6th Generation Maxima (2004-2008) Discussion of the 6th generation Maxima. Come see what others are saying.

Near Supercar vs. Near Luxury

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 04:25 AM
  #1  
SHIFT_NY's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 92
Near Supercar vs. Near Luxury

On my way home from work yesterday I spotted an NSX on my tail. We were going about 75 - 90 mph for about 10 miles threading holes in the traffic and swapping position. I tried to entice him into a run, but he wouldn't bite.

I wonder... was he not interested, or afraid of having a respectable challenge from a sub $30K family sedan? Yeah he probably would have edged me out, but I guess I'll never know...
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 12:52 PM
  #2  
MARC1974's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 54
nsx is fast !!!!
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 02:12 PM
  #3  
ethorn's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 217
I love the MAX but I know who not to try to race... the NSX is one of them. If I remember right it is low 5s 0-60.
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 02:15 PM
  #4  
Jeff92se's Avatar
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,127
Go around some turns and see if you give him a "decent run for his $"

I think the NSX has a 270-290hp engine depending on the year?
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 02:25 PM
  #5  
ironchefigor's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 25
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Go around some turns and see if you give him a "decent run for his $"

I think the NSX has a 270-290hp engine depending on the year?
True, but the max has alot more torque, so it wont run away from you that fast.

Torque (lb.-ft. @ rpm) NSX 3.2 MT: 224 @ 5500
NSX 3.0 AT: 210 @ 5300
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 02:49 PM
  #6  
SHIFT_NY's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 92
Originally Posted by ironchefigor
True, but the max has alot more torque, so it wont run away from you that fast.

Torque (lb.-ft. @ rpm) NSX 3.2 MT: 224 @ 5500
NSX 3.0 AT: 210 @ 5300
I agree, off the line or on a curvy run the NSX will toast a Max. But on the highway it would be alot closer. My first new car was an 88 Integra - a wicked fun little car in its own right. I got some of the early advanced mailings on the NSX. Quickly became one of my favorite "wish list" cars - and still is. No lack of respect for a fine automobile here.
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 03:00 PM
  #7  
VIP Maxima
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
90 grand for that thing. rip off if u ask me
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 03:06 PM
  #8  
SHIFT_NY's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 92
Originally Posted by 98SterlingMaxSE
90 grand for that thing. rip off if u ask me
Expensive? Unquestionable. Rip off? That I don't know. I always thought of it as Japan's answer to the Ferrari. You could put the Skyline in there as well, but its availability is so limited.

IMO, the NSX's appeal comes from a near perfect balance of performance, creature comforts and a simple yet striking design.
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 04:27 PM
  #9  
ironchefigor's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 25
Originally Posted by SHIFT_NY
Expensive? Unquestionable. Rip off? That I don't know. I always thought of it as Japan's answer to the Ferrari. You could put the Skyline in there as well, but its availability is so limited.

IMO, the NSX's appeal comes from a near perfect balance of performance, creature comforts and a simple yet striking design.
If it was supposed to be the answer to a ferrari then make it alot more powerful and awe inspiring. And in my opinion it doesnt look to good, for 10k more i could grab a new aston martin amv8 vantage when they come out, and then be rolling like a pimp daddy .
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 04:48 PM
  #10  
CallmeDoc's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 176
Here's what happened to a 04 TL 6-speed vs. a 04 NSX.........

http://video.vtec.net/04/nsx/04nsx_v_tl.wmv
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 07:22 PM
  #11  
ethorn's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 217
no permission on the video. what was the outcome? or should I ask?

Here are the 0-60 and quarter run on the NSX 2002:
Transmission: Manual
0-60: 5
1/4 Mile: 13.4
1/4 Speed: 106
www.car-stats.com
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 07:24 PM
  #12  
ethorn's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 217
or here you go....
http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html
1991 Acura NSX 5.8 14.4
1992 Acura NSX 5.6 13.9
1993 Acura NSX 5.6 13.9
1994 Acura NSX 5.3 13.6
1996 Acura NSX 5.2 13.8
1996 Acura NSX-T 5.8 14.3
1997 Acura NSX-T 4.8 13.3
2002 Acura NSX 4.8 13.4

2004 Acura TL 6 speed 6.0 14.44
2004 Acura TL A Spec 5.7 14.25

1985 Nissan Maxima SE 8.6 16.7
1989 Nissan Maxima SE 8.9 16.9
1992 Nissan Maxima SE 7.3 15.7
1994 Nissan Maxima SE (auto) 8.8 16.7
1995 Nissan Maxima SE 7.4 15.7
1997 Nissan Maxima SE 7.1 15.5
2002 Nissan Maxima SE 6.0 14.7

No 04 Max on the site though....
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 07:30 PM
  #13  
CallmeDoc's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 176
Copy the link and post it onto your browser......TL keeps close at first.....but the NSX has some SERIOUS top end.
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 09:12 AM
  #14  
Joseph Zheng's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 122
nsx is a rip off imoa, for 90 thou you can get 2 corvettes which are much faster at 405hp and 400 pounds of torque. nsx wont stand a chance to that.
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 09:16 AM
  #15  
Edify11's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 412
I'd take an NSX over two Corvettes any day.
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 09:24 AM
  #16  
Jeff92se's Avatar
I'm needing a caw
iTrader: (82)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 34,127
I would have probably agreed with you if it weren't for the absolutely gorgeous new Corvette that came out. That thing is very good looking.

If I had 90 grand, I probably wouldn't buy the NSX either. That's M5 territory

Originally Posted by Edify11
I'd take an NSX over two Corvettes any day.
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 10:28 AM
  #17  
CoolMax's Avatar
is invisible
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 11,778
From: DFW
Of course we are comparing to a car whose platform has remained largely unchanged since its intro in 1991 - 13 yrs ago.
Not bad, but outdated - Acura needs to get the new one out asap.
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 11:20 AM
  #18  
Edify11's Avatar
Donating Maxima.org Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 412
Originally Posted by Jeff92se
That's M5 territory
Most definitely!
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 12:58 PM
  #19  
MaximA VlaD's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 543
From: Bethel, CT
Originally Posted by Edify11
Most definitely!



check this one out, i thought it was funny since i am from that region.
http://www.topgear.com/content/featu...rom_russia/01/
http://members.lycos.nl/jamesbond007drno/alevel.html

i heard the cost to make it was upwards in the quarter mil range...

riiiiiight
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 04:04 PM
  #20  
Redsand187's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 249
I've driven a couple NSX's and road in another. They aren't that great. I was not very impressed at all. Sure, they are decently fast, but there are loads of cars faster and cheaper.

The idea behind that car must have came much past the 20th round of saki. It is not a smart move by Honda other then they can say they make a 90,000 dollar "super" (or lack there of) car.

The car is underpowered. I've never been a fan of mid engine cars. The handling is very biased. 50/50 is ideal, not 35/65 or whatever the thing is, is not. I guess some people like that. I don't I want a car to handle like it is on rails, not like it is on gravel.

The styling is somewhat cool, but you can't say with a straight face that it is not a spiced up, cheap copy of the F348. Ferrari styling, Honda power, and Toyata handling... that is not my idea of an ideal car.

The interior is nice, but not great. Porsche's interior is far nicer, their car does the same job, only accomplishes it far better. MB destroy's the NSX, I'd much rather take an CL or SL over the NSX. There is not one aspect that the Honda would win with... well maybe fuel economy, but what do you expect when the Acura has 6 less cylinders, no turbo's and 300 less horsepower.

The NSX is getting to be an old sloppy car. It lacks refinement. It was nice 13 years ago when it was new, but since then there has been little improvement from the honda camp, however, the Germans have put out everything they can. 7 speed auto tranny's, Sequential Tranny's, Twin Turbo v12's. Crossed Drilled Rotors, super rifined suspension. Handfree electronic operation, from the ignition to the navigation.

The NSX is way out of it's league... way behind. Infact it is so far behind cars from lower classes are passing it. The CLK will own it, the M3 will own it, the Z06 will own it. It's in the Boxter league, and cost twice as much.
Old Jul 7, 2004 | 05:31 PM
  #21  
Klax's Avatar
Newbie - Just Registered
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3
The reason the NSX dude didn't bite is because he is 1 point away from losing his license after a half dozen similar incidents.


The NSX was designed as a development platform for street cars. At least that's what the manufacturer stated when the car was released. I agree that there are several vehicles out there that will thrash it. If I were going to spend money in the 100K range, I'd buy a GT40 remake. If I were sensible, Id simply buy a G35 coupe and mod the living daylights out of it.
Old Jul 7, 2004 | 07:51 PM
  #22  
Blue04SEinIL's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 69
I outran an NSX in an old 93 Saturn SL2 once. He was on the Chicago Tollway and I was merging on. He gunned it, I gunned it, and I walked away from that chump.....I should probably mention that he blew, what I'm guessing was a head gasket when he jumped on it, as white smoke came billowing out to the point I couldn't even see his car in my rear view mirror!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mgold07
5th Generation Maxima (2000-2003)
8
Feb 28, 2001 07:07 AM
97GLE
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
8
Jan 1, 2001 06:13 AM
mAdD MAX
General Maxima Discussion
7
Dec 20, 2000 03:22 AM
VQ Quick
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
5
Dec 14, 2000 09:38 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:55 AM.