5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

New v2OBX headers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 18, 2009 | 09:11 AM
  #761  
diverdown3's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 290
Originally Posted by CMax03
That'S weird that you never mentioned the grinding of the rear motor mount.....??? It's no where close to perfect fit....the Xmember will take out your flex section soon or later cause it's gonna move around even just a little, especially during accelerating!
This aspect of the discussion leaves me wondering if one of the two following situations has taken/is taking place
  1. The OBX header welding jig/fixture has been improved and therefore grinding is no longer necessary.
  2. There is a variance in OBX header jigs/fixtures causing varying installation experiences.
I think #2 is unlikely since the most recent installation experience contribution consistantly did not require grinding in three (3) separate installs.
Old May 18, 2009 | 11:18 AM
  #762  
C-Young's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 212
From: Lawton, OK
Originally Posted by TJ_Max
If it were not for that 02 sensor issue, this would be a completey DIY job. If you get sims (which is more money spent that isnt even necessary, because the cost of a shop relocating a bung is cheaper than 2 02 sims, or a double sim)...
No doubt... Just got this done over the weekend in preparation for June 6th install. $25 at my local muffler shop for the rear primary plug/weld and drilling/installing a new O2 sensor bung 90 degrees to the right or passenger side.

Will I still need to extend the rear primary now since I'm not going to put the rear primary in one of the secondaries?

Good info here fellas...
Old May 18, 2009 | 11:24 AM
  #763  
Phantom-V's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 430
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by C-Young
No doubt... Just got this done over the weekend in preparation for June 6th install. $25 at my local muffler shop for the rear primary plug/weld and drilling/installing a new O2 sensor bung 90 degrees to the right or passenger side.

Will I still need to extend the rear primary now since I'm not going to put the rear primary in one of the secondaries?

Good info here fellas...

Did you get this done before or after you had the headers installed? i have mine just hanging with the SES light on still. haven't extended my 02 sensor yet.

Will this crack your headers or make them weaker?
Old May 18, 2009 | 11:38 AM
  #764  
C-Young's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 212
From: Lawton, OK
Originally Posted by Phantom-V
Did you get this done before or after you had the headers installed? i have mine just hanging with the SES light on still. haven't extended my 02 sensor yet.

Will this crack your headers or make them weaker?
I'm set up to install on the 6th of June so I just got this done over the weekend.

I don't think it should affect the header much since the old bung was plugged with an O2 sensor plug from Summit. It's like it was never there and instead theres a thick ****. The drill and weld of the new O2 sensor bung was clean so I would say it holds up.

I don't think it should be a problem... guess only time will tell.
Old May 18, 2009 | 11:45 AM
  #765  
Kevlo911's Avatar
Kevlo for President
iTrader: (36)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 35,755
From: Lake Orion, MI
TJ, did you add an EGR bung to the 4th gen install?
Old May 18, 2009 | 11:50 AM
  #766  
Phantom-V's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 430
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by C-Young
I'm set up to install on the 6th of June so I just got this done over the weekend.

I don't think it should affect the header much since the old bung was plugged with an O2 sensor plug from Summit. It's like it was never there and instead theres a thick ****. The drill and weld of the new O2 sensor bung was clean so I would say it holds up.

I don't think it should be a problem... guess only time will tell.

I see, well i really do hope this works out. Sounds cheaper. You would just have to get this done before installation. Thanks for the inpute.
Old May 18, 2009 | 11:55 AM
  #767  
C-Young's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 212
From: Lawton, OK
Originally Posted by Phantom-V
I see, well i really do hope this works out. Sounds cheaper. You would just have to get this done before installation. Thanks for the inpute.
No prob bro...

Yeah i've had these headers in the closet for over 2 months just gathering up as much info as possible before installing em.

After numerous installers pointing out that rear primary location problem I wanted to make sure I had this taken care of before puttin my machine on the lift.
Old May 18, 2009 | 12:26 PM
  #768  
TJ_Max's Avatar
Paradox Systems Vendor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,436
Originally Posted by CMax03
That'S weird that you never mentioned the grinding of the rear motor mount.....??? It's no where close to perfect fit....the Xmember will take out your flex section soon or later cause it's gonna move around even just a little, especially during accelerating!
That's why I mentioned giving throttle at idle to check for any clearance issues, and I also mentioned that when 2 of the guys came back for work months down the line, nothing was damaged, scratched, or bent at all. I put the xmember up last and it slid right by the headers and bolts right up.

Maybe the improved the design? These 3 installs were done in the past 2-3 months, headers bought within that time frame.

Originally Posted by diverdown3
This aspect of the discussion leaves me wondering if one of the two following situations has taken/is taking place
  1. The OBX header welding jig/fixture has been improved and therefore grinding is no longer necessary.
  2. There is a variance in OBX header jigs/fixtures causing varying installation experiences.
I think #2 is unlikely since the most recent installation experience contribution consistantly did not require grinding in three (3) separate installs.
I'm gonna say Number 1 is probably true.

Originally Posted by C-Young
No doubt... Just got this done over the weekend in preparation for June 6th install. $25 at my local muffler shop for the rear primary plug/weld and drilling/installing a new O2 sensor bung 90 degrees to the right or passenger side.

Will I still need to extend the rear primary now since I'm not going to put the rear primary in one of the secondaries?

Good info here fellas...
You're well on your way man. Good stuff. Post pics if you can have the location so that I can have all my customers do this prior to install.

Originally Posted by Kevlo911
TJ, did you add an EGR bung to the 4th gen install?
Funny that you should mention that since I never did a 4th gen, but I did a 2000 who eliminated the EGR. He didnt care about the CEL, didnt add a bung, bro. Installation on this for a 4th gen would probably mean the rear section has to be fabbed up. I believe its too short and wouldn't reach the cat.
Old May 18, 2009 | 01:39 PM
  #769  
C-Young's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 212
From: Lawton, OK
In reference to extending the O2 sensor wires... you think this product would work?

May be a little more clean and easy...

http://passwordjdm.com/PasswordJDM-O...P1767C320.aspx

or this one...

http://www.2kracing.com/Product/2722.html

Last edited by C-Young; May 18, 2009 at 01:49 PM.
Old May 18, 2009 | 02:23 PM
  #770  
diverdown3's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 290
Originally Posted by C-Young
In reference to extending the O2 sensor wires... you think this product would work?

May be a little more clean and easy...

http://passwordjdm.com/PasswordJDM-O...P1767C320.aspx

or this one...

http://www.2kracing.com/Product/2722.html
I'm liking the looks of those. Definitely easier. I'm not big on soldering.
Old May 18, 2009 | 08:06 PM
  #771  
MoncefA33's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,982
Originally Posted by C-Young
In reference to extending the O2 sensor wires... you think this product would work?

May be a little more clean and easy...

http://passwordjdm.com/PasswordJDM-O...P1767C320.aspx

or this one...

http://www.2kracing.com/Product/2722.html
Sounds like a good idea, but will they work on VQ30/35s?
Old May 18, 2009 | 08:08 PM
  #772  
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,825
I was kinda wondering the same thing... i wouldnt think they were universal??? unless all connectors for o2 sensors are alike then i can see how its universal
Old May 18, 2009 | 08:12 PM
  #773  
MoncefA33's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,982
I wouldn't think they'd be universal. That second link showed them being used on '02-'05 SpecV's or something.

I'd bet that on different cars the O2 plugs are pinned differently.
Old May 18, 2009 | 08:31 PM
  #774  
dwade27's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 112
From: Columbus, GA
i just emailed password jdm to see if it was a universal plug or not. Now time to sit and wait for them to replay.
Old May 19, 2009 | 09:18 PM
  #775  
dwade27's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 112
From: Columbus, GA
Originally Posted by dwade27
i just emailed password jdm to see if it was a universal plug or not. Now time to sit and wait for them to replay.
i just got a reply back and all they could say is that they should work if the connectors are the same
Old May 20, 2009 | 09:22 AM
  #776  
C-Young's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 212
From: Lawton, OK
Originally Posted by dwade27
i just got a reply back and all they could say is that they should work if the connectors are the same
Wow... that's like the weather man saying it may or may not rain today. I guess we just need to search and find out if O2 sensor wires and connections are universal... at least within Nissan or within 00-03 Nissans. I'll get on it.

I'll post pics of the rear manifold O2 sensor relocation for you guys to see this weekend.

In the meantime I'll see what I can find on the wire extension deal.
Old May 20, 2009 | 09:49 AM
  #777  
C-Young's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 212
From: Lawton, OK
Found this O2 extension harness... it says universal:
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...art=CEI-109002

This one has connectors that look more like ours:
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku

What do you guys think? The connectors look strange to me... Maybe you guys know more than I do about it though.

Last edited by C-Young; May 20, 2009 at 09:53 AM.
Old May 20, 2009 | 09:52 AM
  #778  
pmohr's Avatar
No more Maximas...
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 14,329
From: Oak Ridge, TN
Originally Posted by C-Young
Found this O2 extension harness... it says universal.

http://store.summitracing.com/partde...art=CEI-109002

What do you guys think? The connectors look strange to me... Maybe you guys know more than I do about it though.
Originally Posted by Summit
Oxygen Sensor Extension Harness, 24 in., 1-Terminal Round Connector,
Good luck with that.

You could always check with Dave B, a while back he was looking for O2 sensors that are compatible with and longer than the stock Maxima units.
Old May 20, 2009 | 10:13 AM
  #779  
dwade27's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 112
From: Columbus, GA
whose gonna be the ginea pig to try one of them ?
Old May 20, 2009 | 10:43 AM
  #780  
C-Young's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 212
From: Lawton, OK
Originally Posted by pmohr
Good luck with that.
Ok... how about this one? Square connector...
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku

Originally Posted by dwade27
whose gonna be the ginea pig to try one of them ?
I guess I will... Im all about not splicing and cutting wires.

Last edited by C-Young; May 20, 2009 at 10:46 AM.
Old May 20, 2009 | 10:49 AM
  #781  
pmohr's Avatar
No more Maximas...
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 14,329
From: Oak Ridge, TN
Originally Posted by C-Young
Ok... how about this one? Square connector...
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku



I guess I will... Im all about not splicing and cutting wires.
That link is broken.
Old May 20, 2009 | 10:58 AM
  #782  
C-Young's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 212
From: Lawton, OK
Originally Posted by pmohr
That link is broken.
Weird... try the one in my post a few more down.

Scratch that... here's the link:
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku
Old May 20, 2009 | 11:01 AM
  #783  
pmohr's Avatar
No more Maximas...
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 14,329
From: Oak Ridge, TN
Originally Posted by C-Young
Weird... try the one in my post a few more down.
Ah, I see. If you just copy and paste the text, long links don't work; vbulletin puts an ellipses in there to shorten it up.

From a quick look and memory, it uses a different locking tab and pin spacing/size seems to be different.
Old May 20, 2009 | 11:11 AM
  #784  
C-Young's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 212
From: Lawton, OK
Originally Posted by MoncefA33
Sounds like a good idea, but will they work on VQ30/35s?
I emailed Nissan Tech Support today to find out if the connectors on a 2.5 are the same for a 3.5. If so... I think these will work:
http://www.2kracing.com/Product/2722.html
Old May 20, 2009 | 09:59 PM
  #785  
tookrzy4u192's Avatar
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7
From: Oklahoma City
i'm looking into getting these.. hopefully soon
Old May 21, 2009 | 09:45 PM
  #786  
throttlehappy46's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 217
From: North Coast NSW, Australia
I am going to pipe in here about AFR tuning based on what I read from the last few pages.

There is no 'perfect' AFR that works on every engine or even the same AFR that works on the same series engine but in a different car.

However, it is easier to use LAMBDA or Stoich mixture readings to measure an accurate AFR goal for a base tune. Then adjust the engine from that point to obtain what is known in the industry as BMT, or Best Mean Torque. This involves playing with ignition timing and fuel settings around 10% either side and measuring wheel torque(crank torque is better on an engine dyno!!) until you find a 'range' that is optimal at that rpm range. For example, you may find than 30 degrees of advance at 4000rpm with 12.2 gives x amount of torque but 27 degrees of advance at 12.9 has a similiar torque figure. I would be aiming for the one that uses the least amount of fuel for fuel economy(same amount of torque but less fuel volume means better fuel economy) but giving it a small buffer zone so would be hitting around 12.4 with 27 degrees advance which should allow for a good detonation free engine

Most modern engines will happily run quite lean if the 3D timing map is suitable. Then when you have your WOT timing and fuel tables sorted, the part throttle tables are even more exciting with fuel tables often under control of the O2 sensor but then suddenly dropping out of closed loop A smooth transition makes the engine feel smoother!

This is of course dependant on what fuel your using and how accurately you can control your high and low octane fuel/timing maps, along with KS sensitivity etc.
Old May 22, 2009 | 02:11 PM
  #787  
mist max2000's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,071
Originally Posted by throttlehappy46
I am going to pipe in here about AFR tuning based on what I read from the last few pages.

There is no 'perfect' AFR that works on every engine or even the same AFR that works on the same series engine but in a different car.

However, it is easier to use LAMBDA or Stoich mixture readings to measure an accurate AFR goal for a base tune. Then adjust the engine from that point to obtain what is known in the industry as BMT, or Best Mean Torque. This involves playing with ignition timing and fuel settings around 10% either side and measuring wheel torque(crank torque is better on an engine dyno!!) until you find a 'range' that is optimal at that rpm range. For example, you may find than 30 degrees of advance at 4000rpm with 12.2 gives x amount of torque but 27 degrees of advance at 12.9 has a similiar torque figure. I would be aiming for the one that uses the least amount of fuel for fuel economy(same amount of torque but less fuel volume means better fuel economy) but giving it a small buffer zone so would be hitting around 12.4 with 27 degrees advance which should allow for a good detonation free engine

Most modern engines will happily run quite lean if the 3D timing map is suitable. Then when you have your WOT timing and fuel tables sorted, the part throttle tables are even more exciting with fuel tables often under control of the O2 sensor but then suddenly dropping out of closed loop A smooth transition makes the engine feel smoother!

This is of course dependant on what fuel your using and how accurately you can control your high and low octane fuel/timing maps, along with KS sensitivity etc.
you wanna come to america and tune my car?? lol... very well said...
Old May 22, 2009 | 02:27 PM
  #788  
C-Young's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 212
From: Lawton, OK
Originally Posted by mist max2000
you wanna come to america and tune my car?? lol... very well said...
Yeah... I was wondering if his post was in some foreign language or something
Old May 23, 2009 | 08:01 AM
  #789  
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,825
???
Old May 23, 2009 | 08:51 AM
  #790  
diverdown3's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 290
Originally Posted by throttlehappy46
However, it is easier to use LAMBDA or Stoich mixture readings to measure an accurate AFR goal for a base tune.
An explanation of Throttle's terms is available here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air-fuel_ratio

Last edited by diverdown3; May 23, 2009 at 09:00 AM.
Old May 23, 2009 | 10:56 AM
  #791  
Grand_hustle17's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,825
thats just a lil bit too much formula for me, i like math and all but, ill leave all that to the pro's
Old May 23, 2009 | 10:36 PM
  #792  
throttlehappy46's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 217
From: North Coast NSW, Australia
To summarise: Text book or light reading material is a good starter but experience is better Especially if you want fuel economy and power from the 'same' tune.
Old May 26, 2009 | 09:52 AM
  #793  
C-Young's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 212
From: Lawton, OK
In case some wanted to see the rear manifold O2 sensor relocation here you go:









Relocating O2 Sensor = $25
Ease of Install after relocation = priceless
Old May 26, 2009 | 10:24 AM
  #794  
MoncefA33's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,982
That's for the rear primary so you don't have to extend/modify the O2 sensor wiring, correct?
Old May 26, 2009 | 10:50 AM
  #795  
C-Young's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 212
From: Lawton, OK
Originally Posted by MoncefA33
That's for the rear primary so you don't have to extend/modify the O2 sensor wiring, correct?
Well... Its more so you don't have to worry about fitting that O2 sensor in the tiny, tiny space between the manifold and the firewall. I've seen pics where the O2 sensor actually rubs against the wall and under hard acceleration or bump in the road it could very well damage the sensor or break it off.

This will give me a lot more room to work with in that cramped rear section of the engine compartment.

Hearing it from guys that have installed these headers numerous times... its a must pre-install mod.
Old May 26, 2009 | 10:51 AM
  #796  
dwade27's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 112
From: Columbus, GA
Originally Posted by C-Young
I emailed Nissan Tech Support today to find out if the connectors on a 2.5 are the same for a 3.5. If so... I think these will work:
http://www.2kracing.com/Product/2722.html
did you ever find out if the extender will work?
Old May 26, 2009 | 11:01 AM
  #797  
MoncefA33's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,982
Originally Posted by C-Young
Well... Its more so you don't have to worry about fitting that O2 sensor in the tiny, tiny space between the manifold and the firewall. I've seen pics where the O2 sensor actually rubs against the wall and under hard acceleration or bump in the road it could very well damage the sensor or break it off.

This will give me a lot more room to work with in that cramped rear section of the engine compartment.

Hearing it from guys that have installed these headers numerous times... its a must pre-install mod.
Will do, I'll add that to my prep list.

Edit: Are there any bungs you'd need to fill/block that were already welded into the headers?

Last edited by MoncefA33; May 26, 2009 at 11:11 AM.
Old May 26, 2009 | 11:04 AM
  #798  
C-Young's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 212
From: Lawton, OK
Originally Posted by dwade27
did you ever find out if the extender will work?
They never got back to me. I posted a thread in the main section and it seemed that most didn;t think the connectors looked the same.

So while that's not a definite answer it's somewhat of a good indicator that those wouldn't work.

The search continues...
Old May 26, 2009 | 07:24 PM
  #799  
CMax03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,587
From: Houston, Tx
Originally Posted by dwade27
did you ever find out if the extender will work?
The extender we tried on Maximo's OBX header install didn't prevent the CEL. But some extender are designed better than others! I would get the ones with only 1 or 2 holes no more! You want it to sniff but a restricted sniff! Unsure what brand...but did see the extenders work on a SRT-4 Neon! It had only one hole to sniff thru! Maybe our system on the Maxima are more accurate!!!
Old May 26, 2009 | 07:27 PM
  #800  
pmohr's Avatar
No more Maximas...
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 14,329
From: Oak Ridge, TN
Originally Posted by CMax03
The extender we tried on Maximo's OBX header install didn't prevent the CEL. But some extender are designed better than others! I would get the ones with only 1 or 2 holes no more! You want it to sniff but a restricted sniff! Unsure what brand...but did see the extenders work on a SRT-4 Neon! It had only one hole to sniff thru! Maybe our system on the Maxima are more accurate!!!
Err...what?

Are you referring to a spark plug anti-fouler?

He's referring to an O2 sensor harness extension, if you read the post he quoted...



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:44 PM.