5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

VQ TT might be in the future

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2002, 12:03 PM
  #1  
Donating Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
 
Tanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,267
VQ TT might be in the future

Just read the Superstreet article about the JGTC. They commented that "the factory Skylines were spotted with twin-turbo VQ motors" and "the people we spoke to at Nismo said the swap to the V-6 has nothing to do with the introduction of the 350Z or any other car (to the JGTC), but we're not so sure. The 2004 Skyline GT-R will be equipped with this motor, so it looks like Nismo is preparing for that release."

Personally, I'm not sure if I'd rather the 2004 GT-R have a V-8 versus a V-6 TT. Reliability vs upgradeability, hmmm.

What this means as far as Maximas are concerned, I don't think the VQ TT will fit in the Maxima, but it's nice to know that Nissan engineers can expand the VQ engine to work with twin turbos.
Tanman is offline  
Old 10-06-2002, 07:25 PM
  #2  
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
MiniRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,875
Hey nice info, i never knew that..

Oh yeah, Tanman thanks for the door panel removal instrauctions a while back!! Kudos..

ED
MiniRX7 is offline  
Old 10-06-2002, 09:01 PM
  #3  
Donating Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
 
Tanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,267
Originally posted by MiniRX7
Hey nice info, i never knew that..

Oh yeah, Tanman thanks for the door panel removal instrauctions a while back!! Kudos..

ED
Hey no problem, always glad to help. Hope you got everything working ok.
Tanman is offline  
Old 10-06-2002, 09:02 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Nismo87SE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,807
Re: VQ TT might be in the future

Originally posted by Tanman
Just read the Superstreet article about the JGTC. They commented that "the factory Skylines were spotted with twin-turbo VQ motors" and "the people we spoke to at Nismo said the swap to the V-6 has nothing to do with the introduction of the 350Z or any other car (to the JGTC), but we're not so sure. The 2004 Skyline GT-R will be equipped with this motor, so it looks like Nismo is preparing for that release."

Personally, I'm not sure if I'd rather the 2004 GT-R have a V-8 versus a V-6 TT. Reliability vs upgradeability, hmmm.

What this means as far as Maximas are concerned, I don't think the VQ TT will fit in the Maxima, but it's nice to know that Nissan engineers can expand the VQ engine to work with twin turbos.
Powered by a VQ25DETT or VQ20DETT.
Nismo87SE is offline  
Old 10-06-2002, 11:36 PM
  #5  
Donating Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
 
Tanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,267
Re: Re: VQ TT might be in the future

Originally posted by Nismo87SE


Powered by a VQ25DETT or VQ20DETT.
There's a VQ25 or VQ20? What cars are they used in currently?
Tanman is offline  
Old 10-07-2002, 12:29 AM
  #6  
Old Timer
 
d_warner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Huntsville, TX
Posts: 1,433
Re: Re: VQ TT might be in the future

Originally posted by Nismo87SE


Powered by a VQ25DETT or VQ20DETT.
Maybe a VQ35DETT?
d_warner is offline  
Old 10-07-2002, 05:54 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Black VQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,018
Re: Re: Re: VQ TT might be in the future

Originally posted by Tanman
There's a VQ25 or VQ20? What cars are they used in currently?
The VQ25DE is used in the Japanese Cefiro. There's a VQ25DD(direct injection) with almost 250hp available too. A "276hp" VQ25DET is used in the Stagea wagon. The VQ30DET is used in the Gloria(similar to the Infiniti M45), making..."276hp."
The Maxima QX in Europe comes with the VQ20DE(around 160hp, I think) standard, with the VQ30DE(193hp) as an option. The 2L is standard, because of the high fuel costs.The power numbers are for the A32 chassis. I'm not sure about the A33 version, since most of the QX pages aren't in English.
Black VQ is offline  
Old 10-07-2002, 08:25 AM
  #8  
Donating Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
 
Tanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,267
Re: Re: Re: Re: VQ TT might be in the future

Originally posted by Black VQ


The VQ25DE is used in the Japanese Cefiro. There's a VQ25DD(direct injection) with almost 250hp available too. A "276hp" VQ25DET is used in the Stagea wagon. The VQ30DET is used in the Gloria(similar to the Infiniti M45), making..."276hp."
The Maxima QX in Europe comes with the VQ20DE(around 160hp, I think) standard, with the VQ30DE(193hp) as an option. The 2L is standard, because of the high fuel costs.The power numbers are for the A32 chassis. I'm not sure about the A33 version, since most of the QX pages aren't in English.
Are the VQ20 and VQ25 V-6s or 4 cylinder engines?

Why would they use a smaller engine with bigger turbos to achieve 500HP on the GT500 cars? Why not use a bigger engine (VQ30 or VQ35) with medium turbos to achieve the same thing? With the larger displacement, more torque, less lag from turbos, more reliable car.
Tanman is offline  
Old 10-07-2002, 08:27 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
acMAX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,378
wish i had a turbo
acMAX is offline  
Old 10-07-2002, 09:03 AM
  #10  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
[maxi-overdose]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,305
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: VQ TT might be in the future

Originally posted by Tanman


Are the VQ20 and VQ25 V-6s or 4 cylinder engines?

Why would they use a smaller engine with bigger turbos to achieve 500HP on the GT500 cars? Why not use a bigger engine (VQ30 or VQ35) with medium turbos to achieve the same thing? With the larger displacement, more torque, less lag from turbos, more reliable car.
current skyline GTR has i6 2.6L engine with TT, I think the lag is pretty much eliminated when u drop two turbos in. I think the reason that they use a small 6cylinder is the weight. GTRs already have a very heavy tranny and to have proper weight balance, they need to give up something.



btw, blower-in in 6 day for me......
[maxi-overdose] is offline  
Old 10-07-2002, 09:51 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Stereodude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Detroit Metro Area
Posts: 1,617
Re: Re: VQ TT might be in the future

Originally posted by Nismo87SE
Powered by a VQ25DETT or VQ20DETT.
How do you figure? How do you know it won't have a VQ35DETT?

Stereodude
Stereodude is offline  
Old 10-07-2002, 10:24 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Kojiro_FtT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,280
I'm not sure, but my guess is that the VQ25DET and VQ20DET are cast iron blocks. The VQ35DE is aluminum, and will never stand up to the beating of a high boost turbo over long periods of time. That's why the R34 GT-R had a cast iron 2.5 liter. They do the iron blocks in smaller displacement so the weight doesn't get rediculous.
Kojiro_FtT is offline  
Old 10-07-2002, 02:31 PM
  #13  
Donating Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
 
Tanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,267
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: VQ TT might be in the future

Originally posted by [maxi-overdose]


current skyline GTR has i6 2.6L engine with TT, I think the lag is pretty much eliminated when u drop two turbos in. I think the reason that they use a small 6cylinder is the weight. GTRs already have a very heavy tranny and to have proper weight balance, they need to give up something.



btw, blower-in in 6 day for me......
Sweet! Have you decided on a pulley size yet?
Tanman is offline  
Old 10-07-2002, 03:15 PM
  #14  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
[maxi-overdose]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,305
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: VQ TT might be in the future

Originally posted by Tanman


Sweet! Have you decided on a pulley size yet?
yup.....3.33 and hope that I wont destroy the tranny. really gentle on first to second.
[maxi-overdose] is offline  
Old 10-07-2002, 03:40 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Stereodude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Detroit Metro Area
Posts: 1,617
Originally posted by Kojiro_FtT
I'm not sure, but my guess is that the VQ25DET and VQ20DET are cast iron blocks. The VQ35DE is aluminum, and will never stand up to the beating of a high boost turbo over long periods of time. That's why the R34 GT-R had a cast iron 2.5 liter. They do the iron blocks in smaller displacement so the weight doesn't get rediculous.
Unless I'm mistaken there's a VQ30DET in the asian Q45 (Cima). So I'm failing to see how the VQ35 can't have a VQ35DET or VQ35DETT variant. Either way there's always the ol' engine swap. The VQ20 and VQ25 are both 6 cylinder 60 degree V's that are sold in the Cefiro in at least Taiwan. That means the parts should be available to adapt 'em into the FWD Maxima. Add a turbo or two and things could get interesting.

So, no matter how you look at it we could get a VQxxDET or VQxxDETT

Stereodude
Stereodude is offline  
Old 10-07-2002, 05:28 PM
  #16  
Donating Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
 
Tanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,267
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: VQ TT might be in the future

Originally posted by [maxi-overdose]


yup.....3.33 and hope that I wont destroy the tranny. really gentle on first to second.
Good choice .

Don't worry too much about the tranny (like I can talk.. hehe), just don't race too much. Also, don't manually shift the auto tranny. I think I destroyed my last car by manually shifting it.
Tanman is offline  
Old 10-07-2002, 05:52 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Black VQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,018
Originally posted by Kojiro_FtT
I'm not sure, but my guess is that the VQ25DET and VQ20DET are cast iron blocks. The VQ35DE is aluminum, and will never stand up to the beating of a high boost turbo over long periods of time. That's why the R34 GT-R had a cast iron 2.5 liter. They do the iron blocks in smaller displacement so the weight doesn't get rediculous.
All VQs Are aluminum block. The VQ(not sure of the displacement) used in the JGTC R34 GT-R made about 540hp before the block cracked. However, the block was probably not reinforced, so with some bolstering, it should be able to handle more boost.

Originally posted by Tanman
Are the VQ20 and VQ25 V-6s or 4 cylinder engines?
Why would they use a smaller engine with bigger turbos to achieve 500HP on the GT500 cars? Why not use a bigger engine (VQ30 or VQ35) with medium turbos to achieve the same thing? With the larger displacement, more torque, less lag from turbos, more reliable car.
All VQs are V6 engines. The QR-series is more like a 4 cylinder VQ. If Nissan was using the VQ25DET in the JGTC R34 GT-R, there wouldn't be all that much of a displacement decrease over the RB(.1L). What Nissan might have done to get the 2.5L configuration of the VQ was destroke it, leaving the bore unchanged. By destroking the VQ, it could have similar displacement and rev characteristics to the RB. Another thing is that a bigger displacement could have placed more restrictions on the car as far as classification goes.

And on another note, TRD uses the 3SGTE(MR2 Turbo and Celica All-Trac engine) 4-banger for the JGTC Supra. Why? The same reason Nissan tried out the VQ:
1. The engine weighs less.
2. The engine is shorter and can be mounted farther back for better weight distribution and handling. The drivers of the R34 reported that handling was more neutral and turn-in was greatly improved.
3. With the power class restrictions(GT-R's class has a maximum of 500hp), it doesn't matter what the ultimate capability of the engine is. Why use a bigger, heavier engine while a smaller one can make the same power? The 3SGTE and the VQ still made enough power for their classes, while still providing the above advantages.
Black VQ is offline  
Old 10-07-2002, 10:56 PM
  #18  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
iTrader: (3)
 
[maxi-overdose]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,305
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: VQ TT might be in the future

Originally posted by Tanman


Good choice .

Don't worry too much about the tranny (like I can talk.. hehe), just don't race too much. Also, don't manually shift the auto tranny. I think I destroyed my last car by manually shifting it.
thx.....yes, no stop light racing for me. wish me luck.
[maxi-overdose] is offline  
Old 10-08-2002, 12:10 AM
  #19  
Donating Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
 
Tanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,267
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: VQ TT might be in the future

Originally posted by [maxi-overdose]


thx.....yes, no stop light racing for me. wish me luck.
Well don't go that far! Stop light racing is the funnest part about having the SC. Just don't over-do it, and you should be fine .
Tanman is offline  
Old 10-08-2002, 07:56 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Kojiro_FtT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,280
Originally posted by Black VQ
And on another note, TRD uses the 3SGTE(MR2 Turbo and Celica All-Trac engine) 4-banger for the JGTC Supra. Why? The same reason Nissan tried out the VQ:
1. The engine weighs less.
2. The engine is shorter and can be mounted farther back for better weight distribution and handling. The drivers of the R34 reported that handling was more neutral and turn-in was greatly improved.
3. With the power class restrictions(GT-R's class has a maximum of 500hp), it doesn't matter what the ultimate capability of the engine is. Why use a bigger, heavier engine while a smaller one can make the same power? The 3SGTE and the VQ still made enough power for their classes, while still providing the above advantages.
Good point about the power restriction.
That's cool that the VQ took that much power too.
Kojiro_FtT is offline  
Old 10-08-2002, 11:10 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Black VQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,018
Thanks!

Originally posted by Kojiro_FtT
Good point about the power restriction.
That's cool that the VQ took that much power too.
The thing I was thinking about was that the VQ that failed at 538hp probably wasn't a 3.5L because there are probably displacement restrictions as well. The engine was probably a VQ30DET(or TT) at the largest, if not a VQ25DET(or TT). The VQ35DE should be capable of even more power.

If there wasn't a limit on displacement(and perhaps cylinders), I'd like to see Nissan use the VK V8, maybe destroked to 3.5L like the IRL engine. But hey, Nissan probably doesn't even use that engine for their Japan market cars, so there might be homologation or production restrictions too.*sigh*
Black VQ is offline  
Old 10-08-2002, 01:33 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Kojiro_FtT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,280
Re: Thanks!

Originally posted by Black VQ


The thing I was thinking about was that the VQ that failed at 538hp probably wasn't a 3.5L because there are probably displacement restrictions as well. The engine was probably a VQ30DET(or TT) at the largest, if not a VQ25DET(or TT). The VQ35DE should be capable of even more power.

If there wasn't a limit on displacement(and perhaps cylinders), I'd like to see Nissan use the VK V8, maybe destroked to 3.5L like the IRL engine. But hey, Nissan probably doesn't even use that engine for their Japan market cars, so there might be homologation or production restrictions too.*sigh*
The VK45DE in the Q45? Yeah, they have it in the Q45 in Japan as the Cima, except it is DD (VK45DD).

We'll have to wait and see what they do. So far the Skyline has 2.5, 3.0 and 3.5 liter engines in Japan (I think all are VQ), so who knows which one will make it into the GT-R.
Sorry I'm going off-topic.
Kojiro_FtT is offline  
Old 10-08-2002, 05:17 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Chinkzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,816
It's not the Horsepower that causes the block to crack of course, it's the pressure and temperature from the boost and compression. Given a block can take an unlimited amount of pressure and temperature, the limiting factor becomes the Crankshaft. Thus, when they say an engine is rated at a certain maximum horsepower potential, they're talking about how much hp and torque the crankshaft can take before it makes like a breadstick and shatters. As far as the comparison between 3.0 and 3.5 liter VQ's, while turboed, and not taking into account block strengths, they would probably be rated at the same max power despite the displacement difference. They both share essentially the same crankshaft, and even if the 3.5 makes more power under boost, the crank would snap at the same point as the 3.0. Get it?

Oh, and all the audi and vw turbo engines are aluminum block. Just cause it's aluminum doesn't mean you can't force feed it!
Chinkzilla is offline  
Old 10-08-2002, 05:29 PM
  #24  
Donating Maxima.org Member
Thread Starter
 
Tanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,267
Originally posted by Chinkzilla
It's not the Horsepower that causes the block to crack of course, it's the pressure and temperature from the boost and compression. Given a block can take an unlimited amount of pressure and temperature, the limiting factor becomes the Crankshaft.
So when is someone going to try a titanium block and crankshaft? I'm guessing titanium is strong and can take more heat and pressure than iron, but I wasn't that great at chemistry.
Tanman is offline  
Old 10-09-2002, 05:43 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Black VQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,018
Originally posted by Chinkzilla
It's not the Horsepower that causes the block to crack of course, it's the pressure and temperature from the boost and compression. Given a block can take an unlimited amount of pressure and temperature, the limiting factor becomes the Crankshaft.
I see your point about how the crank becomes a limiting factor, but you won't get that far if something else like the block fails first. Which it did.


As far as the comparison between 3.0 and 3.5 liter VQ's, while turboed, and not taking into account block strengths, they would probably be rated at the same max power despite the displacement difference. They both share essentially the same crankshaft, and even if the 3.5 makes more power under boost, the crank would snap at the same point as the 3.0. Get it?
Yeah, I "get it," but they wouldn't be rated at the same power in the first place, because the two cranks are different. The 3.5 crank has a longer throw/stroke than the 3.0 crank, not to mention the different bore sizes. Yes, both cranks might fail under the same boost pressure. However, the 3.5 will be making more power because of the greater displacement. Keep in mind that under normal aspiration, the 3.5L would already be making more power to begin with. With forced induction, the gains increase even more.

Oh, and all the audi and vw turbo engines are aluminum block. Just cause it's aluminum doesn't mean you can't force feed it!
And that's why Nissan has the SR20DET, and the various JDM VQxxDETs.

Don't mind me, I'm just e-thuggin'.
Black VQ is offline  
Old 10-11-2002, 10:12 AM
  #26  
Supporting Maxima.org Member
 
SkylineGTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 878
Originally posted by Tanman


So when is someone going to try a titanium block and crankshaft? I'm guessing titanium is strong and can take more heat and pressure than iron, but I wasn't that great at chemistry.
titanium isnt used for its strength, its used bc for its weight it is very strong, and in racing applications, they would rather use the slightly weaker but far lighter component than the strongest possible component. Forged steel is stronger than Titanium by like 10% or something around there but Titanium is roughly like 25% lighter, my numbers arent exact, but its that type of difference.
SkylineGTR is offline  
Old 10-11-2002, 03:01 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Black VQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,018
Exactly...

And that's one of the reasons why Nissan is going with the VQ.
Black VQ is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Maxboy23
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
51
09-15-2015 01:20 AM
Maxboy23
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
9
09-09-2015 10:37 AM
dcam0326
General Maxima Discussion
4
09-08-2015 11:02 PM
Maxboy23
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
6
09-04-2015 06:04 PM
coasterswim
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
1
09-01-2015 05:27 PM



Quick Reply: VQ TT might be in the future



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:20 PM.