Thinking about fuel delivery.. opinons wanted
#1
Thinking about fuel delivery.. opinons wanted
Ok, so my dyno guy keeps telling me to trash the FMU and get bigger injectors and a rising FPR.
I am trying to do this right the first time... without spending $20 here or $50 there then end up spending $500 and getting it right.
I see so many people on this board running fmu's and stock FPR's and having good results. BUT that seems to be with an SAFC.
And maybe I need to bite that bullet and get one. I just do not have the money for a SAFC , new tires, and new brakes.
So I am asking to see if I can have good success with just an FMU or an FMU and a aftermarket FPR?
And good success is anything over 11:1 A/F while under 13:1
Thanks
I am trying to do this right the first time... without spending $20 here or $50 there then end up spending $500 and getting it right.
I see so many people on this board running fmu's and stock FPR's and having good results. BUT that seems to be with an SAFC.
And maybe I need to bite that bullet and get one. I just do not have the money for a SAFC , new tires, and new brakes.
So I am asking to see if I can have good success with just an FMU or an FMU and a aftermarket FPR?
And good success is anything over 11:1 A/F while under 13:1
Thanks
#2
i currently have AEM FPR, Cartech FMU, S-AFCII.
When i first went in to tune, with the FPR, FMU, and Fields SFC, i was running so rich between 2k and 4.5k, that it wasn't even on the graph. after 5k it'd start to lean out a bit. When we started adjusting the Fields SFC, we were able to bring it to 11.5:1 across the range with no problem.
When i first went in to tune, with the FPR, FMU, and Fields SFC, i was running so rich between 2k and 4.5k, that it wasn't even on the graph. after 5k it'd start to lean out a bit. When we started adjusting the Fields SFC, we were able to bring it to 11.5:1 across the range with no problem.
#4
Originally posted by sx7r
i currently have AEM FPR, Cartech FMU, S-AFCII.
When i first went in to tune, with the FPR, FMU, and Fields SFC, i was running so rich between 2k and 4.5k, that it wasn't even on the graph. after 5k it'd start to lean out a bit. When we started adjusting the Fields SFC, we were able to bring it to 11.5:1 across the range with no problem.
i currently have AEM FPR, Cartech FMU, S-AFCII.
When i first went in to tune, with the FPR, FMU, and Fields SFC, i was running so rich between 2k and 4.5k, that it wasn't even on the graph. after 5k it'd start to lean out a bit. When we started adjusting the Fields SFC, we were able to bring it to 11.5:1 across the range with no problem.
#5
Originally posted by Stephen Max
Thomas, if you don't mind me asking, why are you using the AEM fpr instead of a Sard? I was just about to order a Sard from you until I saw this.
Thomas, if you don't mind me asking, why are you using the AEM fpr instead of a Sard? I was just about to order a Sard from you until I saw this.
#6
Originally posted by sx7r
I bought the AEM before I started selling SARDs. However, since SARD USA no longer exists, I'm not selling SARDs anymore. Now I sell the AEM FPRs. The AEM is more expensive, but you get a couple more features. There are two ports on the pressurized side in addition to a standard 1/8NPT gauge port. Also, you can change the size of the discharge port to match the flow of your fuel pump. This is especially helpful for those running high fuel pressures, as it takes care of the hanging of fuel pressure after WOT.
I bought the AEM before I started selling SARDs. However, since SARD USA no longer exists, I'm not selling SARDs anymore. Now I sell the AEM FPRs. The AEM is more expensive, but you get a couple more features. There are two ports on the pressurized side in addition to a standard 1/8NPT gauge port. Also, you can change the size of the discharge port to match the flow of your fuel pump. This is especially helpful for those running high fuel pressures, as it takes care of the hanging of fuel pressure after WOT.
Thanks!
#7
Im a bit thick here, help me out.
Whats the FPR for if you got the FMU? I got a cartech fmu and the SafcII to fine tune. But what is this FPR then you all are talking about? Is that to replace the stock FPR to control the idle fuel pressure and all?
Dixit
Whats the FPR for if you got the FMU? I got a cartech fmu and the SafcII to fine tune. But what is this FPR then you all are talking about? Is that to replace the stock FPR to control the idle fuel pressure and all?
Dixit
#8
Originally posted by BigDogJonx
Im a bit thick here, help me out.
Whats the FPR for if you got the FMU? I got a cartech fmu and the SafcII to fine tune. But what is this FPR then you all are talking about? Is that to replace the stock FPR to control the idle fuel pressure and all?
Dixit
Im a bit thick here, help me out.
Whats the FPR for if you got the FMU? I got a cartech fmu and the SafcII to fine tune. But what is this FPR then you all are talking about? Is that to replace the stock FPR to control the idle fuel pressure and all?
Dixit
1) I'm using the Walbro 255 lph fuel pump instead of the aux fuel pump that comes with the kit. The Walbro fuel pump raises the base fuel pressure by about 8 psi, so if you want to go back to the stock base fuel pressure you need an adjustable fpr. This is not really critical, though.
2) The real reason I need an adjustable fpr is because I intend to install 370 cc/min injectors in the near future, and to do so without also paying the $$ for the ECU upgrade, I need to adjust the fuel pressure downward to a point where the oem ECU can handle the extra fuel during closed loop operation. Matt has shown that this is possible to do. I will use an SAFCII along with the boost referenced fmu for tuning boosted operation.
#12
Originally posted by Stephen Max
In the Stillen SC kit, you are supplied a boost referenced fmu that controls fuel pressure during boosting to supply extra fuel. The fuel pressure during normal (non-boosted) operation is still controlled by the OEM fpr. In my case, I would like to go to an adjustable fpr for two reasons:
1) I'm using the Walbro 255 lph fuel pump instead of the aux fuel pump that comes with the kit. The Walbro fuel pump raises the base fuel pressure by about 8 psi, so if you want to go back to the stock base fuel pressure you need an adjustable fpr. This is not really critical, though.
2) The real reason I need an adjustable fpr is because I intend to install 370 cc/min injectors in the near future, and to do so without also paying the $$ for the ECU upgrade, I need to adjust the fuel pressure downward to a point where the oem ECU can handle the extra fuel during closed loop operation. Matt has shown that this is possible to do. I will use an SAFCII along with the boost referenced fmu for tuning boosted operation.
In the Stillen SC kit, you are supplied a boost referenced fmu that controls fuel pressure during boosting to supply extra fuel. The fuel pressure during normal (non-boosted) operation is still controlled by the OEM fpr. In my case, I would like to go to an adjustable fpr for two reasons:
1) I'm using the Walbro 255 lph fuel pump instead of the aux fuel pump that comes with the kit. The Walbro fuel pump raises the base fuel pressure by about 8 psi, so if you want to go back to the stock base fuel pressure you need an adjustable fpr. This is not really critical, though.
2) The real reason I need an adjustable fpr is because I intend to install 370 cc/min injectors in the near future, and to do so without also paying the $$ for the ECU upgrade, I need to adjust the fuel pressure downward to a point where the oem ECU can handle the extra fuel during closed loop operation. Matt has shown that this is possible to do. I will use an SAFCII along with the boost referenced fmu for tuning boosted operation.
Now for my ride, since they dont make larger injectors as of yet, would getting an aftermarket FPR be needed? or should I just live with the extra 6-8psi more that walbro is giving me at idle?
Dixit
#14
yeah, sx7 how much are you selling the aem for?
ok but now Stephen Confused me. Im a little dense when it comes to this stuff. Is he saying that if you have the vortech FMU which is a boost referenced fmu then, you dont have to use a fpr? Now also are you guys saying that if you have an adjustable fpr that you will not get the bogging down that you may get sometimes after you have run the car at wide open throttle and then stopped lets say at a light. My car sometimes seemed as if it were going to idle erradicly or was going to shut off.
ok but now Stephen Confused me. Im a little dense when it comes to this stuff. Is he saying that if you have the vortech FMU which is a boost referenced fmu then, you dont have to use a fpr? Now also are you guys saying that if you have an adjustable fpr that you will not get the bogging down that you may get sometimes after you have run the car at wide open throttle and then stopped lets say at a light. My car sometimes seemed as if it were going to idle erradicly or was going to shut off.
#15
Originally posted by Redmax
yeah, sx7 how much are you selling the aem for?
ok but now Stephen Confused me. Im a little dense when it comes to this stuff. Is he saying that if you have the vortech FMU which is a boost referenced fmu then, you dont have to use a fpr? Now also are you guys saying that if you have an adjustable fpr that you will not get the bogging down that you may get sometimes after you have run the car at wide open throttle and then stopped lets say at a light. My car sometimes seemed as if it were going to idle erradicly or was going to shut off.
yeah, sx7 how much are you selling the aem for?
ok but now Stephen Confused me. Im a little dense when it comes to this stuff. Is he saying that if you have the vortech FMU which is a boost referenced fmu then, you dont have to use a fpr? Now also are you guys saying that if you have an adjustable fpr that you will not get the bogging down that you may get sometimes after you have run the car at wide open throttle and then stopped lets say at a light. My car sometimes seemed as if it were going to idle erradicly or was going to shut off.
One reason people are replacing the oem fpr with an adjustable fpr is because the Walbro fuel pump raises fuel pressure by about 7-8 psi. With an adjustable fpr you can lower the base fuel pressure back to stock levels. Also, Matt was able to successfully run 370's without having his ecu reprogrammed by lowering the base fuel pressure with an adjustable fpr.
Why you get bogging at idle I can't say. Could be a IAC problem, throttle body needs cleaning, lack of a recirculating bov loop, where you have your maf located, etc.
#16
Originally posted by Stephen Max
lack of a recirculating bov loop
lack of a recirculating bov loop
#17
Originally posted by DA-MAX
to this day I've never seen a MAF car run well with open atmosphere BOV. the only option I'd say is to tune it/use a VPC...
to this day I've never seen a MAF car run well with open atmosphere BOV. the only option I'd say is to tune it/use a VPC...
i like the 370 injectors without an ecu idea.. good info on the FP and safc - thanks
#18
Originally posted by guestNX
or put the MAF after the BOV on a 4th gen.. problem solved,
or put the MAF after the BOV on a 4th gen.. problem solved,
#19
Originally posted by DA-MAX
only way to do that is put the maf on the charge side and I thought that was the whole problem to begin with on the 4th gen kits...pressurized air through the MAF wasn't cutting it and casuing probs. I don't really think there is any way around it!
only way to do that is put the maf on the charge side and I thought that was the whole problem to begin with on the 4th gen kits...pressurized air through the MAF wasn't cutting it and casuing probs. I don't really think there is any way around it!
#20
Re: Thinking about fuel delivery.. opinons wanted
Originally posted by bags533
Ok, so my dyno guy keeps telling me to trash the FMU and get bigger injectors and a rising FPR.
Ok, so my dyno guy keeps telling me to trash the FMU and get bigger injectors and a rising FPR.
does anyone have any knowledge or experience of the HKS AFR other than just what is on their website? seems like a very good unit, and at a cost of only ~$200 (list approx 279 i believe)
bags you could get an old SAFC unit for under 100 bucks too (not the digital screen SAFC I's)... but only offers +/- 20%
#21
Re: Re: Thinking about fuel delivery.. opinons wanted
if I recall some of the turbo guys when they first started these kits had problems with MAF on the charge side...I'm a little foggy about it, cause I didn't really used to pay attention to the whole turbo 4th gen thing
as for the AFR, check the Supra boards(I browse the MKIII section occasionally)...many of them are using the AFR since it somewhat has that "automatic" EIDS function for BOVs. check the Supra boards thats where I've seen it used most, but even with the EIDS some still had probs with open atmosphere.
as for the AFR, check the Supra boards(I browse the MKIII section occasionally)...many of them are using the AFR since it somewhat has that "automatic" EIDS function for BOVs. check the Supra boards thats where I've seen it used most, but even with the EIDS some still had probs with open atmosphere.
#22
You know instead of hassling with all new injectors, why not run a 7th and 8th injector and a seperate fuel ecu to control those? That way you have decent idle and part throttle running and extra fuel when you need it. Trouble is you have to mount them somewhere less than ideal for fuel atomization. ie.. near the TB or something.
#24
Originally posted by Redmax
Once you start using alot of boost u cant put the maf on the charge side. the mafe will get destroyed from the volume of air
Once you start using alot of boost u cant put the maf on the charge side. the mafe will get destroyed from the volume of air
Originally posted by DA-MAX
if I recall some of the turbo guys when they first started these kits had problems with MAF on the charge side...I'm a little foggy about it, cause...
if I recall some of the turbo guys when they first started these kits had problems with MAF on the charge side...I'm a little foggy about it, cause...
and the supra guys? reason they will experience trouble is they have it on the non-charged side, and of course that brings us to the same problem all over again with BOV. I don't know why we got spoiled by nissan with strong 4g MAFs that can be pressurized, but who is going to complain about that.
#25
At 15psi, you're pushing over 350fwp. The stock MAF can't read more than that, so at 18psi, you're definately going to need a better MAF or an emanage to be able to process that amount of air. I'm not saying you'll "destroy" your MAF by running 15-18psi, I'm just saying your ECU won't be able to read that much air.
#26
Originally posted by ereet
At 15psi, you're pushing over 350fwp. The stock MAF can't read more than that, so at 18psi, you're definately going to need a better MAF or an emanage to be able to process that amount of air. I'm not saying you'll "destroy" your MAF by running 15-18psi, I'm just saying your ECU won't be able to read that much air.
At 15psi, you're pushing over 350fwp. The stock MAF can't read more than that, so at 18psi, you're definately going to need a better MAF or an emanage to be able to process that amount of air. I'm not saying you'll "destroy" your MAF by running 15-18psi, I'm just saying your ECU won't be able to read that much air.
#27
Originally posted by Stephen Max
If you're using a boost referenced fmu then it doesn't matter how much air you're pumping through the maf.
If you're using a boost referenced fmu then it doesn't matter how much air you're pumping through the maf.
#29
Dixit
Originally posted by BigDogJonx
This is the info I wanted. Good stuff. I knew there had to be someway of bringing down the fp from having the walbro installed.
Now for my ride, since they dont make larger injectors as of yet, would getting an aftermarket FPR be needed? or should I just live with the extra 6-8psi more that walbro is giving me at idle?
Dixit
This is the info I wanted. Good stuff. I knew there had to be someway of bringing down the fp from having the walbro installed.
Now for my ride, since they dont make larger injectors as of yet, would getting an aftermarket FPR be needed? or should I just live with the extra 6-8psi more that walbro is giving me at idle?
Dixit
1)During startup/warmup your ECU goes open loop. If your base fuel pressure is 6-8psi higher while you're in open loop, your ECU is not going to be measuring 02's and you'll be running rich. Depending on how rich, you can foul plugs, soot 02's, and even ruin a cat.
2)Once the car has warmed up and is in closed loop, you're going to be rich and your ECU will decrease injector pulse width to compensate, ie lean you out. This MAY be fine, however there has to be a limit where the injectors don't open far enough to properly distribute/atomize fuel or you still run rich.
I know there is more, but I can't remember right now.
#30
Originally posted by Jeff92se
You know instead of hassling with all new injectors, why not run a 7th and 8th injector and a seperate fuel ecu to control those? That way you have decent idle and part throttle running and extra fuel when you need it. Trouble is you have to mount them somewhere less than ideal for fuel atomization. ie.. near the TB or something.
You know instead of hassling with all new injectors, why not run a 7th and 8th injector and a seperate fuel ecu to control those? That way you have decent idle and part throttle running and extra fuel when you need it. Trouble is you have to mount them somewhere less than ideal for fuel atomization. ie.. near the TB or something.
Stillen is using this method on their SC, but they designed a whole new plenium for the SC+7th injector.
I think the atomization problem will be a concern, but if guys are running wet N20?
#31
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado
Posts: 1,035
I agree with this. Some of the japanese tuners add additional injectors rather than messing with larger injectors. You can keep your stock fuel maps and throw in additional fuel when needed. The emanage has this capability built in for 2 additional injectors. For 2002+, unless you go through the pain of running a return line, this is probably the best way to go!
Originally posted by Jeff92se
You know instead of hassling with all new injectors, why not run a 7th and 8th injector and a seperate fuel ecu to control those? That way you have decent idle and part throttle running and extra fuel when you need it. Trouble is you have to mount them somewhere less than ideal for fuel atomization. ie.. near the TB or something.
You know instead of hassling with all new injectors, why not run a 7th and 8th injector and a seperate fuel ecu to control those? That way you have decent idle and part throttle running and extra fuel when you need it. Trouble is you have to mount them somewhere less than ideal for fuel atomization. ie.. near the TB or something.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
homewrecker
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
13
08-24-2015 08:56 PM