4th gen Max 2-way active!
#82
for the baffle or the whole box?
i tried to tap the knowledge of the audio section, but know buddy had anything to say about gettin the right color carpet.
so this is what i went with it works for my purpose but in the future i wanna try some different carpet cuz this stuff is sort of hard to work with
i tried to tap the knowledge of the audio section, but know buddy had anything to say about gettin the right color carpet.
so this is what i went with it works for my purpose but in the future i wanna try some different carpet cuz this stuff is sort of hard to work with
#86
Nice Job on the deadening all round. I just finished most of mine about 2 months ago. Spent a week on the entire floor (whole interior out), and another week on the front 2 doors. What i find really useful is to have the amps and deck in temporarily, then with an AUX in (or CD If that's your only source), use a signal generator to go through sweeps with your midbasses blasting. You can find a lot of rattles that way. I did it first without the door panel on (which was actually pretty good for rattles), and then again with the deadened panel on (which had more rattles to rid).
This is my first post in the Audio section, but i was happy to see a 4th gen with a very similar setup to mine.
I'm running the 880prs, Seas 27TAFNC/D (neo's), B&C 6NDL38 (7" midbasses...B&C is a pro-audio brand, so they are high efficiency, but also high excursion (5.5mm), and high power handling and my favorite of all...very high output.)
As for subs, currently running a Dayton 10" Reference HF in 1.1cu ft.
Amps - Xtant A2002 (tweets), Xtant 4.4 (bridged to midbass), Avionixx Axt1200.2 (highly recommended budget amp buy. 1500rms @ `14v @ 4 ohms, and only $129.99 on ebay...on final clearout. 3-4 years ago, they were $250ish+ and were still a good deal. Class T design and very clean.
Anyways, I shoudl get an install thread on my setup going i think. My only other plus in my setup is i did custom A-pillars for the tweets (fully molded all together..they're loookin good ).
Good luck on the rest of the install!
This is my first post in the Audio section, but i was happy to see a 4th gen with a very similar setup to mine.
I'm running the 880prs, Seas 27TAFNC/D (neo's), B&C 6NDL38 (7" midbasses...B&C is a pro-audio brand, so they are high efficiency, but also high excursion (5.5mm), and high power handling and my favorite of all...very high output.)
As for subs, currently running a Dayton 10" Reference HF in 1.1cu ft.
Amps - Xtant A2002 (tweets), Xtant 4.4 (bridged to midbass), Avionixx Axt1200.2 (highly recommended budget amp buy. 1500rms @ `14v @ 4 ohms, and only $129.99 on ebay...on final clearout. 3-4 years ago, they were $250ish+ and were still a good deal. Class T design and very clean.
Anyways, I shoudl get an install thread on my setup going i think. My only other plus in my setup is i did custom A-pillars for the tweets (fully molded all together..they're loookin good ).
Good luck on the rest of the install!
#91
now for some steps in the right direction
new rcas ran(no whine ) and ipod connected up
test setup lol
remote wire(extra stuff i had lying around)
more pics to come in the morning
new rcas ran(no whine ) and ipod connected up
test setup lol
remote wire(extra stuff i had lying around)
more pics to come in the morning
Last edited by travmaximas1998; 09-25-2008 at 06:19 PM.
#99
ya the ground all the way to back i know its overkill just wanted to have a real solid ground.
and yes im aware of bottoming out, my car isnt dropped or anything, so im not real worried about it i will keep an eye on my wiring.
i am double fusing the positive run, to avoid a fireworks show if it happens to short out
and yes im aware of bottoming out, my car isnt dropped or anything, so im not real worried about it i will keep an eye on my wiring.
i am double fusing the positive run, to avoid a fireworks show if it happens to short out
#101
A more solid ground would have been to ground it to the sheet metal in your trunk. It all goes back to the same place anyway.
Double fusing is absolutely unnecessary unless you expect something to go wrong in between your battery and your first fuse... ~15 inches? I think not. Once a short occurs, you want the power cut as close to the battery as possible. Think about it logically.
Double fusing is absolutely unnecessary unless you expect something to go wrong in between your battery and your first fuse... ~15 inches? I think not. Once a short occurs, you want the power cut as close to the battery as possible. Think about it logically.
#103
#104
#105
A more solid ground would have been to ground it to the sheet metal in your trunk. It all goes back to the same place anyway.
Double fusing is absolutely unnecessary unless you expect something to go wrong in between your battery and your first fuse... ~15 inches? I think not. Once a short occurs, you want the power cut as close to the battery as possible. Think about it logically.
Double fusing is absolutely unnecessary unless you expect something to go wrong in between your battery and your first fuse... ~15 inches? I think not. Once a short occurs, you want the power cut as close to the battery as possible. Think about it logically.
i've asked about running a ground back up to the battery as well. some say it doesn't make a difference and some say it does (although it may be negligible). i researched a little on ground loops and came to the conclusion that it's probably a good idea because of al the bcu's grounded to the chassis in the 4th gen. one thing is for sure though; a sheet metal ground is not more solid. it is as solid at best.
#108
double fusing is completely necessary since there is a hot in the trunk as well as underhood. suppose something happens between the underhood fuse and the rear battery. without being double fused the front fuse will blow but you will have a hot wire from the rear battery up. a fuse as close to the front battery + and one as close to the rear battery + as possible is the right way to do it.
i've asked about running a ground back up to the battery as well. some say it doesn't make a difference and some say it does (although it may be negligible). i researched a little on ground loops and came to the conclusion that it's probably a good idea because of al the bcu's grounded to the chassis in the 4th gen. one thing is for sure though; a sheet metal ground is not more solid. it is as solid at best.
i've asked about running a ground back up to the battery as well. some say it doesn't make a difference and some say it does (although it may be negligible). i researched a little on ground loops and came to the conclusion that it's probably a good idea because of al the bcu's grounded to the chassis in the 4th gen. one thing is for sure though; a sheet metal ground is not more solid. it is as solid at best.
thanks mike
and im glad everybody is on the same page now
#109
#114
Impressive indeed. Also curious about the sound. I've got a mad hankerin to go 2-way active this summer and wanna know how it sounds compared to a standard bridged setup. I'm thinking my system can sound a heckuva lot better if I go active but I wonder if my current amp has enough ***** to make it worth it (75 x 4)
I see that your tweets are getting 100w, what are your mids getting a piece?
I see that your tweets are getting 100w, what are your mids getting a piece?
#115
the 2 way is definately very nice.
i can control the range of frequencys the speakers see. The pioneer 880 has the abilitys to control the crossover points without messing with the amps.
the tweets are probably seeing in the range of ~30watts, the gain is about 1/3 on those guys.
and my mids are seeing close to 100W i have the gain almost maxed out. I hope to soon be running the mids bridged on the 4 channel and put the tweets on a smaller amp.
i can control the range of frequencys the speakers see. The pioneer 880 has the abilitys to control the crossover points without messing with the amps.
the tweets are probably seeing in the range of ~30watts, the gain is about 1/3 on those guys.
and my mids are seeing close to 100W i have the gain almost maxed out. I hope to soon be running the mids bridged on the 4 channel and put the tweets on a smaller amp.
#116
the 2 way is definately very nice.
i can control the range of frequencys the speakers see. The pioneer 880 has the abilitys to control the crossover points without messing with the amps.
the tweets are probably seeing in the range of ~30watts, the gain is about 1/3 on those guys.
and my mids are seeing close to 100W i have the gain almost maxed out. I hope to soon be running the mids bridged on the 4 channel and put the tweets on a smaller amp.
i can control the range of frequencys the speakers see. The pioneer 880 has the abilitys to control the crossover points without messing with the amps.
the tweets are probably seeing in the range of ~30watts, the gain is about 1/3 on those guys.
and my mids are seeing close to 100W i have the gain almost maxed out. I hope to soon be running the mids bridged on the 4 channel and put the tweets on a smaller amp.
Now I just gotta figure out how to do it.
#119
got alot of info form soundsolutionsaudio.com
i pretty much have the same setup as one of the guys on the forum.
my mids are 8ohm so they need more power, thats y i wanna bridge them
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Finkle
4th Generation Maxima (1995-1999)
13
09-27-2015 09:53 PM
Slamrod
4th Generation Classifieds (1995-1999)
2
08-10-2015 12:33 PM