5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003) Learn more about the 5th Generation Maxima, including the VQ30DE-K and VQ35DE engines.

2002 Maxima Berk Intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 1, 2011 | 07:18 AM
  #161  
Eirik's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 496
From: Boise, ID
So, anyway, I was reading Road & Track this month and found the definitive answer for which intake solution works best: KnightXYZPDQ and Sparks's, na klar.



That's from the new Hennessey Venom GT, a haxx0red Lotus Exige with the LS2 Corvette "small"-block V8 boosted to 1200 horsepower. Now, can you see what is feeding that 6.whatever liter engine? Yeah, two cone filters directly attached to short pipes that run straight into the twin intake manifolds. I'm guessing that welded on bit with the cable running to it is part of the EGR and the black metal with the aluminum bands is the MAF.

So this is a street car, that happens to be capable of 270 MPH, but it's still a street car. So if that intake solution is good enough for Mr. Hennessey, surely it's ideal for our equally huge V8-oh, that's not right... Ideal for our half-the-displacement, two-fewer-cylinder, naturally-aspirated VQ35DEs?
Old Feb 1, 2011 | 07:25 AM
  #162  
Rochester's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
G37 air intake. Twice the fun. (Two MAF's? Ug.)

Old Feb 1, 2011 | 09:34 AM
  #163  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Some G35's 350z's also had 2 MAF's, but now this thread is just out of hand.
Old Feb 1, 2011 | 09:43 AM
  #164  
Eirik's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 496
From: Boise, ID
Problem solved, then.
Old Feb 2, 2011 | 08:39 AM
  #165  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
wat
Old Feb 2, 2011 | 08:50 AM
  #166  
sparks03max's Avatar
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
Originally Posted by Rochester
G37 air intake. Twice the fun. (Two MAF's? Ug
Nissan has finally jumped on the twin plenum bandwagon. It's by far the best design for a V6 behind ITBs as proven time and again on other platforms. Wish I had the resources and tuning capability to build one... Length tuned, 1 degree tapered runners formed out of sheet metal and ending with a venturi stack into a separate plenum for each bank with a single 60-70MM TB and intake for each. For now I'll just have to settle for hoping this ghetto sheet metal SSIM project works out.
Old Feb 2, 2011 | 09:36 AM
  #167  
nismopc's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,806
From: Lewis Center, OH
Originally Posted by Eirik
Yeah, two cone filters directly attached to short pipes that run straight into the twin intake manifolds.
What you neglected to state was that there are two massive turbines between that SRI and the manifolds.

Yes you did stated boosted though.
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 12:37 PM
  #168  
essential1's Avatar
My axles cry for mercy...
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 0
From: Boynton Beach, FL
Originally Posted by Eirik
So, anyway, I was reading Road & Track this month and found the definitive answer for which intake solution works best: KnightXYZPDQ and Sparks's, na klar.

That's from the new Hennessey Venom GT, a haxx0red Lotus Exige with the LS2 Corvette "small"-block V8 boosted to 1200 horsepower. Now, can you see what is feeding that 6.whatever liter engine? Yeah, two cone filters directly attached to short pipes that run straight into the twin intake manifolds. I'm guessing that welded on bit with the cable running to it is part of the EGR and the black metal with the aluminum bands is the MAF.

So this is a street car, that happens to be capable of 270 MPH, but it's still a street car. So if that intake solution is good enough for Mr. Hennessey, surely it's ideal for our equally huge V8-oh, that's not right... Ideal for our half-the-displacement, two-fewer-cylinder, naturally-aspirated VQ35DEs?
Please tell me that you see the big azz turbos that these "pipes" run too. Completely different car, completely different setup, completely different purpose. And no, that is not an EGR...

Originally Posted by sparks03max
Nissan has finally jumped on the twin plenum bandwagon. It's by far the best design for a V6 behind ITBs as proven time and again on other platforms. Wish I had the resources and tuning capability to build one... Length tuned, 1 degree tapered runners formed out of sheet metal and ending with a venturi stack into a separate plenum for each bank with a single 60-70MM TB and intake for each. For now I'll just have to settle for hoping this ghetto sheet metal SSIM project works out.
Didnt they have twin plenums on the 300zx/j30 already? And also, nissan did have ITBs on a couple factory vehicles. Along with some other manufacturers a while back.
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 12:39 PM
  #169  
SEmy2K2go's Avatar
Go BUCKS!!!
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 9,557
From: Delaware, OH-IO
Wow, these intake threads are still showing up all these years later
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 12:46 PM
  #170  
Rochester's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,296
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by SEmy2K2go
Wow, these intake threads are still showing up all these years later
This gives you cause to head-bang? Really?

Intake mods are affordable, accessible, and seemingly straight forward enough for even the most feeble minded enthusiasts to wrap their brains around, even if they don't always get it right.

I'd be surprised if intake threads suddenly stopped showing up. Enjoy it, or look away until the Electric Maxima hits the streets.
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 12:48 PM
  #171  
SEmy2K2go's Avatar
Go BUCKS!!!
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 9,557
From: Delaware, OH-IO
Originally Posted by Rochester
This gives you cause to head-bang? Really?

Intake mods are affordable, accessible, and seemingly straight forward enough for even the most feeble minded enthusiasts to wrap their brains around, even if they don't always get it right.

I'd be surprised if intake threads suddenly stopped showing up. Enjoy it, or look away until the Electric Maxima hits the streets.
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 01:27 PM
  #172  
NmexMAX's Avatar
dot dot dot ...
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 34,576
From: Santa Fe, NM
Seems as if lately they have gotten a bit more depth and breadth in the fact that we are discussing it in far more detail these days and including additional dynamics such as intake manifold design, and electronics. Of course there are now repeatable data concerning AFR and resonance effects on whp. But really, yes the newbie's still ask the same 'ol elementary intake question. And then the cool kids come in and shed some much needed technical light on it such as sparks, essential, and a few others.
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 03:36 PM
  #173  
sparks03max's Avatar
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
Originally Posted by Rochester
This gives you cause to head-bang? Really?

Intake mods are affordable, accessible, and seemingly straight forward enough for even the most feeble minded enthusiasts to wrap their brains around, even if they don't always get it right.

I'd be surprised if intake threads suddenly stopped showing up. Enjoy it, or look away until the Electric Maxima hits the streets.
Not all intake mods are for the feeble minded



Old Feb 3, 2011 | 03:50 PM
  #174  
nismopc's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,806
From: Lewis Center, OH
Originally Posted by sparks03max
Nice holder for six candles. Would look great on my coffee table



Can't wait to see the end results...
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 03:54 PM
  #175  
essential1's Avatar
My axles cry for mercy...
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 0
From: Boynton Beach, FL
Originally Posted by sparks03max
Not all intake mods are for the feeble minded


intake manifold /= SRI or CAI

This Thread = 2 advanced for j00.

Your basic IM project is nothing compared to the power made by bolting on the Berk intake. Get out or ban.

























Old Feb 3, 2011 | 03:56 PM
  #176  
sparks03max's Avatar
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
Originally Posted by essential1
intake manifold /= SRI or CAI

This Thread = 2 advanced for j00.

Your basic IM project is nothing compared to the power made by bolting on the Berk intake. Get out or ban.
Hey it's always possible my IM project will lose more power than a Injen intake
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 04:09 PM
  #177  
essential1's Avatar
My axles cry for mercy...
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 0
From: Boynton Beach, FL
Originally Posted by sparks03max
Hey it's always possible my IM project will lose more power than a Injen intake
true... lol. we'll see.
Old Feb 4, 2011 | 09:23 AM
  #178  
Eirik's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 496
From: Boise, ID
Originally Posted by essential1
Please tell me that you see the big azz turbos that these "pipes" run too. Completely different car, completely different setup, completely different purpose.
I didn't think one had to be an English major to detect sarcasm.
Old Feb 4, 2011 | 11:15 AM
  #179  
essential1's Avatar
My axles cry for mercy...
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 0
From: Boynton Beach, FL
Originally Posted by Eirik
I didn't think one had to be an English major to detect sarcasm.
That's my bad. Its hard to detect sarcasm on the org when you still have threads seriously asking about electric superchargers and what not. I gotta add you to the list of sarcastic members along with the likes of Rochester, Moncef, datdude, etc.
Old Feb 5, 2011 | 12:31 AM
  #180  
CMax03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,587
From: Houston, Tx
Originally Posted by sparks03max
Not all intake mods are for the feeble minded



So what were you doing here? Cleaning up the sharp edges and cast flashings and smoothing out the intake runner entrances? Looks like the VIAS shelve has been deleted completely....??? Sparks you know anyone who's extrudehoned one of our 3.5 intakes?
Old Feb 5, 2011 | 07:21 AM
  #181  
sparks03max's Avatar
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
Originally Posted by CMax03
So what were you doing here? Cleaning up the sharp edges and cast flashings and smoothing out the intake runner entrances? Looks like the VIAS shelve has been deleted completely....??? Sparks you know anyone who's extrudehoned one of our 3.5 intakes?
Cut off the stock plenum to give those leftmost runners room to breathe and increase the volume with a new plenum, plus deleting the shelf, giving myself room to polish the runners and the venturi entrances, and a new elbow to go with it. Little more progress now.


Last edited by sparks03max; Feb 5, 2011 at 07:24 AM.
Old Feb 5, 2011 | 07:40 AM
  #182  
sparks03max's Avatar
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
On extrude honing, I believe I read an old thread (2007ish) in which a 4th gen person had a fully stock 02VI extrude honed and didn't get amazing results. I think extrude honing would be great if your manifold is already optimal for your application (plenum size, runner length/size), but also insanely expensive. In the case of a stock 02VI, it is certain to gain 4-5hp (maybe a little more) over what it already makes, but they drop off like a rock above 5800 as is.
Old Feb 5, 2011 | 11:23 AM
  #183  
CMax03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,587
From: Houston, Tx
So how are you gonna clean up the weld internally when put it back together? Did you baseline the Oem IM as far as flowbench numbers thru each runner before the butchering? Are you gonna flow the modded IM was welded back together? Yeah I did my 3rd gen IM the same way so you should see crispier throttle response!

Last edited by CMax03; Feb 5, 2011 at 11:28 AM.
Old Feb 5, 2011 | 11:42 AM
  #184  
sparks03max's Avatar
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
Originally Posted by CMax03
So how are you gonna clean up the weld internally when put it back together? Did you baseline the Oem IM as far as flowbench numbers thru each runner before the butchering? Are you gonna flow the modded IM was welded back together? Yeah I did my 3rd gen IM the same way so you should see crispier throttle response!
I will be cleaning up the welds internally as they are made (it has 5 sides not including the one with the runners, doesn't have to be put together all at once) and in addition, we will not be welding on the interior as you saw in the previous picture. Those welds on the inside were purposely built up in order to grind and form them, all welds from here on out will be exterior only. A weld on the outside leaves very minor bumps at the very worst and more often just a clean surface on the opposite side. So worst case scenario, I have a couple of spots on the elbow plate that are not cleaned up which conveniently will see the least air traveling across it.

I still have a vias deleted stock intake manifold on my car. Will be installing this intake manifold and getting my A/F tune dialed in, then going to a dyno and testing them against each other back to back just swapping maps on the UTEC to avoid time consuming tuning (with identical ignition timing maps, of course). Will also be dyno testing 3" intake w/stock maf (70MM) vs 3.5" intake w/ LR MAF (82-83MM) on the same day. This testing will be done after cams and supporting mods are installed, so I'm not sure how well it will apply to a bolton car. However the cams are quite mild so it shouldn't be a huge difference. With more plenum volume, I am actually expecting slightly LESS throttle response as basic physics come into play. Hopefully more top end power to go with it, though.

This discussion is far off topic of this thread, though... I've already made a thread about this project if you want to continue discussion in there. http://forums.maxima.org/all-motor/6...heorizing.html
Old Feb 5, 2011 | 12:10 PM
  #185  
CMax03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,587
From: Houston, Tx
Originally Posted by sparks03max
I will be cleaning up the welds internally as they are made (it has 5 sides not including the one with the runners, doesn't have to be put together all at once) and in addition, we will not be welding on the interior as you saw in the previous picture. Those welds on the inside were purposely built up in order to grind and form them, all welds from here on out will be exterior only. A weld on the outside leaves very minor bumps at the very worst and more often just a clean surface on the opposite side. So worst case scenario, I have a couple of spots on the elbow plate that are not cleaned up which conveniently will see the least air traveling across it.

I still have a vias deleted stock intake manifold on my car. Will be installing this intake manifold and getting my A/F tune dialed in, then going to a dyno and testing them against each other back to back just swapping maps on the UTEC to avoid time consuming tuning (with identical ignition timing maps, of course). Will also be dyno testing 3" intake w/stock maf (70MM) vs 3.5" intake w/ LR MAF (82-83MM) on the same day. This testing will be done after cams and supporting mods are installed, so I'm not sure how well it will apply to a bolton car. However the cams are quite mild so it shouldn't be a huge difference. With more plenum volume, I am actually expecting slightly LESS throttle response as basic physics come into play. Hopefully more top end power to go with it, though.

This discussion is far off topic of this thread, though... I've already made a thread about this project if you want to continue discussion in there. http://forums.maxima.org/all-motor/6...heorizing.html
My question concerned the exterior ones only,......sometimes things flow thru or form weld spots when welding externally......which could in turn became a airflow disturbance.....
Old Feb 5, 2011 | 12:14 PM
  #186  
sparks03max's Avatar
DO NOT DO BUSINESS WITH THIS MEMBER - OWES PEOPLE MONEY
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,468
From: Greensboro, NC
Originally Posted by CMax03
My question concerned the exterior ones only,......sometimes things flow thru or form weld spots when welding externally......which could in turn became a airflow disturbance.....
I am relatively certain that I answered your question.

Originally Posted by sparks03max
I will be cleaning up the welds internally as they are made (it has 5 sides not including the one with the runners, doesn't have to be put together all at once)

A weld on the outside leaves very minor bumps (ie weld spots) at the very worst and more often just a clean surface on the opposite side. So worst case scenario, I have a couple of spots on the elbow plate that are not cleaned up which conveniently will see the least air traveling across it.
So basically, I will be cleaning up the inside throughout the entire creation of the manifold until I cannot anymore at the elbow plate which will be the last that gets welded on, and we will weld that carefully.

Last edited by sparks03max; Feb 5, 2011 at 12:19 PM.
Old Feb 5, 2011 | 12:35 PM
  #187  
CMax03's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 9,587
From: Houston, Tx
I'll have mine off one day to do my spacers and I'll see what's up and what can be improved upon in a much less minor way compared to yours.....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nintensity
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
9
Aug 13, 2015 05:41 PM
fastcarny
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
8
Aug 12, 2015 03:50 PM
papo99
5th Generation Classifieds (2000-2003)
0
Aug 9, 2015 07:24 AM
yat70458
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
2
Aug 3, 2015 01:16 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:02 PM.