.
#12
Well the inner part of my flex pipe came apart and blocked up the exit side of the flex pipe, with a hole, only about the size of a pea, for the exhaust to get through. It caused a major power loss.
Whatever held it in place gave, and it simply closed up.
Whatever held it in place gave, and it simply closed up.
#13
Originally posted by N1sMO
From reading all the problems with the flex section, I'm planning to get the PR motor mounts to prevent the y-pipe from flexing.
From reading all the problems with the flex section, I'm planning to get the PR motor mounts to prevent the y-pipe from flexing.
#14
Originally posted by SLC I30t
Your motor will still move when you rev the engine. It will take more than PolyUrethane Motor mounts to get a 300lb engine to keep from gyro-shifting. You could always just weld metal links in place of the motormounts.
Your motor will still move when you rev the engine. It will take more than PolyUrethane Motor mounts to get a 300lb engine to keep from gyro-shifting. You could always just weld metal links in place of the motormounts.
#15
I know what you mean, but the stock motor mounts flexes like a ****. With the PR motor mounts plus a good y-pipe (warpspeed? when will it be available?!?!), I should be trouble free. I'm not too worried about the extra vibration since I've heard most of it is with the automagics.
Originally posted by SLC I30t
Your motor will still move when you rev the engine. It will take more than PolyUrethane Motor mounts to get a 300lb engine to keep from gyro-shifting. You could always just weld metal links in place of the motormounts.
Your motor will still move when you rev the engine. It will take more than PolyUrethane Motor mounts to get a 300lb engine to keep from gyro-shifting. You could always just weld metal links in place of the motormounts.
#16
Actually there is couple of other ways to do the flex section of the Y pipe without the flex without adding a slip joint. Right after we finish the radial arms we'll do a couple of prototypes and send them out for testing. Our 2001 is coming in on Monday so we can finally finish the 5th gen Y pipes.
We did an install on a Pontiac GTP Grand Prix today and fitted it with subframes, nice looking car. The guy says it handles better, feels more stable in turns and is very pleased with how much faster he can corner.
Another car passed the old "suspension geometrics" test, (that is a joke by the way). Anyway he liked it.
Dallas
We did an install on a Pontiac GTP Grand Prix today and fitted it with subframes, nice looking car. The guy says it handles better, feels more stable in turns and is very pleased with how much faster he can corner.
Another car passed the old "suspension geometrics" test, (that is a joke by the way). Anyway he liked it.
Dallas
#20
Originally posted by Keven97SE
Cattman's original stainless ypipe used a slip joint instead of a flex. Didn't work so well. The increased vibration and stress tended to break welds. He eventually settled on the flex joint.
He already did the work for you. Flex joints work better than slip joints on our car. You could try to re-engineer the wheel, but you're almost certainly going to end up with the same result.
Cattman's original stainless ypipe used a slip joint instead of a flex. Didn't work so well. The increased vibration and stress tended to break welds. He eventually settled on the flex joint.
He already did the work for you. Flex joints work better than slip joints on our car. You could try to re-engineer the wheel, but you're almost certainly going to end up with the same result.
#21
I got an email from Brian yesterday. It looks like he is researching a stronger and better flex section. But- it will most likely be several weeks before any of our pipes get fixed with the new design. In that case, I might as well put the stocker back on for the time being.
#22
Originally posted by Dave B
BTW, I wondering out this. Some cars with the shorter flex sections me be experiencing knock-retard simply because of the extra vibration coming back thru the motor. I know that this has happened with LT1 F-Bodies with headers/y-pipes. Just something to consider.
BTW, I wondering out this. Some cars with the shorter flex sections me be experiencing knock-retard simply because of the extra vibration coming back thru the motor. I know that this has happened with LT1 F-Bodies with headers/y-pipes. Just something to consider.
#25
This may be of some interest. I put on my stock Y pipe today. And when i had it on, I noticed that my muffler was suddenly hitting my trailer hitch. This could mean only one thing. The stock Y pipe is longer in length then the cattman Y is. This would also explain why the inner flex would "shrink" up and disattach itself from the crimping. Cause if the equilibrium point of the tail pipe assembly is further back then what the cattman Y wants to sit at, then somethin is gettin stretched. And its most likely the flex.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TallTom
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
50
07-08-2022 09:54 AM
My Coffee
New Member Introductions
15
06-06-2017 02:01 PM