VQ TT might be in the future
#1
VQ TT might be in the future
Just read the Superstreet article about the JGTC. They commented that "the factory Skylines were spotted with twin-turbo VQ motors" and "the people we spoke to at Nismo said the swap to the V-6 has nothing to do with the introduction of the 350Z or any other car (to the JGTC), but we're not so sure. The 2004 Skyline GT-R will be equipped with this motor, so it looks like Nismo is preparing for that release."
Personally, I'm not sure if I'd rather the 2004 GT-R have a V-8 versus a V-6 TT. Reliability vs upgradeability, hmmm.
What this means as far as Maximas are concerned, I don't think the VQ TT will fit in the Maxima, but it's nice to know that Nissan engineers can expand the VQ engine to work with twin turbos.
Personally, I'm not sure if I'd rather the 2004 GT-R have a V-8 versus a V-6 TT. Reliability vs upgradeability, hmmm.
What this means as far as Maximas are concerned, I don't think the VQ TT will fit in the Maxima, but it's nice to know that Nissan engineers can expand the VQ engine to work with twin turbos.
#3
Originally posted by MiniRX7
Hey nice info, i never knew that..
Oh yeah, Tanman thanks for the door panel removal instrauctions a while back!! Kudos..
ED
Hey nice info, i never knew that..
Oh yeah, Tanman thanks for the door panel removal instrauctions a while back!! Kudos..
ED
#4
Re: VQ TT might be in the future
Originally posted by Tanman
Just read the Superstreet article about the JGTC. They commented that "the factory Skylines were spotted with twin-turbo VQ motors" and "the people we spoke to at Nismo said the swap to the V-6 has nothing to do with the introduction of the 350Z or any other car (to the JGTC), but we're not so sure. The 2004 Skyline GT-R will be equipped with this motor, so it looks like Nismo is preparing for that release."
Personally, I'm not sure if I'd rather the 2004 GT-R have a V-8 versus a V-6 TT. Reliability vs upgradeability, hmmm.
What this means as far as Maximas are concerned, I don't think the VQ TT will fit in the Maxima, but it's nice to know that Nissan engineers can expand the VQ engine to work with twin turbos.
Just read the Superstreet article about the JGTC. They commented that "the factory Skylines were spotted with twin-turbo VQ motors" and "the people we spoke to at Nismo said the swap to the V-6 has nothing to do with the introduction of the 350Z or any other car (to the JGTC), but we're not so sure. The 2004 Skyline GT-R will be equipped with this motor, so it looks like Nismo is preparing for that release."
Personally, I'm not sure if I'd rather the 2004 GT-R have a V-8 versus a V-6 TT. Reliability vs upgradeability, hmmm.
What this means as far as Maximas are concerned, I don't think the VQ TT will fit in the Maxima, but it's nice to know that Nissan engineers can expand the VQ engine to work with twin turbos.
#7
Re: Re: Re: VQ TT might be in the future
Originally posted by Tanman
There's a VQ25 or VQ20? What cars are they used in currently?
There's a VQ25 or VQ20? What cars are they used in currently?
The Maxima QX in Europe comes with the VQ20DE(around 160hp, I think) standard, with the VQ30DE(193hp) as an option. The 2L is standard, because of the high fuel costs.The power numbers are for the A32 chassis. I'm not sure about the A33 version, since most of the QX pages aren't in English.
#8
Re: Re: Re: Re: VQ TT might be in the future
Originally posted by Black VQ
The VQ25DE is used in the Japanese Cefiro. There's a VQ25DD(direct injection) with almost 250hp available too. A "276hp" VQ25DET is used in the Stagea wagon. The VQ30DET is used in the Gloria(similar to the Infiniti M45), making..."276hp."
The Maxima QX in Europe comes with the VQ20DE(around 160hp, I think) standard, with the VQ30DE(193hp) as an option. The 2L is standard, because of the high fuel costs.The power numbers are for the A32 chassis. I'm not sure about the A33 version, since most of the QX pages aren't in English.
The VQ25DE is used in the Japanese Cefiro. There's a VQ25DD(direct injection) with almost 250hp available too. A "276hp" VQ25DET is used in the Stagea wagon. The VQ30DET is used in the Gloria(similar to the Infiniti M45), making..."276hp."
The Maxima QX in Europe comes with the VQ20DE(around 160hp, I think) standard, with the VQ30DE(193hp) as an option. The 2L is standard, because of the high fuel costs.The power numbers are for the A32 chassis. I'm not sure about the A33 version, since most of the QX pages aren't in English.
Why would they use a smaller engine with bigger turbos to achieve 500HP on the GT500 cars? Why not use a bigger engine (VQ30 or VQ35) with medium turbos to achieve the same thing? With the larger displacement, more torque, less lag from turbos, more reliable car.
#10
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: VQ TT might be in the future
Originally posted by Tanman
Are the VQ20 and VQ25 V-6s or 4 cylinder engines?
Why would they use a smaller engine with bigger turbos to achieve 500HP on the GT500 cars? Why not use a bigger engine (VQ30 or VQ35) with medium turbos to achieve the same thing? With the larger displacement, more torque, less lag from turbos, more reliable car.
Are the VQ20 and VQ25 V-6s or 4 cylinder engines?
Why would they use a smaller engine with bigger turbos to achieve 500HP on the GT500 cars? Why not use a bigger engine (VQ30 or VQ35) with medium turbos to achieve the same thing? With the larger displacement, more torque, less lag from turbos, more reliable car.
btw, blower-in in 6 day for me......
#12
I'm not sure, but my guess is that the VQ25DET and VQ20DET are cast iron blocks. The VQ35DE is aluminum, and will never stand up to the beating of a high boost turbo over long periods of time. That's why the R34 GT-R had a cast iron 2.5 liter. They do the iron blocks in smaller displacement so the weight doesn't get rediculous.
#13
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: VQ TT might be in the future
Originally posted by [maxi-overdose]
current skyline GTR has i6 2.6L engine with TT, I think the lag is pretty much eliminated when u drop two turbos in. I think the reason that they use a small 6cylinder is the weight. GTRs already have a very heavy tranny and to have proper weight balance, they need to give up something.
btw, blower-in in 6 day for me......
current skyline GTR has i6 2.6L engine with TT, I think the lag is pretty much eliminated when u drop two turbos in. I think the reason that they use a small 6cylinder is the weight. GTRs already have a very heavy tranny and to have proper weight balance, they need to give up something.
btw, blower-in in 6 day for me......
#14
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: VQ TT might be in the future
Originally posted by Tanman
Sweet! Have you decided on a pulley size yet?
Sweet! Have you decided on a pulley size yet?
#15
Originally posted by Kojiro_FtT
I'm not sure, but my guess is that the VQ25DET and VQ20DET are cast iron blocks. The VQ35DE is aluminum, and will never stand up to the beating of a high boost turbo over long periods of time. That's why the R34 GT-R had a cast iron 2.5 liter. They do the iron blocks in smaller displacement so the weight doesn't get rediculous.
I'm not sure, but my guess is that the VQ25DET and VQ20DET are cast iron blocks. The VQ35DE is aluminum, and will never stand up to the beating of a high boost turbo over long periods of time. That's why the R34 GT-R had a cast iron 2.5 liter. They do the iron blocks in smaller displacement so the weight doesn't get rediculous.
So, no matter how you look at it we could get a VQxxDET or VQxxDETT
Stereodude
#16
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: VQ TT might be in the future
Originally posted by [maxi-overdose]
yup.....3.33 and hope that I wont destroy the tranny. really gentle on first to second.
yup.....3.33 and hope that I wont destroy the tranny. really gentle on first to second.
Don't worry too much about the tranny (like I can talk.. hehe), just don't race too much. Also, don't manually shift the auto tranny. I think I destroyed my last car by manually shifting it.
#17
Originally posted by Kojiro_FtT
I'm not sure, but my guess is that the VQ25DET and VQ20DET are cast iron blocks. The VQ35DE is aluminum, and will never stand up to the beating of a high boost turbo over long periods of time. That's why the R34 GT-R had a cast iron 2.5 liter. They do the iron blocks in smaller displacement so the weight doesn't get rediculous.
I'm not sure, but my guess is that the VQ25DET and VQ20DET are cast iron blocks. The VQ35DE is aluminum, and will never stand up to the beating of a high boost turbo over long periods of time. That's why the R34 GT-R had a cast iron 2.5 liter. They do the iron blocks in smaller displacement so the weight doesn't get rediculous.
Originally posted by Tanman
Are the VQ20 and VQ25 V-6s or 4 cylinder engines?
Why would they use a smaller engine with bigger turbos to achieve 500HP on the GT500 cars? Why not use a bigger engine (VQ30 or VQ35) with medium turbos to achieve the same thing? With the larger displacement, more torque, less lag from turbos, more reliable car.
Are the VQ20 and VQ25 V-6s or 4 cylinder engines?
Why would they use a smaller engine with bigger turbos to achieve 500HP on the GT500 cars? Why not use a bigger engine (VQ30 or VQ35) with medium turbos to achieve the same thing? With the larger displacement, more torque, less lag from turbos, more reliable car.
And on another note, TRD uses the 3SGTE(MR2 Turbo and Celica All-Trac engine) 4-banger for the JGTC Supra. Why? The same reason Nissan tried out the VQ:
1. The engine weighs less.
2. The engine is shorter and can be mounted farther back for better weight distribution and handling. The drivers of the R34 reported that handling was more neutral and turn-in was greatly improved.
3. With the power class restrictions(GT-R's class has a maximum of 500hp), it doesn't matter what the ultimate capability of the engine is. Why use a bigger, heavier engine while a smaller one can make the same power? The 3SGTE and the VQ still made enough power for their classes, while still providing the above advantages.
#18
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: VQ TT might be in the future
Originally posted by Tanman
Good choice .
Don't worry too much about the tranny (like I can talk.. hehe), just don't race too much. Also, don't manually shift the auto tranny. I think I destroyed my last car by manually shifting it.
Good choice .
Don't worry too much about the tranny (like I can talk.. hehe), just don't race too much. Also, don't manually shift the auto tranny. I think I destroyed my last car by manually shifting it.
#19
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: VQ TT might be in the future
Originally posted by [maxi-overdose]
thx.....yes, no stop light racing for me. wish me luck.
thx.....yes, no stop light racing for me. wish me luck.
#20
Originally posted by Black VQ
And on another note, TRD uses the 3SGTE(MR2 Turbo and Celica All-Trac engine) 4-banger for the JGTC Supra. Why? The same reason Nissan tried out the VQ:
1. The engine weighs less.
2. The engine is shorter and can be mounted farther back for better weight distribution and handling. The drivers of the R34 reported that handling was more neutral and turn-in was greatly improved.
3. With the power class restrictions(GT-R's class has a maximum of 500hp), it doesn't matter what the ultimate capability of the engine is. Why use a bigger, heavier engine while a smaller one can make the same power? The 3SGTE and the VQ still made enough power for their classes, while still providing the above advantages.
And on another note, TRD uses the 3SGTE(MR2 Turbo and Celica All-Trac engine) 4-banger for the JGTC Supra. Why? The same reason Nissan tried out the VQ:
1. The engine weighs less.
2. The engine is shorter and can be mounted farther back for better weight distribution and handling. The drivers of the R34 reported that handling was more neutral and turn-in was greatly improved.
3. With the power class restrictions(GT-R's class has a maximum of 500hp), it doesn't matter what the ultimate capability of the engine is. Why use a bigger, heavier engine while a smaller one can make the same power? The 3SGTE and the VQ still made enough power for their classes, while still providing the above advantages.
That's cool that the VQ took that much power too.
#21
Thanks!
Originally posted by Kojiro_FtT
Good point about the power restriction.
That's cool that the VQ took that much power too.
Good point about the power restriction.
That's cool that the VQ took that much power too.
If there wasn't a limit on displacement(and perhaps cylinders), I'd like to see Nissan use the VK V8, maybe destroked to 3.5L like the IRL engine. But hey, Nissan probably doesn't even use that engine for their Japan market cars, so there might be homologation or production restrictions too.*sigh*
#22
Re: Thanks!
Originally posted by Black VQ
The thing I was thinking about was that the VQ that failed at 538hp probably wasn't a 3.5L because there are probably displacement restrictions as well. The engine was probably a VQ30DET(or TT) at the largest, if not a VQ25DET(or TT). The VQ35DE should be capable of even more power.
If there wasn't a limit on displacement(and perhaps cylinders), I'd like to see Nissan use the VK V8, maybe destroked to 3.5L like the IRL engine. But hey, Nissan probably doesn't even use that engine for their Japan market cars, so there might be homologation or production restrictions too.*sigh*
The thing I was thinking about was that the VQ that failed at 538hp probably wasn't a 3.5L because there are probably displacement restrictions as well. The engine was probably a VQ30DET(or TT) at the largest, if not a VQ25DET(or TT). The VQ35DE should be capable of even more power.
If there wasn't a limit on displacement(and perhaps cylinders), I'd like to see Nissan use the VK V8, maybe destroked to 3.5L like the IRL engine. But hey, Nissan probably doesn't even use that engine for their Japan market cars, so there might be homologation or production restrictions too.*sigh*
We'll have to wait and see what they do. So far the Skyline has 2.5, 3.0 and 3.5 liter engines in Japan (I think all are VQ), so who knows which one will make it into the GT-R.
Sorry I'm going off-topic.
#23
It's not the Horsepower that causes the block to crack of course, it's the pressure and temperature from the boost and compression. Given a block can take an unlimited amount of pressure and temperature, the limiting factor becomes the Crankshaft. Thus, when they say an engine is rated at a certain maximum horsepower potential, they're talking about how much hp and torque the crankshaft can take before it makes like a breadstick and shatters. As far as the comparison between 3.0 and 3.5 liter VQ's, while turboed, and not taking into account block strengths, they would probably be rated at the same max power despite the displacement difference. They both share essentially the same crankshaft, and even if the 3.5 makes more power under boost, the crank would snap at the same point as the 3.0. Get it?
Oh, and all the audi and vw turbo engines are aluminum block. Just cause it's aluminum doesn't mean you can't force feed it!
Oh, and all the audi and vw turbo engines are aluminum block. Just cause it's aluminum doesn't mean you can't force feed it!
#24
Originally posted by Chinkzilla
It's not the Horsepower that causes the block to crack of course, it's the pressure and temperature from the boost and compression. Given a block can take an unlimited amount of pressure and temperature, the limiting factor becomes the Crankshaft.
It's not the Horsepower that causes the block to crack of course, it's the pressure and temperature from the boost and compression. Given a block can take an unlimited amount of pressure and temperature, the limiting factor becomes the Crankshaft.
#25
Originally posted by Chinkzilla
It's not the Horsepower that causes the block to crack of course, it's the pressure and temperature from the boost and compression. Given a block can take an unlimited amount of pressure and temperature, the limiting factor becomes the Crankshaft.
It's not the Horsepower that causes the block to crack of course, it's the pressure and temperature from the boost and compression. Given a block can take an unlimited amount of pressure and temperature, the limiting factor becomes the Crankshaft.
As far as the comparison between 3.0 and 3.5 liter VQ's, while turboed, and not taking into account block strengths, they would probably be rated at the same max power despite the displacement difference. They both share essentially the same crankshaft, and even if the 3.5 makes more power under boost, the crank would snap at the same point as the 3.0. Get it?
Oh, and all the audi and vw turbo engines are aluminum block. Just cause it's aluminum doesn't mean you can't force feed it!
Don't mind me, I'm just e-thuggin'.
#26
Originally posted by Tanman
So when is someone going to try a titanium block and crankshaft? I'm guessing titanium is strong and can take more heat and pressure than iron, but I wasn't that great at chemistry.
So when is someone going to try a titanium block and crankshaft? I'm guessing titanium is strong and can take more heat and pressure than iron, but I wasn't that great at chemistry.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
coasterswim
8th Generation Maxima (2016-)
1
09-01-2015 05:27 PM