Supercharged/Turbocharged The increase in air/fuel pressure above atmospheric pressure in the intake system caused by the action of a supercharger or turbocharger attached to an engine.

Thinking about fuel delivery.. opinons wanted

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-13-2003, 06:31 AM
  #1  
VG Ridah's Biatch Hoe
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Bags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,472
Thinking about fuel delivery.. opinons wanted

Ok, so my dyno guy keeps telling me to trash the FMU and get bigger injectors and a rising FPR.

I am trying to do this right the first time... without spending $20 here or $50 there then end up spending $500 and getting it right.

I see so many people on this board running fmu's and stock FPR's and having good results. BUT that seems to be with an SAFC.

And maybe I need to bite that bullet and get one. I just do not have the money for a SAFC , new tires, and new brakes.

So I am asking to see if I can have good success with just an FMU or an FMU and a aftermarket FPR?

And good success is anything over 11:1 A/F while under 13:1

Thanks
Bags is offline  
Old 07-13-2003, 04:43 PM
  #2  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
sx7r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: TX
Posts: 1,998
i currently have AEM FPR, Cartech FMU, S-AFCII.

When i first went in to tune, with the FPR, FMU, and Fields SFC, i was running so rich between 2k and 4.5k, that it wasn't even on the graph. after 5k it'd start to lean out a bit. When we started adjusting the Fields SFC, we were able to bring it to 11.5:1 across the range with no problem.
sx7r is offline  
Old 07-13-2003, 05:37 PM
  #3  
VG Ridah's Biatch Hoe
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Bags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,472
Thanks sx7r, I guess the cartech fmu is the way to go, adjustable, and the SAFC I or II.

Just sucks , but I found one for cheap today so I may bite the bullet and sell more plasma.
Bags is offline  
Old 07-14-2003, 07:20 AM
  #4  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Stephen Max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,869
Originally posted by sx7r
i currently have AEM FPR, Cartech FMU, S-AFCII.

When i first went in to tune, with the FPR, FMU, and Fields SFC, i was running so rich between 2k and 4.5k, that it wasn't even on the graph. after 5k it'd start to lean out a bit. When we started adjusting the Fields SFC, we were able to bring it to 11.5:1 across the range with no problem.
Thomas, if you don't mind me asking, why are you using the AEM fpr instead of a Sard? I was just about to order a Sard from you until I saw this.
Stephen Max is offline  
Old 07-14-2003, 08:36 AM
  #5  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
sx7r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: TX
Posts: 1,998
Originally posted by Stephen Max


Thomas, if you don't mind me asking, why are you using the AEM fpr instead of a Sard? I was just about to order a Sard from you until I saw this.
I bought the AEM before I started selling SARDs. However, since SARD USA no longer exists, I'm not selling SARDs anymore. Now I sell the AEM FPRs. The AEM is more expensive, but you get a couple more features. There are two ports on the pressurized side in addition to a standard 1/8NPT gauge port. Also, you can change the size of the discharge port to match the flow of your fuel pump. This is especially helpful for those running high fuel pressures, as it takes care of the hanging of fuel pressure after WOT.
sx7r is offline  
Old 07-14-2003, 08:53 AM
  #6  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Stephen Max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,869
Originally posted by sx7r


I bought the AEM before I started selling SARDs. However, since SARD USA no longer exists, I'm not selling SARDs anymore. Now I sell the AEM FPRs. The AEM is more expensive, but you get a couple more features. There are two ports on the pressurized side in addition to a standard 1/8NPT gauge port. Also, you can change the size of the discharge port to match the flow of your fuel pump. This is especially helpful for those running high fuel pressures, as it takes care of the hanging of fuel pressure after WOT.
What's your price? Also, I understand the AEM is adjustable down to 20 psi, is that correct?

Thanks!
Stephen Max is offline  
Old 07-14-2003, 09:36 AM
  #7  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (7)
 
BigDogJonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,128
Im a bit thick here, help me out.

Whats the FPR for if you got the FMU? I got a cartech fmu and the SafcII to fine tune. But what is this FPR then you all are talking about? Is that to replace the stock FPR to control the idle fuel pressure and all?

Dixit
BigDogJonx is offline  
Old 07-14-2003, 10:52 AM
  #8  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Stephen Max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,869
Originally posted by BigDogJonx
Im a bit thick here, help me out.

Whats the FPR for if you got the FMU? I got a cartech fmu and the SafcII to fine tune. But what is this FPR then you all are talking about? Is that to replace the stock FPR to control the idle fuel pressure and all?

Dixit
In the Stillen SC kit, you are supplied a boost referenced fmu that controls fuel pressure during boosting to supply extra fuel. The fuel pressure during normal (non-boosted) operation is still controlled by the OEM fpr. In my case, I would like to go to an adjustable fpr for two reasons:

1) I'm using the Walbro 255 lph fuel pump instead of the aux fuel pump that comes with the kit. The Walbro fuel pump raises the base fuel pressure by about 8 psi, so if you want to go back to the stock base fuel pressure you need an adjustable fpr. This is not really critical, though.

2) The real reason I need an adjustable fpr is because I intend to install 370 cc/min injectors in the near future, and to do so without also paying the $$ for the ECU upgrade, I need to adjust the fuel pressure downward to a point where the oem ECU can handle the extra fuel during closed loop operation. Matt has shown that this is possible to do. I will use an SAFCII along with the boost referenced fmu for tuning boosted operation.
Stephen Max is offline  
Old 07-14-2003, 11:00 AM
  #9  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
sx7r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: TX
Posts: 1,998
Originally posted by Stephen Max


What's your price? Also, I understand the AEM is adjustable down to 20 psi, is that correct?

Thanks!
AEM does go down to 20psi.
sx7r is offline  
Old 07-14-2003, 11:39 AM
  #10  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
96BLUMAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Leesburg,Virginia
Posts: 2,374
How do i know if my FPR is a rising one? I have a weapon-r one.
96BLUMAX is offline  
Old 07-14-2003, 11:41 AM
  #11  
ejj
Donating Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (5)
 
ejj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,602
Originally posted by sx7r


AEM does go down to 20psi.
Does the SARD?
ejj is offline  
Old 07-14-2003, 01:02 PM
  #12  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (7)
 
BigDogJonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,128
Originally posted by Stephen Max


In the Stillen SC kit, you are supplied a boost referenced fmu that controls fuel pressure during boosting to supply extra fuel. The fuel pressure during normal (non-boosted) operation is still controlled by the OEM fpr. In my case, I would like to go to an adjustable fpr for two reasons:

1) I'm using the Walbro 255 lph fuel pump instead of the aux fuel pump that comes with the kit. The Walbro fuel pump raises the base fuel pressure by about 8 psi, so if you want to go back to the stock base fuel pressure you need an adjustable fpr. This is not really critical, though.

2) The real reason I need an adjustable fpr is because I intend to install 370 cc/min injectors in the near future, and to do so without also paying the $$ for the ECU upgrade, I need to adjust the fuel pressure downward to a point where the oem ECU can handle the extra fuel during closed loop operation. Matt has shown that this is possible to do. I will use an SAFCII along with the boost referenced fmu for tuning boosted operation.
This is the info I wanted. Good stuff. I knew there had to be someway of bringing down the fp from having the walbro installed.

Now for my ride, since they dont make larger injectors as of yet, would getting an aftermarket FPR be needed? or should I just live with the extra 6-8psi more that walbro is giving me at idle?

Dixit
BigDogJonx is offline  
Old 07-14-2003, 01:57 PM
  #13  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (15)
 
sx7r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: TX
Posts: 1,998
Originally posted by ejj


Does the SARD?
yes, SARD also goes to 20psi.
sx7r is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 09:44 AM
  #14  
Redlinemax Owner
iTrader: (20)
 
Redmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,027
yeah, sx7 how much are you selling the aem for?

ok but now Stephen Confused me. Im a little dense when it comes to this stuff. Is he saying that if you have the vortech FMU which is a boost referenced fmu then, you dont have to use a fpr? Now also are you guys saying that if you have an adjustable fpr that you will not get the bogging down that you may get sometimes after you have run the car at wide open throttle and then stopped lets say at a light. My car sometimes seemed as if it were going to idle erradicly or was going to shut off.
Redmax is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 11:06 AM
  #15  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Stephen Max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,869
Originally posted by Redmax
yeah, sx7 how much are you selling the aem for?

ok but now Stephen Confused me. Im a little dense when it comes to this stuff. Is he saying that if you have the vortech FMU which is a boost referenced fmu then, you dont have to use a fpr? Now also are you guys saying that if you have an adjustable fpr that you will not get the bogging down that you may get sometimes after you have run the car at wide open throttle and then stopped lets say at a light. My car sometimes seemed as if it were going to idle erradicly or was going to shut off.
If you are using a vortech fmu you also have to have either the OEM fpr or an aftermarket adjustable fpr. The fmu only controls fuel pressure when there is positive manifold pressure (i.e. boosting). At all other times the fuel pressure is controlled by the OEM fpr (or an adjustable fpr if you have one).

One reason people are replacing the oem fpr with an adjustable fpr is because the Walbro fuel pump raises fuel pressure by about 7-8 psi. With an adjustable fpr you can lower the base fuel pressure back to stock levels. Also, Matt was able to successfully run 370's without having his ecu reprogrammed by lowering the base fuel pressure with an adjustable fpr.

Why you get bogging at idle I can't say. Could be a IAC problem, throttle body needs cleaning, lack of a recirculating bov loop, where you have your maf located, etc.
Stephen Max is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 11:14 AM
  #16  
Eat, sleep, and sh*t 2JZ
iTrader: (10)
 
DA-MAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,979
Originally posted by Stephen Max
lack of a recirculating bov loop
that was my guess....at the meet last month Coreys car was sptting straight black soot out of the pipes(ie-rich) and the bogging is a sure sign as well. to this day I've never seen a MAF car run well with open atmosphere BOV. the only option I'd say is to tune it/use a VPC(if you can find one), but even with that its not worth it or nearly as easy as running recirc...which I bet is the cause of his probs
DA-MAX is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 03:15 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
guestNX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 113
Originally posted by DA-MAX
to this day I've never seen a MAF car run well with open atmosphere BOV. the only option I'd say is to tune it/use a VPC...
or put the MAF after the BOV on a 4th gen.. problem solved, and you'd see a MAF car run perfect w/ an open atmosphere BOV.

i like the 370 injectors without an ecu idea.. good info on the FP and safc - thanks
guestNX is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 04:41 PM
  #18  
Eat, sleep, and sh*t 2JZ
iTrader: (10)
 
DA-MAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,979
Originally posted by guestNX
or put the MAF after the BOV on a 4th gen.. problem solved,
only way to do that is put the maf on the charge side and I thought that was the whole problem to begin with on the 4th gen kits...pressurized air through the MAF wasn't cutting it and casuing probs. I don't really think there is any way around it!
DA-MAX is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 06:11 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
guestNX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 113
Originally posted by DA-MAX


only way to do that is put the maf on the charge side and I thought that was the whole problem to begin with on the 4th gen kits...pressurized air through the MAF wasn't cutting it and casuing probs. I don't really think there is any way around it!
hm exactly who is having problems with pressurized maf's on 4th gens. if i recall correctly, stillens 4th gen supercharge kits pressurized the maf (i am unsure of what year they switched to nonpressurized, but whenever the 5th gen mafs started on maximas)
guestNX is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 06:16 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
guestNX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 113
Re: Thinking about fuel delivery.. opinons wanted

Originally posted by bags533
Ok, so my dyno guy keeps telling me to trash the FMU and get bigger injectors and a rising FPR.
rising fpr being a fmu..? i dont understand what he is telling you to do.. but yes bigger injectors would be good, just remember what goes with them - more tuning.

does anyone have any knowledge or experience of the HKS AFR other than just what is on their website? seems like a very good unit, and at a cost of only ~$200 (list approx 279 i believe)

bags you could get an old SAFC unit for under 100 bucks too (not the digital screen SAFC I's)... but only offers +/- 20%
guestNX is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 06:50 PM
  #21  
Eat, sleep, and sh*t 2JZ
iTrader: (10)
 
DA-MAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,979
Re: Re: Thinking about fuel delivery.. opinons wanted

if I recall some of the turbo guys when they first started these kits had problems with MAF on the charge side...I'm a little foggy about it, cause I didn't really used to pay attention to the whole turbo 4th gen thing

as for the AFR, check the Supra boards(I browse the MKIII section occasionally)...many of them are using the AFR since it somewhat has that "automatic" EIDS function for BOVs. check the Supra boards thats where I've seen it used most, but even with the EIDS some still had probs with open atmosphere.
DA-MAX is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 10:21 PM
  #22  
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Jeff92se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,147
You know instead of hassling with all new injectors, why not run a 7th and 8th injector and a seperate fuel ecu to control those? That way you have decent idle and part throttle running and extra fuel when you need it. Trouble is you have to mount them somewhere less than ideal for fuel atomization. ie.. near the TB or something.
Jeff92se is offline  
Old 08-11-2003, 11:40 PM
  #23  
Redlinemax Owner
iTrader: (20)
 
Redmax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,027
Once you start using alot of boost u cant put the maf on the charge side. the mafe will get destroyed from the volume of air
Redmax is offline  
Old 08-12-2003, 05:01 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
guestNX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 113
Originally posted by Redmax
Once you start using alot of boost u cant put the maf on the charge side. the mafe will get destroyed from the volume of air
proof of this, and at what psi are you talking about? I know at 15-18psi the stock 4g maf is perfectly fine.



Originally posted by DA-MAX
if I recall some of the turbo guys when they first started these kits had problems with MAF on the charge side...I'm a little foggy about it, cause...
no, you have it backwards.. they had issues when they put the MAF on the non-charge side, getting idle, boost->noboost transitions, etc because partially yes - of the atmosphere BOV. now, getting back to my point, MAF on the charged side, it runs 100% perfect.

and the supra guys? reason they will experience trouble is they have it on the non-charged side, and of course that brings us to the same problem all over again with BOV. I don't know why we got spoiled by nissan with strong 4g MAFs that can be pressurized, but who is going to complain about that.
guestNX is offline  
Old 08-12-2003, 05:11 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
ereet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,452
At 15psi, you're pushing over 350fwp. The stock MAF can't read more than that, so at 18psi, you're definately going to need a better MAF or an emanage to be able to process that amount of air. I'm not saying you'll "destroy" your MAF by running 15-18psi, I'm just saying your ECU won't be able to read that much air.
ereet is offline  
Old 08-12-2003, 06:05 AM
  #26  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Stephen Max's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,869
Originally posted by ereet
At 15psi, you're pushing over 350fwp. The stock MAF can't read more than that, so at 18psi, you're definately going to need a better MAF or an emanage to be able to process that amount of air. I'm not saying you'll "destroy" your MAF by running 15-18psi, I'm just saying your ECU won't be able to read that much air.
If you're using a boost referenced fmu then it doesn't matter how much air you're pumping through the maf.
Stephen Max is offline  
Old 08-12-2003, 08:29 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
ereet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,452
Originally posted by Stephen Max
If you're using a boost referenced fmu then it doesn't matter how much air you're pumping through the maf.
Harumph. I suppose you're correct. The MAF won't know what the heck is going on, and neither will the fuel system, however because neither depends on the other anymore with the FMU, that'll work. Woops
ereet is offline  
Old 08-13-2003, 08:33 AM
  #28  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (14)
 
MardiGrasMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,491
FWIW, Vortech Super FMU has the abality to adjust base fuel pressure so no FPR is needed.
MardiGrasMax is offline  
Old 08-13-2003, 11:20 PM
  #29  
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
IceY2K1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Dixit

Originally posted by BigDogJonx
This is the info I wanted. Good stuff. I knew there had to be someway of bringing down the fp from having the walbro installed.

Now for my ride, since they dont make larger injectors as of yet, would getting an aftermarket FPR be needed? or should I just live with the extra 6-8psi more that walbro is giving me at idle?

Dixit
I would go for the adjustable FPR or Vortech Super FMU to correct the base idle fuel pressure. At least two reasons:

1)During startup/warmup your ECU goes open loop. If your base fuel pressure is 6-8psi higher while you're in open loop, your ECU is not going to be measuring 02's and you'll be running rich. Depending on how rich, you can foul plugs, soot 02's, and even ruin a cat.

2)Once the car has warmed up and is in closed loop, you're going to be rich and your ECU will decrease injector pulse width to compensate, ie lean you out. This MAY be fine, however there has to be a limit where the injectors don't open far enough to properly distribute/atomize fuel or you still run rich.

I know there is more, but I can't remember right now.
IceY2K1 is offline  
Old 08-13-2003, 11:28 PM
  #30  
Fastest Fantasy Maxima Evar
iTrader: (3)
 
IceY2K1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,245
Originally posted by Jeff92se
You know instead of hassling with all new injectors, why not run a 7th and 8th injector and a seperate fuel ecu to control those? That way you have decent idle and part throttle running and extra fuel when you need it. Trouble is you have to mount them somewhere less than ideal for fuel atomization. ie.. near the TB or something.
Agree...been saying that for a long time. I've seen a universal HKS aux injector controller, but I'm not sure how good it works.

Stillen is using this method on their SC, but they designed a whole new plenium for the SC+7th injector.

I think the atomization problem will be a concern, but if guys are running wet N20?
IceY2K1 is offline  
Old 08-14-2003, 01:27 AM
  #31  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
turbo97SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado
Posts: 1,035
I agree with this. Some of the japanese tuners add additional injectors rather than messing with larger injectors. You can keep your stock fuel maps and throw in additional fuel when needed. The emanage has this capability built in for 2 additional injectors. For 2002+, unless you go through the pain of running a return line, this is probably the best way to go!

Originally posted by Jeff92se
You know instead of hassling with all new injectors, why not run a 7th and 8th injector and a seperate fuel ecu to control those? That way you have decent idle and part throttle running and extra fuel when you need it. Trouble is you have to mount them somewhere less than ideal for fuel atomization. ie.. near the TB or something.
turbo97SE is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
homewrecker
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
13
08-24-2015 08:56 PM
doctorpullit
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
10
08-20-2015 05:15 PM
Balkins
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
1
08-12-2015 06:39 AM
MikesChevelle
Audio and Electronics
0
08-09-2015 11:50 AM



Quick Reply: Thinking about fuel delivery.. opinons wanted



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:44 PM.